Evrim Gözener
Miami University was founded in 1809 in the small town of Oxford, Ohio.  It has enrollment of  around 15.000 undergraduate...
Vision of Miami University;  To provide quality, friendly and timely service and to create an atmosphere of shared respons...
MISION AND VISION STATEMENT ANALYSIS <ul><li>Mision of Miami University;  </li></ul><ul><li>The advancement of learning th...
MISION AND VISION STATEMENT ANALYSIS Costomers Yes Products or services Yes Markets No Technology Yes Concern for survival...
CPM MATRIX   Miami  University University of  Virginia University of  Michigan Critical Success Factors  W R Sc R Sc R Sc ...
EFE MATRIX of MIAMI UNIVERSITY Key External Factors Weight Rating W. Score OPPORTUNUTIES       Government support 0.20 4 0...
IFE MATRIX of MIAMI UNIVERSITY Key External Factors Weight Rating W. Score STRENGTH       Brand image of university 0.10 4...
SWOT MATRIX <ul><li>SO Strategies </li></ul><ul><li>New building required </li></ul><ul><li>WO Strategies </li></ul><ul><l...
SPACE MATRIX SPACE FACTORS INTERNAL STRATEGY  POSITION EXTERNAL STRATEGY POSITION FINANCIAL STRENGTH (FS) ENVIRONMENTAL ST...
SPACE MATRIX SPACE FACTORS INTERNAL STRATEGY POSITION EXTERNAL STRATEGY POSITION COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE (CA) INDUSTRY STREN...
SPACE MATRIX <ul><li>Competetive Strategies </li></ul><ul><li>Backward Integration </li></ul><ul><li>Horizantal Integratio...
IE MATRIX <ul><li>Backward Integration </li></ul><ul><li>Horizantal Integration </li></ul><ul><li>Forward Integration </li...
GRAND STRATEGY MATRIX <ul><li>Related Diversification </li></ul><ul><li>Unrelated Diversification </li></ul><ul><li>Joint ...
QSPM Stategic Alternnatives 1 2 New Buildings Required Reduce Fee Key Factors Weight AS TAS AS TAS STRENGTH           Bran...
QSPM OPPORTUNUTIES           Government support 0.20 4 0.80 3 0.60 Private endowment and charities 0.15 1 0.15 3 0.45 High...
In Conclusion Our Strategy is; Reduce fee and admit the students of all classes including middle class people so that ever...
THANK YOU =)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

The Case of Miami University_Evrim Gözener

5,418 views

Published on

Published in: Education
1 Comment
4 Likes
Statistics
Notes
No Downloads
Views
Total views
5,418
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
11
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
1
Likes
4
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

