Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Lte latam 2016 v2.5a


Published on

Intends to provide a description of overall benefits about SDN and NFV in Mobile Network Architecture and its Evolution to 5G. Also, brigs to a discussion some concerns and open questions, such as transport, architecture, standardization, security, performance etc.

Published in: Technology
  • Be the first to comment

Lte latam 2016 v2.5a

  1. 1. Challenges and Lessons Learned: Evolution of the Mobile Network Architecture for NFV / SDN Network Technology Strategy Department Alberto Boaventura 2016-04-06 Rio de Janeiro - Brazil April, 6th 2016 LTE LATAM 2016
  2. 2. Traffic Reveue Voice Data Changes ... Rapid and consistent mobile broadband consolidation, doubling year over year, will bring a tsunami of data traffic, representing in 2020 1000x of the traffic in 2010. Mobile Data Traffic Dozens of billions of connected devices foreseen by industry (GSMA, Ovum, MachinaResearch etc.) on upcoming decade. Internet of Things All customer requirements are not equal. It is worthwhile to discover which attributes of a product or service are more important to the customer. Negative perception of services is the major reasons for changing of service provider Customer Experience Main broadband dilemma: Traffic and Revenue decoupling. It brings a continuous research for cost effective and affordable solutions. Flat Revenue 1000x
  3. 3. ...Challenges More Spectrum: Licensed, Shared or Unlicensed; New Technology; New Cell Site; Spectral Efficiency; Spatial Efficiency; Interference Control; Capacity & Resource Management More Capacity; More Elasticity; More Resiliency; More Granularity; Low latency; Self Organized; Synchronization; Service and Network State Awareness; Network Slicing; Architecture Evolution Multiple technologies and costs; Service, technology and spectrum balancing; Device subsidy; Spectrum refarming; Lifecycle Management + vs vs ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 256QAM
  4. 4. Next Generation Mobile Network (NGMN) 5G Vision USE CASES BUSINESS MODEL VALUE CREATION Asset Provider Connectivity Provider Partner Service Provider XaaS; IaaS; NaaS; PaaS Network Sharing Basic Connectivity Enhanced Connectivity Operator Offer Enriched by Partner Parter Offer Enriched by Operator Broadband Access in Dense Areas Broadband Access Everywhere Higher User Mobility Massive Internet of Things Extreme Real-Time Communications Lifeline Communications Ultra-reliable Communications Broadcast-like Services HIGH RELIABLE AND FLEXIBLE NETWORK SERVICEEXPERIENCETRUST Security Identity Privacy RealTime Seamless Personalized Interaction& Charging QoS Context “5G is an end-to-end ecosystem to enable a fully mobile and connected society. It empowers value creation towards customers and partners, through existing and emerging use cases, delivered with consistent experience, and enabled by sustainable business models” Requirements Attribute 3GPP Release 12 NGMN Requiremnents Data rate per user Up to 100 Mbps on average Peaks of 600 Mbps (Cat11/12) > 10 X expected on average and peak rates > 100 X expected on cell edge End-toend latency 10 ms for two-way RAN (pre- scheduled) Typically up to 50 ms e2e I > 10X (smaller) Mobility Functional up to 350 km/h No support for civil aviation > 1,5 X Spectral Efficiency DL: 0,074-6,1 bps/Hz UL: 0.07-4.3 bps/Hz Pushing for substantial increase Connection Density 2000 Active Users/km2 > 100 X
  5. 5. 5G Potential Technologies 1=0º 1=45º 30 210 60 240 90 270 120 300 150 330 180 ... p1 p2 pN   Native M2M support  A massive number of connected devices with low throughput;  Low latency  Low power and battery consumption hnm h21 h12 h11  Higher MIMO order: 8X8 or more  System capacity increases in fucntion of number of antennas  Spatial-temporal modulation schemes  SINR optimization  Beamforming  Enables systems that illuminate and at the same time provide broadband wireless data connectivity  Transmitters: Uses off-the-shelf white light emitting diodes (LEDs) used for solid-state lighting (SSL);  Receivers: Off-the-shelf p-intrinsic-n (PIN) photodiodes (PDs) or aval anche photo-diodes (APDs) C-plane (RRC) Phantom Celll Macro Cell F1 F2 F2>F1 U-plane D2D  Phantom Cell based architecture  Control Plane uses macro network  User Plane is Device to Device (D2D) in another frequency such as mm-Wave and high order modulation (256 QAM). Net Radio Core Cache  Access Network Caching  Network Virtualization Function  Cloud-RAN  Dynamic and Elastic Network  5G Non-Orthogonal Waveforms for Asynchronous Signalling (5GNOW)  Universal Filtered Multi-Carrier (UFMC) : Potential extension to OFDM ;  Filter Bank Multi Carrier (FBMC): Sustainability fragmented spectra.  Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (NOMA)  Sparse-Code Multiple Access (SCMA)  High modulation constellation MASSIVE MIMO SPATIAL MODULATION COGITIVE RADIO NETWORKS VISIBLE LIGHT COMMUNICATION DEVICE-CENTRIC ARCHITECTURE NATIVE SUPPORT FOR M2M CLOUD NETWORK & CACHE NEW MODULATION SCHEME  New protocol for shared spectrum rational use  Mitigate and avoid interference by surrounding radio environment and regulate its transmission accordingly.  In interference-free CR networks, CR users are allowed to borrow spectrum resources only when licensed users do not use them.
