Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Popularity, Prosperity and Programs at London Public Library

297 views

Published on

This is a presentation that features a fictional research study designed by myself and another MLIS student that explores how a library may go about analyzing popularity of summer programs.

  • Be the first to comment

Popularity, Prosperity and Programs at London Public Library

  1. 1. Popularity, Prosperity & ProgramsPopularity, Prosperity & Programs at theat the London Public LibraryLondon Public Library By Ashley D’Andrea & Amanda R. Kelly
  2. 2. Purpose • To understand the relationship between children’s programs in LPL branches and the average household income of patrons. Why is this valuable?
  3. 3. Research Question • Is there a relationship between the average economic status of LPL’s patrons and the availability and use of children’s programs?
  4. 4. Hypothesis • Programs offered in lower- income branches are more numerous and more popular than those of higher-income areas. • Negative correlation between income and frequency, and income and attendance.
  5. 5. Conceptualization • London Public Library • Catchment Area • Children’s Programs • Attendance
  6. 6. Variables • Independent: Average Household Income • Dependent: Children’s Programs • (A) Attendance • (B) Frequency
  7. 7. Methodology • Average Household Income • Determine branch catchment. • Identify average income for each catchment area. • Children’s Programs • Select weeks of study. • Determine frequency (calendar). • Tally attendance.
  8. 8. Data Analysis • Average Household Income • Ordinal data. • Descriptive statistics. • Scatterplot. • Income v. Catchment • Children’s Programs • Ratio data. • Descriptive statistics. • Histograms. • Scatterplots.
  9. 9. Reliability • Overall high reliability. • High stability. • High equivalence. • Consistent measurements. • Training for librarians/program supervisors.
  10. 10. Validity • Internal Validity. • Out-of-catchment patrons. • Alternate children’s services. • Ex. Nearby community centre. • External Validity. • Similar cities in Ontario. • Applicable to any library system.
  11. 11. Additional Observations • Ethical Concerns. • Library staff recording data. • Informed consent. • Implications for Future Research.
  12. 12. Bibliography Arrighetti, Julie. “The Challenge of Unattended Children in the Public Library.” Reference Services Review 29.1 (2001): 65-71. Web.   Babbie, Earl. The Basics of Social Research. 5th ed. Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011. Print. London Public Library. The London Public Library, 2012. Web. 8 April 2012.  Vaughan, Liwen. Statistical Methods for the Information Professional. Medford, New Jersey: Information Today Inc., 2005. Print.    

×