Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Why do we need to model the science system?

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 16 Ad

More Related Content

Similar to Why do we need to model the science system? (20)

More from Andrea Scharnhorst (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

Why do we need to model the science system?

  1. 1. “Why do we need to model the science system?” Talk at the seminar of the Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Sciences, June 2, 2016 Andrea Scharnhorst, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, DANS
  2. 2. Story line • How got I roped into this? • What kind of models do we hunt for? • There is no one model of science – but there is also not really an overview about them or a tool box • Why do we need them? • Do we have enough good data for predictive models of science dynamic? • Modeling and measuring of science – living apart together • Barriers and actions • If only I had ….
  3. 3. A Map of Science and a journey
  4. 4. System-Umwelt-Grenze Teilsystem 1 Teilsystem i Teilsystem j 0 Di 0 Di 1 Ai 0 Aij 0, Mij Aij 1 x1 xi xj Ai 1 CijBij Physics Economics DataScience Education Scientific schools Retirement Fieldmobility Ebeling, W., Scharnhorst, A. (1986) Selforganization Models for Field Mobility of Physicists. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B36 , pp. 43-46. Bruckner, E., Ebeling, W., Scharnhorst, A. (1990) The Application of Evolution Models in Scientometrics. Scientometrics 18 (1-2), pp. 21-41 Darwinian selection among scientific fields
  5. 5. One model, two models, many models … Elementary unit: researcher, group, invisible college, papers, journals, institutions, Phenomenon: growth of scientific fields, the journal market, the flows of citations, the structure of collaborative networks, the boundary conditions for a successful individual career, ….
  6. 6. Proposed funding systemIllustrations of the existing (left) and the proposed (right) funding systems, with reviewers in blue and investigators in red. Johan Bollen et al. EMBO Rep. doi:10.1002/embr.201338068 ©2014 by European Molecular Biology Organization Reasonswhyweneedmodels Proposalcrisis
  7. 7. List of full professors in the Netherlands with an expertise tag (D category) which is seldom ! Rare expertise types among the full professors In The Netherlands BUT: we tag the person expertise build a hierarchical system ….. Reasonswhyweneedmodels Thefunctionofsmallfields
  8. 8. Communication Text Actors words journals references authors institutions countries… Co-word maps Semantic maps (Callon, Rip, White) Citation environments of journals (Leydesdorff) Maps of science (Boyack, Börner, Klavans; Leydesdorff, Rafols) Bibliographic coupling Citation networks Co-citation networks (Marshokova, Small/Griffith) Productivity (Lotka) Coauthorship (…..) Disciplinary profiles Performance Impact (…..) International collaboration (…..) What is a topic? What is a paradigm? What are fields and disciplines? What are the hot areas and research fronts? What are the knowledge flows? Core and periphery of knowledge exchange in a globalized economy Biographies, key player, Individual vs group dynamics Key players, evaluation Meaning of a citation, deeper understanding of knwoledge flows Sentiment of citations Small, Thelwall, Boyack… Theapplicationofamodel isonlyasgoodas…
  9. 9. Measuring and modelling the sciences Stochastic processes & indicators Science maps, network analytics & epidemic processes Hirsh index Lucio-Arias, D., & Scharnhorst, A. (2012). Mathematical Approaches to Modeling Science from an Algorithmic-Historiography Perspective. In A. Scharnhorst, K. Börner, & P. van den Besselaar (Eds.), Models of Science Dynamics (pp. 23–66). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23068-4_2
  10. 10. Barriers
  11. 11. Vision Evidence based policy advice Science model laboratory Science observatory Science in society interface
  12. 12. On the way… • Workshops to raise awareness • Special issues, books, review articles • Data mining and data visualisation • Interaction with stakeholders in science policy
  13. 13. Informa on Professionals/ Informa on Scien sts Social Scien sts Computer Scien sts Physics/Mathema cs Digital Humani es Information professionals • Collections, Information retrieval • WG 1 Phenomenology of knowledge spaces • WG 4 Data curation & navigation Social scientists • Simulating user behavior • WG 2 Theory of knowledge spaces • WG 4 Data curation & navigation Computer scientists • Semantic web, data models • WG 1 Phenomenology of Knowledge Spaces • WG 4 Data curation &navigation Physicists, mathematicians Digital humanities scholars • Collections, interactive design • WG 3 Visual analytics – knowledge maps • WG 4 Data curation & navigation Participating communities • Structure & evolution of complex knowledge spaces, big data mining • WG 2 Theory of knowledge spaces • WG 3 Visual analytics – knowledge maps www.knowescape.org
  14. 14. Digital Humanities as transient innovation With Sally Wyatt, June 2015
  15. 15. dans.knaw.nl DANS is an institute of KNAW en NWO Thanks for your attention! Andrea.scharnhorst@dans.knaw.nl Twitter: @knowescape; Mendeley

×