Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

April 2014 World Oil Article: Long-term, solid-scale inhibitor shows promise in deep water


Published on

Baker Hughes Sorb™ Ultra solid inhibitors minimize the risk
of lost production and can significantly delay expensive interventions in deepwater wells. Visit our website to learn more:

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

April 2014 World Oil Article: Long-term, solid-scale inhibitor shows promise in deep water

  1. 1. A stimulation vessel in the Gulf of Mexico. Long-term,solid-scaleinhibitor showspromiseindeepwater FLOW ASSURANCE 90 APRIL 2014 / A new, chemical-infused, proppant-sized solid inhibitor is being used in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico to provide long-term inhibition for barium sulfate scale. ŝŝ STEPHEN SZYMCZAK, D. V. SATYA GUPTA, DONG SHEN, WILLIAM STEINER and KEVIN LANGLINAIS, Baker Hughes A new, proppant-sized solid-scale in- hibitor—with a substrate based on nan- otechnology—was recently applied in a deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM) frac- pack completion, to inhibit barium sul- fate scale deposition for a high volume of cumulative water production. The in- hibitor was used in a well, where the field design called for a sulfate-rich seawater flood to mix with a barium-rich connate water. The subsea oil well, in 1,700 ft of water, was frac-packed with 14,881 lb of proppant, of which 1,488 lb—or 10%— were the new, solid-scale inhibitor. Baker Hughes’ Sorb Ultra solid inhib- itor uses a patented, spherically-shaped, high-strength nano material that is the same size as a proppant, and provides high internal and external surface areas, onto which a robust scale inhibitor is ad- sorbed. The end result is proppant-sized material that combines strength, greater than that of an intermediate-strength proppant, with a high amount of an ac- tive scale inhibitor, to provide primary stimulation and prolonged flow assur- ance with significantly reduced interven- tion operations. SCALE AND INHIBITORS Typically, deepwater wells are gravel- or frac-packed. This is done to provide a secondary barrier to fines migration; the primary barrier being the screen. In addition to formation fines migrating to the gravel- or frac-pack, this is also the area—known as the near wellbore— where inorganic scale deposition creates the biggest operational problem. The deposition of scale occurs when oilfield operations disturb the formation equi- librium that has existed for millions of years. Even a slight change in tempera- ture or pressure may affect the pH and cause the process, of scale formation and deposition, to be set into motion. Mix- ing of non-native waters or salts can also upset the balance of dissolved salts. How quickly scale deposits form depends on the rate of nucleation combined with the rate of crystal growth. Many waters do not immediately form scale deposits upon the start of production, and some waters never form scale at all. However, scale formation often begins, almost im- mediately, when conditions in the for- mation begin to change. Scale inhibitors interrupt crystal growth or slow the nucleation process that impacts the rapidity of scale forma- tions. As the inhibitor is pumped back into the wellbore, the crystal growth, or nucleation, is slowed to a level that keeps inorganic scale deposits to a minimum. Conversely, if scale formation and de- position are not inhibited, the scale can quickly reduce production and lead to repeated remediation operations. In se- vere cases, particularly offshore, expen- sive workovers are required to remove deposits and repair corrosion-damaged assets. In a deepwater, subsea well, the cost of an intervention can exceed $10 million. The goal of chemical scale in- hibitors is to retard scale formation and Originally appeared in World Oil ® APRIL 2014 issue, pgs 90-95. Posted with permission.
