Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

2018 Blog Post + Landing Page Audit Excel Templates

366 views

Published on

http://bit.ly/landing-page-audit-video
Over a year ago we did a live critique of Unfunnel Growth Labs member landing pages and blog posts on our weekly Office Hours webinar training.

During that content auditing segment, I identified several blogging factors PLUS the four main landing page criteria that every landing page design must consider.

Today I’m expanding that list with a 15-Point Landing Page Audit across those 4 categories that will tell you if your landing page offer, design and copy stacks up.

The Landing Page Audit worksheet has five components (labeled above):

1. Grading Elements – Evaluating elements like the headline, offer, trust, visuals, etc..
2.Grading Criteria – Grade these elements based on specific criteria.
3. Element Scores – Score each element separately on a scale from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory.
4. Final Score – Receive an overall score out of 100.
5. Action Items – Take action to improve the elements that don’t receive a perfect score.

With all of the Landing Page editors or themes you can use out there, it is REALLY easy to create a kind of Frankenstein’s monster without even knowing it — this will give you the process you need to avoid doing that entirely.

Download This Template at http://bit.ly/revenue-launchpad

Published in: Marketing
  • Be the first to comment

2018 Blog Post + Landing Page Audit Excel Templates

  1. 1. 2017 Blog Post + Landing Page Audit - Blog Post Audit Template 2017 BLOG POST + LANDING PAGE AUDIT URL: Writer: Date: Need instructions? Click here to access the 4-minute Blog Post Audit explainer video. Grading Element Exceptional (4 points) Competent (3 points) Needs Improvement (2 points) Unsatisfactory (1 point) Score (1-4) Headline • A clear, "tightly-written" promise is made using as many words as necessary. • The promise made in the headline is delivered upon in the body of the post. • Headline is compelling without being misleading or hypey. • Headline needs to be "tightened" or requires a bit more description to completely communicate the promise. • Headline isn't as compelling as it could be or is somewhat hypey or misleading. • Headline is "wordy" or far too short to completely communicate the promise. • Headline is not compelling or is hypey or misleading. • Elements of the promise made in the headline are not delivered upon in the body of the post. • Headline is weak or completely misleading and/or hypey. Introduction • Copy is extremely easy to consume and develops a rhythm for the post. • Copy draws the reader in and compels them to read the entire article. • Copy creates a "speed bump" for the reader through a wordy or unneccesary statement, complex words, or intimidating formatting. • The benefit of reading the entire article is not made completely clear early in the introduction. • Copy contains 2-3 "speed bumps" for the reader through wordy or unneccesary statements, complex words, or intimidating formatting. • Copy is extremely difficult to consume because of 4 or more wordy or unneccesary statements, complex words, or intimidating formatting. • The benefit of reading the entire article is not made clear at all in the introduction. Consumption • Copy is formatted in a way that makes the article easy to consume. • Transitions between ideas and subheadlines are smooth. • Copy contains one "speed bump" that could be removed by formatting with bullets, numbered lists, blockquotes, etc. • One transition between ideas and headlines creates a "speed bump" for the reader. • Copy contains 2-3 "speed bumps" that could be removed by formatting with bullets, numbered lists, blockquotes, etc. • 2-3 transitions between ideas and subheadlines create "speed bumps" for the reader. • Copy contains 4 or more "speed bumps" that could be removed by formatting with bullets, numbered lists, blockquotes, etc. • 4 or more transitions between ideas and headlines create "speed bumps" for the reader. Goal • A clear call to action is made that is relevant to the subject matter of the article. • Copy and/or design of the call to action compel the reader to take the desired action. • Call to action is located in one or more prominent positions within the post. • A more relevant call to action is available for this post. • Copy and/or design of the call to action could be more compelling to the reader. • Call to action could be located in a more prominent location in the post. • Call to action is completely irrelevant to the subject matter of the post. • Copy and/or design of the call to action is not compelling. • Call to action is difficult to find in the post. • The post does not contain a call to action. Media • All images, video, and audio are clean and clear and of high production quality. • All the posts' needs for images, video, and audio are met. • One instance of an image, video, or audio is unclear or of low production quality. • One section of the post requires the use of an image, video, or audio to complete the post. • There are 2-3 instances of images, video, and/or audio that are unclear or of low production quality. • To complete the post, 2-3 sections require the use of an image, video, or audio. • The post contains no media. Close • The close effectively concludes the post. • The close uses humor, wit, insight, or otherwise incites emotion that compels the reader to comment, share, or visit more pages on the blog. • The close effectively concludes the post. • The close uses dry or boring language. • The close does not effectively conclude the post. • The close uses dry or boring language. • The post contains no close.
