Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

(slides)

438 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

(slides)

  1. 1. Sustainable Support for Renewable Energy: an alternative energy perspective Tom Briggs, VP Policy & Communications, BP Alternative Energy
  2. 2. Alternative energy: the market today Grossed-up estimate based on disclosed deals. New investment only. Source: New Energy Finance Global new investment in clean energy 2007 0 25 50 75 100 125 $28.6bn 2004 $54.6bn 2005 $86.5bn 2006 $148.4bn $bn 150
  3. 3. Principles for transitional incentives <ul><li>Goal: “accelerate the deployment of low-carbon power technologies” </li></ul><ul><li>Policy understood to be ‘transitional’ – eventually phased down and replaced with a carbon-based measure </li></ul><ul><li>Policy based around a market mechanism, e.g. tradable certificate system – to seek out lowest-cost solutions and to allow business to optimise across a wider playing field </li></ul><ul><li>Policy provides encouragement tailored to each technology without ‘picking winners’ for favored treatment </li></ul>
  4. 4. Priorities to stimulate investment <ul><li>Enduring carbon pricing policies eg continuance of CDM, cap and trade in US and EU </li></ul><ul><li>Stability and predictability in transitional incentives - long-term policies – avoiding stop-go syndrome </li></ul><ul><li>Further tailoring of incentives to technologies </li></ul><ul><li>Regulatory support for Grid expansion and development, including streamlined planning permission. </li></ul><ul><li>Reduce barriers to global trade and investment </li></ul>
  5. 5. Historical cost development and learning rates <ul><li>Capital cost; 2004 USD/W </li></ul><ul><li>Cumulative capacity installed </li></ul><ul><li>MW </li></ul><ul><li>Solar PV 1975 – 2003 </li></ul><ul><li>Solar Thermal 1985 – 1991 </li></ul><ul><li>Wind Power 1981 – 2001 </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Historical learning rates per doubled cumulative capacity of </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>23% for Solar PV* </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>13% for Wind Power </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>15% for Ethanol </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>6% for PV inverters </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>3% for Solar Thermal </li></ul></ul></ul>Source: UC Berkeley Energy Resource Group; Navigant consulting <ul><li>Ethanol 1978 – 1996 </li></ul><ul><li>PV inverter </li></ul><ul><li>1995 – 2002 </li></ul>“ By the year 2010 we'll be able to halve generation costs. By 2020 we expect a further reduction – half of 2010 – and by 2030 we expect half the 2020 level.” Katsuhiko Machida President, Sharp Corp
  6. 6. BP Alternative Energy <ul><li>In 2008, BP AE will invest $1.5 billion in renewable energy technologies and projects. </li></ul><ul><li>In BP Alternative Energy, ~$800 million has been invested in wind energy projects to date. Two-thirds of the 2008 wind investment spend is in the US </li></ul><ul><li>By end of 2008, we expect to have 1000MW wind capacity installed </li></ul>2008 investment spend ($m) 2008 Alternative Energy investment spend by region
  7. 7. BP Alternative Energy: where we operate Investing $1.5bn in 2008 Solar PV facility / market Wind power Hydrogen power Biofuels facility / market Gas fired power
  8. 8. Overview of Texas electricity market <ul><li>Texas produces and consumes more electricity than any other state: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>9.8% share of US total net electricity generation </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>11 th in the world in terms of consumption </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Approximately 50% of electricity produced by gas-fired power plants </li></ul><ul><li>Texas is the largest wind energy producer in the US </li></ul><ul><li>78.5% of Texas’ renewable generation is from wind </li></ul>Source: EIA August 2008 Texas electricity generation mix Texas renewable generation mix
  9. 9. The growth of wind power in Texas Growth of renewable energy capacity in Texas Capacity (MW) <ul><li>As a result of incentives and competitive market forces, Texas has seen an explosion in investment in generation facilities, particularly wind. </li></ul><ul><li>As of 1Q 2008, Texas has installed over 5,300 MW of wind capacity – more than any other state. </li></ul><ul><li>ERCOT predicts that as much as 10,000 MW could be operating by spring 2009. </li></ul><ul><li>The growth surge has been driven by: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>high natural gas prices </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>excellent wind resources </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>relatively few planning permission issues </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>viable retail and wholesale markets in which to sell energy </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>favourable transmission policies </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Federal tax credits and Texas Renewable Portfolio Standards </li></ul></ul>
