Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Avoiding Environmental Acquisition Landmines

268 views

Published on

Antea Group presented at the recent SIGMA Maintenance Environmental & Safety Share Group on potential pitfalls during environmental acquisitions, how to avoid them, and evaluating and quantifying liabilities.

Published in: Environment
  • Login to see the comments

  • Be the first to like this

Avoiding Environmental Acquisition Landmines

  1. 1. SIGMA Maintenance, Environmental & Safety Share Group September 2016 San Antonio, Texas Maintenance & Environmental Acquisition Landmines
  2. 2. Perspectives and fine print Maintenance & Environmental Acquisition Pitfalls 1Antea USA, Inc.
  3. 3. 1. Warm-up 2. Understanding the Deal 3. Defining Liabilities 4. Quantifying Liabilities 5. Other considerations 6. Portfolio Integration Agenda Maintenance & Environmental Acquisition Pitfalls 2Antea USA, Inc.
  4. 4. What are some pitfalls that you have come across during Acquisitions? Warm-up Maintenance & Environmental Acquisition Pitfalls 3Antea USA, Inc.
  5. 5. Pitfall #1: Unclear understanding of the Deal Maintenance & Environmental Acquisition Pitfalls 4Antea USA, Inc.
  6. 6. • Type of Transaction • Asset portfolio • Stakeholders and the Deal Team • Liability Types and accountability • Accessing asset information • Confidentiality • Seller provided information • Asset inspection • Reliable public sources of information Educate yourself – Pre-planning considerations Understanding the Deal 5Antea USA, Inc.
  7. 7. Pitfall #2: Overlooking liabilities Maintenance & Environmental Acquisition Pitfalls 6Antea USA, Inc.
  8. 8. Types of EHS Liabilities – know where to focus Defining Liabilities 7Antea USA, Inc. Compliance Remediation Third Party Obligations Civil, Criminal & Punitive Natural Resource Damage Occupational H&S Abatement
  9. 9. Typical Liabilities Based on Transaction Type Defining Liabilities 8Antea USA, Inc. Real Estate Acquisition Business Unit Acquisition Business Merger or Acquisition Joint Venture, Leveraged Buyout Credit Facility (Collateral)
  10. 10. Other Factors Affecting the Evaluation Defining Liabilities 9Antea USA, Inc. Or…
  11. 11. Pitfall #3: Not all liabilities can be defined Maintenance & Environmental Pitfalls 10Antea USA, Inc.
  12. 12. Collecting Information Quantifying Liabilities 11Antea USA, Inc. 1) Review of Seller-provided documents 2) Review of publicly available information 4) Visual inspection of selected assets 5) Visual inspection of all assets 7) Intrusive Assessments 3) Use Commercial Database Services 6) Phase I ESA (under ASTM)
  13. 13. • Typically in a data room • May require the buyer to acknowledge that it has reviewed and accepted the seller’s information as complete disclosure. • Important that the buyer review all information provided by the seller 1) Seller Provided Documentation Collecting Information 12Antea USA, Inc. PROS • Inexpensive, fast, potential to identify wide range of property and corporate liabilities • Can effectively communicate large amounts of data • All parties have access to the same information CONS • Information controlled by Seller • Difficult to verify and to glean relevant data • Difficult to establish timelines and historical significance of documents • Seller may limit ability to copy or download • Seller can restrict time allowed for review in competitive bidding and auctions
  14. 14. • Obtained anonymously or through information requests (FOIA). • If public-held company, utilize annual reports and SEC filings • Regulatory Agency Databases and files through on-line access points or FOIA requests; Keyword and topical searches on-line; Local Government archives for historical and building information 2) Review publicly available information Collecting Information 13Antea USA, Inc. PROS • Inexpensive if on-line or electronic means utilized • Can be performed anonymously • Buyer can control information sources CONS • Need key information about each asset • Information is often incomplete or dated • Proprietary data will not show in searches • Cannot be anonymous if using FOIA request • Some files must be viewed in-person
  15. 15. • Provide environmental and other types of information filtered by geographic coordinates (i.e. radius reports) • Examples: EDR, ERS, ERIS 3) Commercial database services Collecting Information 14Antea USA, Inc. PROS • Meets requirements for AAI • Maintains anonymity • Search criteria widely accepted, repeatable, recognized, and consistent • Ability to geocode the information saves considerable search time • Some unique and proprietary databases are available CONS • Exact location information is needed • Geocoding can be unreliable • Can contain irrelevant and repetitive data • Source databases don’t translate well • Often incomplete or dated results • Data on multi-tenant sites and government installations can be jumbled and confusing
  16. 16. • Visual inspection of selected representative assets • Visual inspection of all assets • Often performed in conjunction with historical reviews and databases • Adds confidence to database searches 4) & 5) Visual Inspections Collecting Information 15Antea USA, Inc. PROS • Most effective way to observe and confirm site information and operations • Fills an important requirement to meet the standards for all appropriate inquiry CONS • Time consuming and expensive for teams to reach remote sites • The brief inspection “snapshot” may not give a reliable picture of typical facility operation • Confidentiality and anonymity are difficult to maintain
