Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Ukraine Crisis Webinar Series Session - V

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad

Check these out next

1 of 19 Ad

Ukraine Crisis Webinar Series Session - V

Download to read offline

Predicting Food Crop Production in times of Crisis: The Case of Wheat in South Africa

Predicting Food Crop Production in times of Crisis: The Case of Wheat in South Africa

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Ukraine Crisis Webinar Series Session - V (20)

More from AKADEMIYA2063 (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

Ukraine Crisis Webinar Series Session - V

  1. 1. Predicting Food Crop Production in Times of Crisis: The Case of Wheat in South Africa Presented by Dr. Greenwell Matchaya Senior Researcher, ReSAKSS ESA Regional Coordinator, IWMI/Pretoria Based on Racine Ly, Greenwell Matchaya, and Khadim Dia, 2022. 17 Jan 2023
  2. 2. • Introduction • Objectives • Methodology • Results • Key Messages Outline
  3. 3. • With the numerous challenges related to agricultural trade that African countries currently face, • It is crucial for policymakers to be aware of potential/impending food production disruptions • Estimating agricultural production with greater precision is also generally important for intervention planning • Russia and Ukraine are key exporters of many agricultural products, including sunflower oil and seed, wheat, barley, rapeseed and maize. • Jointly, the two countries account for 27% of global wheat trade, and 23%, and 14% of barley and maize trade respectively • Furthermore, the two countries account for over 28% of the world’s nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous fertilizer exports Introduction
  4. 4. • The Russia-Ukraine war has therefore destabilized global food and other agricultural value chains, • This may worsen the longer and more intensely the war is fought. • As net importers of both fertilizers and wheat, African countries are already experiencing • a rise in the prices of these commodities as well as their substitutes. • Unfortunately, the fertilizer and wheat price increases will negatively impact agricultural production in the • current and coming seasons. • Many more households may therefore need support in order to survive the resulting and inevitable food price hikes.
  5. 5. • The focus on wheat is useful. Wheat is the second most important crop in South Africa after corn. • South Africa produces around 2Million MT of wheat and imports a further 1.7Million MT. • Consumption demand for wheat in South Africa is upward of 3.6 million MT annually • The sales value is ~10% (R19 Billion)of total sales of all field crops • So it’s a significant crop • Importance of Accurate and Timely Statistics and the role of AI/Machine Learning • Under these conditions, more accurate and timely statistics on crop production are critical • To know how much production will be available nationally • Which areas will produce less. This can facilitate development of interventions to save livelihoods
  6. 6. Objectives The objectives of this brief were: • To forecast the quantity of wheat production in South Africa for the 2022 harvest • To forecast the spatial distribution of wheat in South Africa in the 2022 harvest season and provide insights into implications • Nevertheless, for a country with limited resources, and when time is of the essence, • survey based methods for estimates may be inappropriate, infeasible or inefficient • Using satellite data and artificial Intelligence and more specifically machine Learning can be useful in these cases • This method can also reduce the time and costs needed for calculating production levels from surveys and field visits. • Further, the inherent precision of the techniques contributes to the availability of better quality data
  7. 7. • Used the Africa Crop Production (AfCP) model to predict future production • The model uses satellite remote sensing data as explanatory variables and machine learning techniques as a predictive modelling framework, • To provide production quantities before the harvesting period at the pixel level • The remote sensing data makes it possible to uniquely examine different earthly objects without having to see them physically. • Remote sensing also enables the production of more extensive and better-quality data over a shorter period. • Machine learning makes it possible to extract the many hidden features in the vast amount of remotely sensed data and make sense out of it. Methodology
  8. 8. • The 2022 predictions are in line with expected patterns- more production in Western cape, Free State • KZN production trails that of the WC and Free State • Northern Cape and North Western Provinces are generally not heavily involved in wheat production Results
  9. 9. • Nationally, a total of around 1.8 million Mt predicted for 2022 • Down from the 2Million realized in 2021 • Western Cape and Free State registered an increase • However all other provinces registered a reduction • More reduction in Eastern Cape, KwaZulu Natal, and Mpumalanga Production by province
  10. 10. • Within the North West Province, there was a general decline • the largest decline was in Dr Ruth Mompati municipality (22%), followed by Bojanala (20%.) • In contrast, Gaetsewe municipality registered the most decline (42%) in Northern Cape, but Siyanda and Frances Baard municipalities saw an increase. • The central Karoo saw the largest decline (32%) in Western Cape, but the West Coast, Eden and Overberg saw an increase Within Provinces Province District Municipality 2021 wheat producti on (MT) 2022 wheat producti on (MT) production ratio (2022/2021) North West Ngaka Modiri Molema 64049,8 58309,1 0,91 North West Dr Ruth Segomotsi Mompati 38682,3 29940,8 0,77 North West Bojanala 32198,2 25634 0,8 North West Dr Kenneth Kaunda 29259,2 24554 0,84 Northern Cape Namakwa 84751,4 91938,9 1,08 Northern Cape Pixley ka Seme 55615,9 53326,1 0,96 Northern Cape Frances Baard 35520,2 41222,2 1,16 Northern Cape Siyanda 32406,2 36406,8 1,12 Northern Cape John Taolo Gaetsewe 3502,19 2021,87 0,58 Western Cape West Coast 271847 308653 1,14 Western Cape Overberg 109065 115529 1,06 Western Cape Cape Winelands 94265,4 85324,7 0,91 Western Cape Eden 76451,9 76959,5 1,01 Western Cape City of Cape Town 10565 9068,85 0,86 Western Cape Central Karoo 7571,02 5118,48 0,68