  6. 6. Why Virtualize?
  7. 7. Why SmallCells? 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 0,0 Mbps/km2 500,0 Mbps/km2 1000,0 Mbps/km2 1500,0 Mbps/km2 2000,0 Mbps/km2 0,250 km0,350 km0,450 km0,550 km DOWNTOWN: HIGH DENSITY TRAFFIC Coverage Radius Capacity 2015 Capacity 2016 Capacity 2017 A +63% C D +61% +54% B TECHNOLOGY ALTERNATIVES AND TOTAL COST OWNERSHIP $$$ $$$ $$$ $$$ $$$ $$$ 1 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 9 x 2600 MHz (10) +1800 MHz (5) +1800 MHz (10) SmallCell 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Legend Notes: 2600 MHz (10) : Basic Scenario; +1800 MHz (5): Additional 5 MHz; +1800 (10): Additional 10 MHz; SmallCell: Using 2600 MHz with 10 MHz TCO  A B C Indifference between Macro 1800 & 2600 MHz Macro LTE 1800 MHz for coverage Dual layer Macro LTE 1800 & 2600 MHz 181 265 890 SmallCell 2600 MHz 𝑴𝒃𝒑𝒔 𝒌𝒎 𝟐 X  DEMANDS Source: SmallCells Forum INDOOR TRAFFIC 39% 32% 14% 4% 11% In Car At Home At Work Travelling Others The indoor traffic density can be thousand times higher than outdoor: the number of persons per km2 in stadium, can reach 1 Million! If all persons upload video with 64 kbps, it represents 64 Gbps/km2 Voice Originating Call INDOOR LOST PERFORMANCE 0 bps/Hz 4 bps/Hz 8 bps/Hz 12 bps/Hz -130 dBm -110 dBm -90 dBm 3GPP (LTE) Shannon OutdoorIndoor Building Penetration Loss varies around 10-20 dB, that reduces around of 50% overall performance of outdoor macro sites; RSRP  50% and 80% of voice and data traffic respectively are performed indoor. ≈-50%
  8. 8. Why Centralizing? CAPACITY & COVERAGE: Centralized RAN acts as huge Base Station and can easily coordinate resources for interference avoiding by using functionalities such as CoMP and e-ICIC. CoMP and e-ICIC can together increase the system capacity in 30 times distributed network; C-RAN is also suitable for non-uniformly distributed traffic due to the load-balancing capability in the BBU pool. Though the serving RRH changes dynamically according to the movement of UEs, the serving BBU is still in the same BBU pool. 50% of voice traffic and 80% of data traffic are performed in indoor environment, and due concentrated traffic , indoor traffic density can represent 10-100 times outdoor environment; Centralized RAN can be optimal solution and accordingly to Airvana and it is 69% cheaper than DAS; TRANSMISSION & INFRASTRUCTURE: Algorithms such as e-ICIC and CoMP have tighter latency requirement below 10 micro seconds. In general IP backhaul transport cannot accomplish this latency level in X2 interface. Network Synchronization can be simplified by requiring synchronism in less centralized sites Currently almost LTE Cell Site is attended by fiber and DWDM is affordable solution for transport CPRI inside of lambdas. Space/Colocation, air conditioning and other site support equipment's power consumption can be largely reduced. China Mobile estimates a reduction of 71% of power saving comparing to Distributed Cell Site; ROLLOUT, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE : Faster system rollout due simpler remote cell site that reduces 1/3 comparing to Distributed RAN. Multi-Tenant BBUs are aggregated in a few big rooms, it is much easier for centralized management and operation, saving a lot of the O&M cost associated with the large number of BS sites in a traditional RAN network. TCO : Accordingly to China Mobile, 15% and 50% of CapEx and OpEx savings respectivelly comparing to Distributed RAN Core Net. BBU TDM IP BBU BBU Core Net. Fronthaul Backhaul IP BBU BBU BBU eICIC CoMP Distributed RAN Centralized RAN Coherent transm. & Non-Coherent transm. Instantaneous Cell Selection X2 X2 ABS Protected Subframe Aggressor Cell Victim Cell X2 Identifies interfered UE Requests ABS Configure s ABS ABS Info Measurement Subset Info Uses ABS and signalsPatern