  2. 2. World Oil / APRIL 2014 93 FLOW ASSURANCE deposition, at least until the produced water has reached the surface facilities. Traditionally, inhibitors have been applied to a well in one of three ways: continuous or batch injection of a liquid stream down the annulus, or through a capillary tubing string, which requires frequent visits to the well, to maintain chemical tanks or re-inject chemicals; a slow effusing liquid inhibitor placed in the rat hole, which requires frequent replenishment of the chemical; and a squeeze treatment that injects a liquid inhibitor into the near-wellbore area, where it mixes with producing fluids. The first two options protect only the tubulars in the wellbore. The third op- tion, the squeeze treatment, protects the wellbore, perforations and near-wellbore formation. Typically, a squeeze must be repeated every six to 12 months. DEEPWATER SOLUTION All of the traditional chemical inhibi- tor applications have limitations in deep water. Continuous, batch and rathole treatments have delivery issues, and of- fer no protection in the formation or per- forations. Squeeze treatment has been the conventional choice; however, it re- quires large volumes of chemicals, offers no predictability as to where the treat- ment actually ends up in the formation, and has a relatively short treatment life. In 2005, Baker Hughes introduced Sorb solid inhibitor technology, by which chemical inhibitors are adsorbed onto a proppant-like substrate; fed with the proppant during the hydraulic frac- turing operation; and pumped deep, and evenly, into the formation. Upon pro- duction of hydrocarbons, or water, the solid-state, slow-releasing inhibitor is re- leased into the fluid stream, to inhibit the deposition of scale and other contami- nants, such as paraffin and asphaltenes. Since 2005, more than 20,000 wells have been fractured using this technology. However, while the Sorb inhibitor has performed exceptionally in land wells, it has limited use in the gravel- and frac- pack market. This is due, primarily, to the limitation on the mass of Sorb that can be used, because of issues related to conductivity. By limiting the amount used, a limitation is also placed on the total amount of chemical available to provide a long treatment life. Sorb Ul- tra uses a stronger substrate, and thus a high weight percent (wt%) can be used. This results in the placement of a greater total amount of chemical in the formation. The ideal inhibitor for a deepwater well meets three critical criteria. First, it does no harm to the formation. Second, it is compatible with a wide range of stimulation fluids. And third, it retards, or prevents, scale sufficiently to preclude the need for an intervention, for a time period well in excess of the expectation from any other form of prevention. The Sorb Ultra product used in this application consists of the high-strength solid carrier with a non-phosphonate scale inhibitor that can be monitored by laboratory or field analysis techniques. These inhibitors are effective for barium- and strontium-sulfate scale formation, as well as for calcium carbonate and cal- cium sulfate formation. The product is added with conventional intermediate- or high-strength proppant at any ratio up to 100% Sorb Ultra. This results in the inhibitor being placed along the entire volume of the proppant pack. Because the inhibitor is retained in the proppant pack, without plugging the pore throats, it can be used in a wide range of reser- voir conditions. The release profile is designed to provide immediate avail- ability—as well as sustained, long-term availability of the inhibitor. In laboratory and field tests, the new material demonstrated no conductiv- ity loss, when added at up to 20 wt% to high-strength (bauxite) proppant. I also can withstand up to 16,000-psi closure stress. Continuous monitoring of the scale-inhibitor residual, in the produced water, shows a concentration above the minimum inhibitor concentration (MIC)—typically around 1–3 ppm for calcium carbonate and 5–10 ppm for barium sulfate—for up to five years for low water producers, and for over 1 MMbbl of cumulative water in a high water-producing well. The application can be applied to any type of formation and any completion technique, wherever a proppant is used. The ScaleSorb Ultra used in the current case history is totally inert; it will not dissolve over time, so there is no risk of fines migration. The scale inhibitor desorbs only into the water phase of production, so a treat- ed well—which produces only oil during the early stages of production—can still benefit from a complete arsenal of scale inhibitors when water production even- tually begins. A final advantage of the new inhibi- tor technology for deep water is shape, Fig. 1. The original, chemical-laden sub- strate is irregular in shape, which is not a concern in fractures; it is, however, a concern in gravel- and frac-packs. The new, higher-strength material is spheri- cal, which tightens the fit to reduce sand migration and makes it better situated as a gravel- or frac-pack additive. For deep- water wells—which are traditionally gravel- or frac-packed—the new material can provide prolonged inhibitor life to delay, or eliminate, future interventions. This represents a significant saving on projected expenditures, as well as an on- going flow assurance program that pro- tects against scale deposition, from the formation to the surface. LABORATORY EVALUATION To test the new scale-inhibitor com- posite for release, a length of 35-cm stainless steel pipe, with an internal di- ameter (ID) of 1.08 cm, was fitted with provisions to attach tubing to each end, such that water, or other fluids, could be injected at one end and exit at the other. The column was filled with 55 g Fig. 1. A comparison of Sorb particles vs. Sorb Ultra particles. Sorb Ultra uses a patented, spherically-shaped, high-strength nano material.
