Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Feick "Institutional Identifier - Soon To Be a Reality - I2"

10 views

Published on

This presentation was provided by Tina Feick of North America, HARRASSOWITZ Booksellers & Subscription Agents, and The I2 Working Group, during the NISO/BISG Forum: The Changing Standards Landscape: Creative Solutions to Your Information Problems, held at ALA Annual on June 27th, 2008.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Feick "Institutional Identifier - Soon To Be a Reality - I2"

  1. 1. Helen Henderson, Ringgold Tina Feick, HARRASSOWITZ NISO/BISG Meeting Anaheim, California June 27, 2008 Helen’s Dream  Standard identifier for each institution  Same identifier to be used across publishers and agents  Define hierarchies and combinations (consortia) 6/24/2008 2 Institutional Identifiers - the story to date  Information  Library registries  Location definitions  Financial/business  Ringgold Identifier  Journal Supply Chain Pilot 6/24/2008 3 NISO Working Group on Institutional Identifiers - I2  Stakeholders  Scenarios  Workplan  Timescale  Co-chairs: Grace Agnew and Tina Feick 6/24/2008 4 Stakeholders  Libraries  Agents  Publishers  Aggregators  Hosting services  Fulfillment services  Academics  Institutional repositories  Students  Authors  Editors  Reviewers  Manuscript systems  Funding bodies  Academic administrators  Rights agencies  Consortia  eLearning vendors/services  Doctors  State-wide/national agencies 6/24/2008 5 Scenarios - Topics  Electronic resources supply chain  E-learning/courseware  Research evaluation/funding  Author registries  Institutional repositories  Licensing/Micro-licensing  Usage metrics  Collaboration  Authentication 6/24/2008 6
  2. 2. Scenarios - communities  Higher education  Research evaluation  Public library  Medical  ??? 6/24/2008 7 Scenario A Electronic Resources Supply Chain Stakeholders  Libraries  Agents  Publishers  Aggregators  Distributors  Hosting Services  Fulfilment services Issues  Granularity of metadata  Population of systems  Systems capability 6/24/2008 8 Work Plan  Scenario Development  Review current identifier standards and usage  Determine metadata fields  Working draft  Trial use plan  Test against scenarios  Review by committees and advisory groups  Identify maintenance organizations  Determine tools for adoption  Release for ballot 6/24/2008 9 Timeline  Final appointment of Work Group (July 2008)  Development of sample scenario (July 08)  Data gathering (Jun-Dec 08)  Test & finalize direction of identifier (Jan-Feb 09)  Working draft (Mar-Oct 09)  Submit for Public Review (Aug 09)  Draft standard for trial Oct 09-Mar 10)  Start trial use (Nov 09)  Ballot released (Mar-May 10) 6/24/2008 10 Check us out ---  http://www.niso.org/workrooms/i2  Want to Work on a Scenario??? Review drafts? Be in the know!! Contact:  Tina Feick (co-chair) – tfeick@ottosvc.com  Grace Agnew (co-chair) – gagnew@rci.rutgers.edu  Helen Henderson – helen@ringgold.com  Karen Wetzel – kwetzel@niso.org 6/24/2008 11

×