Be the first to like this
Ifeyhewen Badidi v. Loretta Lynch, No. 14-60155 June 25, 2015 (Summary Calendar) "...We reach the merits of Badidi’s claim that the BIA erred in denying his request for a continuance pending the appeal of the denial of his I-130 petition. The BIA determined that the IJ had properly denied Badidi’s continuance request, given that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service had denied the I-130 petition. This determination is in accord with the record, which indicates that the I-130 petition was denied due to numerous discrepancies in the couple’s answers to questions designed to establish the authenticity of their marriage. Badidi’s conclusory assertions regarding this issue do not establish a likelihood of success in challenging USCIS’s determination, or that the denial of a continuance was an abuse of discretion. See, e.g., Ahmed v. Gonzales, 447 F.3d 433, 438-39 n.3 (5th Cir. 2006); Matter of Hashmi, 24 I & N. Dec. 785, 790 (BIA 2009) (listing factors to be considered in assessing whether to grant a continuance due to a pending petition)...."