AOF 6.29.11 webinar powerpoint


Published on

Experts discuss Conference Committee report and the State Budget.

Published in: Business, Health & Medicine
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • three main points about the importance of access to treatment—it protects the health of people living with HIV and enables them to stay healthier vs. progressing to AIDS; when people are on treatment, their viral loads are lower and therefore they are less likely to transmit the virus (i.e. treatment as preventionHIV medications require strict adherence (95% compliance with taking meds as prescribed) or else the virus can mutate and the meds will not longer work.  So, being on meds, then going off, then going back on can have a significant impact on the ability to treat patients successfully.  Most other medications don’t require this level of adherence.  A 2nd tier point—there is a significant emphasis at all levels on getting people tested for HIV so we can lower the percentage of people who are infected but unaware of their status (currently about 20%).  There’s a real ethical dilemma if we are encouraging people to get tested, but then don’t have a payer of last resort to give them access to medications to keep them healthy.   Community Health Centers – had received about $5M in the last biennium – used to treat the uninsured – becomes basis for access for many under federal health reform – committee was very interested in fixing this.
  • AOF 6.29.11 webinar powerpoint

    1. 1. Advocates for Ohio’s Future Political and Field Call<br />Featuring:<br />Susan Ackerman, Senior Budget and Fiscal Analyst at the Center for Community Solutions <br />Gayle Channing Tenenbaum, Co-Chair of Advocates for Ohio’s Future, Senior Policy Associate for Voices for Ohio’s Children, and Director of Policy and Govt Affairs at PCSAO<br />Bill Sundermeyer, Associate State Director of Advocacy, AARP Ohio<br />Lisa Hamler-Fugitt, Executive Director of the Ohio Association of Second Harvest Foodbanks (OASHF)<br />Deborah Nebel, Director of Public Policy at Linking Employment, Abilities and Potential (LEAP) and a member of the Ohio Olmstead Task Force<br />
    2. 2. Highlights of HB 153 (State Budget Proposal, FY 2012-2013)Susan AckermanSenior Budget and Fiscal AnalystCenter for Community Solutions<br />
    3. 3. HB 153 – ConferenceCommittee Highlights<br />GRF spending will increase by $111.7M from FY 2011 to FY 2012 and by $1.6B from FY 2012 to FY 2013 – but looks are very deceiving<br /><ul><li>If you pull out Medicaid spending – The GRF budget decreases by $999M from FY 2011 to FY 2012 and increases by $353M from FY 2012 to FY 2013 (so GRF spending in FY 2013 is still almost $700M less than we were spending in FY 2011)
    4. 4. Medicaid spending that had been counted as non-GRF revenue is moved to the GRF (Aging, MH, and ODADAS) – this change increases GRF spending by almost $1.2B over the biennium – no additional people served, no additional dollars spent – just an accounting change
    5. 5. Medicaid spending is up because more and more people lost insurance coverage during the last recession.  In FY 2010 and FY 2011, Medicaid caseloads grew by 8.4% and 5.6% respectively.  Unemployment remains high and Medicaid caseloads are expected to continue to grow throughout this biennium, although at lower rates. (amplifying the need to reform health care)
    6. 6. In this deep reduction GRF debt service payments will increase by $273M over the biennium
    7. 7. Education funding through the foundation formula decreases by about $160M per year compared to FY 2011
    8. 8. Regent funding through the state share of instruction decreases by about $250M per year compared to FY 2011 – many schools have announced tuition increases to help make up the difference</li></li></ul><li>HB 153 – ConferenceCommittee Highlights<br />Conference committee added $99M in GRF (state and federal share) over the Senate version – this includes some additional funding for nursing homes, PASSPORT, mental health.<br /><ul><li>PASSPORT – Governor proposed a cut of $160M all funds over the biennium - $95M all funds was restored. Funding increases over FY 2010-2011 levels but this program is facing an expected 14% growth in caseload. Holds monthly per member costs flat at FY 2011 levels; retains a 3% cut in provider rates, and makes cuts to AAAs operations.
    9. 9. Mental Health – We’re spending a lot of money to treat people too late in their illnesses. Even though the House, Senate, and Conference Committee added modest amounts to the county subsidy lines, this system still loses ground. In FY 2011, state spending on the “community” line items totaled $415.4M. This grows to $440.2M in FY 2012 before falling to $423.6M in FY 2013.
    10. 10. 2 important things to remember federal enhanced FMAP funds end tomorrow – so state investment will not go as far in FY 2012 and FY 2013 as it did in FY 2011. The Governor has also proposed $242M in cuts to the Medicaid MH benefit over the next biennium. Advocates have been successful at lessening the impact of some of these cuts- but to really improve health through better care, we need more not less MH Medicaid services.</li></li></ul><li>Key Concerns Remain<br />This budget continues more than decade long tradition of asking people to do more with less and the end is not in sight. If you think this budget is bad, hold on to your seat:<br /><ul><li>A number of tax proposals were added to the budget that will continue to lower the revenue base going into the next biennium (estate tax, InvestOhio)
    11. 11. There will be another budget in a year – folks are calling this a “mid-biennium review.” If the past is any indication of the future – be prepared for more cuts
    12. 12. There are more than 5,000 pages of policy changes in this budget, yet there is very little detail on what is planned. Remain alert and skeptical.</li></li></ul><li>HB 153 (State Budget, FY 2012-2013)Gayle Channing TenenbaumCo-Chair of Advocates for Ohio’s Future, Senior Policy Associate for Voices for Ohio’s Children, and Director of Policy and Govt Affairs at PCSAO <br />
