Mitigating Real or Perceived Risks
                                 A Pro-active Approach for Dealing with
               ...
Presenters




                     Bart Schutte                              Kevin Jones
                Director, Web &...
Mitigating Real or Perceived Risks
A Pro-active Approach for Dealing with
Naysayers and Critics)

          Tips and tech...
What are the risks you see/fear?




© Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved.   4
Executive
    I want the benefits of
           –   Innovation
           –   Efficiency
           –   Collaboration
    ...
HR
    I want the benefits of
           – Being able to attract talent because of the quality of
             our toolset...
Manager
    I want the benefits of
           –   Global coordination
           –   Network-enabled team
           –   E...
Employee
    I want the benefits of
           – Greater visibility for myself
           – Greater access to information;...
Perceived and Real Issues
   Real Issues                                                Perceived Issues
    Employee Rig...
On Issues and Solutions
    It’s all about People
           – Most issues are emotional – regardless of the subject
    ...
Addressing Real Issues
   Real Issues                                                These issues largely concern HR
    ...
Addressing Perceived Issues

     Address issues directly with                             Perceived Issues
     stakehold...
The Legal Context
    Global Context
           – There is no common international law on these issues
                  ...
Managing Correct Behavior
    Have a user charter
           – Always best if existing charter is used
           – Any n...
© Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved.   15
Engage. Evangelize. Empower.
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Enterprise 2.0 Black Belt Workshop: Mitigating Real or Perceived Risks

2,752 views

Published on

The 2.0 Adoption Council Enterprise 2.0 Black Belt Workshop: Mitigating Real or Perceived Risks by Kevin Jones & Bart Schutte @ Enterprise 2.0 Conference Boston, June 2010