  9. 9. Base Station Virtualization & Cloud RAN Architecture Fronthaul Interface Hardware Backplane Backhaul Interface Hardware Hardware Poll Virtualization Layer (Ex.: Hypervisor/VMM) VM BBU 1 VM BBU N Core Network Cache & Local Breakout ... O&M/Control/Orchestrator Fronthaul: CPRI, OBSAI, ETSI ORI Internet RRU/ RRH Radio Unit Network Datacenter Only Radio Unit Backhaul IP RRU/ RRH Backhaul Core Network BBU BBUBBU Internet RRU/ RRH RRU/ RRH GbE Existing Deployed Topology Fronthaul Internet V-BBUs V-Core RRU/ RRH RRU/ RRH RRU/ RRH CPRI/ OBSAI Cloud RAN Topology DEPLOYMENT PARADIGM CHANGE PRINCIPLES AND ADVANTAGES ARCHITECTURE Network Function Virtualization Elastic & liquid Resources Operational Flexibility Reduces space and power consumption Reduces CapEx, OpEx and delivery time Software Defined Network Creates an abstraction layer for: controlling; faster development ; system service orchestration and overall system evolution; Open Development Interface Creates an open environment for new development; Catalyzes new SON & interference mitigation functionalities support;
  10. 10. Role of SDN & NFV in Mobile Network Evolution
  11. 11. NETWORK FUNCTION VIRTUALIZATION WHy NFV & SDN? SDN applications SDN controllers Network Resources Programmatic control of abstracted network resources (application- control interface) Logically centralized control of network resources (resource- control interface) Source: ITU-T Y.3300 Acceleration of innovation: Accelerates business and/or technical innovation through more flexibility of the network operations, thus making trials easier; Accelerated adaptation to customer demands: Dynamic negotiation of network service characteristics and of dynamic network resource control; Improved resource availability : Improves network resource availability and efficiency, Service-aware networking: Allows network customization for the network services which have different requirements, through the programming of network resource operations, including the dynamic enforcement of a set of policies. Hardware Resources Virtualized Network Functions (VNFs) Virtualization Layer VNF ... NFVManagementand Orchestration Compute Storage Network NFV Infrastructure Virtual Compute Virtual Storage Virtual Network VNF VNF VNF CapEx: Reduces equipment costs by consolidation, leveraging the economies of scale; OpEx: Reduces power consumption, space and collocation costs, improved network monitoring. O&M: Improves operational efficiency by taking advantage of a homogeneous physical platform Deployment: Easily, rapidly, dynamically provision and instantiate new services in various locations (i.e. no need for new equipment install) Time to market: Minimizing a typical network operator cycle of innovation. Service differentiation: Rapidly prototype and test new services Source: ETSI NFV+SDN => MOBILE NETWORK SDN can enable, simplify and automate NFV implementation Mobile Network Simplification: Common functions optimized for RAN , EPC and transport . Traffic Optimization : Network status awareness allows to optimize traffic by observing e2e congestion level, system capacity and element capabilities. Resilience: SDN provides greater visibility at the network level, regardless of whether the network concept is Layer 2, Layer 3 or even Layer 4. Power Management: Power consumption of wireless network elements can be optimized in real-time. Spectrum and Interference Management: Opens a new range of interference mitigation and spectrum optimization techniques at the network level. SDN applications SDN controllers Network ResourcesHardware Resources Virtualized Network Functions (VNFs) Virtualization Layer VNF ... NFVManagementand Orchestration Compute Storage Network NFV Infrastructure Virtual Compute Virtual Storage Virtual Network VNF VNF VNF SOFTWARE DEFINED NETWORK
