Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Joshua Maroske


Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Joshua Maroske

  1. 1. Emissions Trading Scheme ( ETS ) - Opportunity to Aquaculture Ridley Aquafeed 2009 Australian Prawn Farmers’ Association & Australian Barramundi Farmers’ Association Aquaculture into the Future July 29-30 2009, Jupiters Casino, Townsville, Queensland Joshua Maroske Fisheries Economist Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation
  2. 2. Federal Government’s Proposed ETS <ul><li>Known as the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) </li></ul><ul><li> aims to drive reduction in emissions of greenhouse gases </li></ul><ul><li>To be introduced 1 st July 2011 (full trading by 2012-13) </li></ul><ul><li>Reduction of greenhouse gases of 5% below 2000 levels by 2020 (40% reduction by the year 2050) </li></ul><ul><li>Decision on whether to include primary industries in the scheme (eg – agriculture, fisheries, aquaculture ) to be made in 2013 </li></ul>
  3. 3. Land and Water Australia Report - Summary <ul><li>Aquaculture unlikely to ever be included as direct participant in ETS (not a significant emitter of greenhouses gases) </li></ul><ul><li> commercial fishing and aquaculture make up < 0.2% of national greenhouse gas emissions, with 348 emissions per unit or revenue (t CO 2 – e /$m revenue) </li></ul><ul><li>A variety of information needs required by industry (to help to inform decisions about priority areas of future research) : </li></ul><ul><ul><li>the specific rules of the CPRS </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>the rules for the recognition of offsets </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>the potential revenue available from plantation offsets </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>likely scale of the cost impacts that will arise for energy and energy-related farm inputs </li></ul></ul>
  4. 4. Information Needs & Research Opportunities <ul><li>PRIORITY: H = High M = Medium L = Low N/A = Not Applicable </li></ul><ul><li>TIMEFRAME: ST = Short Term (0-5 years) LT = Long Term (5-15 years) </li></ul>
  5. 5. Example of Price Impacts - Electricity <ul><li>WHOLESALE </li></ul><ul><li>Prices range from $30-$40 per Megawatt hour </li></ul><ul><li>Add full cost of greenhouse emission ($30-$40 per tonne) </li></ul><ul><li>WHOLE ELECTRICITY PRICE WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY DOUBLED </li></ul><ul><li>RETAIL </li></ul><ul><li>Composed of 50% electricity costs and 50% ‘poles and line’ costs </li></ul><ul><li>Doubling whole electricity prices could lead to a 50% INCREASE IN RETAIL ELECTRICTY PRICE AT THE FARMGATE OR HOUSEHOLD </li></ul><ul><li>One Megawatt hour of electricity = 1 tonne CO 2 -e of greenhouse gases </li></ul><ul><li>Real costs likely to be even greater than this ( electricity generators face high capital investment costs for conversion) </li></ul>
  6. 6. Importance of Aquaculture in the face of climate change <ul><li>Climate change brings new opportunities to the industry: </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Selective breeding </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Regulating the environment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>New species opportunities </li></ul></ul><ul><li>In Australia: </li></ul><ul><li>- Wild-catch seafood production and value declining ↓ </li></ul><ul><li>- Aquaculture seafood production and value increasing ↑ </li></ul><ul><li>Aquaculture production in Queensland increased by 5% in 2007-08 to $75.5mil, a 27% of total value ( Source: Australian Fisheries Statistics, ABARE) </li></ul><ul><li>Trends suggest further growth and greater seafood market share for aquaculture industry in future </li></ul>
  7. 7. Opportunities arising from the ETS <ul><li>The use of certification systems as part of product-marketing efforts </li></ul><ul><li>Offsets </li></ul><ul><li>- actions to help reduce atmospheric greenhouse gas concentration </li></ul><ul><li>- participants in the CPRS would pay non-participants to undertake emission offset activities </li></ul><ul><li>- potential opportunity for aquaculture businesses, particularly if landholdings are available for plantation development </li></ul><ul><li>( Offset opportunity not likely to be available in initial years of scheme; requires further research, eg – Life Cycle Assessment analysis ) </li></ul>
  8. 8. Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities <ul><li>Projection of likely input cost implications arising from imposition of the ETS on direction emission generators </li></ul><ul><li>Projection of both international and domestic changes likely to arise as the ETS is implemented </li></ul><ul><li>Other Areas: </li></ul><ul><li>- potential for biodiesel production from waste aquaculture products; </li></ul><ul><li>- potential for biodiesel production from algae; </li></ul><ul><li>- the potential for specific activities in marine areas to be recognised as </li></ul><ul><li>carbon offsets or carbon sinks </li></ul><ul><li>This knowledge can help policy development, to ensure the aquaculture industry remains competitive and continues to grow </li></ul>
  9. 9. Other aspects to consider <ul><li>Many aquaculture ventures in public waterways, acute impacts likely to be highly visible  could lead to more concerted efforts </li></ul><ul><li>Department of Climate Change Report </li></ul><ul><li>Aquaculture an important source of employment, especially in coastal towns  declining importance of wild-catch fisheries </li></ul><ul><li>The interaction of social and economic factors in relation to climate impacts and setting public policy needs to be properly played out </li></ul><ul><li>Australian aquaculture industry well positioned in face of government’s impending ETS </li></ul>
  10. 10. Summary <ul><li>Implementation of an ETS would have a variety of economic, social, environmental impacts on aquaculture industry </li></ul><ul><li>Impacts currently difficult to quantity  more research and understanding is required to help shape future direction of industry </li></ul><ul><li>Short and long-term  likely consequences include price increase in factors such as energy (electricity), feed sources (grains) and fuel; potential opportunity in the form of carbon offsetting </li></ul><ul><li>For further information, please see </li></ul><ul><li> </li></ul>