2. FLIES AND MIDGES ARE A NUISANCE TO ANIMAL HEALTH
Most common ectoparasite of animals are:-
•
•
•
•
•
Flies ( Diptera)
Lice (Phthiraptera)
Fleas (Siphonaptera)
Ticks (Ixodes)
Mites (Acarina)
3. SOME OF THE COMMON FLIES THAT ARE ECTOPARASITES
6. DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE ECTOPARASITES
FLIES AND
TICKS
EXSANGUINATION
TOXICOSIS
REDUCED
ANIMAL
PRODUCTION
ARTHROPOD
BORNE
DISEASES
7. Contd..
• Ectoparasites infect by two ways primarily by
removal of blood, damage to tissues as well as by
stimulating immune response and inflammatory
response.
• Secondly ectoparasites acts as vectors for
pathogens (babesiosis,ehrlichiosis,filariosis,louping
ill,lyme disease and many more)
8. What are available options to control Ectoparasites
• Pyrethroids
• Organophosphates
• Cypermethrin
• Ivermectin
9. Limitation of current approach
• Dangerous to both animals and human handlers
• Residues remain in environment
• Resistance develops as a result every year more
stronger insecticides are required
• Food Safety is a concern because of the chemical
compounds that may enter food chain.
• More costly for the farmer.
13. Why it is better
• It is made of herbs so it is completely safe.
• It doesn’t leave deleterious residues.
• Resistance doesn’t develop against Keetguard.
• It has multipronged action it kills eggs, larva, pupa,
and adult so it is very effective.
14. Usage
• Dilute 1 part Keetguard with 40 parts water and use
in barn or spray in animal premises.
• For effective control apply/spray Keetguard twice a
week.
• In severe conditions, apply/spray regularly once
daily for one week followed by twice per week and
keep Keetguard applied on body for 18-24 hrs
before giving bath.
19. To study efficacy of Keetguard liquid (herbal
ectoparasiticidal & fly repellent) in natural cases of
ectoparasitic infestation in ruminants
Dr. Pratibha Jumde, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Veterinary
Parasitology, Nagpur Veterinary college, NVC, MAFSU, Nagpur,
Maharashtra.
20. RESEARCH DESIGN
24 (n=24) heavily infested non descript cattle with
Boophilus ticks were selected.
GROUP A(6n)
GROUP B (6n)
GROUP C(6n)
GROUP D(6n)
Each group of animals was kept as control for specific
period of time and thereafter they were treated with
Keetgaurd Liquid as per the prescription.
21. PARAMETERS STUDIED
• Ectoparasite ( Ticks) counts/intensity before and
after treatment was compared.
• The protection period against reinfestation in
treated group.
• Reproductive potential such as preoviposition and
oviposition periods
22. No of adult ticks died after treatment
G
r
o
u
p
No
Of
Ticks/
unit
area
Untreated group (control)
Treated group
EFFI
CAC
Y%
6h
12h 18h 24h 30 h 48 h 72h
6h 12h 18h 24h 30h 48h 72h
A 16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
9
-
-
-
-
100
%
B 14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
8
-
-
-
-
100
%
C 16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
12
-
-
-
-
100
%
D 13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
8
-
-
-
-
100
%
23. Comments
• The percent efficacy of Keetguard liquid on adult stages of
ticks of non descript cattle was found 100% at 24 hours of
treatment. The product shows 100 percent efficacy on tick
infestation with no side effects of the product was observed.
• The reinfestation time noted on the same animals was 45
days. This may be due to mixed grazing, common pasture
land, sharing of huts, sheds etc, with ectoparasitic load.
24. No of Nymphs died after treatment
G
R
O
U
P
Untreated ( control )
Treated group
6h 12h 18h 24h 30h 46h 72 h
6h 12h 18h 24h 30h 46h
Ny
mp
hs/
64
sq
cm
72h
E
F
F
I
C
A
C
y
A
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
6
4
-
-
-
-
100%
B
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
8
5
-
-
-
-
100%
C
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
7
6
-
-
-
-
100%
D
17
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
5
6
-
-
-
-
100%
25. No of females depositing eggs after treatment
G
R
O
U
P
Control
Treated
% oviposition
No
of
Engorged
females
%
of
oviposition
24h
48h
72h
96h
120h
A
6
83.33%
0
0
0
1
0
16.66%
B
5
80.0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
5
100%
0
1
0
0
0
16.66%
D
6
83.33%
0
0
0
0
0
0
26. The overall percent oviposition in treatment group was noted
as 8.33 %. From the observations noted the test product
shows high efficacy on the oviposition of the female ticks. The
efficacy of product recorded as 91.67 %.
27. TO STUDY THE EFFICACY OF KEETGAURD IN
CONTROLLING LICE FROM NAGPURI BUFFALOES
28. DESIGN
24 Buffaloes were taken for the study
GROUP A
N(6)
GROUP B
N(6)
GROUP C
N(6)
GROUP D
N(6)
29. No of live lice after treatment
G
R
O
U
P
Control
4h
12h
TREATED
E
F
F
I
C
A
C
y
4h
24h
8h
12h
16h
20h
24h
A
12
12
12
0
1
3
3
5
0
100%
B
13
13
13
0
0
2
5
6
0
100%
C
13
13
13
1
2
1
1
8
0
100%
D
12
12
12
0
0
3
5
4
0
100%
30. TO STUDY THE EFFICACY OF SARCOPTES MITES IN
GOATS
32. No of dead mites after treatment
G
R
O
U
P
Mites
/6sq
cm
from
thigh
Control
Treated
30 m 4h
12h
30m 1h
2h
4h
6h
8h
12h
E
F
F
I
C
A
C
y
A
6
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
1
0
100%
B
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
0
0
100%
C
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
5
1
0
100%
D
9
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
5
2
0
100%
33. Efficacy of Herbal Fly repellant product Keetgaurd
to control Musca domestica population in poultry
egg layer farm
submitted by Dr. Gopal Bharkad, Associate Professor, Dept. of
Veterinary Parasitology, Bombay Veterinary College, Parel, Mumbai
34. RESEARCH DESIGN
3 layer sheds caged with 10 thousand layer birds
were selected.
Two concentration of keetguard was taken for Group
A and Group B
GROUP A
(Test1)
GROUP B
(Test2)
GROUP C
(Control)
1:20
1:40
Water
35. PARAMETERS STUDIED
• Count of larvae after treatment
• Larvicidal activity after treatment
• Count of Musca after treatment
36. RESULTS
Musca spp population after treatment
Pre
1 Hr
Treatment post
4Hr
post
6Hr
post
24Hr
post
3rd day
post
5th
day
post
7th day
post
55.33%
Group A 14.17
(1:20)
88.21
%
78.83 %
68.24%
58.86%
10.59%
27.10%
Group B 14
(1:40)
86.93
%
73.79%
67.86%
35.71%
3.58%
+22.57% +41.64%
Group C 13.83
(Water)
6.01%
4.84%
2.39%
+13.30
%
+43.38% +73.53% +87.99%
37. Larvicidal activity after treatment
Conc of Test
Comp
Before Treatment
After Treatment
Percent reduction
in larvae
Group A (1:20)
18
1
95%
Group B (1:40)
18
4
73%
Cypermethrin 1 %
18
5
100%
Water
18
0
nil