Jason Seiden @ LinkedIn Talent Connect 2013


Published on

Ajax CEO Jason Seiden spoke again at LinkedIn's Talent Connect conference this year... he provided 4 strategic "stop doing" points, 3 "start doing" points, and 1 strategic model for helping HR leaders leverage LinkedIn to engage their employees and amplify their employer brands. Here is the deck...

Published in: Business, Career
1 Like
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Thanks for being here…I take it we’re all here because we want to be more effective…Here’s the deal: I’m going to walk thru 4 things you need to stop doing immediately.But then I’m going to go a little deeper. I’m going to give you 3 things you need to start doing immediately.And between the stop doing list and the start doing list, I’m going to share a strategic model with you that will help you understand why you need to change your behaviors. This is important because when you get home, you’re going to say to the people you work with, “stop doing these four things, and start doing these 3 things instead,” and they’re going to say, “why?” I’ll give you the why.Sound good?4 things to stop doing, 3 things to start doing, and a strategic model to tie everything together?And everything you’re about to hear all relates back to a very simple idea:Getting your employees to say the right thing to the right people at the right time.
  • Great.Let’s get started.
  • Thing #1 you need to stop doing right now: stop telling people on your teams and in your organizations how they should and shouldn’t be using LinkedIn.Wait… WHAT?!What on earth does this have to do with being more EFFECTIVE on LinkedIn?!Yeah, well, I’m sure some of you may have figured this out already, but to achieve the kind of efficiency gains I promised in the title of this program, you’re going to have to do more than fix your profile or tweak your status updates. You’re going to have to work as a team.So this presentation is about what you need to do to maximize how you use LinkedIn as a team.My team is optimizing profiles at the Rock My Profile booth—and I encourage you to stop by and have them take a look at your profile. Right now, we’re going to fry the big fish. Starting with how you communicate internally.
  • Here’s the deal. If you’re not teaming up with your employees, you’re creating a problem. You’re not just missing out on opportunity… you are creating. A. problem.I don’t know about you, but when I think about social media problems, the first thing that comes to mind for me is the rogue tweet or blog post where an employee shows poor judgment and the whole thing goes viral in a bad way.But it turns out, there’s another social media problem companies have. This one is much bigger, but it’s harder to see because it’s chronic. It puts a slow drag on your results every single day.And you can see it in this chart.Just a few years ago, my company did a research project. We analyzed how the top 50 digital ad agencies used LinkedIn. We looked up the companies themselves, and then we looked up their 51,608 employees who had LinkedIn profiles. This chart shows the frequency with which the companies and employees used certain keywords.Digital, for instance, was used by about 61% of the companies we looked at. Why that number wasn’t 100%, I have no idea, but that’s a different story. Only 17% of employees, however, had the word digital show up anywhere on their profiles.The other 83% either said nothing, or had undifferentiated profiles about how they were passionate, innovative program managers… just like everyone else. Overall, we found that if you looked up an employee from an ad agency, you had a 90% chance of learning zero about the company where the person worked.Why is this a problem? Because the way people look for jobs today starts online. It starts with people looking up their friends and peers online to see what companies look good. If you don’t show up in that initial orientation that prospects are doing, then your recruiters have to work that much harder to catch up later.
  • And by the way, I know that the ad agency market isn’t exactly known for its stellar corporate cultures.So this year, we did a quick follow up study where we analyze the top 25 best companies to work for.On average, about 20% of the employees we saw had any sort of company messaging in their profiles. 38% had messaging touting what amazing individuals they were, though. Even the best company we saw still had fewer than 50% of its employees aligned with the company message. So this is a problem that effects everybody.And you know how you’re NOT going to fix it? You’re not going to fix this problem by yelling at everyone to start using company messaging. All that will do is create new compliance costs, degrade morale, and create more acute problems for you as employees start venting on Glassdoor.How many of you have had your company outed on Glassdoor?So stop with the cram down communications, it stops teamwork dead.
  • Next, you need to stop expecting to be able to create one approach to social business that works for everyone in your organization.Again, this may not be a problem you think you have, because like the last thing you need to stop doing, it’s not something that’s immediately obvious.But let me show you what I’m talking about.
  • How many of you recognize this poster?You’ve seen these in offices, in airplane magazines… everywhere.Well, meet one of the guys responsible for making these happen.
