Esd the broad impact and design challenges part2of2

1,415 views

Published on

Ted Dangelmayer and Terry Welsher, of Dangelmayer Associates, present two topics involving Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) and the connection to product reliability. Please join both presentations to increase your understanding of the impact of ESD and specific considerations during product design.
In this seminar, we discuss the challenges designers will be facing over the next several years. Changes in technology will continue to put pressure on designers to provide adequate protection but often without good information or tools. Highlights of the following will be covered: The shrinking design window for CMOS integrated circuits; changes in component level ESD threshold targets and the lack of availability of component information; the implications of new packaging and interconnect technologies such as through silicon vias (TSV); design of system connection and user interfaces; the use and misuse of component level ESD information for system level protection and emerging methods for co-design; and the evolution of EOS/ESD testing methods and standards.

Published in: Technology, Business
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,415
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
73
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
76
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Esd the broad impact and design challenges part2of2

  1. 1. Part II: Challenges in the Design of  Integrated Circuits for ESD/EOS  Integrated Circuits for ESD/EOS Robustness Terry Welsher ©2011 ASQ & Presentation Terry Presented live on Jul  07th, 2011http://reliabilitycalendar.org/The_Reliability_Calendar/Short_Courses/Shliability Calendar/Short Courses/Short_Courses.html
  2. 2. ASQ Reliability Division  ASQ Reliability Division Short Course Series Short Course Series The ASQ Reliability Division is pleased to  present a regular series of short courses  featuring leading international practitioners,  academics, and consultants. academics and consultants The goal is to provide a forum for the basic and  The goal is to provide a forum for the basic and continuing education of reliability  professionals.http://reliabilitycalendar.org/The_Reliability_Calendar/Short_Courses/Shliability Calendar/Short Courses/Short_Courses.html
  3. 3. Part II: Challenges in the Design of Integrated Circuits for ESD/EOS RobustnessProfessional Services Only No Product Sales!•  Client Locations Terry Welsher www.dangelmayer.com
  4. 4. Outline •  Factory Control vs. Device Protection •  ESD Threshold Roadmap Revisited •  Industry Council on ESD Targets •  Changes in Design Targets •  2000 volts HBM •  CDM Challenges •  “Machine” Model •  System Level Issues •  EOS p2Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  5. 5. ESD Control and Protection Control Protection Range of 10000 Events OccurringElectrostatic Voltage without Static 1000 Controls Device Sensitivity with Protection Circuitry 100 Events with Ordinary Class 0 Controls 10 Device Sensitivity w/o protection circuits Advanced Controls MR Head SensitivityCopyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  6. 6. ESD Sensitivity Trends - Revisited p4Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  7. 7. ESDA Technology Roadmap HBM Roadmap (Min-Max) 6kV 4kV 2kV 1kV ESD Control Methods 0V 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 ESD Control is becoming increasingly critical! p5Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  8. 8. Typical IC With Protection Circuitry Protection CircuitsProtection CircuitsConstrained or Omitted By:• Technology Node Feature Sizes• Circuit Functionality Functional Circuitry• I/O Density• Circuit Speed Requirements Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  9. 9. ESDA Technology Roadmap CDM Roadmap (Min-Max) 1000V 750V 500V 250V 125V ESD Control Methods 0V 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 ESD Control is becoming increasingly critical! p7Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  10. 10. Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  11. 11. Misuse of ESD Classifications Classification Voltage Range (V) 0A < 125 0B 125 to < 250 1A 250 to < 500 1B 500 to < 1000 1C 1000 to < 2000 2 2000 to < 4000 3A 4000 to < 8000 3B ≥ 8000 There is no industry standard for tailoring control procedures according to these levelsCopyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  12. 12. Industry Council on ESD Target LevelsMission•  Review the ESD robustness requirements of modern IC products to allow safe handling in an ESD protected area.•  While accommodating both the capability of the manufacturing sites and the constraints posed by downscaled process technologies on practical protection designs, the Council provides a consolidated recommendation for future ESD target levels.•  The Council Members and Associates promote these recommended targets for adoption as company goals.•  Being an independent entity, the Council presents the results and supportive data to all interested standardization bodies. Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  13. 13. Industry Council on ESDTarget Levels 11Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  14. 14. Industry Council White Papers•  White Paper 1: A Case for Lowering Component Level HBM/MM ESD Specifications and Requirements.•  White Paper 2: A Case for Lowering Component Level CDM ESD Specifications and Requirements•  White Paper 3: System Level ESD Part I: Common Misconceptions and Recommended Basic ApproachesCopyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  15. 15. Challenge and Effort of Meeting ESD Level Requirements Required Effort and Resources HBM 2kV n @ tai ain M kV HBM n @1 D esig vel Han dling Le Meet Safe Tech. Node 130nm 90nm 65nm 45nm 32nm 22nm Qualification 2001 2003 2005 2008 2010 2014 Year Reducing to 1kV will alleviate a lot of ESD effort but as technologies are scaled down further the challenge will continue… 13 Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates Industry Council
