Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

DR Grantee Cuyahoga County


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

DR Grantee Cuyahoga County

  1. 2. Permanency for Ohio’s Children: Recruitment of Relatives and for Sibling Initiative A Public-Private-University Initiative and Neighborhood-Based Approach
  2. 3. PARTNERS <ul><li>Cuyahoga County Department of Children & Family Services </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Jacqueline McCray </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Mary Mitchell </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Tracey Brichacek </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Adoption Network </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Betsy Norris </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Kate Lodge </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Dottie Klemm </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Beech Brook </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Cheryl Jamison </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Neighborhood Collaboratives </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Julian Discoll </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Case Western Reserve Univesity </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Professor Victor Groza from the Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences </li></ul></ul>
  3. 4. Problem and Objectives for Relatives Initiative <ul><li>Less than 37% of children in permanent care in Cuyahoga County (CC) are being adopted in less than 12 months. Objective one in our initiative is to increase the percent of children who exit for adoption in less than 24 months from 25.1% to match the state’s percent of 37.2% or higher . </li></ul><ul><li>At the time of this proposal, 75% of kin families in Cuyahoga County do not have a completed home study by the time permanent custody (PC) is granted! Our second objective is by the time PC is granted, 35% of caregivers who plan to adopt will have a completed home study. </li></ul><ul><li>Because the home study process is set up for efficiency, and most of the relatives are not efficient in completing paperwork, 75% of relatives have difficulty getting through the home study process . Objective 3 is to provide a model of service that allows 50% of relatives to complete their home study. </li></ul><ul><li>Pre-Service training does not address the unique issues that relatives have, frustrating then and contributing to increased lack of completing pre-service training for 50% of relatives. Objective 4 is to change pre-service training to meet the needs of relatives, working with public policy to allow flexibility for relatives . </li></ul>
  4. 5. Problem and Objectives for Sibling Initiative <ul><li>There is a lack of approved foster homes willing and able to take placement of sibling groups of 3 or more children. About 25% or 193 children in permanent custody need to be placed together as siblings. Objectives A and B for our Sibling Initiative are to increase adoptive placements of siblings by 22% (from 58% to 80%) and increase our number of resource families willing to care for large sibling groups. </li></ul><ul><li>Siblings have different levels of service needs. Objective C for our Sibling Initiative is to increase services and service access to enable resource families to maintain large sibling groups. </li></ul>
  5. 6. Recruitment that results in Placement. <ul><ul><li>Our general recruitment campaign will be about relationship building/community building. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Because we are using a neighborhood based approach to evaluate our intervention, in addition to the general recruitment activities, we will consult with a social marketer in Phase 1 to develop strategies for target recruiting relatives and resources families for siblings in the specific neighborhoods receiving the intervention. </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Our child centered recruitment will work with the arts community to add to the description of the children waiting for families. Print and video recruitment materials that are specific to the children and youth will be augmented through partnership with the arts community. </li></ul></ul>
  6. 7. Our Innovation <ul><li>The specific design we are using to evaluate this project is a match group design. </li></ul><ul><li>We will compare the outcomes for program participants with outcomes for a comparison group selected to closely match participants on key demographic variables. </li></ul><ul><li>The match group will we use are specific neighborhoods that received the intervention and compare them to the matched neighborhood that did not receive the intervention. </li></ul>
  7. 8. Year 1 <ul><li>We are excited! </li></ul>