  • Meet Peter. Some of you may have already met him at the Rock My Profile Booth. Peter’s the guy responsible for all those Successory posters we’e all seen on office walls, about teamwork and leadership and perseverance. He founded that company, he’s taken firms public, and private, and he’s a mentor to me and I’m lucky to have him as part of the Ajax team.When Peter first said to me, “Explain this LinkedIn thing to me,” here’s what he was thinking:I’ve been doing this for 30 years plus. I know who my network is. I have personal relationships with many of the people I work with, and I know what work my friends do in case I have a business opportunity for them, too. When I reach out to someone, I’m very careful about how I do it because everything I do has meaning to someone…. So show me how I can shift from phone calls to LinkedIn without creating risk.”Peter’s problem is partly technical. But ultimately, peter’s problem is political. He needs coaching on how to leverage linkedin in a fixed network where all the players are set and relationships are set and there’s a delicate balance to everything.
  • Now meet Ben.Ben graduated from Northwestern University in 2011. He’s making a documentary. Ajax is his first real gig.When Ben looked at me the first time and said, “Explain this LinkedIn thing to me,” he was thinking something totally different.He wanted to know what a professional profile was, how it differed from a resume, and how he was going to put one together.And, he wanted to know how he could appeal to 3 different networks with one profile:• his current professional network, • the professional network he was still trying to build, • and his personal network, where he already had a “brand,” but maybe not one that would work for him professionally.His needs are 180º from Peter’s. Ben needs training on basic communications. What is a professional persona, how does it differ from a personal persona and why is it important and what should I share and what shouldn’t I share. Ben needs help building a story. And Ben doesn’t need any technical training at all.You can’t just put Ben and Peter in a room together and expect them to figure things out. You need a translator to challenge their assumptions and make sure they understand each other before they start trying to solve the social business problem. And if you don’t have a translator? You end up creating guidelines and policies that work for some and create problems for others. And if you’re creating problems, you’re holding people back. Knock it off.
  • This lookssimilar to what I was saying before about cramming down rules about how to use LinkedIn, but it’s just different enough that I thought it merited its own slide.Earlier, I was talking about the way in which communication happened. This is about how decisions happen.Even if management is nice about how they ask employees to engage on LinkedIn, if they try to control the process from the top, they immediately run into two problems:
  • First, you’re trying to control something that’s bigger than you. When it comes to social media, you the company, you’re the tail, not the dog. This is my inmap. If you’ve never seen an image like this before, go to inmaps.linkedinlabs.com and create your own. Very powerful.This is a picture of my professional network. Every dot here is a person I’m connected to.Let’s pretend that the gray area to the left is ajax. If my boss tried to tell me what to do, I could quit tomorrow, and you know what changes about my network? Nothing. At worst, a few people in that small gray cluster don’t like me. so what?By making everything explicit, Linkedin makes it far easier for me to move through my network. So if my company tries to control me, I can hit the eject button. Even if I don’t quit, I can certainly stop trying and start looking for my next job.How many employees are ejecting from your company because they resent being controlled? It’s an interesting question, right?
  • Here’s the 2nd problem with control: it’s slow.You’re employees are out there right now, today, and tomorrow, and next week, and every day between now and next year when your management team finally gets itself aligned and puts out approved guidelines.Which means that between now and then, you’re at the mercy of each employee’s sense of professional judgment.This is Pat, btw, another Ajax team member, and despite the photos, Pat actually shows good judgment.
  • Finally, the fourth thing you need to stop doing. Stop putting 100% of your social budget into broadcasting status updates.It’s a failed strategy.
  • Any chicagoans in the house?This is buddy ryan, who was credited with changing the way football is played in 1985 when he changed the way the chicago bears played defense.
  • Offense is more glamorous, and in football, we all love the quarterback and those last minute heroics. But the beauty of having a great defense is this: it buys time for the offense to do its thing.A strong defense reduces risk and keeps you in the game, which is especially important when it comes to social business because you may not know what the secret to success is yet.As buddy said, “offense wins games. Defense wins championships.”
  • So those are the four things you need to stop doing:Stop dictating.Stop trying to come up with a single solution for everyone.Stop trying to control social communications.Stop playing 100% offense.
  • Here’s what you need to be doing instead.
  • Actually, hold on.
