A talk of two halves


Published on

The first half of this presentation is about academic use of social media and the second half is about recent findings from my current HEA-funded audio feedback project: http://lebioscience.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/audio-feedback-evidence-is-mounting.html
Sorry, now audio for these yet, but the first half is rather similar to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgU5Gx5bh3o and I'll try to put up a commentary for the feedback section soon.

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Dr Alan J. Cann, Department of Biology,Adrian Building, University of Leicester,University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
  • Dr Alan J. Cann, Department of Biology,Adrian Building, University of Leicester,University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
  • Motivation?
  • Tumbleweed.
  • Motivation?
  • A talk of two halves

    1. 1. Academic Use of Social Networks - a talk of two halves Alan Cann, University of Leicester bit.ly/AJCannMapping engagement Dark Social
    2. 2. Why me?• Visitors and Residents: mapping student attitudes to academic use of social networks. (2013) Learning, Media and Technology, 38(2). A ramble through the history of online learning (2012) The Biochemist 34(4); 2-5.• An efficient and effective system for interactive student feedback using Google+ to enhance an institutional virtual learning environment (2012) Leicester Research Archive.• Beyond marks: new tools to visualise student engagement via social networks (2012) Research in Learning Technology 20: 16283.• Reflective Social Portfolios for Feedback and Peer Mentoring (2011) Leicester Research Archive.• Observing Emerging Student Networks on a Microblogging Service (2011) Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7 (1)• Social media: A guide for researchers (2011) Research Information Network.• Assessment 2.0: Wikipedia writing projects (2008) Case studies of E-learning, the HEA Centre for Bioscience. Search on scholar.google.com
    3. 3. What is social media?Internet services where the online contentis generated by the users of the service( = Web 2.0, participatory media, etc)
    4. 4. Why?• Education as professional training• Transferable and employability skills development• Students as producers – learning partnerships• Intellectual ownership of media and content – producers not consumers
    5. 5. @daveowhite - Visitors and Residentsblip.tv/tall-research/visitors-residents-2733992
    6. 6. NetworkContext Content
    7. 7. Extrinsic IntrinsicAssessment as driver?
    8. 8. Emerging concept: Dark Socialscienceoftheinvisible.blogspot.com/search/label/DarkSocial Why? Ownership = engagement?
    9. 9. “Engaging by Talking: An Agile andEffective Approach to Audio Feedback” HEA STEM Students express widespread dissatisfaction with academic feedback. Teaching staff perceive a frequent lack of student engagement with written feedback, much of which goes uncollected. Published evidence shows that audio feedback is highly acceptable to students but is grossly underused. This project will explore methods to produce and deliver audio feedback to a wide range of students engaged in a variety of academic tasks with the aim of maximising student engagement while working towards a framework which increases the use of audio feedback by teaching staff. goo.gl/yehf7
    10. 10. Phase 1 - GradeMarkN = 31A trial of the TurnitIn GradeMark system in a mixed information economy. (2012) figshare.http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.98134
    11. 11. Phase 1 - GradeMarkBUT:• Marks before feedback - pedagogically broken• Learning analytics – what analytics?• Personal tutor shutout
    12. 12. Phase 1 - GradeMark• I really liked the voice comment. It was useful being able to listen to it again. I would have liked it to be longer and with more improvement points.• It was very useful, I thought that they said a lot about the essay and that it was more useful than the text comment.• The most useful aspect was that you can access the feedback whenever and I liked the fact that it was interactive and had voice comments.• The most useful aspects of feedback was the voice recording as it let me hear in the tone what my tutor felt towards my essay. The least helpful aspect were the notes/comments within the essay. This at times was crowded to read and should be listed on the side with bullets as to where to comment is referring. [GradeMark]• Could be improved by making it easier to find. [GradeMark]
    13. 13. Phase 2 - SoundCloud {{Mail merge}} students (& tutors) [Module Tag] - filters Feedback then Marksn = 170 (never again…)Processing time, cost.Engagement (downloads): 94%
    14. 14. Phase 2 - SoundCloud• I was able to listen to it at home and did not have to collect it from campus - as is the case with written feedback.• It removes the difficulty of reading bad handwriting that lots of markers have!• Useful that its accessible on the computer instead of being on paper, which can be mixed up or lost. The voice was really clear and understandable even for international students.• It feels more personalised and also easier as it doesnt require picking up work from the office, can access at home.• Criticism seemed more constructive and less negative when given in audio form. Sometimes written feedback comes across as too negative.• I found the length of the feedback to be ideal as it was both concise and informative. As it was sent by email, it was extremely easy to access. I was impressed by how quickly we had received the feedback, even before we were able to get the marks for assignment.• You also have to listen to the whole thing as instead of skim reading feedback... this is both positive and negative.• I see no weaknesses in this form of feedback rather it was more elaborate than most feedback I have given in the past.• Please use again and tell other staff to do so!
    15. 15. Phase 3 Local recording Dropbox {{Mail merge}}AudacityGarageBand n = 25 Processing time, free. Engagement (downloads): 91%
    16. 16. Phase 3• Very useful. The feedback was easily accessible and was given very quick (very much appreciated, thank you).• Most useful aspect: we dont have to keep a paper record of what could have been improved in our plan/essay, and can be accessed at any time.• It was useful as I received feedback which were specific, compared to written feedback which I have noticed tend to be somewhat vague in most parts.• The most useful was probably was that the feedback would seem more personal, and therefore feels more comprehensive. However, sometimes having feedback written has its advantages in the ease of re-accessing the feedback.• I would prefer written feedback by email as it is easier to go back over and review. The audio feedback took quite a long time to load on my home computer as my internet is very low speed but this was not a problem on the University computers.
    17. 17. Convenience EvidenceAssessment as driver?
    18. 18. Pedagogy not technology