1. www.studypedia.au.dk/en
Suggestions for the content of the PhD
project description within the
humanities at Danish universities
Based on input from Professor Stig Hjarvad, former leader of the Danish
National Research School for Media, Communication, and Journalism,
and translated from Unni From and Nete Nørgaard Kristensen: Proces og
struktur i ph.d.-forløbet, Samfundslitteratur, 2005.

2. General guidelines (1)
• Be clear, concise and thorough
• Write so that non-specialists can understand the
entire project description; the applications are
often assessed by persons from very different
areas of specialisation
• Emphasise the ways in which your project is
innovative in comparison to previous research
www.studypedia.au.dk/en

3. General guidelines (2)
• Be both ambitious and realistic: outstandingly
examining only one problem is better than
examining many different themes mediocrely
• Arrange for a senior researcher within the field
to read through and comment on your
application well in advance of submission
www.studypedia.au.dk/en

4. Generally, the project description
consists of the following parts
1. Introduction
2. The project’s background
3. The project’s theoretical frame
4. Methods used in the project
5. Work plan or schedule for the project
6. Expected results
7. List of references
www.studypedia.au.dk/en

5. 1. Introduction
• Title of project: specific and interesting
• Initial motivation for the project: relevance, topicality,
specific characteristics, etc.
• Delimitation of the project: thematic, historical,
geographical, institutional, etc.
• What kind of project is it – filling in an empirical blind
spot, tackling a (well-defined) theoretical problem or
something else
• The thesis statement
www.studypedia.au.dk/en

6. 2. The project’s background
• Previous research in the field – both in Denmark and
abroad – most important works
• How is this project situated in the context of prior
research
• Own research within this field, if any
• The social relevance of the project, if any
• Relevant research environments, nationally and
internationally, into which the project can be integrated
• Association with graduate schools
www.studypedia.au.dk/en

7. 3. The project’s theoretical frame
• Explanation of and reasons for the chosen
theories
• Epistemological choices: hermeneutics,
phenomenology, cognition, etc.
www.studypedia.au.dk/en

8. 4. Methods used in the project
• Give a short explanation of methods you may use, for example:
quantitative/qualitative, discourse analysis, qualitative interviews,
media ethnography, survey
• Short explanation of reasons behind the choice of methods – and
maybe the methods you did not choose
• Selection of empirical material: what is being examined, for example
groups of films, respondent groups, documents
• Access to empirical material: possible access to archives,
permission for interviews, etc.
• Possible ethical conditions concerning the methods/empirical
material: anonymising, etc.
www.studypedia.au.dk/en

9. 5. Work plan for the project (including a
timetable for the 3-year period)
• A clear specification of timetable for reading stages,
empirical analysis, writing stages, etc.
• When do you plan to participate in courses and
meet your teaching obligations?
• Staying abroad: Where? Contacts?
• Participation in courses: write down a few of the first
courses where possible
• Special expenses tied to the project (for example
questionnaires, travel, etc.)
www.studypedia.au.dk/en

10. 6. Expected Results
• What are the results – in general – you expect to
obtain through this project?
• In what way will they be of use for future
research in the field and society in general?
• How do you expect to communicate them?
www.studypedia.au.dk/en

11. 7. List of references
• The literature referred to in the application
should be listed here
www.studypedia.au.dk/en

12. www.studypedia.au.dk/en
Supporting students in building academic skills