  • Slow down.Turns out, the reason company leaders engage in these practices is because they’re trying to move too fast.they’re either trying to skip a step (like going all offense all the time, or trying to establish one policy for everyone) or they’re trying to scale too quickly (controlling things from the top, cramming down communication).True leverage comes from slowing down just enough that you can get everyone on the team to see what you’re doing and buy in.Win-win thru opt-in is the phrase we use, which was coined by Lisa Cervenka, self-proclaimed brand nerd, but to me, she’s the powerhouse behind Ajax’s understanding of how to help companies optimize their branding to work on social. Some of you may have met her with me on the 2nd floor… Lisa, would you please stand up?This is the way to become 9 gajillion % more effective on LinkedIn!So before I get into the 3 things you need to be doing, let’s talk about the strategy behind it all.
  • This is what you’re working with.This is the communication equation according to ajax.
  • Let’s look at the traditional marketing approach, which is also the “run like hell” approach, where a few people at corporate drive things,They work under the assumption that employees at large either can’t or won’t support their efforts.
  • Resonance is tough…When you speak as a monolithic company, you’re trying to be all things to all people.Very difficult.And besides, who here would prefer to to talk with a company when you could engage with a real person.Seriously… show of hands… how many of you would prefer to connect with a company?’Actually, I have some data on that in a moment…
  • …one we call workforce marketing.We need something new here.We need a phrase that we can use that will help remind people that we need to change our habits, that the same old same old won’t cut it.The phrase we use at Ajax is Workforce Marketing.
  • Here’s what workforce marketing is about.Engaging employees in making simple, effective optimizations to their linkedin profiles so that they…
  • Project a polished, professional image to the world, and…
  • Communicate a clear and consistent company brand message.This is a win-win… it’s good for companies and good for employees.The 3 steps are all designed to help achieve that very thing: employee buy in.So let me talk about the company benefits for a moment. I’ll get into the individual benefits when I talk about the 3 new behaviors you should be engaging in.
  • So, how do we do this?
  • Very simple.3 steps.Step 1.
  • There is a big difference between being on LinkedIn and using LinkedIn well.If you bought me a great set of paint brushes, it wouldn’t change the fact that I can’t paint.Even if I learned how to use them all, it still wouldn’t make much of a difference.I’d still need to learn how to paint.On social, people need to learn how to deliver a message. LinkedIn is just the paintbrush
  • In terms of social, here’s what that means literally.Let’s say we all worked for Nike.Any Nike people here?Adidas? Reebok?OK, Nike. Nike has one of the most well known brand statements of any company in the history of ever.But as employees, we’re not going to run around saying “just do it, man!” to each other. That’s great for a at-shirt or magazine ad, but it doesn’t work as interpersonal communication.
  • What employees need is a framework for turning the idea of “just do it” into messaging that will work on social media.This is akin to what knowing how to use a paintbrush. Literally, this is knowing what message you want to communicate via linkedin.
  • Step 2.
  • You need to get your message into the hearts and minds of your employees.But how?
  • Any company that has ever tried to get employees to work together has faced this challenge.And when their efforts failed, here’s what they said.I’ve been in talent development and communications for nearly 2 decades. This isn’t a social thing—this is a management thing.But in terms of social, here’s what’s often missing:
  • Looking at a program from the perspective of the people who will be going through it.Taking the time to walk a mile in employees’ shoes to ask, what does this look like from their perspective?What’s in it for them?
  • Remember Peter and Ben?They have totally different problems.So your solution needs to address both of their needs.For Ben, you need to help him optimize his profile for 2 and possibly 3 networks—personal and professional, and maybe even personal, current professional, and future professional.Peter, meanwhile, needs a more strategic understanding of how to use LinkedIn without losing a feel for all the the political delicacies that exist in his network.At ajax, we have a protocol that gets people what they need, all underscored with a technology that keeps things consistent and scalable.If you have a solution coming together, great… if we can help you, great. We’re here to help!
  • Finally…
  • Use a process that creates feedback.When you direct things from the top, the only feedback you get about your employees is how compliant they are.But when you set the stage right and give employees a chance to opt in to good messaging and use it to their own benefit, then you get all sorts of feedback.You learn who your employee advocates are. You learn what company messaging resonates with employees, and what messaging doesn’t.You learn which managers are building teams of advocates and which aren’t.It’s rich stuff!
  • And here’s the real power of all this feedback.Even thought the technologies change, success metrics don’t.
