Ausd Budget Upadate Feb232010

361 views

Published on

2010 Budget Overview

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
361
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
3
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Ausd Budget Upadate Feb232010

  1. 1. <ul><ul><ul><li>Azusa Unified School District </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Budget Study Session </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>February 23, 2010 </li></ul></ul>
  2. 2. U.S. Economic Outlook <ul><li>The broader national economy may be turning the corner </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The rate of job loss has slowed considerably </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Job growth, although likely weak, may begin soon </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Since the recession began, the U.S. has lost 7.6 million jobs </li></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Home sales are rising </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Consumer spending is up 2.8% in the third quarter of 2009 </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The stock market is up 60% from its March 2009 low </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Third quarter U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) increased 2.2% (revised), the best showing since the recession began </li></ul></ul>1
  3. 3. U.S. Economic Outlook <ul><li>Because of excess capacity in the labor and products market, UCLA forecasts low inflation in the near term of about 2% annually through 2011 </li></ul><ul><li>Once the recovery is fully under way, inflationary pressures will mount as the federal government finances the debt </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Interest costs could reach $800 billion annually, 40% of current receipts, according to UCLA </li></ul></ul>Source: UCLA Anderson Forecast, September 2009 2
  4. 4. California’s Economy <ul><li>While there are signs of recovery, California’s economy will continue to suffer from high unemployment </li></ul><ul><ul><li>As of November 2009, the state’s unemployment rate is 12.3%, compared to 10.0% for the U.S. as a whole </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>The Department of Finance forecasts the unemployment rate to remain above 10% through 2011 </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Other factors that will impair the recovery include: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Very weak construction and manufacturing sectors </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Continuing drought </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Political gridlock in Sacramento </li></ul></ul>3
  5. 5. Governor’s Budget 2010-11 <ul><li>For the current year, 2009-10, the Governor’s January Budget proposes no change in revenue limit funding, with the deficit factor remaining at 18.355% </li></ul><ul><li>In 2010-11, the statutory cost of living adjustment (COLA) is negative 0.38% and is fully “funded” </li></ul><ul><li>The deficit factor of 18.355% remains unchanged in the 2010-11 budget </li></ul><ul><li>In addition to the negative COLA and the continuation of the 18.355% deficit factor, the Governor’s Budget proposes an ongoing targeted cut of $1.5 billion in 2010-11 which approximates $201 per ADA </li></ul>4
  6. 6. Risks to the Budget Proposal <ul><li>The Governor’s Budget assumes $6.9 billion in additional federal support to fund state/federal programs </li></ul><ul><ul><li>The federal government is running a $1.5 trillion deficit </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The Governor proposes funding shifts for various programs </li></ul><ul><li>A major change is the Administration’s proposal to eliminate the state tax on gasoline and substitute an increase in the excise tax on gasoline </li></ul><ul><ul><li>This shift provides more flexibility in how the funds can be spent </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>However, it also reduces General Fund revenues by $1.6 billion which drives the calculation of the Proposition 98 minimum guarantee </li></ul></ul>5
  7. 7. Risks to the Budget Proposal <ul><li>Other shifts include: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>$550 million from the California Children and Families Act of 1998 (Proposition 10) to children’s programs administered by the Departments of Developmental Services and Social Services </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>$452 million from the Mental Health Services Act (Proposition 63) to fund other mental health services </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Both require voter approval, but last May, voters rejected all of the Governor’s special election Budget initiatives </li></ul></ul><ul><li>The economic and revenue forecasts are vulnerable to downward revision, especially when the economic signals are mixed </li></ul>6
  8. 8. California Revenue Limit Deficit Factors 7
