Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Aoc exam presentation Manchester


Published on

Published in: Education, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Aoc exam presentation Manchester

  1. 1. Improving the value ofexamination procurement in Sussex Tim Strickland CEO, FE Sussex
  2. 2. FE Sussex-value for money procurement fromAwarding Bodies Set the context of who we are and why we have done this Talk about the methodology we used Discuss what can be gained Suggest successful ways of improving value for money Talk about the future
  3. 3. FE Sussex -value for money procurement from Awarding Bodies “Gentlemen: we are running out of money”and yet “…(the) finance committee’s cases of administrative waste and inefficiency Winston Churchill, History of WWII, Pg 352 Vol IVI always study (sic) with great interest”
  4. 4. FE SussexThe consortium company of the 12 post-sixteenSussex colleges
  5. 5. The 12 post-sixteen Sussex colleges Total turnover £228.21M pa Total examination board spend £5.1M pa
  6. 6. The 12 post-sixteen Sussex colleges Five Sixth Form colleges Six General Further Education colleges One specialist land-based college
  7. 7. Colleges as businesses All colleges are businesses in their own right and therefore have •Suppliers and customers •Business philosophy •Business ethic Awarding bodies are suppliers of services to colleges
  8. 8. The efficiency programme Our aim To improve the value for money we receive from the suppliers who provide services to our member colleges
  9. 9. What are the pros and cons ofcollaborative working? Group question What are the pros and cons of collaborative working?
  10. 10. Collaborative working The pros Strength Ideas PRD Pulling power Success The cons •Trust – is it truly there? •Understanding – who wants what •Relationships – take time! •External politics – difficult!! ……
  11. 11. The efficiency programme Question? Why has the awarding body agenda come to the fore? •Government •Ofqual •Customers •Fashion •Inefficiency •Value for money agenda
  12. 12. What we set out to put right!
  13. 13. How we’re doing
  14. 14. Our awarding bodies target savings10% savings by July 2011
  15. 15. Smarter examination procurementGroup question How many awarding bodies do you use in your college? What is the amount of total spend? What is the spread of spend?
  16. 16. How we started the process of value formoney improvement Undertook a spend analysis on awarding bodies within our consortium What it told us What it did not tell us The result - a plan of action
  17. 17. Conducting a spend analysis Group question What will the end result look like?
  18. 18. The results of our spendanalysis- An enormous spreadsheet – 12 rows deep, 59 columns wide Maximum spend – minimum spend
  19. 19. Our end result - the format of our spend analysis: Universit British y ofName of Horse British Cambrid ABCCollege AQA OCN OCR Soc Council NCFE ASDAN EAL EDI EMTA Lantra ge ESOL AWARDSPlumptonNorthbrookChichesterCCBBhasvicSDCSCCVarndeanCollyersWorthingCSCBexhill 0
  20. 20. The results of our spendanalysis- 18% City and Guilds Edexcel 57% Other 25%
  21. 21. The results of our spend analysis Knowledge of spend with each awarding body Strategic targeting of leading boards Realisation of the need to target spending An ability to talk with confidence to awarding bodies The need to get on our bike and talk to awarding bodies Concerns by our colleges over effects on teaching, success rates and L&M
  22. 22. FE SussexWhat do we do now?
  23. 23. FE SussexWhat do we do now?Look to achieve our original aim of improvingvalue for money for our colleges
  24. 24. Improve value for money HOW?
  25. 25. FE SussexWhat do we do now? By consolidating and targeting our business and using the advantages this could bring
  26. 26. FE SussexWhat do we do now? Approach the largest awarding bodies with an offer of a strategic partnership
  27. 27. Group question What should a partnership arrangement offer - on both sides
  28. 28. What a partnership could offerSome examples Financial gain Improved efficiency Enhanced CPD Marketing help Financial analysis and assistance
  29. 29. What do we want from an awardingbody? Service Value for money Someone who knows the job Someone who takes action Accurate and concise information Ease of contact and availability
  30. 30. What’s going to get in the way Barriers Problems Obstacles Stumbling blocks Challenges
  31. 31. Suggest five examples of barriers and putthem in rank order! Group question
  32. 32. Barriers, challenges, obstaclesFrom our experience: From exams…We don’t need to change From curriculum teams…doom and gloom Cross college…inertia in planning Ignorance of the strategic objective
  33. 33. The results of talking –Success Incentive discounts linked to level of turnoverValue added enhancements such as: Key account managers Improved quality assurance assistance Speedy turnaround of registrations and certification Early alerting to problems Free CPD and staff development Sponsorship of award ceremonies
  34. 34. Celebrating the achievement ofvocational learners in Sussex
  35. 35. Who are they and what didthey say?.. Nobody said there would be days like this…(and his aunt said “ you’ll never make a living out of playing a guitar”) The times they are a-changing… There will be fewer people to manage. Collaboration is about saving costs, both front and curriculum areas…look around at your competitors…we need to be imaginative and take risks… (24.6.10, Bloomsbury Hotel– Future of Further Education)
  36. 36. Future ways of workingfor colleges Tender exercises for suppliers of qualifications Having preferred suppliers of qualifications – from tendering Forgingmeaningful and commercially advantageous partnerships
  37. 37. The future: Rationalisation of the number of awarding bodies we deal with Formation of two-way strategic alliancesPrice reduction and value for money increaseThe need to incorporate open and fair competition under UK procurement rules
  38. 38. The future:The introduction of tendering –driving down costs and increasing service levelsOpportunity to become an awarding body Regionally or sub-regionally
  39. 39. FE SussexSummary
  40. 40. FE SussexThank you and any questions!