The Case of Miami University_Evrim Gözener

  1. 1. Evrim Gözener
  2. 2. Miami University was founded in 1809 in the small town of Oxford, Ohio. It has enrollment of around 15.000 undergraduates and its located just 35 miles of Cincinnati. The landscape of Miami consists of numerous red brick buildings and it’s considered one of the most beautiful campuses in the nation. The held educated students by developing, maintaining and supporting safe, functional and attractive campuses for Miami University.
  3. 3. Vision of Miami University; To provide quality, friendly and timely service and to create an atmosphere of shared responsibility in which all employees have the opprtunity to contribute to process of improving the service that to provide the customers . MISION AND VISION STATEMENT ANALYSIS
  4. 4. MISION AND VISION STATEMENT ANALYSIS <ul><li>Mision of Miami University; </li></ul><ul><li>The advancement of learning throught teaching, scholarship and service to society : by offering to outstanding undergraduate and graduate students the best education available; by carrying out scholarly activities judged to be excellent when measured against the highest international standards; in those ways for which are well-studied by virtue of the academic strengths . </li></ul>
  5. 5. MISION AND VISION STATEMENT ANALYSIS Costomers Yes Products or services Yes Markets No Technology Yes Concern for survival, growth and profitability No Philosophy Yes Self – concept No Concern for public image Yes Concern for employees No
  6. 6. CPM MATRIX   Miami University University of Virginia University of Michigan Critical Success Factors W R Sc R Sc R Sc Advertisement 0.20 2 0.4 2 0.4 2 0.4 Servicve Quality 0.10 4 0.4 3 0.3 2 0.2 Fee Competition 0.10 3 0.3 4 0.4 3 0.3 Managemet 0.10 3 0.3 2 0.2 4 0.4 Financial Position 0.15 3 0.45 2 0.3 1 0.15 Loyalty 0.10 2 0.2 3 0.3 3 0.30 Market Share 0.25 4 0.1 3 0.75 2 0.5 TOTAL 1.00   3,05   2,65   2,25
  7. 7. EFE MATRIX of MIAMI UNIVERSITY Key External Factors Weight Rating W. Score OPPORTUNUTIES       Government support 0.20 4 0.80 Private endowment and charities 0.15 3 0.45 High employment ratio 0.10 4 0.40 Student exchange programs 0.10 2 0.20 Online fulltime education system 0.10 3 0.30 Strong relationships with social societies 0.05 3 0.15 THREATS       Reduce subsidiary due high enrollment (up to 16.000) 0.10 2 0.20 Negative public perception (too white, too rich, too expensive) 0.10 3 0.30 Perception of p e ople (only liberal art) 0.10 2 0.20 TOTAL 1.00   3.00
  8. 8. IFE MATRIX of MIAMI UNIVERSITY Key External Factors Weight Rating W. Score STRENGTH       Brand image of university 0.10 4 0.4 Graduate rate 64% per year 0.05 3 0.15 Enrollment raitio increase every year 0.10 4 0.4 Top rank in 21 universities in the USA 0.05 4 0.2 75% full time and part time PhD Faculty 0.15 3 0.45 Most frequent class size 20-30 0.10 4 0.4 Decentrilized System 0.05 3 0.15 Business realted education 0.05 3 0.15 WEAKNESS       Expensive 0.10 2 0.2 Low ratio of higher education 0.05 1 0.05 Hamilton and Midtown Campuses aren't residential 0.05 2 0.1 High fees 0.05 2 0.1 High strength of students from same state 0.10 2 0.2 TOTAL 1.00   2,95
  9. 9. SWOT MATRIX <ul><li>SO Strategies </li></ul><ul><li>New building required </li></ul><ul><li>WO Strategies </li></ul><ul><li>Built new residential campus </li></ul><ul><li>ST Strategies </li></ul><ul><li>Strict admission policy could be implement to control the enrollment ratio </li></ul><ul><li>WT Strategies </li></ul><ul><li>Reduce fee </li></ul>
  10. 10. SPACE MATRIX SPACE FACTORS INTERNAL STRATEGY POSITION EXTERNAL STRATEGY POSITION FINANCIAL STRENGTH (FS) ENVIRONMENTAL STABILITY (ES) Fee & Other Charges 6 Technological Changes -4 Federal Grant 4 Rate of inflation -5 State & Local Grant 3 Fee of competing institutions -4 Endewment Income 2     Alumni 3     Other Sources 2       3,3   -4,3
  11. 11. SPACE MATRIX SPACE FACTORS INTERNAL STRATEGY POSITION EXTERNAL STRATEGY POSITION COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE (CA) INDUSTRY STRENGTH (IS) Market share -3 Growth potential 5 Servicve quality -2 Financial stability 6 Loyalty -1 Technological know how 6 Competition capacity utilization -1 Resources utilization 3 Technology -1 Goodwill 3           -1,6   4,6
  12. 12. SPACE MATRIX <ul><li>Competetive Strategies </li></ul><ul><li>Backward Integration </li></ul><ul><li>Horizantal Integration </li></ul><ul><li>Forward Integration </li></ul><ul><li>Market Penetration </li></ul><ul><li>Market Development </li></ul><ul><li>Product Development </li></ul>
  13. 13. IE MATRIX <ul><li>Backward Integration </li></ul><ul><li>Horizantal Integration </li></ul><ul><li>Forward Integration </li></ul><ul><li>Market Penetration </li></ul><ul><li>Market Development </li></ul><ul><li>Product Development </li></ul>
  14. 14. GRAND STRATEGY MATRIX <ul><li>Related Diversification </li></ul><ul><li>Unrelated Diversification </li></ul><ul><li>Joint Ventures </li></ul>
  15. 15. QSPM Stategic Alternnatives 1 2 New Buildings Required Reduce Fee Key Factors Weight AS TAS AS TAS STRENGTH           Brand image of university 0.10 4 0.40 4 0.40 Graduate rate 64% per year 0.05 2 0.10 3 0.15 Enrollment raitio increase every year 0.10 1 0.10 2 0.20 Top rank in 21 universities in the USA 0.05 2 0.10 4 0.20 75% full time and part time PhD Faculty 0.15 2 0.30 4 0.60 Most frequent class size 20-30 0.10 4 0.40 2 0.20 Decentrilized System 0.05 4 0.20 2 0.10 Business realted education 0.05 3 0.15 3 0.15 WEAKNESS           Expensive 0.10 2 0.20 2 0.20 Low ratio of higher education 0.05 1 0.05 1 0.05 Hamilton and Midtown Campuses aren't residential 0.05 4 0.20 2 0.10 High fees 0.05 3 0.15 3 0.15 High strength of students from same state 0.10 3 0.10 2 0.20 TOTAL 1.00        
  16. 16. QSPM OPPORTUNUTIES           Government support 0.20 4 0.80 3 0.60 Private endowment and charities 0.15 1 0.15 3 0.45 High employment ratio 0.10 2 0.20 2 0.20 Student exchange programs 0.10 2 0.20 3 0.30 Online fulltime education system 0.10 1 0.10 2 0.20 Strong relationships with social societies 0.05 2 0.10 2 0.10 THREATS           Reduce subsidiary due high enrollment (up to 16.000) 0.10 2 0.20 2 0.20 Negative public perception (too white, too rich, too expensive) 0.10 1 0.10 1 0.10 Perception of prople (only liberal art) 0.10 4 0.40 2 0.20 TOTAL 1.00   4,70   4,95
  17. 17. In Conclusion Our Strategy is; Reduce fee and admit the students of all classes including middle class people so that every talented person can got the education even a poor person who can’t bear the fee of their study.
  18. 18. THANK YOU =)

×