  12. 12. Base Station Virtualization in Phases CLOUD RANHETNETCENTRALIZED RANMULTI STANDARD RAN Multi-sector BBU or BBU Hotel Overall TCO (CapEx+OpEx) saving of New Cell Site Network elasticity based on resource pooled in a single BBU Network synchronization simplification Fronthaul Rollout Vendor consolidation MSR and SDR deployment 2G+3G+4G in single BBU CellSite Modernization IP Backhauling Lifecycle Management Optimization SmallCell Rollout Capacity improvement by using CoMP, eICIC, CA etc. Taking advantage of LTE-A & LTE-A PRO (Rel.11, Rel.12 and Rel. 13) Baseband pooled across BBU Using General Purpose HW EPC and Cloud RAN in a same Network Datacenter Core Net. 2G 3G 4G 2G 3G 4G 2G 3G 4G TDM IP Core Net. 2G +3G+4G TDM IP 2G +3G+4G 2G +3G+4G Core Net. BBU TDM IP BBU BBU Core Net. BBU Fronthaul Backhaul IP BBU BBU Core Net. BBU Fronthaul Backhaul IP BBU BBU Core Net. Fronthaul Backhaul IP BBU BBU BBU Core Net. Fronthaul Backhaul IP BBU BBU BBU Fronthaul Backhaul IP SBI/Fronthaul NBI/Internet Hardware Poll Virtualization Layer BBU1 ... O&M/Orchestrator BBU2 BBUn EPC IMS MTAS
  13. 13. Mobile Network Evolution ALL SDN: VIRTUALIZED & OPTIMIZEDNFV: VERTICALLY VIRTUALIZEDCURRENTLY: MONOLITHIC & DEDICATED HARDWARE Internet SGi MME HSS PCRF IMS OCS OFCSAttach Auth Mobility Bearer Context Attach Auth Policy Policy Billing Policy Billing Mobility S/PGW Policy Billing Attach Mobility Bearer Context Data IP Backhaul Macro Radio Access Network Network Datacenter Fronthaul MME HSS PCRF IMS OCS OFCS CRAN S/PGW Internet Mobility Bearer Context Attach Auth Mobility Bearer Context Attach Auth Policy Policy Billing Policy Billing Mobility Policy Billing Attach Mobility Bearer Context DataData Heterogeneous Radio Access Network Network Datacenter (SBI) Open Flow Infrastructure Layer (NBI) Control Layer SGi Hardware and Software are monolithic and based on well defined and standardized Network Functions; All-SDN network can simplify the existing EPC architecture by eliminating and collapsing common functionalities in specialized Network Functions, such as: MME, S/PGW, IMS, PCRF, HSS etc. Thus, it can optimize latency accomplishing the 5G requirements via set of hierarchical controllers as opposed to a single centralized controller associated with various control functionalities of the mobile network; Easy service development by Service Chaining orchestration and application abstraction layer and Open API Interface; CapEx reduction by using network functions through software virtualization techniques running on commodity hardware; OpEx reduction due collocation and energy consumption by consolidating networking appliances Decreasing time to market of a new service by changing the typical innovation cycle of network operators (e.g., through software-based service deployment); PCRF HLR/HSS OCS/ OFCS Internet S-GW P-GW MME IMS Ro/Rf S11 S5 GxRx S6a Gy/Gz Sy Cx/Sh Evolved Packet Core S1-US1-AP Macro Radio Access Network SGi Sp
  14. 14. SON in New SDN/NFV Architecture SON AS A PART OF SDN/NFV ORCHESTRATIONCENTRALIZED SON FUNCTIONALITIESDISTRIBUTED & STANDARD SON FUNCTIONALITIES Hardware Resources Virtualized Network Functions Virtualization Layer vBBU(CRAN) Orchestration (SON,CEMetc.) NFV Infrastructure MME HSS IMS vBBU(CRAN) SGW,PGW PCRF OCS,OFCS ... RRU Macro Layer SmallCell Layer Fronthaul IP RRURRU RRU RRU HeNB HeNB Macro Layer SmallCell Layer eNB HeNB HeNBEMS EMS PCRF HLR/HSSOCS/ OFCS S-GW P-GW MMEIMS EMS OSS (X2) Backhaul IP RRU Macro Layer SmallCell Layer EMS PCRF HLR/HSSOCS/ OFCS S-GW P-GW MMEIMS EMS OSS Fronthaul IP RRURRU RRU BBU Hotel SON CEM South/East Bound Interface BBU BBU ... BBU Standard distributed SON functionalities: ANR, MLB, Network Inventory; ICIC etc. Centralized platform for e2e SON; New e2e functionalities can be introduced for: Self-Optimization, Self-Planning and Self –Healing etc. Centralized resource management facilitates the e2e optimization; E2e Network status awareness and Customer Experience tools allows to optimize radio access and core network resources by network and user perspectives.
