Case Study: 2012 Top Ten COTE | IUB-OCA


Published on

Case Study: 2012 Top Ten COTE | IUB-OCA

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Owner /User requirements for the project included these items
  • Located within the State of Iowa Capitol Complex, this project is an infill development on the 6-acre site of a former landfill. As a gateway to the complex at its Southeast corner, the project is a figural and literal threshold to the powerful example of government — supported by location and by its demonstration of replicable strategies for performance and savings. It further proves that the challenge of elegant design and exemplary performance can be solved even within limited budgets.Rod’s Notes: Interesting that the project is the second closest building to the Capital Complex Power Plant and is on a site with closed horizontal coal mines.Blue triangle indicates protected ‘view corridors’ to the Capital Building
  • The building — home to two state agencies that govern state utilities issues — is organized in two wings joined by a central lobby. The north wing comprises the State Utilities Board on two levels, while the south wing is comprised of the State’s Consumer Advocate Office on level two and common spaces on level one. The resulting building is elegant in design — and performance — proving that the very energy it regulates can transform design. It sits as a symbol of the sustainable stewardship of the State of Iowa by demonstrating proven, cost-effective energy efficiency measures.Rod’s Notes: 45 – 55 Feet wide footprint to maximize daylightingOpen office workstations on the south.
  • The project captures 100% of stormwater (based on average annual rainfall) and diverts stormwater from 6 acres of adjacent streets for on-site treatment, something particularly important due to recent catastrophic flooding within the state. State law dictates that these two agencies share a building; however this forced synergy also created design efficiency through shared and adaptable spaces. The sleek use of materials confronts the idea that structural finishes can become elegant articulation.
  • As a state government building sited at the southeastern corner of the Capitol Complex, the building represents the political temperature of the State. In particular, its strong sustainability goals represent significant commitment to model positive development by the State and its agencies. It’s also a symbol of efficient use of the State’s limited resources — an outward expression of environmental responsibility, explicitly different from the existing historic stock while respectful in terms of scale, proportion and value. It has a positive influence on stormwater issues that affected the viability and prior development of this site. Furthermore, the building creates a strong eastern entry to the Capitol grounds as a tie between varying architectural styles, between old and new. The Capitol is a significant hub for metro-area transit options, as all city routes are available on site or within one transfer. Preferred parking is available on site for vanpools and alternative-fuel and hybrid vehicles; showers are provided to encourage cycling and walking; and parking was reduced to the minimum allowed by local code.
  • The southern half of the 6-acre site employs two site strategies for strong site ecology: a native prairie restoration and a treatment train to filter and capture on-site stormwater (plus that of six additional acres of off-site diverted stormwater). The building sits at the northern edge of the site. The landscape here transitions to a more formal expression in order to merge this site with that of the larger Capitol Complex. The entrance courtyard is comprised mostly of beds filled with little bluestem, a dominant species in the pre-development history of the state. These more organized plantings blend the building into the landscape while showcasing a symbol of the state’s natural history.
  • The site’s native prairie restoration provides wildlife habitats for native species. Tall-grass prairie once covered the majority of the state, but within 15 years of the Civil War, it was virtually wiped out. The native prairie restoration occurring on-site, a symbol of the pre-settlement state of Iowa, has multiple benefits in that it comprises significant components of the stormwater treatment train, slows the rate of stormwater flow and establishes a wildlife habitat; the native landscape eliminates the need for site irrigation.
  • The building is sited with proper east-west orientation. A narrow north-south building configuration provides the most appropriate daylighting and natural ventilation opportunities. West and east elevations are designed only to accept specific views to mitigate excessive heat gain and glare.In this climate of hold/cold extremes, white Thermomass precast concrete (with continuous insulation and non-thermally conductive ties) provides a simple yet high-performance envelope, eliminating traditional thermal bridging at roof interfaces, foundation walls and wall openings. The team innovated details that allow insulation to wrap uninterrupted from the roof into the thermal wythe of the wall panel and then down and around the foundation system and across the underside of the slab on grade.
  • Thermal mass captures “free heating”, modulates temperatures and, thus, reduces loads. The geothermal well field uses the earth’s constant temperature to offset heating and cooling loads. High-performance glass is tuned to the characteristics of each elevation’s exposures.