  • THAT’S IT.4 things to stop doing as an organization.Stop dictating.Stop trying to come up with a single solution for everyone.Stop trying to control social communications.Stop playing 100% offense.3 things to start doing:Focus on messaging.Help employees understand how they can benefit from using company messaging in their own profiles.Set up feedback loops that track engagement rather than compliance.And one strategic protocal:Workforce marketing… amplifying the communication equation by asking employees to take specific, tactical steps to optimize their profile that make them look more professional and leverage consistent messaging to make everyone—employee and company alike—look better.That’s how you get to be 9 gajillion % more effective on LinkedIn.Now if you want more:If you want to optimize your personal profile, come to the 3rd floor. Meet Peter and Ben and Pat and the team.If you have questions about how to put this in produce for your company, come to the 2nd floor. See lisa. Lisa, stand up!We’ll be there tomorrow!Thank you.
  • We have a few minutes left for questions?
  • If you have questions that we didn’t have a chance to answer, or if you want more information about how Ajax helps companies maximize the value they get from LinkedIn, email me or connect with me on LinkedIn. I look forward to talking with you!
  • Jason Seiden @ LinkedIn Talent Connect 2013

    1. 1. Knock It Off A 4-Point “Stop Doing” List That Will Make You 9 Gajillion Percent* More Effective On LinkedIn Jason Seiden CEO, Ajax Workforce Marketing (*Rough Estimate)
    2. 2. Knock it off, right now.
    3. 3. Stop cramming down rules about how to use LinkedIn. – me info@ajaxwm.com
    4. 4. Internal communication challenges = Market facing disconnects. info@ajaxwm.com
    5. 5. Personal branding vs. employer branding on LinkedIn profiles For Fortune’s top 25 Best Companies to Work For 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% company branding personal branding 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% max mean min info@ajaxwm.com
    6. 6. Stop expecting executives and professionals to see social media the same way. –me again info@ajaxwm.com
    7. 7. info@ajaxwm.com
    8. 8. Professional Personal Network Network info@ajaxwm.com
    9. 9. Professional Personal Network Network info@ajaxwm.com
    10. 10. Stop treating this like something that can be controlled from the top. – yeah, me info@ajaxwm.com
    11. 11. inmaps.linkedinlabs.com info@ajaxwm.com
    12. 12. Influence what you can. (Quickly.) info@ajaxwm.com
    13. 13. Stop expecting LinkedIn strategies to be all offense all the time. – you’re not going to believe this, but… me info@ajaxwm.com
    14. 14. info@ajaxwm.com
    15. 15. Reduce risk, wait for the win. info@ajaxwm.com
    16. 16. Stop: dictating trying to use 1 solution for everyone controlling social communications playing 100% offense info@ajaxwm.com
    17. 17. Now run like hell.
    18. 18. Actually, don’t.
    19. 19. Win-win is opt-in. – Lisa Cervenka, Ajax brand nerd info@ajaxwm.com
    20. 20. Message impact = reach * resonance effort info@ajaxwm.com
    21. 21. Applying traditional marketing to social: Expensive. Need people following the company. Message impact = Limited. People have their guards up. reach * resonance effort Expensive. Weight is born by corporate and/or an agency. info@ajaxwm.com
    22. 22. Applying traditional marketing to social: Expensive. Need people following the company. Message impact = Limited. People have their guards up. reach * resonance effort Expensive. Weight is born by corporate and/or an agency. info@ajaxwm.com