  17. 17. • Site-specific implementation of a program to collect samples of soil, ground water, surface water, building materials and other materials • Testing could include equipment and structures (such as tanks) 7) Intrusive Assessments Collecting Information 16Antea USA, Inc. PROS • Reliable, conservative approach leaves little to speculation • Results can inform further action and likely to be accepted by regulatory agency if action plan is needed CONS • Investigations can get expensive • Time is needed which may not be practical within an aggressive due diligence period • Competitive disadvantage in an auction bid • Creation of affect media information could require disclosure to regulatory agencies; • Potential damage and disruption of property • Difficult to remain anonymous/ confidential
  18. 18. Collecting Information Quantifying Liabilities 17Antea USA, Inc. 1) Review of Seller-provided documents 2) Review of publicly available info 4) Visual inspection of selected assets 5) Visual inspection of all assets 7) Intrusive Assessments 3) Use Commercial Database Services 6) Phase I ESA (under ASTM)
  19. 19. • Screen all documents made available by the Seller • Use the level of materiality to focus on relevant liabilities • Tabulate all material findings and liabilities and separate those that are accruable (can reserve) • Speak the language of the decision makers • What are costs? • When and how will they be paid? • Handling of non-compliance issues Evaluating and Quantifying Liabilities Quantifying Liabilities 18Antea USA, Inc.
  20. 20. Pitfall #4: An ASTM Phase I is always required Maintenance & Environmental Acquisition Pitfalls 19Antea USA, Inc. E1527-13
  21. 21. • Most common method for addressing potential liabilities where site inspections possible • Evaluation process is widely recognized and accepted • Buyers of real estate protected from Superfund liability by performing all appropriate inquiry (AAI), no benefits to leaseholders or Sellers • Only satisfies the CERCLA AAI requirement • Non-ASTM scope considerations must be added to identify compliance concerns and hazardous building materials • Poorly-written evaluations can identify environmental conditions that are not significant or risky Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Quantifying Liabilities 20Antea USA, Inc.
  22. 22. Pitfall #5: You can rely on previous Phase Is Maintenance & Environmental Acquisition Pitfalls 21Antea USA, Inc.
  23. 23. • Liability evaluation is project/client-specific – single point in time Reliance by Multiple Stakeholders Quantifying Liabilities 22Antea USA, Inc. • Risk tolerance levels are project/client-specific • Reliance agreements are best negotiated at the beginning of a transaction so the requirements of all stakeholders can be considered
  24. 24. Pitfall #6: All consultants are created equal Maintenance & Environmental Acquisition Pitfalls 23Antea USA, Inc.
  25. 25. • This is not a time for commodity pricing • There is no such thing as over- communicating • When it comes to quantifying risk, question the certainty of a single number • The “state” of compliance for assets/equipment is quantifiable • They should have a plan for handling inconsistent data • There are no standard “REC” categories Key Considerations when hiring consultants Quantifying Liabilities 24Antea USA, Inc.
  26. 26. Pitfall #7: This is a “one and done” project Maintenance & Environmental Acquisition Pitfalls 25Antea USA, Inc.
  27. 27. • The Goal of Integration Align the newly acquired EHS organization to the existing organization and culture while maintaining the necessary EHS programs • Every transaction presents unique situations – the integration strategy must be flexible • Integration is bigger than EHS team • Leverage your Consultant to learn about the Seller’s EH&S team The importance of Integration (for EH&S) Portfolio Integration 26Antea USA, Inc.
  28. 28. • Look at Management System functions as a guide • Interviews with Key staff • Identify important organization and procedural issues to review • Establish some metrics • Determine how identified liabilities will be handled Preparing for Integration Portfolio Integration 27Antea USA, Inc.
  29. 29. • The due diligence assessment process may identify previously unknown liabilities (non-compliance and contamination) known only to the acquiring EHS Team • Develop a corrective action plan • Assign responsibilities • Develop schedule for completion • Determine non-compliance items that need to be disclosed to the agency • The seller may be at risk if the buyer identifies liabilities that create an agency notification requirement Post-transaction priorities Portfolio Integration 28Antea USA, Inc.
  30. 30. During your investigation, you identify a discoverable incident and your Contractor is legally obliged to report it. During your investigation, you find historic use of “methyl-ethyl death” (something other than petroleum). Example: a site used PCE historically and no investigation was conducted, was then bought/sold and now used as retail fuel operations. PCE impact could be out there. Do you assess for PCE? Would it vary by state? Would you use as potential leverage tool in liability quantification/purchase price negotiations? Ask for an indemnification? The property has historic use of petroleum before UST Regs by EPA, and no subsurface investigations ever conducted. During your site visit, you identify significant staining, numerous regulatory violations or releases that could be indicative of subpar management/compliance. Same comment as above, but the state has LUST Trust Fund. Other Pitfalls Maintenance & Environmental Acquisition Pitfalls 29Antea USA, Inc.
  31. 31. BET TER BUSINESS, BET TER WORL D℠ Antea Group Offices USA Headquarters 5910 Rice Creek Parkway, Suite 100 St. Paul, MN 55126, USA USA Toll Free: +1 800 477 7411 International: +1 651 639 9443 Belgium Roderveldlaan 1 2600 Antwerpen Colombia Calle 35 No. 7-25, Piso 12 Bogota, DC France 29 avenue Aristide Briand - CS 10006 94117 Arcueil Cedex Netherlands Monitorweg 29 1322 BK Almere www.anteagroup.com

×