Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Why the United Kingdom scrapped its UID


Published on

Presentation made in June 2014 to explain David Cameroon's reasons for keeping his election promise in 2011 and scrapping the UK's UID program and destroying its database.

Published in: Government & Nonprofit
  • Be the first to comment

Why the United Kingdom scrapped its UID

  1. 1. Why the UK Scrapped its UID
  2. 2. UK destroys its Unique ID Program • Section 1(1) of the Identity Documents Act repealed the Identity Cards Act 2006 on 21 January 2011 (making all ID cards invalid) and mandated the destruction of all data on the National Identity Register by 21 February 2011. • The ID register was officially destroyed on Thursday the 10 February 2011 when the final 500 hard drives containing the register were shredded at RDC in Witham, Essex.
  3. 3. Increases Identity Theft • Placing trust in a single document may make identity theft easier, since only this document needs to be targeted.
  4. 4. Perpetuates Identity Denial • Tampering, forgery possible. • Failure of technology will deny identity.
  5. 5. Violates National Security • Extremely high risk of use of identity theft for organised crime and terrorism. • High risk to sleepwalk into a surveillance society and a 1984 dystopia.
  6. 6. Erodes Civil Liberty • Instead of the state being the servant to the citizen, it suddenly becomes the master. • Any breakdown in this register will mean that a whole series of services will collapse and your access to those services will collapse. • If it was… compulsory to carry your card everywhere you went – that you had to produce it upon request from a police officer who didn’t have to have any excuse to ask you – it’s a horrible vision -- but one could understand the ID cards having a real potency and a power.
  7. 7. Violates Human Rights Violates the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and in particular: • Article 3: Right to life, liberty and security of person, • Article 6: Right to recognition everywhere, • Article 7: Right to equality, • Article 8-11: Right to Justice, • Article 12: Protection from arbitrary interference with privacy, family, home or correspondence, or to attacks upon honour and reputation, • Article 13: Freedom of movement and residence, • Article 15: Right to a nationality, • Article 17: Right to property, • Article 20: No one may be compelled to belong to an association, • Article 21: Right of equal access to public services, • Article 22: Right to social security, economic, social and cultural rights, • Article 26: Right to education, • Article 28: Right to social order in which these rights can be realized.
  8. 8. Encourages Feature Creep • Even without new primary legislation, the Identity Cards Act 2006 allowed the potential scope of the scheme to be much greater than that usually publicised by the Government.
  9. 9. Builds Discrimination • Nomads, homeless and the poor (such as Gypsies, travellers, asylum-seekers and refugees) risk being criminalized by failing to update their registration each time they move. • Significant concern among ethnic groups over how the Police would use their powers to cause abuse and discrimination.
  10. 10. Purposeless and Ineffective • Universal registers of personal information are very rarely effective as solutions to corruption and incompetence of the government.
  11. 11. Wastes Public Funds Needlessly • In 2005, an estimate from the Home Office placed the cost of a "standalone" ID card at £30. • In 2009, it was announced that retailers would be collecting fingerprints and photographs, and that they would be able to charge for this, meaning that the total cost for a standalone ID card was expected to be up to £60.
  12. 12. Is there a case for other UIDs to not be scrapped?
  13. 13. References • Act_2006#Criticism • • election_2010/8678233.stm • ript.htm