Published in: Education, Technology, Business

Enterprise 2.0 Black Belt Workshop: Mitigating Real or Perceived Risks

  1. 1. Mitigating Real or Perceived Risks A Pro-active Approach for Dealing with Naysayers and Critics) Bart Schutte and Kevin Jones © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved.
  2. 2. Presenters Bart Schutte Kevin Jones  Director, Web &  Social Media Strategist, NASA / Architecture, Saint-Gobain MSFC  Schutte.bart@gmail.com  kevin@engagedlearning.net © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 22
  3. 3. Mitigating Real or Perceived Risks A Pro-active Approach for Dealing with Naysayers and Critics)  Tips and techniques for dealing with Naysayers and Critics  Creating and championing policy decisions that support ‘open’  How to be successful in anticipating and addressing real or perceived risks from your key global stakeholders  Mitigating risk by partnering with key stakeholders  How to leverage the combination of reporting, automation and engagement to address concerns (i.e. abuse reporting, etc)  Leveraging community management and user advocates to promote real-time awareness and user supported governance © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 3
  4. 4. What are the risks you see/fear? © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 4
  5. 5. Executive  I want the benefits of – Innovation – Efficiency – Collaboration – Time to market  But I worry about – “Social Software” tools are not serious (we aren’t paid to be social) – These tools will cause people to waste time – How can I control the time people spend using these tools – People will use these tools for non-business activities (how to control) – These tools cost more than the benefit they bring © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 5
  6. 6. HR  I want the benefits of – Being able to attract talent because of the quality of our toolsets – Being able to retain talent because of the quality of our toolsets – Culture-shaping through tools that stress transparency, equality, … – Employee efficiency from effective tools  But I worry about – Personal Data issues – Liability issues around employee data and actions – Fear that people will say things they shouldn’t  politically incorrect  Confidential – People will rail against the company – I will give a communications channel to the workers' councils © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 6
  7. 7. Manager  I want the benefits of – Global coordination – Network-enabled team – Efficiency – Innovation  But I worry about – I will lose the control that comes with hierarchy and owning the communication channel  I own information (this gives me power)  I filter information (this gives me control) – I will lose the automatic credibility and reputation that comes from position – My staff will surpass me in visibility, credibility, reputation © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 7
  8. 8. Employee  I want the benefits of – Greater visibility for myself – Greater access to information; transparency from my company – Greater access to resources, expertise, and information  But I worry about – That what I say and do can be used against me • Content – That what I say and do won’t be used in my favor • Activity Stream – That I will be pressured to participate and judged badly • Presence and if I don’t Usage logs – What others say and post about me, and my ability to • Activity / Reputation control what is said ranking – The tags and ratings others attach to me or my content – That my confidential information will be compromised, made visible © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 8
  9. 9. Perceived and Real Issues Real Issues Perceived Issues  Employee Rights Issues  There is no clear ROI/Business Justification  Personal data protection issues  E20 is a waste of time  Company Liability for – Employee Rights issues  Inappropriate content – Personal Data Protection issues  Accuracy of Information  Control challenge for managers  Participant’s Age or Ability  Confidentiality concerns  Unsupportive Culture  Workers' Council issues  Controlling the content  Information Overload  Employees will abuse system and waste time © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 9
  10. 10. On Issues and Solutions  It’s all about People – Most issues are emotional – regardless of the subject – And while all of these issues are real… – None of them are new  Think, “How do you deal with this situation now? The answer with social software is the same.” – But the speed and ease of web 2.0 makes the risk and the need to address them more urgent  Solutions can be found to all of these issues – The solution will be specific or adapted to your organization based on  Culture  Legal context / global context – Not all issues need to be addressed before you go-live © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 10
  11. 11. Addressing Real Issues Real Issues These issues largely concern HR  Employee Rights Issues and Legal  Personal data protection issues Address them through a governance organization  Company Liability for composed of HR, Communication, – Employee Rights issues IT, and Business (Legal works for – Personal Data Protection issues HR and/or IT)  Control challenge for managers Approach :  Confidentiality concerns  Sit-down with the Legal and HR,  explain to them the context,  Workers Council issues  give examples of what others are doing,  make it their job to take a position on the issues and to implement the policy (this tends to calm their enthusiasm for significant effort) © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 11
  12. 12. Addressing Perceived Issues Address issues directly with Perceived Issues stakeholders  There is no clear ROI/Business  Anticipate the issues (create your list) Justification  Have prepared answers  Refer to the real experiences of others  E20 is a waste of time  Inappropriate content Create and Champion policy  Accuracy of Information decisions that support “Open”  Open means trusting users first and  Participant’s Age or Ability controlling only when the problem has become real  Unsupportive Culture  Evaluate the real risk and potential impact. It is often less than we think  Controlling the content Use senior champions to carry  Information Overload your message of openness  Employees will abuse system and In general : waste time  Use the community to monitor and auto correct  Report on issues that are not sufficiently addressed by the community © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 12
  13. 13. The Legal Context  Global Context – There is no common international law on these issues  What is sensitive data  Obligation regarding workers' councils  Corporate liability – There are regional and bi-lateral agreements – Your company will have to decide how it will address these issues See the 2.0 Adoption Council report on  Workers’ Council Issues “Implementing Enterprise 2.0 Within the European – Rules appear most strict in Germany Union” available for free at Newsgator.com – Any change to work environment or terms of work require Workers’ Council approval (councils are very fragmented, so http://www.newsgator.com/c have to deal with many) ompanyinfo/press/archive.a spx?post=204  Personal Data Protection – Since users post their own information, this is not usually an issue – Logs information that the user does not see cannot be used to gather information on individual behavior or actions © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 13
  14. 14. Managing Correct Behavior  Have a user charter – Always best if existing charter is used – Any new charter needs to be approved by workers councils – Keep rules light, common sense, and avoid “legalese” and “fear”  Employee Rights – Must have ability to correct and request the removal of content – Have a system for raising “whistle blowing” alerts to incorrect behavior – Go overboard in reassuring users – Have clearly stated policies on how participation (or lack of) will not be used in performance evaluations, etc. – Address real concerns about them feeling pressured to participate © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 14
  15. 15. © Copyright 2010 2.0 Adoption Council. All rights reserved. 15
  16. 16. Engage. Evangelize. Empower.

×