  9. 9. SSC Financial Dartboard 8 Factor 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 Statutory COLA (use for K-12 and COE Revenue Limit) 4.25% (0.38%) 1.80% 2.40% 2.80% 3.10% K-12 Revenue Limit Deficit 18.355% 18.355% 18.355% 18.355% 18.355% 18.355% Net Revenue Limit Change (7.64%) (0.38%) 1.80% 2.40% 2.80% 3.10% Other Revenue Limit Adjustments ($252.83) per ADA ($191) ESD ($231) HSD ($201) USD ($191) ESD ($231) HSD ($201) USD ($191) ESD ($231) HSD ($201) USD ($191) ESD ($231) HSD ($201) USD ($191) ESD ($231) HSD ($201) USD Special Education COLA (on state and local share only) 0.00% (0.38%) 1.80% 2.405 2.80% 3.10% State Categorical COLA (including adult education and ROC/P; Tier I In addition to prior year Tier II reduction of 15.38%) Tier III 0.00% (4.46%) (4.46%) N/A (0.38%) (0.38%) 1.80% 1.80% 1.80% 2.40% 2.40% 2.40% 2.80% 2.80% 2.80% 3.10% 3.10% 3.10% California CPI 0.80% 2.00% 2.60% 2.90% 3.20% 3.40% California Lottery Base $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 $110.00 Prop 20 $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 Interest Rate for Ten-Year Treasuries 3.50% 3.90% 4.30% 4.70% 5.00% 5.20%
  10. 10. Azusa USD 2008-09 K-12 Revenue Limit *0.92156 = 1.0 – 7.844% (deficit factor) 9 Average Unified District for 2008-09 Base Revenue Limit per ADA (A) Proration Factor (B) Funded Base Revenue Limit (C) = (A) x (B) 1. 2007-08 Base Revenue Limit $5,789.44 1.00000 $5,789.44 2. 2008-09 COLA per ADA 329.00 – – 3. 2008-09 Base Revenue Limit 6,118.44 0.92156* 5,638.51 4. 2008-09 One-Time Reduction – – 0.00 5. Net 2008-09 Funding (C3 minus C4) $ 5,638.51 6. Dollar Change (Line 5, Column C minus Line 1, Column C) <$150.93> 7. Percentage Change (Line 6, Column C divided by Line 1, Column C) <2.61%>
  11. 11. Azusa USD 2009-10 K-12 Revenue Limits *0.81645 = 1.0 – 18.355% (deficit factor) 10 Average Unified District for 2009-10 Base Revenue Limit per ADA (A) Proration Factor (B) Funded Base Revenue Limit (C) = (A) x (B) 1. 2008-09 Base Revenue Limit $6,118.44 0.92156 $5,638.51 2. 2009-10 COLA per ADA 261.00 – – 3. 2009-10 Base Revenue Limit 6,379.44 0.81645* 5,208.49 4. 2009-10 One-Time Reduction – – <252.83> 5. Net 2009-10 Funding (C3 minus C4) $4,955.66 6. Dollar Change (Line 5, Column C minus Line 1, Column C) <$682.85> 7. Percentage Change (Line 6, Column C divided by Line 1, Column C) <12.11%>
  12. 12. Azusa USD 2010-11 K-12 Revenue Limits *0.81645 = 1.0 – 18.355% (deficit factor) 11 Average Unified District for 2010-11 Base Revenue Limit per ADA (A) Proration Factor (B) Funded Base Revenue Limit (C) = (A) x (B) 1. 2009-10 Base Revenue Limit $6,379.44 0.81645 $5,208.49 2. 2010-11 COLA per ADA (0.38%) <24.00> – – 3. 2010-11 Base Revenue Limit 6,355.44 0.81645* 5,188.90 4. 2010-11 Proposed Ongoing per Student Reduction <201.00> – <201.00> 5. Net 2010-11 Funding (C3 minus C4) $4,987.90 6. Net 2009-10 Funded Revenue Limit (Slide TK Line 5, Column C) 4,955.66 7. Dollar Change (Line 5, Column C Minus Line 6, Column C) $32.24 8. Percentage Change (Line 7, Column C Divided by Line 1, Column C) 0.65%
  13. 13. Azusa USD Declining Average Daily Attendance (P2) 12
  14. 14. Azusa USD Revenue Limit Funding Reductions 13 State Funding Reductions Declining Enrollment Cumulative Effect 1. 2008-09 Year $5,171,543 $737,855 $5,909,398 2. 2009-10 Year $15,319,102 $79,340 $15,398,442 3. 2010-11 Year $14,220,832 $1,800,226 $16,021,058 4. Total $34,711,477 $2,617,421 $37,328,898
  15. 15. ARRA Funding Cliff <ul><li>ARRA funds have provided LEAs with a welcomed level of relief – and, depending on how the funding was used, either alleviated or created budget challenges </li></ul><ul><li>Districts need to be prepared for the loss of ARRA funding </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Tough choices will need to be made – positions, services, and supplies funded with ARRA dollars will need to be eliminated, reduced, or shifted to another source of funding </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Don’t include competitive ARRA funding in your 2010-11 budget </li></ul><ul><ul><li>These funds are not a sure thing </li></ul></ul><ul><li>MYPs need to acknowledge the loss of ARRA funding </li></ul>14
  16. 16. AUSD ARRA Funding- Estimated Allocations 15
  17. 17. 2008-09 Azusa USD General Fund Revenues 16
  18. 18. 2008-09 Azusa USD General Fund Expenditures 17
  19. 19. 2008-09 Azusa USD Salaries and Benefits by Classification - All Funds 18
  20. 20. Azusa USD General Fund Revenues (in thousands) as of January 31, 2010 19
  21. 21. <ul><li>Over a quarter of districts, representing approximately 38% of the state’s ADA, responded to an SSC survey regarding class size and contract/school year length </li></ul><ul><li>Not surprising . . . </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Class sizes are increasing across all grade levels </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>School years are getting shorter </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>And many districts have made or are contemplating work-year reductions </li></ul></ul>Flexibility Changes to Staffing Practices 20
  22. 22. 2009-10 Estimated Second Interim Report 21
  23. 23. 2009-10 Estimated Second Interim Report, cont. 22
  24. 24. Previous Reductions - Never Reinstated 23
  25. 25. Current Budget Reduction Measures 24
  26. 26. Potential Reductions 25
  27. 27. Potential Reductions, Cont. 26
  28. 28. <ul><ul><ul><li>The End </li></ul></ul></ul>

×