  2. 2. 2017 Blog Post + Landing Page Audit - Blog Post Audit Template Search • All 5 on-page SEO elements (URL, body text, images, title tag, meta description) are optimized for a keyword unique to that page. • All opportunities to cross-link to other content are used. • One on-page SEO element is not keyword optimized. • One opportunity to cross-link is missed in this post. • 2 on-page SEO elements are not keyword optimized. • 2-3 opportunities to cross-link to other content are missed in this post. • The post is not keyword optimized or it "keyword cannibalizes" another post on the website. • The post misses 4 or more opportunities to cross- link to other content. Categorization • The post is in the appropriate category. • The post is appropriately tagged. NA NA • The post is not in the appropriate category. • The post is not appropriately tagged. Completeness • The post completely delivers on the promise made in the headline and introduction. • Every idea in the post is appropriately strengthened with media (images, video, etc), examples, data, and/or links to more information. • One idea in the post requries media (images, video, etc), examples, data, and/or links to more information to be complete. • 2-3 ideas in the post requrie media (images, video, etc), examples, data, and/or links to more information to be complete. • 4 or more ideas in the post require media (images, video, etc), examples, data, and/or links to more information to be complete. Consistency • The content of the post is consistent with the brand. • The content of the post is consistent with other information presented by the organization. NA NA • One or more elements of the post are inconsistent with the brand. • One or more elements of the post are inconsistent with other information presented by the organization. Final Score 0 Action Items *
  3. 3. 2017 Blog Post + Landing Page Audit - Landing Page Audit Sample LANDING PAGE AUDIT SAMPLE URL: Writer: Date: Grading Element Exceptional (4 points) Competent (3 points) Needs Improvement (2 points) Unsatisfactory (1 point) Score Offer Clarity • A clear, "tightly-written" headline, and subheadline that answers 'What is it?' and 'What does it do for me?' • The promise made in the headline is expanded upon in the subsequent content • Headline is compelling without being misleading or hypey. • Headline needs to be "tightened" or only answers one of the key questions. • Headline isn't as compelling as it could be or is somewhat hypey or misleading. • Headline is "wordy" or far too short to completely communicate the promise. • Headline is not compelling or is hypey or misleading. • Elements of the promise made in the headline are not delivered upon in the subsequent content • Headline is weak or completely misleading and/or hypey. 4 Scent • The copy and promises of the ad (or referring source) is articulated on the page. • The images from the ad (or referring) are shown on the landing page. • The design of the landing page is consistent with the ad (or referring source). • The copy and promises of the ad (or referring source) are somewhat articulated on the page. • The design of the landing page is somewhat consistent with the ad (or referring source). • The copy and promises of the ad (or referring source) are loosely articulated on the page. • The design of the landing page is loosely consistent with the ad (or referring source). • The copy and promises of the ad (or referring source) are not articulated on the page. • The images from the ad (or referring) not on the landing page. • The design of the landing page is not consistent with the ad (or referring source). 4 Relevance • The offer is something the target audience wants/needs. • The offerarticulartion is personalized for the specific target market. • The offer is something the target audience wants/needs. • The offer is articulated for an individual audience (many-to-one) • The offer is something the target audience might wants/needs. • The offer isn't articulated for the audience but is a feature list. • The offer isn't something the target market wants/needs. • The offer is poorly articulated to any audience. 4 Visualization • The product or service is depicted via authentic imagery or video. • The product’s or service’s features are depicted by authentic imagery or video. • The product or service is depicted via stock imagery or video. • The product’s or service’s features are depicted by bulleted lists. • The product or service is depicted via stock imagery or video. • The product’s or service’s features aren't depcited at all. • The product or service is not visually depcitec • The product’s or service’s features aren't visually depcited. 