  15. 15. 5G Architecture (NGMN) Public & Private IP Network 5G RAT Family E2EManagement&Orchestration Operator Services Enterprise Vertical OTT & 3rd. Party Use cases, business models, value proposition Library of Modular Network Functions & Value Enabling Capabilities Common Information Repository CP Functions UP Functions RAT Config State Info Virtualization Business Enabler APIs E2E MANAGEMENT AND ORCHESTRATION ENTITY Is the contact point to translate the use cases and business models into actual network functions and slices. Defines the network slices for a given application scenario, chains the relevant modular network functions, assigns the relevant performance configurations, and finally maps all of this onto the infrastructure resources. BUSINESS APPLICATION LAYER Contains specific applications and services of the operator, enterprise, verticals or third parties that utilize the 5G network. The end-to-end management and orchestration entity allows, for example, to build dedicated network slices for an application, or to map an application to existing network slices. BUSINESS ENABLEMENT LAYER Is a library of all functions required within a converged network in the form of modular architecture building blocks, including functions realized by software modules that can be retrieved from the repository to the desired location, and a set of configuration parameters for certain parts of the network, e.g., radio access. INFRASTRUCTURE RESOURCE LAYER Consists of the physical resources of a fixed-mobile converged network, comprising access nodes, cloud nodes (which can be processing or storage resources), 5G devices (in the form of (smart) phones, wearables, CPEs, machine type modules and others), networking nodes and associated links. NETWORK SLICE Supports the communication service of a particular connection type with a specific way of handling the C- and U-plane for this service. Is composed of a collection of 5G network functions and specific RAT settings that are combined together for the specific use case or business model. Source: NGMN/2015
  16. 16. Concerns & Open Questions FRONTHAUL AIR INTERFACE AGGREGATION & SLICING Transmission & Transport Split for function centralization can happen on each protocol layer or on the interface between each layer. Currently, LTE implies certain constraints on timing as well as feedback loops between individual protocol layers. Depending on resource scheduling and coordination requirements will be needed, different schemes of centralized vs distributed protocol stacks can be used; It can flexibilize the overall fronthaul requirements; WHAT TO VIRTUALIZE RF PHY MAC RRM AC/LC NM RF PHY MAC RRM AC/LC NM How much to centralize Executed at RRH Centralized Executed Centralized Executed SDRMonolithic Executed at BTS Middle Range Virtualization Source: IEEE CommunicationsMagazine BBU CPRI OBSAI ETSI ORI Data Control Sync RRU/ RRH BBU N BBU 2 BBU 1 CRAN 246 Mbps 1200 Mbps 2500 Mbps 9830 Mbps WCDMA (1 Carrier) LTE (MIMO 2x2, 10 MHz) LTE (MIMO 2x2, 20 MHz) WCDMA + LTE CRAN requires a tighter latency requirement for interefrence control (e-ICIC and CoMP) - In general IP backhaul transport cannot accomplish this latency level in X2 interface. CRAN unfolds complexity of capillarity for access trasportation; Although there are fronthaul standards, but each vendor implemented its own flavor: OBSAI, CPRI versions; CPRI/OBSAI requires low latency 5 micro seconds in total, that introduces limitation of 40 km in terms of distance between BBU and RRU; LTELTEWi-Fi Xw PHY MAC PHY MAC RLC PDCP RRC Tunnel (Xw) LWA: LTE & Wi-Fi Link Aggreation MOCN: RAN Sharing PHY MAC RLC PDCP RRC PDCP RRC Op1 Op2 S1S1 CoreCore Network slicing is not a new concept for SDN, but it brings some challenges for Mobile Network, such as air interface protocols; Resource aggregation and slicing are required for multi-standard harmonization in 5G; Already existed in LTE standards, such as Carrier Aggregation; LWA and RAN Sharing ; Needed an fronthaul adaptation capability, such as: Software Defined Fronthaul;
  17. 17. Concerns & Open Questions SDN IS NOT ENOUGH INDEPENDENT CERTIFICATION ORGANIZATION Architecture & Standardization MYRIAD OF STANDARDS & PROPOSALS CellSDN Odin OpenRoad OpenRadio SoftRAN SoftCell MobileFlow OpenRAN SoftCOM ONOS M-CORD OpenRF Northbound API Southbound API Infrastructure Plane Control Plane Application Plane Radio& Spectrum Management Mobility Management Resource Management RoutingPolicy Management Controllers for Mobile Edge Controllers for Mobile Core SONPolicy SDN Control. SDWN Control. SDA Control. User Plane SDA SDWN SDN Mobile network has other requirements different from fixed one, such as: mobility; Broadly used technologies require new extensions, such as: OpenFlow, OpenDaylight; Several proposals have been introduced since 2009. And each proposals have their own roadmaps; SDO vs OS: SDO follows a rigid specification mechanism, OS projects are continuously adapted and integrated new code contributions driven by solving current issues; An industry direction must require for investment optimization and risk minimization; Hardware Resources Virtualized Network Functions (VNFs) Virtualization Layer VNF ... NFVManagementand Orchestration Compute Storage Network NFV Infrastructure Virtual Compute Virtual Storage Virtual Network VNF VNF VNF Source: ETSI Telecom equipment lifecycle management is led by vendor; It comprehends to make compatible new HW, SW, OS versions for proper product works; SDN and NFV bring new concern about how to absorb this complexity into operator internal processes: validate and guarantee that multi- environment can work with expected behavior; For different SW and HW suppliers, an Independent Certification Organization is definitely imperative for overall system compliance.
