Emma Riddiough
Gender Results
8
6
4

2
0
Male

Female

The results show that out of all the people
we asked, all where female.
Age Results
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
16-18

19-21

22-25

26-29

30+

When looking at the results, I noticed that it
was those betwee...
1

2

3

4

5

Interviews

-

-

3

2

1

Archive Footage

-

-

1

3

2

Voiceover

-

-

-

3

3

Music

1

-

2

3

-

...
Title Results
6
5

4
3

2
1

0
yes

no
The graph shows that out of all the
people we asked, only one believed that
the tit...
Interview Relevance?

Yes:

7
6

“lots of books in background”
“very well done”
“creative”

5
4
3
2

1
0
Yes

No

This sli...
Yes:

5

“Interesting , wanted to find out more”
“I found it interesting”
“It was interesting”
“very interesting”

4
3
2

...
6
5
4
3
2
1

0
yes

no
Graph shows that 5 out of the 6 people
thought that the documentary related to
our chosen target au...
6

Yes:

5

“full of information”
“through interviews, voiceover
and archive footage”

4

3

No:

2

“could do with more b...
Title Sequence
Interviews

Relevant
Creative

Clear
Graphics

Name three good things
about the documentary:

Cutaways

Voi...
Wide range of interviews
More Music

Less archive

Clear
graphics

Name three improvements:

Music (random)

Interviewee
l...
7
6

5
4
3
2
1
0
yes

no
The graph shows that all six thought that the
radio trailer was relevant to our documentary.
4.5

4
3.5
3
2.5
2

1.5
1
0.5
0
yes

no
Results show that 4/6 people said
they would watch the documentary if
they heard t...
6
5
4
3

2
1
0

yes

no
5/6 people said that the advert suited our
target audience.
7
6
5
4
3

2
1
0
yes

no

Looking at the results, I can see that the people
thought that the music suited the trailer.
Voiceover

Sound effects

Name three things
good about the radio
trailer:

Music

Vox pops

Clarity of
voiceover

Informat...
Music

More exciting

Name three
improvements:

Too much
interview

Unsuitable for
audience

More upbeat
music

Better sou...
1

2

3

4

5

Imagery

-

-

-

2

4

Information Provided

-

-

-

2

4

Documentary Title

-

-

1

3

2

Logo

-

-

...
7
6
5
4
3

2
1
0
yes

no
Graph shows the results people gave in
relation to whether they thought the
advertisement was eye...
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

yes

no
Results show that all of them thought
that the newspaper advertisement
suited our target audience...
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0

yes

no
The graph shows that all of them said that
they would be encouraged to watch the
documentary if t...
Title
Information

Effective
Creative

Name three good things
about the newspaper
advertisement:

Clear

Pictures

Colours...
More book references
in images

Name three improvements:

This is the only improvement that the
people pointed out when it...
Audience feedback – moving foreword
Audience feedback – moving foreword
Audience feedback – moving foreword
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Audience feedback – moving foreword

424 views

Published on

A2 coursework

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
424
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
227
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Audience feedback – moving foreword

  1. 1. Emma Riddiough
  2. 2. Gender Results 8 6 4 2 0 Male Female The results show that out of all the people we asked, all where female.
  3. 3. Age Results 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 16-18 19-21 22-25 26-29 30+ When looking at the results, I noticed that it was those between the ages of 16 – 21 that answered the questionnaire that they filled out.
  4. 4. 1 2 3 4 5 Interviews - - 3 2 1 Archive Footage - - 1 3 2 Voiceover - - - 3 3 Music 1 - 2 3 - Cutaways - - 1 5 - Opening Sequence - - - 2 4 The table above shows the ratings that all the people gave us on the various aspects of our fully completed documentary.
  5. 5. Title Results 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no The graph shows that out of all the people we asked, only one believed that the title didn’t suit the documentary.
  6. 6. Interview Relevance? Yes: 7 6 “lots of books in background” “very well done” “creative” 5 4 3 2 1 0 Yes No This slide shows what the people thought about the mise-en-scene of the interviews.
  7. 7. Yes: 5 “Interesting , wanted to find out more” “I found it interesting” “It was interesting” “very interesting” 4 3 2 No: 1 “focuses to much on interviews” “not interested in topic” 0 yes no The slide shows both the graph and reasons in relation to whether they would watch it, (4/6 said they would).
  8. 8. 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Graph shows that 5 out of the 6 people thought that the documentary related to our chosen target audience.
  9. 9. 6 Yes: 5 “full of information” “through interviews, voiceover and archive footage” 4 3 No: 2 “could do with more but the five minutes did provide information” 1 0 yes no Following slide shows the reasons and the graphed results for the following question.
  10. 10. Title Sequence Interviews Relevant Creative Clear Graphics Name three good things about the documentary: Cutaways Voiceovers Interesting Creatively Clever Storyline Archive Footage The following diagram shows what the people thought where good about the documentary we created.
  11. 11. Wide range of interviews More Music Less archive Clear graphics Name three improvements: Music (random) Interviewee looking at camera Cuts early Shorter Interviews More cutaways Diagram shows the various improvements that the people thought where necessary to our documentary.
  12. 12. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no The graph shows that all six thought that the radio trailer was relevant to our documentary.
  13. 13. 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 yes no Results show that 4/6 people said they would watch the documentary if they heard the radio trailer.
  14. 14. 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no 5/6 people said that the advert suited our target audience.
  15. 15. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Looking at the results, I can see that the people thought that the music suited the trailer.
  16. 16. Voiceover Sound effects Name three things good about the radio trailer: Music Vox pops Clarity of voiceover Information The following diagrams show the areas in which the people thought where good in relation to our radio trailer.
  17. 17. Music More exciting Name three improvements: Too much interview Unsuitable for audience More upbeat music Better sound effects The following diagram shows what the people thought could be improved with the radio trailer.
  18. 18. 1 2 3 4 5 Imagery - - - 2 4 Information Provided - - - 2 4 Documentary Title - - 1 3 2 Logo - - - 3 3 Slogan - - - 2 4 Background Colour - - - 1 5 The table shows the results as to how people have rated the following things.
  19. 19. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Graph shows the results people gave in relation to whether they thought the advertisement was eye-catching or not.
  20. 20. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no Results show that all of them thought that the newspaper advertisement suited our target audience.
  21. 21. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 yes no The graph shows that all of them said that they would be encouraged to watch the documentary if they saw the newspaper advertisement in a newspaper or magazine.
  22. 22. Title Information Effective Creative Name three good things about the newspaper advertisement: Clear Pictures Colours Unique Bold Slogan Graphics The following diagram shows what the people thought where good about our newspaper advertisement.
  23. 23. More book references in images Name three improvements: This is the only improvement that the people pointed out when it came to the newspaper advertisement.

×