  11. 11. • The Free state generally saw an increase in production although the Xhariep municipality registered a12% decline • The Eastern Cape however saw the largest decline. The Buffalo city saw a 58% decline while the rest declined by at least 49%. • In Gauteng, the largest decline was in the City of Johannesburg, while the least decline was sin Sedibeng municipality Province District Municipality 2021 wheat production (MT) 2022 wheat production (MT) Wheat production ratio (2022/2021) Eastern Cape Cacadu 44656,11 22876,1 0,51 Eastern Cape Chris Hani 43860,85 22425,9 0,51 Eastern Cape Joe Gqabi 33596,64 16896,1 0,5 Eastern Cape Amathole 30409,15 13911,8 0,46 Eastern Cape O.R. Tambo 17688,94 8395,26 0,47 Eastern Cape Alfred Nzo 15374,96 7889,43 0,51 Eastern Cape Buffalo City 4063,81 1723,22 0,42 Eastern Cape Nelson Mandela Bay 2115,19 1001,43 0,47 Free State Thabo Mofutsanyane 170240,53 182930 1,07 Free State Lejweleputswa 130248,06 136636 1,05 Free State Fezile Dabi 110797,8 120263 1,09 Free State Xhariep 86528,24 76167,1 0,88 Free State Mangaung 25708,98 26876,7 1,05 Gauteng City of Tshwane 8698,8 6089,84 0,7 Gauteng West Rand 6597,22 4833,72 0,73 Gauteng Sedibeng 5220,8 4193,79 0,8 Gauteng Ekurhuleni 4694,26 3237,05 0,69 Gauteng City of Johannesburg 1661,03 897,74 0,54
  12. 12. • All municipalities in KwaZulu Natal, Limpopo and Mpumalanga registered declines in wheat production when compared to 2021 • The worst decline in KZN was in Umkhanyakude (49%) • Mpumalanga’s Ehlanzeni municipality (40%), and Limpopo’s Vhembe (31%) were some of the municipalities with the worst decline Province District Municipality 2021 wheat productio n (MT) 2022 wheat production (MT) Wheat production ratio (2022/2021) KwaZulu-Natal Zululand 21452,2 12423,4 0,58 KwaZulu-Natal Sisonke 15850,9 9875,3 0,62 KwaZulu-Natal Uthukela 14652,4 9043,82 0,62 KwaZulu-Natal Umgungundlovu 14227,6 8719,67 0,61 KwaZulu-Natal Umkhanyakude 15511,2 7900,99 0,51 KwaZulu-Natal Umzinyathi 12668,3 7343,12 0,58 KwaZulu-Natal Uthungulu 11022,2 6011,76 0,55 KwaZulu-Natal Amajuba 9862,35 5829,75 0,59 KwaZulu-Natal Ugu 8750,5 4850,64 0,55 KwaZulu-Natal iLembe 4959,81 2905,44 0,59 KwaZulu-Natal eThekwini 2323,38 1261,28 0,54 Limpopo Waterberg 64804,9 56212,1 0,87 Limpopo Sekhukhune 23657,9 19122,5 0,81 Limpopo Capricorn 22824,1 19061,3 0,84 Limpopo Mopani 19843,3 15202,9 0,77 Limpopo Vhembe 15568,7 10714,3 0,69 Mpumalanga Gert Sibande 48711 32487 0,67 Mpumalanga Nkangala 25720,1 18000,5 0,7 Mpumalanga Ehlanzeni 21307,3 12772,2 0,6
  13. 13. • Huge positive and negative differences in rainfall patterns for example <-20 and >20 mm appear to correlate negatively with wheat production . • Larger anomalies observed in North West, Kwazulu Natal, Limpopo, parts of Western Cape. Many of these have low production Relationships with biophysical elements Rainfall Anomalies and Wheat production patterns
  14. 14. • Huge anomalies observed in parts of Limpopo, Mpumalanga, Western Cape (Rising temperature) • Temperatures have deviated negatively over parts of North West, Northern Cape • Some of the spatial variations in wheat production may be explained by this spatial variation in LST anomalies Land Surface Temperature Anomalies and Wheat production
  15. 15. • Modest changes in NDVI appear to favor better wheat production • Areas of the Northern Cape and the North West have larger NDVI and are also those where wheat production is weakest Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) Anomalies and Predicted Wheat Production
  16. 16. Key Messages • The Russia-Ukraine war presents a challenge to global food security and household resilience • Especially in those countries that depend on international trade for agricultural inputs and food. • Predicting future agricultural production is critical for anticipating and crafting timely interventions that may limit the negative effects emanating from the war. • Remote sensing and artificial intelligence techniques can play a key role in provide data needed for decision making, timeously • Using these techniques, it was possible to predict the impending production decline in wheat production for South Africa long before its harvest. • The predictions are consistent with actual production ranges observed
  17. 17. • Equipped with such information, policy-makers can leverage on such information to develop mechanisms that increase consumer access to local production • Which can minimize the threat emanating from the disruption of global wheat supply chains for those households in areas with declining production levels. • This information can also motivate for planted area expansion and can make the government and stakeholders interested in food security, more prepare. • It may be useful to encourage farmers to expand areas planted to wheat in the next season to limit the extent of future global price increases • Good agricultural water management can also boost production in water scarce parts of South Africa. • This would dampen the observed negative correlations between rainfall anomalies and predicted wheat production.
  18. 18. • Another input affected by the war is inorganic fertilizer. • This will continue to be a limiting factor in wheat production as long as value chain disruption persist • To develop food system resilience, agricultural research in South Africa should consider placing further emphasis on wheat yield improvement programs that aim to produce wheat varieties with low input requirements • Targeting low fertilizer and water requirements in breeding will reduce the input costs in wheat production while also increasing production, productivity, and profitability.
  19. 19. THANK YOU

×