  18. 18. Concerns & Open Questions TOPOLOGY: DISTRIBUTED OR CENTRALIZED FUNCTIONS SECURITY Real-time processing algorithm implementation for virtualization of the baseband processing pool; Exploitation of virtualized resources on commodity hardware, which does not provide the same real- time characteristics as currently deployed hardware. Additional computational latency and jitter, which needs to be considered in the protocol design. It is an opportunity for new algorithms exploiting a large amount of resources efficiently (e.g., through stronger parallelization) or new Hardware Architecture (such as Intel DPDK). Source: Intel Network Packet Size Server Packet Size PERFORMANCE Some core Entity Functions are naturally centralized, such as HSS, PCRF, IMS, OCS; but others are preferable on edge: CRAN, PGW; Interference Mitigation. Algorithms such as e-ICIC and CoMP have tighter latency requirement below 10 micro seconds; Cache implementation needed to be on the edge; Local breakaout; SBI/Fronthaul NBI/Internet Hardware Poll Virtualization Layer BBU1 ... O&M/Orchestrator BBU2 BBUn EPC Cache Hardware Resources Virtualized Network Functions (VNFs) Virtualization Layer NFVManagement andOrchestration NFV Infrastructure Malware Remote Access VNF Specific Malware DDOs Remote Access Single point of failure in SDN architecture: SDN Controllers; Infrastructure exposure due open access to APIs for SDN service development and integration; In SDN the services are self and remotely provisioned (vs operator network environment); NFV/SDN Telco operators become open to IT treats and vulnerabilities in VNFs, OS, Hipervisiors etc. Maware can run in VNFs, OS, Hipervisors; Easy BackDoor implementation; Other Issues SBI/Fronthaul NBI/Internet Hardware Poll Virtualization Layer BBU1 ... O&M/Orchestrator BBU2 BBUn EPC IMS MTAS SBI/Fronthaul NBI/Internet Hardware Poll Virtualization Layer BBU1 ... O&M/Orchestrator BBU2 BBUn EPC Cache Traffic Density Growth Core&controlfunctions At Edge At Center
  19. 19. 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020+ Release 16 & 5G Enh Release 15 & 5G SI/WI Evaluation & Specification Proposal Submission Tech. Requirements & Eval. Methodology Vision, Technology & Spectrum 5G Timeframe ITU-R´s docs paving way to 5G: IMT.VISION (Deadline July 2015) - Title: “Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2020 and beyond” Objective: Defining the framework and overall objectives of IMT for 2020 and beyond to drive the future developments for IMT IMT.FUTURE TECHNOLOGY TRENDS (Deadline Oct. 2014) To provide a view of future IMT technology aspects 2015-2020 and beyond and to provide information on trends of future IMT technology aspects EU (Nov 2012) China (Fev2013) Korea (Jun 2013) Japão (Out 2013) 2020 and Beyond Adhoc WRC15WRC12 WRC19 Trials and CommercializationStandardization ActivitiesPre-standardizationExploratory Research First Release White Paper Requirements & Tech. feasibility Trial of basic functionality Tests IoT and deployment Release 14 & 5G SIRelease 10-13
  20. 20. Alberto Boaventura ¡Gracias! Thanks! Obrigado! Q&A