  10. 10. Transmission plays a key role in promoting the growth of renewable energy <ul><li>Within ERCOT, there is no multi-state licensing and permitting that can often delay project development </li></ul><ul><li>No limit to interconnection and a standard interconnection agreement – “plug and play” </li></ul><ul><li>Within ERCOT, all transmission costs are spread among customers within the region </li></ul><ul><li>The PUC is building transmission to the windiest areas in Texas - Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZ) </li></ul><ul><li>The “Wild West of Open Access” </li></ul>From the perspective of network upgrade needs, there are generally 4 sets of potential CREZs: COASTAL PANHANDLE MCCAMEY AREA ABILENE AREA
  11. 11. Transmission CREZs in Texas <ul><li>TX PUC approved Competitive Renewable Energy Zones that will be able to accommodate 18,456 MW of renewable energy by 2017 </li></ul><ul><li>PUC selected the lowest cost scenario, estimating total transmission cost at $4.93 bn. Does not include .8 billion in estimated generator connection costs. </li></ul><ul><li>PUC estimated savings of $38 per MWH relative to other scenarios. </li></ul><ul><li>Study found that 23% wind penetration could be managed reliably by ERCOT. </li></ul><ul><li>The impact of the decision is significant: Wind developers have confidence that grid capacity and operations will not be a barrier to development. </li></ul>
  12. 12. Conclusion <ul><li>TX PUC decision on Grid development provides a useful example of how regulators can support renewable energy. </li></ul><ul><li>However, one reason this approach may work in Texas is due to the relative ease of building transmission lines. </li></ul><ul><li>Approach may not be possible in other jurisdictions. </li></ul>
  13. 13. Additional Slides
  14. 14. Texas electricity market structure <ul><li>Texas spans four regional power grids </li></ul><ul><li>85% of usage occurring in the Electric Reliability Council Of Texas (ERCOT) grid </li></ul><ul><li>ERCOT lies solely within the state so the production and sale of electricity is not subject to regulation by the FERC </li></ul><ul><li>Market and utility restructuring began in 2001, with implementation of Texas Senate Bill 7 </li></ul><ul><li>Transmission, generation and competitive retailers were unbundled into separate market segments </li></ul>
  15. 15. Electricity market structure in ERCOT Generation companies Transmission & distribution utility Retail electricity providers End user REP REP REP <ul><li>Market prices subject to ERCOT-ISO and PUC rules </li></ul><ul><li>Regulated by the PUC </li></ul><ul><li>Open access </li></ul><ul><li>Unregulated rates </li></ul>
  16. 16. Texas wholesale electricity pricing history Source:2007 State of the market report for the ERCOT wholesale electricity markets 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 $/MWh Average all-in price for electricity in ERCOT 2003-2007 Natural gas price ($/MMbtu) Ancillary services Uplift Energy Natural gas price
  17. 17. The retail electricity market in Texas <ul><li>Most Texas residents have a choice in their Retail Electricity Provider (REP) </li></ul><ul><li>There are a proliferation of consumer offerings for all types of customer (industrial, commercial and residential) </li></ul><ul><li>Prior to restructuring, only a fraction of such offerings existed </li></ul>Some of the REPs serving Houston
  18. 18. Transition incentives are needed for new technology <ul><ul><li>Longer term CO2 price driven by economics of supply and demand, and fiscal regime </li></ul></ul>* Solar costs reflect combination of rooftop PV and CSP costs, weighted average across regions. Wind cost is onshore weighted average across regions <ul><li>Solar </li></ul><ul><li>CO 2 price </li></ul><ul><li>$/t </li></ul><ul><li>Year </li></ul><ul><li>Wind </li></ul><ul><li>Carbon price </li></ul><ul><li>Where cost of abatement technology is greater than the carbon price, there is a need for transition incentives to drive investment </li></ul><ul><li>Carbon price “funnel” </li></ul>
  19. 19. Incentives can accelerate maturity R&D Demo. Commercialisation Capital - based Production - based ( MWh ) TRANSITIONAL INCENTIVES CARBON PRICING (CO2 tonnes) Time + trading e.g. capital grants, inv tax credits e.g. feed - in - tariffs, prod tax credits e.g. RO, RPS Cap - and - trade programs, carbon taxes H2 power with CCS Solar PV Onshore wind Gas power Tech Cost Offshore wind Deployment Solar nano
  20. 20. Transmission constraints in Texas <ul><li>Large distances between wind resources and load centres </li></ul><ul><li>The grid is increasingly congested. </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The PUC is reviewing the move to a nodal marketplace from a zonal one </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>New transmission infrastructure is being added </li></ul></ul>West South North Houston Northeast Commercially Significant Constraint (CSC) Zonal market Nodal market

×