    23. 23. Applying traditional marketing to social: Expensive. Need people following the company. Message impact = Limited. People have their guards up. reach * resonance effort Expensive. Weight is born by corporate and/or an agency. info@ajaxwm.com
    24. 24. Applying traditional marketing to social: Expensive. Need people following the company. Message impact = Limited. People have their guards up. reach * resonance effort Expensive. Weight is born by corporate and/or an agency. info@ajaxwm.com
    25. 25. Who do you trust… when it comes to a company’s employer brand? 63% 21% 11% Employees CEO Spokesperson 2013 Edelman Trust Barometer info@ajaxwm.com
    26. 26. In other words… Here’s how much of every dollar spent has impact: 63¢ Employee Messaging 21¢ CEO Messaging 11¢ Spokesperson Messaging info@ajaxwm.com
    27. 27. info@ajaxwm.com
    28. 28. info@ajaxwm.com
    29. 29. info@ajaxwm.com
    30. 30. info@ajaxwm.com
    31. 31. Applying workforce marketing to social: Amplified by size of employees’ personal networks. Message impact = Amplified by employees’ knowledge of their networks’ interests. reach * resonance effort Distributed to the shoulders of employees around the company. info@ajaxwm.com
    32. 32. Applying workforce marketing to social: Amplified by size of employees’ personal networks. Message impact = Amplified by employees’ knowledge of their networks’ interests. reach * resonance effort Distributed to the shoulders of employees around the company. info@ajaxwm.com
    33. 33. Applying workforce marketing to social: Amplified by size of employees’ personal networks. Message impact = Amplified by employees’ knowledge of their networks’ interests. reach * resonance effort Distributed to the shoulders of employees around the company. info@ajaxwm.com
    34. 34. Step 1 of 3 info@ajaxwm.com
    35. 35. Messaging info@ajaxwm.com
    36. 36. (Because communication needs more than tools.) info@ajaxwm.com
    37. 37. “YOLO, dude.” “Oh, hey man, just do it.” info@ajaxwm.com
    38. 38. “YOLO, dude.” “Oh, hey man, just do it.” “I make apparel for people who play hard.” info@ajaxwm.com
    39. 39. Step 2 of 3 info@ajaxwm.com
    40. 40. Hearts & minds info@ajaxwm.com
    41. 41. “We tried that, it didn’t work.” 1. 2. 3. The agency’s campaign failed. Our CEO’s edict failed. Giving up seemed to work! info@ajaxwm.com
    42. 42. One question: Why would an employee go along? What’s In It For Them? info@ajaxwm.com
    43. 43. Solve the employee’s problem They need 1 profile for 2 networks info@ajaxwm.com
    44. 44. Step 3 of 3 info@ajaxwm.com
    45. 45. Message 1 Message 2 Resonance Pull through Engagement Impact Conversion Avg Revenue Value Extrapolated Resonance Pull through Division 1 79.60% 37.41% 37% 83.49% 31.00% $801.77 $248.54 $6,364,608 33.60% 51.63% Recruiting 58.29% 52.34% 99% 87.90% 86.82% $8,353.00 $7,251.92 $185,707,102 60.08% 21.50% Hiring Mgrs 70.80% 49.97% 23% 32.16% 7.42% $6,977.81 $517.50 $13,252,261 28.77% 12.00% Sales 92.09% 40.89% 11% 60.62% 6.80% $704.36 $47.87 $1,225,949 46.21% 22.48% Marketing 11.34% 20.92% 51% 64.24% 32.75% $2,620.53 $858.12 $21,974,853 42.50% 88.05% Execs Ops 57.21% 67.67% 95.38% 32.87% 14% 28% 69.13% 69.56% 9.49% 19.69% $4,286.02 $79.14 $406.77 $15.58 $10,416,644 $399,002 77.93% 7.39% 29.62% 44.82% PMO 59.18% 3.43% 34% 76.62% 25.93% $9,232.82 $2,393.70 $61,297,754 46.62% 37.67% Division 2 44.61% 