  • The building automation system identifies favorable exterior conditions, sending an email to occupants when windows can be opened. Similarly, the system sends emails instructing occupants to close windows. The automation system shuts down the associated zone’s heat pumps when windows are open, ensuring energy is not wasted.
  • An Ideal building footprint depth is employed to deliver daylighting throughout. Louvered sunscreens, with horizontal blades and vertical fabric panels at the south elevation of each wing, reflect daylight deeply during all seasons, block unwanted summertime heat gain and allow passive winter heating. The parabolic profile reflects high elevation summer sun off of the curved portion and low winter sun angles off of the flat portion of the louvers. Zinc-clad office enclosures cantilever from the north elevations, taking advantage of diffuse northern light.
  • Daylight modeling led to selection of open-office workstations, which demonstrated a significant performance increase by implementing low furniture panels with translucent upper panels (36” solid/16” glass). At the core of the building, the selected furniture supported the required footcandles at the work surface without artificial lighting 70% of the time (vs. 30% of the time with owner’s existing 64” tall furniture). Solatube skylights at the core deliver additional daylighting.Rod’s Notes: The daylight harvesting and sunshading system utilized allowed us to harvest daylight as low as desk level.Solar Tubes and interior glazing were used to daylight internal conference and work rooms.Exterior windows were sized and positioned to maximize daylighting in the offfices by capturing the diffuse north light. Interior glazing at the offices assist in daylighting the internal spaces.
  • An overarching theme of interconnection between the building interior and the exterior context and landscape was carried throughout. Ultimately, more 95% of regularly occupied spaces have daylight and views due to the vast glazing at the northern and southern elevations. All employees have access to operable windows.
  • In recent years, the state has experienced devastating flooding, leading to comprehensive stormwater strategies for the site, which treats water from 12 acres —the 6-acre site and 6-acres of adjacent land. The resulting native prairie landscape is a win-win; it purifies water using native plants for increased downstream water quality and eliminates the need for irrigation.The stormwater treatment train consists of a stormwater interceptor, infiltration basin, rain gardens, bioswales and pervious pavement. Stormwater enters the landscape through a limestone boulder sediment trap that slows water and controls erosion. It moves across the native prairie restoration into infiltration basins planted with native grasses (root structures host organisms that feed on suspended pollutants). The basins have valves to regulate the system when plants are being established or for longer detention during storm events. Native species encourage additional infiltration with a lower runoff coefficient. Simple farm terraces throughout the state inspired the process of water movement across the landscape while moderating steep site slopes.Inside, a simple and replicable strategy (ultra-low-flow plumbing fixtures with sensors and faucet aerators and automatic sensors to reduce water flow) contributes to a water use reduction of 46% compared to a typical office building.
  • Optimal orientation and massing, along with a hyper-efficient building envelope, mean the building design contributes to a secure energy future. Additional strategies allow it to outperform a goal of 60% energy savings beyond the energy code baseline by 7.9%:- Geothermal field tied to dual-stage heat pumps accounts for 39% of total energy savings- A total energy recovery unit provides 12% of the total energy savings- Roof-mounted 45 kW photovoltaic array provides 13% renewable energy while offsetting loads during peak demand- Many smaller strategies comprise the other half of the energy savings goals: Variable frequency drives; high-efficiency, low power density lighting; automated dimming for interior lighting; occupancy sensor for lighting and workstation plug loads; time-of-day control of office equipment plug loads; CO2 sensors for moderated control of ventilation airA comprehensive measurement/verification plan measures energy use of all building systems, allowing the owner to make adjustments.The design team, not wanting to overstate results, developed the energy model to reflect conservative performance. Plug load strategies, for example, were not given full credit in the model despite the estimation that they would pay dividends. Actual performance data is noted below and can be contrasted with the conservative performance within the model.
  • Finish choices reduced material use and were selected for their inherent qualities, to integrate with the sleek design, contribute to a healthy environment, and represent the State’s efficient use of limited resources. The team exploited structural elements as finish materials, choosing to tightly detail these to create an elegant aesthetic. The interior finish of the precast panels is exposed as a lightly sandblasted hard-troweled concrete finish, which saved significant material and cost and greatly reduced drywall dust, which led to a healthier construction site. More than 50% of the ceiling is exposed acoustical composite deck; the lobby and restrooms make use of a finished concrete deck. The reduction in materials also freed finances for achieving energy goals, such as the geothermal bore field.
