Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
MICHIGANMANUFACTURINGCORPORATION :THE PONTIACPLANT, 1988 CASESTUDY
MMC                                  HED      The      Pontiac                     8 others                    1 New      ...
HEAVY EQUIPMENT DIVISION This division of MMC mainly focused on Transportation Industry. Its main components were on- an...
COMPLEXITY Complexity of Plant Manager’s Job Depends on the products  produced in the plant. 3 Levels of complexity is d...
PRODUCT LINE It is the very important measure of complexity. There are three Product Lines in HED :-    On- Highway Axl...
PRODUCT FAMILIES Different families typically required unique routing while on  product line. The Pontiac plant made :- ...
PRODUCT MODEL A Product Family can comprise of models up to 20 types. They follow same routing but require different too...
HED PLANTS
DIVISIONAL MAIN CONCERN Managing the Division’s complex set of manufacturing families. Whether to sell plant and machine...
THE PONTIAC PLANT It is the oldest plant of MMC. Over the time profitable products were shifted to other dedicated  plan...
FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF PONTIACPLANT
FACTORS CAUSING POORPERFORMANCE Allen, the newly appointed plant manager, determined some  contributing factors for decre...
INVESTMENT The investment and depreciation
MACHINE TOOLS Variety of machine tools were used. Due to antiqueness of tools and low volume per model setup time,  gene...
THE PLANT A 1986 report had stated- Electric system is inadequate. The sewer system is springing leaks. Plant is below...
LABOR Union – UAW, America. Machine operators were skilled workers. Main problems were-    Bad labor habits had develo...
POLARIZATION
OVERHEAD It is significantly higher than of other plants Allen felt the factors are –    increasing maintenance costs  ...
PRODUCT COSTS A uniform product costing system. In this system a uniform cost of product is decided irrespective of  pla...
THE PONTIAC PLANT STUDYGROUPA feasibility study was conducted ,under Allen, to evaluatealternatives for pontiac. The team ...
STUDY GROUPS
It was also realized that the plant’s visible overhead were very veryless compared to the others. But the numbers were aga...
COMMENTS ABOUT GROUP-1Price increase of the products          10%Avg. Direct Labor Saving                5%Materials Cost ...
COMMENTS ABOUT GROUP 2Direct Labor Savings         6%Materials Savings            1%Tooling Cost                 $5.5 mill...
COMMENTS ABOUT GP-3 The Direct Labor content is too high. Volume is just too low. Can be produced at any other plant at...
ALTERNATIVE FOR THE PONTIACPLANT Closing can bring $2 million. Employee termination cost $3 million. If kept , maintena...
A NEW PLANT. Savings $1.5 m per year based on Pontiac Invest in plant and tooling $18.5 million. Start up cost $3 milli...
UAW LETTER TO NOELLE ALLEN What is the purpose of the “feasibility studies” of Pontiac Plant ,  what does this study cons...
3 MAJOR ALTERNATIVES IN FRONT OFALLEN Close the plant as soon as possible and transfer products to the  other plants Inv...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Michigan manufacturing corporation. case pptx

1,590 views

Published on

This PPT is for a case on the above topic and it is basically a summary of case
you can solve the case by seeing only it.

Published in: Business
  • Digitalessay.net is a good website if you’re looking to get your essay written for you. You can also request things like research papers or dissertations. It’s really convenient and helpful. If you’ve got something very last-minute then it can be a little risky but either way it’s probably better than anything you can throw together :).
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Be the first to like this