48.77% 42% 11.76% 4.89% $230.20 $11.25 $288,130 73.09% 42.83% Recruiting 81.86% 31.09% 43% 1.56% 0.67% $4,941.94 $33.32 $853,293 52.75% 96.53% Hiring Mgrs 22.10% 98.19% 26% 78.99% 20.35% $7,492.50 $1,524.97 $39,051,307 59.17% 4.97% Sales 79.13% 6.26% 29% 33.41% 9.71% $2,746.45 $266.64 $6,828,223 80.73% 57.08% Marketing 62.44% 57.69% 42% 43.57% 18.20% $2,356.82 $428.85 $10,982,099 12.23% 46.43% Execs 76.92% 24.42% 66% 8.99% 5.93% $2,746.50 $162.84 $4,169,973 59.29% 80.34% Ops 15.90% 93.32% 23% 6.02% 1.40% $3,737.77 $52.27 $1,338,554 2.47% 95.99% PMO 10.55% 99.67% 82% 52.67% 43.10% $8,275.52 $3,567.01 $91,344,035 80.90% 37.45% Division 3 86.96% 34.94% 67% 74.68% 50.00% $7,860.26 $3,930.43 $100,650,441 63.45% 44.23% Recruiting 49.49% 59.01% 60% 94.70% 56.42% $5,203.55 $2,935.66 $75,176,485 70.20% 33.65% Hiring Mgrs 16.16% 46.69% 75% 67.19% 50.11% $3,445.83 $1,726.67 $44,216,578 76.88% 27.18% Sales 96.81% 5.12% 98% 84.50% 82.48% $1,722.40 $1,420.57 $36,377,888 91.08% 29.25% Marketing 11.60% 33.49% 64% 99.16% 63.90% $571.76 $365.35 $9,355,865 53.64% 47.26% Execs Get the facts 63.01% 59.51% 32% 43.47% 13.71% $2,366.31 $324.39 $8,306,944 46.12% 26.46% 15.51% 38.94% 68% 28.64% 19.45% $2,946.79 $573.27 $14,680,236 17.88% 84.61% 7.85% 75.70% 73% 11.33% 8.28% $9,881.56 $817.71 $20,939,804 1.64% 13.24% 69.62% 8.22% 43% 28.79% 12.46% $201.74 $25.13 $643,558 80.07% 32.84% 32.53% 9.97% 24% 18.81% 4.45% $6,337.34 $282.27 $7,228,346 42.49% 34.40% 50.76% 1.15% 73% 33.58% 24.63% $5,684.51 $1,400.24 $35,857,437 4.81% 62.19% 26.18% 29.50% 73% 61.26% 44.43% $9,839.81 $4,372.16 $111,962,334 25.15% 13.66% 64.25% 83.56% 62% 74.56% 46.32% $5,215.50 $2,415.61 $61,858,898 98.11% 99.50% 51.64% 95.75% 5% 27.97% 1.27% $1,304.69 $16.53 $423,287 90.67% 78.58% 1.70% 15.12% 30% 20.54% 6.07% $1,831.01 $111.07 $2,844,237 70.55% 0.20% PMO 95.74% 70.81% 97% 2.16% 2.09% $6,102.67 $127.83 $3,273,540 9.99% 33.26% Division 5 62.67% 54.34% 41% 88.37% 36.18% $9,352.94 $3,383.72 $86,650,309 15.89% 26.42% Recruiting 0.91% 38.15% 81% 54.44% 44.07% $7,022.76 $3,095.16 $79,260,937 90.41% 47.52% 54.26% 58.46% 99% 5.30% 5.24% $1,954.53 $102.45 $2,623,531 71.22% 22.02% 7.30% 65.82% 15% 89.61% 13.83% $8,886.94 $1,229.02 $31,472,768 16.28% 75.47% Marketing 17.28% 37.67% 40% 1.96% 0.79% $5,849.19 $46.06 $1,179,449 40.53% 37.38% Execs 17.38% 88.61% 15% 45.37% 6.72% $4,850.28 $325.99 $8,348,067 32.04% 91.20% Ops 2.95% 41.30% 4% 41.24% 1.62% $825.84 $13.38 $342,700 6.29% 5.28% PMO 95.22% 16.05% 32% 45.07% 14.60% $6,540.66 $955.10 $24,458,171 24.81% 0.17% Division 6 63.36% 44.12% 66% 27.89% 18.43% $7,241.36 $1,334.58 $34,175,909 18.80% 51.65% Recruiting 61.35% 3.23% 88% 58.01% 50.98% $5,727.38 $2,919.99 $74,775,182 67.62% 77.28% Hiring Mgrs 10.25% 40.99% 6% 96.72% 5.54% $9,583.49 $531.05 $13,599,049 73.20% 40.41% Sales 85.56% 46.01% 97% 43.60% 42.38% $7,064.37 $2,993.93 $76,668,622 79.31% 97.65% Marketing 55.45% 74.17% 48% 25.91% 12.55% $6,988.36 $877.24 $22,464,284 16.75% 30.38% Execs 88.74% 43.69% 62% 56.64% 35.20% $7,320.32 $2,576.70 $65,984,030 40.22% 79.92% Ops 43.95% 21.44% 79% 13.77% 10.93% $7,700.97 $842.02 $21,562,351 5.81% 43.01% PMO 92.47% 73.46% 82% 9.45% 7.72% $1,774.63 $137.02 $3,508,730 55.93% 18.19% Ops PMO Division 4 Recruiting Hiring Mgrs Sales Marketing Execs Ops Hiring Mgrs Sales info@ajaxwm.com
    46. 46. Lagging metrics don’t change. Leading ones do. info@ajaxwm.com
    47. 47. Have you rocked your profile?
    48. 48. Q&A
    49. 49. Thank You! Jason Seiden CEO, Ajax Workforce Marketing jason@ajaxwm.com