  16. 16. Cost of ESD Control The cost of ESDEffort to Achieve High Yield control does not increase for 2kV or 500V devices Basic ESD Control 500V 1 kV 2 kV 16 kV HBM LevelCopyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  17. 17. Where is the data? Ø  ESD/EOS failures as 1 dpm line all devices provided by various members 1 of the Industry Council based on 21 billion devices Ø  Includes both automotive"EOS/ESD" fails per million devices 0,1 products and consumer ICs Ø  A vast majority of the returns are often found to be due to 0,01 with 1.5kV HBM with 500V HBM EOS 0.7 billion sold 4.8 billion sold 9.3 billion sold 5.7 billion sold with 1kV HBM witj 2kV HBM 1E-3 Ø  Total return rate due to EOS/ ESD fails < 1 dpm Ø  No obvious correlation of 1E-4 EOS/ESD returns to HBM 500 1000 1500 2000 levels of 500 V … 2 kV HBM robustness This data represents products shipped at various ESD levels with the same basic factory control Industry Council 15Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  18. 18. Conclusion for HBM •  2 kV HBM design is frequently causing unnecessary qualification delays across the technologies •  HBM qualification levels between 500 V and 2 kV exhibit the same level of manufacturing quality and field robustness •  Targeting 1kV HBM is safe and is proven to provide margin* *AT&T used a 500 volt requirement starting in 1988 with no HBM problemsNovember 2010 Industry Council 16 Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  19. 19. Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  20. 20. CBE vs. CDM Discharge Waveform Comparison FICBM vs. FICDM Discharge Waveforms (250 V) Voltage for DSP with a 250V Charge 10 GND test pad FICBMPeak Current (Amps) 8 GND pin FICDM 6 4 2 0 -2 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 Time (nanoseconds) Courtesy: Andrew Olney, Quality Director, Analog Devices Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  21. 21. Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  22. 22. CDM Peak Current Dependence on Pin CountCopyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  23. 23. CDM Threshold Dependencies Larger Device Package SizeHigherOperatingSpeeds p21 Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates Ref: Industry Council WPII 2009
  24. 24. Conclusions for CDMCopyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  25. 25. Machine Model evolved from HBM HBM MM Simple Plug-In Module for Existing HBM TesterCopyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  26. 26. MM Relation to HBM, CDM Ø To avoid high charging voltages from the HBM test, MM* was thought to be a good substitute with lower pre-charging voltage but with equivalent current stress. Ø There was really no intention to address any different failure mechanisms to HBM. Ø In the vast majority of cases, analyses between HBM and MM show the same damage sites Ø This is in contrast to CDM, where the rise time is much faster – often leading to voltage drops and typically resulting in unique oxide failures*It isn’t clear when the name “machine” was attachedto this model. 24Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  27. 27. Failure Analysis on Same I/O Pin for Both HBM and MMStress HBM 3.5kV MM 230V Electrical signatures for both HBM and MM failures: Increase in leakage; Site of damage: ESD Diode Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  28. 28. MM Relation to HBM, CDM Ø It was also wrongly assumed that it models the fast discharge from or to a metal surface better than the HBM test. Ø Meanwhile, it is now known that fast discharges are reproduced best by CDM. Ø Field failures due to ESD are rare, and if any do The root cause of almost all ESD failures of ICs is occur they often can be correlated to weak CDM either poor CDM design and poor CDM controls in protection design or poor control of static charges factories. in manufacturing 26Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  29. 29. JEDEC’s New Official Position on MM:JESD22-A115C is a reference document; it is not arequirement per JESD47G.Machine Model as described in JESD22-A115Cshould not be used as a requirement for IC ESDQualification.Only HBM and CDM are the necessary ESDQualification test methods as specified in StressTest Driven Qualification of Integrated Circuits(JESD47G). Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  30. 30. Typical Set-Up: IEC 61000-4-2 System Level ESD Metallic part ESD tip perpendicular to EUT surface Wall Insulating outlet foam EUT 0,03 m ≥ 0,6 m ≥1m 0,1 m insulating support ESD generator Ground ≥1m GRP strapCopyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  31. 31. ESD Testing§  How does one test for ESD robustness?•  Component ESD testing (i.e., HBM and CDM) of ICs is intended to ensure that ICs survive the manufacturing process inside ESD Protected Areas (EPA).•  System level ESD testing is intended to ensure that finished products can continue normal operation during and after a system level ESD strike. –  The IEC ESD Test Method is used to represent one particular scenario of a charged human holding a metal object to discharge. This is a common test method used to assess the ESD robustness of the system –  Other test standards(e.g., ISO10605, DO-160) are used depending on the applicationCopyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates Industry Council 2010