    13. 13. HB 153 – ConferenceCommittee Highlights<br />Local Government cuts another big concern<br /><ul><li>Will have a huge impact on local health and human services / local delivery system
    14. 14. Especially in counties without human service levies – LGF provides $$ for HHS services in these counties </li></li></ul><li>Child Welfare<br /><ul><li>10% cut in child welfare subsidy
    15. 15. 7 M restored for adoption assistance (from Executive Budget)
    16. 16. 3.7 M restored in Kinship Permanency Incentive program
    17. 17. $20 M in TANF going to county JFS offices for PRC
    18. 18. $2 M each year in TANF for youth transitioning out of foster care into independent living</li></li></ul><li>Mental Health<br /><ul><li>Glad we got $11M back in 505 line for Mental Health—but we need a lot more
    19. 19. Glad to have language (thanks to Rep. Amstutz) for children in the Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice systems: they do not have to use new mental health utilization process.
    20. 20. Early Childhood Mental Health Consultation program lost funding. $5M over the biennium.</li></li></ul><li>Child Care<br /><ul><li>Quality day care $$ used to preserve enrollment to keep parents from losing child care, and ECMH was part of that.
    21. 21. Quality dollars used to pay for child care slots</li></ul>Child Care eligibility <br /><ul><li>changes from 150% to 125% of poverty
    22. 22. Child care provider rates cut</li></li></ul><li>Lisa Hamler-FugittExecutive DirectorOhio Association of Second Harvest Foodbanks(614) 221-4336 ext<br />
    23. 23. Ohio Housing Trust Fund<br /><ul><li>Senate Finance Committee had attempted to divert $10 million from the Ohio Housing Trust Fund to county recorders
    24. 24. Through working with the Administration and key Senate leadership, the $10 million was restored for affordable housing.</li></li></ul><li>Second Harvest Foodbanks<br /><ul><li>Ohio Association of Second Harvest Foodbanks: House Finance Committee increased funding by $1 million per year.
    25. 25. Status: $12.5 million in 2012 and 2013
    26. 26. Unfortunately, no increase in the Senate
    27. 27. Requested: $17 million per year in funding.
    28. 28. Amendment offered in Senate Finance:
    29. 29. 5% voluntary payroll deduction for legislators earmarking the $$ to the OASHF
    30. 30. Provision removed in Conference Committee
    31. 31. OASHF position is “you don’t mandate charity”</li></li></ul><li>Rising Food and Fuel Costs, Severe Weather Conditions<br /><ul><li>Estimated to lose 22.5 million pounds of food over the biennium
    32. 32. 26% shortage to meet the rising demand for food
    33. 33. As we continue to see wage stagnation and growing levels of poverty, the 26% number is expected to go up
    34. 34. In 2012, we expect an overall reduction of 25% of federal food through the emergency food assistance program, government Commodities Program, and the Senior Commodity Supplemental Food Program</li></li></ul><li>HB 277<br /><ul><li>The Governor acknowledged that Hunger is a problem in Ohio
    35. 35. When he struck the deal with the casino (Rock Ohio Caesar)—made a commitment to see some of the settlement funds go to support foodbanks
    36. 36. Both houses passed HB 277 which creates the Casino Operator Settlement Fund, which will go towards:
    37. 37. Workforce Development, Economic Development, Job Creation
    38. 38. Education, training
    39. 39. Foodbanks</li></li></ul><li>Bill Sundermeyer, <br />Associate State Director of Advocacy<br />AARP Ohio<br /><br />
    40. 40. Nursing Facilities and <br />In-Home Care<br /><ul><li>Assisted living providers will be at the 2011 levels (other providers will receive 3% cuts)
    41. 41. Nursing Facilities increase of between $30 and $32 Million (from the Governor’s proposal)
    42. 42. PASSPORT—$36 Million increase (from the Governor’s proposal)
    43. 43. Home care providers took a 3% cut
    44. 44. Independent home care providers took an additional 20% cut
    45. 45. 1st time the Home-Based Care received a greater increase (from March through June) than the Nursing Facilities</li></li></ul><li>Deborah Nebel, <br />Director of Public Policy<br />Linking Employment, Abilities and Potential (LEAP)<br /><br />
    46. 46. In-Home Care and Assisted Living for people under 60<br /><ul><li>In-home care for people under 60 did not fair as those over 60 (seniors)
    47. 47. Extend home first provision was in the Senate version: nursing facility diversion program (get PASSPORT or Assisted Living if at risk of unnecessary nursing home placement)
    48. 48. Home First provision was taken out in Conference Committee </li></li></ul><li>Waiver Programs and <br />Waiting Lists<br /><ul><li>Ohio Home Care Waiver—waiting list of 750
    49. 49. DD Waiver—waiting list of 27000
    50. 50. Budget does not adequately address the waiting list issue
    51. 51. If and when aging and disabilities waivers are combined (PASSPORT waiver, Transitions waiver, and Ohio Home Care waiver combined into one waiver)
    52. 52. Then there will be a Home First provision for all populations</li></li></ul><li>Other Policy Changes<br /><ul><li>Commitment by the Administration to rebalancing to 2013
    53. 53. Goal of home based care for 50% of recipients 60 and older and 60% of recipients under 60
    54. 54. Unified Long Term Care systems advisory group was established—focused 4 nursing facilities subgroups: capacity, quality, incentive payments, eligibility for Medicaid, reimbursement
    55. 55. Will consumer groups be at the table when deals are cut? </li></li></ul><li>Questions?Contact Us Advocates for Ohio’s Futurewww.advocatesforohio.org510 East Mound Street, Suite 200Columbus, OH 43215Fax: (614) 228-5150<br />Will Petrik<br />Outreach Director<br /><br />614-602-2464<br />Scott Britton<br />Coordinator<br /><br />614-602-2463<br />