2. Basic Problems
• Expenditure in local budget/APBD does not fully refre to local
planning (RPJMD)
• Local budget expenditure that does not focus on achieving the
goals and trapped in the routine of local expenditure. Does not
provide multiplayer impact
• RPJMD that always change every 5 years (inline with the
succession of the new head of municipal/bupati) tend to be lack
of continuation between each of leadership period
• Budget tends to be dominated by the same sectors every
year, infrastructure for instance
• Budget based on account (pagu), not performance (Blora)
• The priority for expenditure does not fully refer the to RPJMD
• Unequal distribution of expenditure, dominated by big districts
where ―influential‖ people reside
• Group domination take control on the region planning scheme
3. PROCESS
• Multi-stakeholders consultation and coordination
• Agreement with the Bupati
• The formation of Core Team
• Stakeholders Capacity Buildining
• Participatory action research
• The creation of focused, clear, and relaistic vision of
Municipality: describing all stakeholders interest (joint vision of
stakeholders)—begins with SWP vision
• Drafting the Sustainable Local Development Planning (RPDB)
• Content penetration (integrating RPDB to the local planning
and budgeting scheme). Incorporated in to RPJMD
• Open consultation (Friday dialog)
4. GOALS
• To build the regioan with sustainable develpoment scheme
(not depend on just one sector-oil/gas) based on participatory
planning
HOW?
• Conversing oil/gas fund in to:
– Social development: education and health
– Local economic development: strengthen the existing
income source (agricultural-based), and building
sustainable income source that does not related to oil/gas.
5. TYPES OF INNOVATIONS
• Sustainable local development planning
Dokumen RPDB
• Concentration on annual budget based on sectors
RPJMD ABPD
• Municipality Indicative Account : to make equal in
distributing budget
Bupati regulations/Keputusan Bupati No 10A/2011
6. RESULT
• The creation of sustainable development planning
documents (Bojonegoro 15 years, Blora 5 years?)
• Focused-budgeting to specific sectors (basic health
and education services and the developments of
agricultural and industrial-based SMEs), according
to the midterm planning
• Fair percentage of budget distribution to
municipality
• Budgeting based on development priority
7. LESSON LEARN
• Takes time, takes cost: Participatory Planning process
requires long time and often costly
• Representation: representation based on regional and the
number of people represent become a significant variable
in developing participatory planning mechanism
• Equality and trust between multistakeholder becoming key
point in participatory planning
• Synchronization of mechanism for the long process of
participatory planning with existing and stable local
planning
8. FUTURE CHALLENGES
• Moderating interventions from central government and private
sectors in to local development planning
• Moderating political process that often bending planning
implementation
• Encouraging the increase of demand for participatory planning in
village level
• Equality of stakeholders status in local planning, for example, farmer
groups vs business groups
• Implementation of planning often hindered by political process
• Replicating the model
• Institutionalizing the model