Michigan manufacturing corporation. case pptx

  1. 1. MICHIGANMANUFACTURINGCORPORATION :THE PONTIACPLANT, 1988 CASESTUDY
  2. 2. MMC HED The Pontiac 8 others 1 New Plant*The Plants are Specialized by Product lines to minimize fixed investment.
  3. 3. HEAVY EQUIPMENT DIVISION This division of MMC mainly focused on Transportation Industry. Its main components were on- and off- highway axles, brakes , Drive train and Suspension components. MMC profit had been declining for 3 years, therefore HED is under pressure to perform well. Different plants are fractioned on the basis of complexity.
  4. 4. COMPLEXITY Complexity of Plant Manager’s Job Depends on the products produced in the plant. 3 Levels of complexity is defined in HED-  Product Line  Product families  Product Model
  5. 5. PRODUCT LINE It is the very important measure of complexity. There are three Product Lines in HED :-  On- Highway Axles (6 Plants)  Off-Highway Axles (3 Plants)  Brakes (2 Plants) The Table of Which is given by (Exhibit 1)
  6. 6. PRODUCT FAMILIES Different families typically required unique routing while on product line. The Pontiac plant made :-  most of the Low volume families  Prototypes for new products  Replacement parts for the old one.
  7. 7. PRODUCT MODEL A Product Family can comprise of models up to 20 types. They follow same routing but require different tooling or according to customer’s need. Each of the plants has to be stand alone in terms of profitability. Major Concern was return on assets employed.
  8. 8. HED PLANTS
  9. 9. DIVISIONAL MAIN CONCERN Managing the Division’s complex set of manufacturing families. Whether to sell plant and machinery to customers or keeping the plant open and transferring in products from saginaw. HED’s product line, which expanded inexorably.
  10. 10. THE PONTIAC PLANT It is the oldest plant of MMC. Over the time profitable products were shifted to other dedicated plants. The pontiac plant remained with  Low volume products- 60% On-Highway and 40% off-Highway  Replacement parts for all the old one.
  11. 11. FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF PONTIACPLANT
  12. 12. FACTORS CAUSING POORPERFORMANCE Allen, the newly appointed plant manager, determined some contributing factors for decreasing performance of plant while she was division controller for 5 years. These are- o Investment o Machine Tools o The Plant o Labor o Overhead o Product Costs
  13. 13. INVESTMENT The investment and depreciation
  14. 14. MACHINE TOOLS Variety of machine tools were used. Due to antiqueness of tools and low volume per model setup time, generally ,run 10 times then for a making of part. Average age of machine tools at  Pontiac plant- 33.1 years  HED- 15.9 years
  15. 15. THE PLANT A 1986 report had stated- Electric system is inadequate. The sewer system is springing leaks. Plant is below our insurance standards. Thus plant needs major improvements increasing overhead cost.
  16. 16. LABOR Union – UAW, America. Machine operators were skilled workers. Main problems were-  Bad labor habits had developed over the years  Absenteeism and turnover  Polarization among employee  Culture and expectations changed  Wages are higher than new employees.
  17. 17. POLARIZATION
  18. 18. OVERHEAD It is significantly higher than of other plants Allen felt the factors are –  increasing maintenance costs  Past-service pension ($648,000 expense in 1987) The previous manager once said “Many of these retired employees had worked on products that had later transferred to other, yet the pension expense remained with the pontiac plant.”
  19. 19. PRODUCT COSTS A uniform product costing system. In this system a uniform cost of product is decided irrespective of plant. In this Process all new technology plants are in benefit as cost of production is less than pontiac plant.
  20. 20. THE PONTIAC PLANT STUDYGROUPA feasibility study was conducted ,under Allen, to evaluatealternatives for pontiac. The team put the pontiac plant’s products inthree general groups: On-highway axles that are economically worth continuing to produce. Off-highway axles that are worth continuing. Both on- and off-highway axles that are not economically justified.
  21. 21. STUDY GROUPS
  22. 22. It was also realized that the plant’s visible overhead were very veryless compared to the others. But the numbers were against pontiacand the stay wasn’t justified and some considerations were also tobe made before that, Employees. Customers. Competitors. MMC’s situation.A feasible short term initiative was required to make place moreprofitable before making any longer range plans.
  23. 23. COMMENTS ABOUT GROUP-1Price increase of the products 10%Avg. Direct Labor Saving 5%Materials Cost Savings 2%Tooling Cost 8.5 million $ Fully Loading the volume of our underutilised plants for better advantage of economics of Scale.
  24. 24. COMMENTS ABOUT GROUP 2Direct Labor Savings 6%Materials Savings 1%Tooling Cost $5.5 millionIncremental Overhead costs $420k / year/ plant
  25. 25. COMMENTS ABOUT GP-3 The Direct Labor content is too high. Volume is just too low. Can be produced at any other plant at lower cost than Pontiac. The Question is : If we drop the axle what do we do for our customers ?
  26. 26. ALTERNATIVE FOR THE PONTIACPLANT Closing can bring $2 million. Employee termination cost $3 million. If kept , maintenance would cost $1-2 million/year. Remaining time till it falls apart 6-10 years.
  27. 27. A NEW PLANT. Savings $1.5 m per year based on Pontiac Invest in plant and tooling $18.5 million. Start up cost $3 million.
  28. 28. UAW LETTER TO NOELLE ALLEN What is the purpose of the “feasibility studies” of Pontiac Plant , what does this study consist of , and will the union be offered the opportunities to see the results ? When and if this study is completed will the union members be notified of its results and will they have the opportunity to voice their opinions before any official decisions made about the plant’s future ?
  29. 29. 3 MAJOR ALTERNATIVES IN FRONT OFALLEN Close the plant as soon as possible and transfer products to the other plants Invest in plant’s tooling as an attempt to develop a viable operation for at least the next 5-10 years. Build a new plant.What are your suggestions?

×