This document discusses trade-offs and synergies between sustainable food production and ecosystem services for communities in the changing Barotse Floodplain region of Zambia. A package of research questions and methods are proposed to examine how landscape use impacts diets and meets nutrient needs, identify opportunities to improve diets while considering environmental and economic costs/benefits, and develop options that can be implemented at scale. The goal is to find agriculture and nutrition solutions through participatory analysis of scenarios and integrating ecosystem, food system and nutrition factors in models.
Best Call Girls In Sector 29 Gurgaon❤️8860477959 EscorTs Service In 24/7 Delh...
Trade-offs between food production and ecosystem services in Zambia's Barotse Floodplain
1. Trade-offs and synergies between sustainable food production
and other critical ecosystem services for women and men in the
changing and dynamic Barotse Floodplain, Zambia
Natalia Estrada-Carmona
Bioversity International
Photo:KrishnasisGhosh
2. International Food Policy
Research Institute (IFPRI)
Searchinger et al., (2015). High carbon and biodiversity
costs from converting Africa’s wet savannahs to cropland.
Nature Climate Change, 5(May).
doi:10.1038/nclimate2584
3. Cattle in the floodplain during
the dry season
Temporal villages (fisherman)
Reeds to make mats
Cropping with high risk of floods
Fishing
Wildlife habitat
Lealui
Nalitoya
Mapungu
4. Package of research questions and methods
Diet module
Using exis ng data from AAS biodiversity assessment
and value chain surveys
To what extent do diets meet
nutrient requirements of women
and children in different seasons?
How and why is the landscape used
by # groups for their diets?
Capturing temporal and spa al variability
Seasonal calendars and land use maps are developed
together with the communi es
What is the poten al of the
landscape to improve diets?
Landscape monitoring
A combina on of remote sensing and par cipatory
plot, farm & market sampling creates nutri onal
poten al maps and helps iden fying where and how
diversifica on is possible
What are environmental and
economic costs and benefits of
different op ons?
Integrated modeling
Landscape IMAGES, Farm DESIGN, and Cost of Diet
are being applied to Barotse data to help iden fy
best-bet solu ons. Op ons are discussed in view of
community planning and dreaming synergies and
How can op ons go to scale?
Theory of change development & link to policy,
markets & capacity building
Research ques ons Methodology work packages
5. To what extent do diets meet nutrient requirements of women and children
in different seasons?
Food Consumption – CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems Value Chain Survey, adults
6. Check out our recently-published map with the land types http://arcg.is/1Gz92wx
How and why is the landscape used by # groups for their diets?
7.
8. Does matter where food is produced? Trade-offs?
Materials for construction Habitat for wildlife
Cattle grazing
Fish
Water for agriculture
Droughts/Floods control
Pest control
Mulapo
10. Exploring options and evaluation of interventions and tradeoffs
and synergies
What is the potential of the landscape to improve diets?
11. What are environmental and economics cost and
benefits of different options?
Area (%) Crop or Crop rotation
12 Sorghum
61 Eggplant local
0 Watermelon
0
Sweet
potato/Tomato/Cabbage/Rape
/Groundnuts
1 Cassava/Cowpeas
26 Maize/Pumpkin/Rice
12. How can options go to scale?
Ecosystem
services
Food system services
Original landscape
Learn more:
http://bit.ly/BarotseMap
13. Discussion and take-away messages
Our goal is to find agriculture-nutrition pathways for
healthy communities and landscapes through:
• Trade-offs, synergies and scenarios analysis with
communities
• Integrating ecosystem services, food systems and
nutrition variables in multi-objective landscape and
farming models
Introduction
Landscapes across the world are undergoing rapid transitions. In Sub-Saharan Africa, for example, large areas of land have been targeted for agricultural intensification, whilst other areas are undergoing rapid urbanization. These transitions are paired with changes in local social, ecological and food systems. How do these transitions impact agriculture-nutrition pathways and what are entry points for synergies?
To address this question, we’re developing an integrated landscape approach that addresses agriculture-nutrition linkages as part of a socio-ecological system. We present preliminary results from the Barotse floodplain in Zambia.
It is expected that working along such gradients and diverse landscapes will help identify interactions between various ecosystems and the well-being of their populations, allowing researchers to differentiate factors which are very context-specific from those which can be applied in other similar landscapes
One of the main drivers of ecosystem services in the Barotse is the dynamic of the flood pulse associated with the wet and dry seasons – this seasonal flooding fundamentally shapes the ecosystems, community lives and livelihoods and production in the system. Local communities have responded to this for centuries diversifying their livelihoods by migrating from the floodplain every year to the upland areas (with the cattle as well), prior to the floods. Although this migration is still an active tradition, there exist some permanent villages located in elevated areas (little islands) within the plain. Also, there are some permanent villages in the upland where usually men are the ones who migrate to the floodplains for fishing opportunities when water resides. In short, this is a highly complex system, driven by flood dynamics and system ecology, with resourceful and adaptive communities who respond to the challenges and opportunities these dynamics present.
Only 7% is consuming ≥ 5 food groups
Only 15% is consuming ≥ 4 food groups
Population growth and increasing urbanization are coinciding with an increase of health problems related to poor nutrition around the world.
Around 800 million people suffer from insecure food supplies, while 2.1 billion people are obese or overweight.
At the same time, 2 billion people lack essential vitamins and minerals critical for growth and development, such as vitamin A, iron and zinc.
It is important to note that often these forms of malnutrition co-exist.
Source:
Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. 2014
FAO: The State of Food and Agriculture 2014
Global Hunger Index 2014
The basket of technologies (and activities) consists of farm and land management activities that are currently present, or innovative (enriched). This can include new crop and animal types, and trees, etc. These are fed into the modelling at farm or landscape level. Within those models, besides the bio-economic farm indicators like profitability, nutrient cycling and losses, labor profiles, etc., also indicators related to nutrition have been added. These can be used as either an objective to improve (e.g. increase diversity), or as a constraint that has to be within certain limits (adequate nutrition).
The models can be used in a scenario-oriented or exploration-oriented manner. The scenario-oriented approach by proposing practices, activities and technologies as an intervention “manually” and to calculate the effect on indicators. In the exploration-oriented approach this is done in a systematic way, to explore the tradeoffs and synergies among performance indicators.
Points of attention:
the word ‘technologies’ is used in a rather loose and broad manner here, relates not only technological options, but encompasses any productive or management practice/activity that is carried out on-farm or in-landscape.
the word ‘optimization’ is always difficult and immediately points to decision making and coercion. We have to indicate that optimization algorithms are used to explore the window of opportunities, but not to arrive at ‘perfect’ farms that should be implemented. We see the models as “discussion-support” tools, rather than decision-support.
Source:
Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. 2014
FAO: The State of Food and Agriculture 2014
Global Hunger Index 2014
This Initiative studies how to curb the loss of crop and tree biodiversity, and support systems that contribute to more diversity through:
Strategies, management and trait identification
This area of work encompasses the design of global and national strategies for the conservation of priority crop genetic resources, and the preparation of action plans to implement these strategies.
Information services and seed supplies
Our researchers gather evidence with farmers, breeders, seed producers, extension agents and natural resource managers about how seed systems function and how to ensure they deliver varieties and species with traits farmers need.
Policies, institutions and monitoring
We research how policies affect the sharing and conservation of crop and tree diversity and identify incentives for farmers and natural resource managers to conserve, share and use genetic resources.
Examples of research under this initiative can be found here
http://www.bioversityinternational.org/strategic-framework/genetic-resources/