4 Form/CTA Visible Form • The form is immediately visible. N/A N/A • The form is not immediately visible. 4 Appropriate Number Of Fields • The number of form fields is appropriate for the offer, e.g., high commitment offers have longer forms & lower commitment offers have shorter form fields. • There are no ‘optional’ fields. N/A N/A • The number of form fields is disproportionate to the offer, e.g., high commitment offers have longer forms & lower commitment offers have shorter form fields. 4 Compelling Form Headline • A clear, "tightly-written" headline, and subheadline that answers 'What is it?' and 'What does it do for me?' • The promise made in the headline is expanded upon in the subsequent content • Headline is compelling without being misleading or hypey. • Headline needs to be "tightened" or only answers one of the key questions. • Headline isn't as compelling as it could be or is somewhat hypey or misleading. • Headline is "wordy" or far too short to completely communicate the promise. • Headline is not compelling or is hypey or misleading. • Elements of the promise made in the headline are not delivered upon in the subsequent content • Headline is weak or completely misleading and/or hypey. 4 Visible & Noticeable CTA • The CTA is visible. • The CTA stands out. • The CTA is reiterated throughout the page. • The CTA is descriptive, e.g., not ’Submit’ • Only 3 of the 4 CTA criteria are met. • Only 2 of the 4 CTA criteria are met. • 1 ≤ of the 4 CTA criteria are met. 4 Trust Professional Design • Layout is smooth and revolves around a single idea. • Fonts are consistent • Images are authentic • The page flow is intuitive to the user. • Layout is smooth and revolves around a single idea. • Too many font types, sizes, and colors. • Imagery is unprofessional or inauthentic. • The page flow is intuitive to the user. • Page layout is a mashup of multiple design inspirations. • Too many font types, sizes, and colors. • Imagery is unprofessional or inauthentic. • The page flow is intuitive to the user. • Page layout is a mashup of multiple design inspirations. • Too many font types, sizes, and colors. • Imagery is unprofessional or inauthentic. • The page flow is unintuitive to the user. 4
  4. 4. 2017 Blog Post + Landing Page Audit - Landing Page Audit Sample Relevant Trust Icons • Page uses trust icons. • Trust icons are appropriate for the page context. • There are no ‘old school’ hyperbolic trust claims, e. g. ‘Risk Free’ • The page uses trust icons. • Trust icons are not appropriate for the page context. • There are no ‘old school’ hyperbolic trust claims, e. g. ‘Risk Free’ • The page has trust icons. • Trust icons are not appropriate for the page context. • There are ‘old school’ hyperbolic trust claims, e.g. ‘Risk Free’ • There are no trust icons 4 Authentic Testimonials • Your page uses testimonials. • Your testimonials are not anonymous. • You testimonials include a name, photo, job title, and place of business. • Your page uses testimonials. • Your testimonials are not anonymous. • You testimonials don't include all of the following: name, photo, job title, and place of business. • Your page uses testimonials. • Your testimonials are anonymous. • You testimonials don't include any of the following: name, photo, job title, and place of business. • The page has no testimonials 4 Clear Privacy Policies • There is a visible privacy policy. • There is no ‘cute’ copy for your privacy policy information. • The privacy policy is in proximity to your CTA. • There is a visible privacy policy. • There is ‘cute’ copy for your privacy policy information. • The privacy policy is in proximity to your CTA. • There is a visible privacy policy. • There is ‘cute’ copy for your privacy policy information. • The privacy policy is not near your CTA. • The page has no privacy policy. 4 Visual Hierarchy Using Visual Queues To Highilight Key Areas • The page and design guide the eye to high priority sections. N/A N/A • The page and design conflict with your high priority page sections. 4 Page Design Fits A Singular Theme • The fonts, colors, imagery, and copy compliment each other. N/A N/A • The fonts, colors, imagery, and copy compete with one another as a ‘frankenpage’. 4 Supporting Imagery • The supporting imagery, e.g., features, product use, etc… does not compete with your CTA. • The supporting imagery, e.g., features, product use, etc… does not break the page theme. • The supporting imagery, e.g., features, product use, etc… does compete with your CTA. • The supporting imagery, e.g., features, product use, etc… does not break the page theme. • The supporting imagery, e.g., features, product use, etc…, competes with your CTA. • The supporting imagery, e.g., features, product use, etc…, does break the page theme. • The page doesn't use supporting imagery and relies on the hero shot. 4 Final Score 100 Action Items Write the action items down here!

×