  3. 3. 94 APRIL 2014 / FLOW ASSURANCE of 20/40 mesh proppant, containing 10 wt% of the 30 mesh composite. The proppant and composite were in- timately mixed, to disperse the compos- ite product throughout the entire prop- pant column. The pore volume of the test column was 12 ml. A synthetic brine of 0.025 mol/L, CaCl2; 0.015 mol/L, NaHCO3; 1 mol/L, NaCl; sparged with 100% CO2, was pumped through a high-pressure, liquid chromatogra- phy (HPLC) pump into the column, at the rate of 2 ml/min. The effluent from the column was collected periodically and analyzed, for the presence of scale inhibitor, by a UV photometer. The in- hibitor return concentration, in the first few pore volumes, was above 200 ppm, but it fell rapidly to around 10 ppm, and dropped further, to less than detection limit (5 ppm), after 200 pore volumes of return fluid. Dynamic tube-blocking tests were carried out to determine the MIC of scale inhibitor with 50% seawater break- through. Under the test conditions, a blank scaling time of around 28 min. was observed. It was known already that the high-strength solid inhibitor can provide complete inhibition at a concentration of 15 ppm. A slow buildup of pressure was observed, as the solid inhibitor con- centration dropped to 7.5 ppm, indicat- ing that the MIC for this well, under worst-case scenario—that is, 50% sea- water breakthrough—would be between 7.5 ppm and 15 ppm. To test for fluid compatibility, cross- linked fluids were rheologically tested at 200°F, in both the presence and absence of 10-pptg solid-scale inhibitor. The re- sponse to the test is evaluated for signifi- cant changes in the curve. In the case of this product, when compared to a stan- dard, no changes in gel breaking time were observed. This leads to the conclusion that the solid-scale inhibi- tor has no compat- ible issue with cur- rent fracturing fluid formulations. Proppant crush resistance is a standard test to evaluate the suit- ability of a particu- lar proppant, at a given closure stress. Undue crushing will result in conductivity damage, due to the generation of fines, as well as the loss of fracture width of the proppant pack. To conduct the test, 40 g of the 30-mesh sample are placed in an API crush cell. The piston is added and rotated 180°. The sample is then placed on a press, the specified stress is applied over 1 min., held for 2 min., and then released. The sample is then re-sieved. All material that falls through the smallest sieve is consid- ered fines. At 10,000 psi, the test results indi- cated that approximately 15% of the sample was crushed, and a substantially small fraction of the crushed sample can be considered as fines, especially when combined with proppant of 20/40 mesh size. According to API 60, a crush of less than 10% is allowed at a given stress. Therefore, at closure pressures around 10,000 psi, the solid inhibitor does not, significantly, impact the proppant’s in- tegrity, when used at a loading less than 66%, Fig. 2. A spectrophotometric procedure was followed, to determine the residual of the high-strength, solid-scale inhibitor in aqueous solutions. The initial resid- ual—both liquid and solid—was noted as a function of cumulative barrels of produced water during the first two days of production. FIRST GOM APPLICATION A deepwater GOM operator had plans to complete an oil well as a seawater flood. In reviewing potential flow assur- ance issues, the operator, who expected barium scale deposition when seaflood water mixed with high-barium-content connate water, wanted to forestall the onset of scale in the formation and per- forations. Because seawater is high in sulfate, the mixing of high barium water and seawater, in the reservoir, creates a scenario for harmful scale deposition. Barium sulfate scale is a non-acid sol- uble scale. Once formed, it is quite dif- ficult to remove. Unlike carbonate scale, which is soluble in acid, barium scale must be handled in a progressive and ex- pensive manner that includes chelating chemistry, sufficient downhole tempera- ture, and long periods of soaking. Even under optimum conditions, barium scale removal often calls for the use of mechanical means, such as coiled tubing. A plan was developed to address the issue by proactively treating the well against barium scale. The opera- tor decided to use the ScaleSorb Ul- tra offering. The inhibitor was mixed with proppant, on the fly, during the frac-pack operation. The single-zone frac-pack inside a 5½-in., 23 lb/ft liner completion fluid was carried out, using 9.9-ppg CaCl2 in 1,200 ft of water. TVD was 10,861 ft. Bottomhole temperature and pressure