  • First and foremost, the building’s parti, with two wings emanating from a central lobby, supports long-term flexibility. Each wing utilizes an open plan configuration, and the modularity of the workplace design allows the space to adapt to changes or relocation of staff. The wings, or bars, were chosen to support a seamless future addition to the south should the need arise.
  • Secondly, within the building a flexible approach extends to the support spaces, where conference areas were sized and designed to serve the entire capitol complex. Large conference rooms share an operable partition to scale them up or down for various needs.
  • The hearing room was “right sized” for typical crowds with AV connections that support viewing for overflow crowds in the adjacent large conference rooms. Furthermore, durable materials such as zinc cladding and precast concrete wall panels were used to allow for a 100-year useable life, no matter the tenant.
  • Case Study: 2012 Top Ten COTE | IUB-OCA

    1. 1. CASE STUDYIowa Utilities Board/Office of Consumer Advocate
    2. 2. 01/ Project OverviewPROJECT OWNERState of IowaPROJECT COMPLETION DATEJanuary 2011BUILDING GROSS FLOOR AREA44,640 SFTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST$10,127,923OWNER / USER• Demonstration project• 65% below code baseline (ASHRAE 90.1-2004)• Double incremental• target of the 2030 ChallengeSTATE LEGISLATURELEED Platinum
    3. 3. 02/ Design and Innovation
    4. 4. 03/ Regional and Community DesignEstimated percent ofoccupants using public transit,cycling or walking:22%
    5. 5. 04/ Land Use and Site Ecology
    6. 6. 05/ Bioclimatic Design
    7. 7. 06/ Light and Air
    8. 8. Daylighting at levels that allow lights to be off during daylight hours: 98% Views to the Outdoors: 98%Within 15 feet of anoperable window: 53%
    9. 9. Percent reduction of regulated potable water: 46% Percent of rainwater from maximum anticipated 24 hour, 2-year storm event that can be managed onsite: 36%07/ Water Cycle
    10. 10. 08/ Energy Flows and Energy Future Total EUI in 22 kBtu/sf/yr Net EUI in 20 kBtu/sf/yr% Reduction fromNational Ave. EUI 49%
    11. 11. Includes PV
    12. 12. Energy MonitoringLEED Measurement &VerificationElectrical Circuits Monitored• Lighting• Plug Loads• Mechanical Equipment• General Building Loads• IT EquipmentGeothermal LoopData Collected by CapitolComplex Energy ManagementSystem
    13. 13. Renewable Energy198 Photovoltaic ModulesNot Included in 28 kbtu Goal12.5%of building energy use
    14. 14. 09/ Materials and Construction
    15. 15. 35%of total material contentwas recycled67%of materials wereregionally extracted,harvested and fabricated96%of wood used wasForestry StewardshipCouncil certified, henceresponsibly harvested89%of construction wastewas recycled
    16. 16. Agrifiber, a rapidlyrenewable and regionallysourced material, was usedfor the door coresFurniture achieves Cradle-to-Cradle certification orequivalent standardLow V.O.C. materials usedthroughoutAll furniture within theproject is Greenguardcertified at a minimum
    17. 17. 10/ Long Life, Loose Fit
    18. 18. “Taken a site that was historically problematicand prone to flooding and addressed it in anaesthetic manner, a way that reveals their wiseuse of water in that climate.It is a project that established extremely highgoals from the beginning. It is rare that youdetermine a desire to be a replicable model forother government buildings and this hasfollowed through on that mission including verysignificant monitoring as evidence and anexample for other buildings to follow.An EUI of 22 in that climate is a fantasticEUI…extraordinary. 2012 AIA COTEIt was obvious that every design decision thatneeded to be made in support of the climate Jury Commentsstrategy was really made. There was a rigorand focus to the execution that you don’t see inmost projects.They saw the impact of their work was biggerthan just the building it was to set an examplefor other government buildings.Deliberate attempt at shared space.Government departments are known for beingsiloed and they developed a way of promoting “knowledge exchange that also made thebuilding much more efficient.