  32. 32. Industry Wide ProblemThere is a prevailing misunderstanding between IC Suppliers and System Level Designers :•  ESD test specification requirements of system vs. component providers;•  Understanding of the ESD failure / upset mechanisms and contributions to those mechanisms, from system specific vs. component specific constraints;•  Lack of acknowledged responsibility between system designers and component providers regarding proper system level ESD protection for their respective end products.OEMs are attempting to use component ESD information as anindicator of system level performance! Industry Council 2010Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  33. 33. Component Vs. System Test Results – PoorCorrelationAnalysis of system failure case studies having bothHBM and IEC data indicates no correlation of HBMfailure voltage to IEC failure voltage. Industry Council 2010Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  34. 34. Component ESD Versus SystemESD•  HBM/CDM and IEC are completely different tests,and thus there is a clear lack of correlation betweenthe two methods• High levels of HBM performance do not ensurethat system ESD robustness can be achieved•  In fact in some cases, a high level of HBMperformance can be a detrimental to optimumdesign of system protection Industry Council 2010Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  35. 35. Differentiation of Internal Vs. External Pins Internal External Printed IC Circuit connector Board Interchip IC IC IC bus•  Internal Pins and External Pins should meet minimum HBM and CDM levels•  External Pins must be designed for proper system ESD protection Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates Industry Council 2010
  36. 36. Designing for the Overall System • The HBM and CDM levels are important only for component External handling Clamps • System ESD protection design involves an understanding of the system Industry Council 2010Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  37. 37. System-Efficient ESD Design (SEED) Concept PCB With Components IEC IC External Component Response Characterization linked to the IC clamp Pin’s Transient Characteristics External TVS• For an efficient system protection design, the IC pin breakdown characteristics play a critical role• With this type of understanding, effective IEC protection design can be achieved for any IC pin that interfaces with the external world Industry Council 2010 Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  38. 38. SEED Concept Details1.  IC Supplier provides Transmission Line Pulse (TLP) data on the Interface Pin2.  Board Designer characterizes the Transient Voltage Pulse (TVP) to determine the Residual Pulse Stress (RPS) data (Voltage Vs. Time)3.  Board components are adjusted to balance the RPS data to the TLP data PCB With Components IC Residual TLP Pulse Stress InformationIEC clamp Board External Component Pin Design External TVS Industry Council 2010 Copyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates
  39. 39. Electrical Overstress (EOS) and Safe Operating Area (SOA) ESD Area EOS Area SOA Current limit Power limit I P Voltage limit V Time to failure causing localized failures. Over voltage tends to damage breakdown sites. Over voltage tends to damage breakdown sites. Over current tends to fuse interconnects. age tends to damage fuse interconnects. Over current tends to breakdown sites. Over power tends to to fuse interconnects. melt larger areas. Over currenttends to melt larger areas. Over power tends EOS: Wide spreading melt larger areas. large areas of damage. of heat resulting in Over power spreading of heat resulting in large areas of damage. EOS: Wide tends to 37 ESD: Heat does not disperse much causing localized failures. EOS: Heat does not disperse Slide 37 causing localized of damage. Wide spreading of heat much resulting in large areas failures. ESD:
  40. 40. Sources of EOS from Power " High ground impedance (inductive coupling) " Ground loops " Improper power wiring " DC voltage from tools in automated equipment " DC voltage from ungrounded floating metal " Faulty soldering irons and power tools " Faulty power adaptors " Hot plug-in and faulty power sequencing " Wirebonding Copyright 2010, Dangelmayer Assoc. & Semitracks Inc. p38
  41. 41. EOS Control and Design " Unlike ESD, formal EOS prevention, monitoring and auditing systems are not common in manufacturing " Like ESD, EOS failures are often the result of lack of awareness of the problem " Like ESD, many stakeholders n  Product design n  Test and Production equipment design n  Facility design and maintenance n  Quality/process control " Unlike ESD, no standard tests, no standard design Copyright 2010, Dangelmayer Assoc. & Semitracks Inc. 39
  42. 42. Questions? Contact information: Ted Dangelmayer Terry Welsher 978 282 8888 ted@dangelmayer.com www.dangelmayer.com ESD Training Event: DA ESD Workshop July 26th , 27th and 28th Cape Ann, MassachusettsCopyright © 2011 Dangelmayer Associates

×