were 199˚F and 5,430 psi, respectively. The fracture pressure was 6,892 psi. To- tal proppant placed in the formation was 13,895 lb of 20/40 mesh, with a bulk density of 117 lb/sq ft. A borate cross- linked frac fluid system, with a 5% KCl base, was the carrier fluid. The frac fluid was pumped, at an average 12 bpm. Aver- age pressure during the frac job was 5,700 psi; maximum pressure at screen-out was 7,791 psi. The net pressure gained during the job was approximately 1,300 psi, and a tip screen-out was achieved. Increases in net pressure generally reflect a wider, more conductive fracture. The solid-scale inhibitor was pumped at a 10% ratio to the intermediate strength proppant (ISP). The ISP was a 20/40 mesh size; the scale inhibitor sol- id particle was a 30 mesh size. The solid chemical was pumped throughout at the 10% add rate. At the maximum rate, the proppant was added at 10 ppa, and the solid-scale inhibitor product at 1 ppa. A total of 1,389 lb of solid-scale inhibitor was added. The well was put on production, and it immediately flowed both oil and water. Initial production was 636 bopd and 635 bwpd. BHP was 4,240 psi. All post-frac pack production data indicated the job was a success. After two months, and two fluid sample tests (Fig. 3), the analysis Fig. 2. Particle size distribution percent of crush test results of 30 mesh, high-strength, solid-inhibitor composite. At closure pressures of around 10,000 psi, the solid inhibitor does not significantly impact the proppant’s integrity, when used at a loading of less than 66%. In this job, a more conservative treatment rate of 10% loading weight was applied. 84.8% 6.3% 2.7% 2.9% 0.7% 2.5% 30 mesh 35 mesh 40 mesh 50 mesh 60 mesh >60 mesh
  4. 4. World Oil / APRIL 2014 95 FLOW ASSURANCE of the residual scale inhibitor in the pro- duced water demonstrated that the scale inhibitor was still present, and was still inhibiting scale in the formation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This article was adapted from SPE paper 168615. STEVE SZYMCZAK is the product line director for StimPlus at Baker Hughes Inc. He has 30 years of experience in the development, application, sales and marketing of specialty chemicals, in the production and stimulation segments of the oil and gas industry. Mr. Szymczak earned a BA degree from the University of Missouri, St. Louis. D.V. SATYA GUPTA is the business development director, production enhancement technology, for Baker Hughes Pressure Pumping. He was previously senior research manager for fracturing technology for Baker Hughes Pressure Pumping (BJ Services). He has over 35 years of oilfield chemical product development and applications experience. He is on the editorial board of SPE and the Hydraulic Fracture Quarterly technical journal. DONG SHEN is a research scientist with Baker Hughes Pressure Pumping. He is involved in the development of new technology, related to production chemicals and stimulation, for the oil and gas industry. In his six years at Baker Hughes, Mr. Shen has handled several research projects in placing solid- and liquid-scale inhibitors into the formation, through the hydraulic fracturing process, to mitigate scale deposition. He holds a PhD in physical chemistry from the Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Science. WILLIAM STEINER is the product line technology manager for Pressure Pumping at Baker Hughes. Mr. Steiner has extensive experience in oil and gas treating chemicals. He holds three patents in the chemical field. He graduated with a BA degree from Concordia College in Moorhead, Minn. He has taken graduate-level classes in chemistry from the University of Florida and graduate-level business classes from the University of Wisconsin. KEVIN LANGLINAIS is an applications engineer for the Gulf of Mexico Sand Control and Pressure Pumping product lines at Baker Hughes. He is responsible for the design and execution of sand control completions systems. Over his 13-year career in the oil and gas industry, Mr. Langlinais has held roles as a technical representative, sales engineer and a wellsite vessel engineer. He earned a petroleum engineering degree from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. Fig. 3. The post-stimulation monitoring assessments aid in optimizing subsequent well treatments, by measuring stimulation effectiveness and inhibitor residuals. Article copyright © 2013 by Gulf Publishing Company. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. Not to be distributed in electronic or printed form, or posted on a website, without express written permission of copyright holder.