Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

AISB'07

788 views

Published on

Presentation at AISB'07 symposium, Culture Lab, Newcastle University, april 2007

Published in: Education, Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

AISB'07

  1. 1. AISB07 - AI and Narrative Games for Education Newcastle 2nd-5th april 2007 Effects of Narrative Levels on Comprehension : Theoretical Framework and Methodology Baptiste Campion Université catholique de Louvain (UCL) Groupe de Recherche en Médiation des savoirs (GReMS) Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium) baptiste.campion@uclouvain.be http://www.uclouvain.be/comu/
  2. 2. General Overview • Current PhD research led under supervision of Pr Philippe Marion (UCL) and Daniel Peraya (Univ. of Genève) • Attempt to combine cognitive and narratological approaches for studying interactive narrative • Object: Science popularization interactive narrative • Current presentation: work in progress
  3. 3. Whatʼs the matter ? • There exists different uses of narration in educative interactive documents • Is the educative ʻeffectʼ similar in each case ?  Interest of dinstinctions between situations  Interest of modelling presumed effects of narration and testing real effects  Interest both for classic and interactive narratives  Interest for researchers and designers
  4. 4. Comprehension I define ʻeducative effectsʼ in terms of comprehension. Comprehension is defined following Model of Comprehension of Van Dijk and Kintsch (1983) Comprehension process: double process (top down and bottom up) of construction of a coherent representation
  5. 5. Understanding narrative The reader must build a representation of narrative referent • Story Schemata (for ex. Mandler 1984) • Mental Models Theory (Johnson-Laird 1983) • Consistent and coherent with narratology
  6. 6. Narrative comprehension Following Herman (2002) narrative comprehension goes through the construction (by the reader) of a storyworld This storyworld is: •A mental model of ʻwhatʼs going on?ʼ •Set up by bottum-up (microdesign) and top-down (macrodesign) process
  7. 7. Use of narrative for comprehension Herman (2003): “My hypothesis is that stories provide, to a degree that needs to be determined by future research, domain- general tools for thinking” → Storyworld is the base on which comprehension of educative matter transmitted through a narrative is allowed
  8. 8. The ʻlevelsʼ of narration We postulate educational use of narrative on at least two levels: •Surface level (storyworld related to the story) •Deep level (storyworld related to knowledge domain) → Different comprehension effects ?
  9. 9. Research Assumptions • Deep level narrative should lead subjects to build a relatively unified representation • Surface level narrative should oblige subjects to work with two levels of representation : one for the story itself and one another for the educative content
  10. 10. Research Assumptions (II) A&B mixed A. Storyworld useful for Storyworld useful for: the story •The story + •The educative content B. Representation of educative content STORY
  11. 11. Methodology • Quasi-experimentation • Comparison of representation of a scientific phenomenon whether explained with a surface level narrative or a deep level narrative • Coherence of representations is observed with questionnaires : definition question, problem-solving question and drawing the phenomena • Indicators : relations between elements, specific vocabulary, conjunctions and disjunctions, ability of abstracting and re-use gathered info
  12. 12. Current experimentations • Subjects : 100 children of 5th year elementary school (+/-11 year old) • Experimental material : 3 versions of the explanation (short website) of a scientific phenomenon (decay formation) • Deep level, surface level and control group (non- narrative unfollowing Adam criteria [1996]) • Individual passation
  13. 13. Current experimentations (II) Summary of (quasi) experimental design: Identification questionnaire Deep level Surface level Control conditon condition group Deep level Surface level Non-narrative narrative narrative explanation Same questionnaire
  14. 14. Conclusions • Forthcoming results • Elements to take in consideration:  Nuances in results  Extraction operations  Never forget whatʼs the goal of an educative document: the presented distinction make no sense without this
  15. 15. Thank you for your attention. Baptiste Campion baptiste.campion@uclouvain.be Université catholique de Louvain Ruelle de la Lanterne Magique 14 BE 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium)

×