Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Leadership In The Workplace

26,301 views

Published on

leadership

Published in: Business, Education
  • Be the first to comment

Leadership In The Workplace

  1. 1. Leadership in the Workplace
  2. 2. Objectives: <ul><li>To define what is meant by leadership </li></ul><ul><li>To examine the different styles of leaders in terms of their focus and nature </li></ul><ul><li>To discuss the concept and measurement of leader effectiveness </li></ul><ul><li>To apply the issues surrounding leader, leadership style and effectiveness of leaders to own experiences </li></ul>
  3. 3. Your experience of ‘good leadership’! <ul><li>Think of someone who has held a position of leadership over you & whom you have been happy to work for </li></ul><ul><li>What made them able to lead? </li></ul><ul><li>What made them able to organise a group effectively? </li></ul><ul><li>What made you happy in the group? </li></ul><ul><li>What made you want to co-operate with the leader? </li></ul>
  4. 4. Key issues of leadership in work: <ul><li>What sort of leader can keep a group together? </li></ul><ul><li>What sort of leader can make the group productive? </li></ul><ul><li>What sort of leader can maintain a good deal of job satisfaction among the group members? </li></ul>
  5. 5. Definition of leadership: <ul><li>“ as the process (act) of influencing the activities of an organized group in its efforts towards goal setting and goal achievement” </li></ul><ul><li>(Stogdill, 1950: pg 3) </li></ul><ul><li>“ (the) process by which one person directs group members toward the attainment of specific goals” </li></ul><ul><li>Moghaddan (1998; pg 455) </li></ul>
  6. 6. Leadership style - focus : <ul><li>Many different models of leadership style but common to all is the assumption that leadership behaviour can be described in two main ways in relation to their focus: </li></ul><ul><li>Task-oriented </li></ul><ul><li>Relationship-oriented </li></ul>
  7. 7. Task-oriented focus: <ul><li>Manage task accomplishment </li></ul><ul><li>Leader defines clearly & closely what subordinates should be doing, how they should be doing it & actively schedules work for them </li></ul>
  8. 8. Relationship-oriented focus: <ul><li>Managing the interpersonal relations of group members </li></ul><ul><li>Demonstrating concern for subordinates as people </li></ul><ul><li>Responding to subordinate needs </li></ul><ul><li>Promoting team spirit & cohesion </li></ul>
  9. 9. Alternative terms for leadership style: <ul><li>‘ initiating structure’ versus ‘consideration’ (Fleishman, 1953) </li></ul><ul><li>‘ production oriented’ versus ‘people-oriented ’ (Blake & Mouton, 1964) </li></ul><ul><li>‘ production centred’ versus ‘employee-centred’ (Likert, 1967) </li></ul><ul><li>‘ task emphasis versus relations emphasis’ (Fiedler, 1967) </li></ul><ul><li>‘ performance concern’ versus ‘maintenance concern’ (Misumi, 1985) </li></ul>
  10. 10. <ul><li>Reflecting back on your experiences of ‘good leadership’. </li></ul><ul><li>Was the person you were happy to work for ‘task-oriented’ or ‘people-oriented’? </li></ul><ul><li>Do you think a good leader can be both? </li></ul>
  11. 11. Can a leader be both? <ul><li>Some researchers say no! Eg: Fiedler (1967) in his concept of least preferred co worker </li></ul><ul><li>Most agree it is more reasonable to see task & relationship orientations as independent dimensions (Bass, 1990; Stogdill, 1974) </li></ul><ul><li>There is evidence to suggest that leaders change their style to suit situation demands (Barrow, 1976) </li></ul>
  12. 12. Nature of leader’s influence: <ul><li>Democratic – discuss possible projects; involve employees in decisions about tasks; give and explain feedback </li></ul><ul><li>Autocratic – issue orders & tell employees what to do; do not invite opinions; sometimes praise or blame but no explanation of feedback </li></ul><ul><li>Laissez-faire – leave employees to themselves after giving initial instructions; offer assistance only when asked; no praise or blame given </li></ul>
  13. 13. <ul><li>Reflecting back on your experiences of ‘good leadership’. </li></ul><ul><li>Did the person you were happy to work for have a autocratic, democratic or laissez faire nature? </li></ul><ul><li>Do you experience any problems with categorising your ‘good leader’ in this way? </li></ul>
  14. 14. Interaction of focus & nature of leadership style: <ul><li>If a leader is autocratic & task-oriented, how would they act towards their subordinates? </li></ul><ul><li>If a leader is autocratic & relationship-oriented, how would they act towards their subordinates? </li></ul>
  15. 15. Interaction of focus & nature of leadership style: <ul><li>If a leader is democratic & task-oriented, how would they act towards their subordinates? </li></ul><ul><li>If a leader is democratic & relationship-oriented, how would they act towards their subordinates? </li></ul>
  16. 16. Theories of leadership: <ul><li>Dispositional theories – Is a leader born, not made? </li></ul><ul><li>‘ great man theories’, trait theories, behaviour theories </li></ul><ul><li>Situational theories – given the right circumstances anyone is a potential leader? </li></ul><ul><li>Central figure in communication networks </li></ul><ul><li>Contingency theories – good leader outcome is dependent on a number of factors </li></ul>
  17. 17. Leader characteristics : <ul><li>Early work suggested that leaders tended to be higher than non-leaders on: </li></ul><ul><li>Intelligence </li></ul><ul><li>Dominance/need for power </li></ul><ul><li>Self-confidence </li></ul><ul><li>Energy/persistence </li></ul><ul><li>Knowledge of the task </li></ul><ul><li>(Stogdill, 1974) </li></ul>
  18. 18. Leader characteristics : <ul><li>Current research focuses on characteristics such as: </li></ul><ul><li>Sociability </li></ul><ul><li>Need for power </li></ul><ul><li>Need for achievement </li></ul><ul><li>Style (as discussed earlier) </li></ul><ul><li>Nature (as discussed earlier) </li></ul><ul><li>Charisma (more details to follow next session) </li></ul>
  19. 19. Situational & Contingency approaches: <ul><li>Consideration of the wider context in which the leader operates </li></ul><ul><li>Some situations demand one kind of behaviour from leaders, while other situations require other behaviours </li></ul><ul><li>‘ Contingent’ upon the situation </li></ul><ul><li>Read up on Fiedler’s Least Preferred Co-worker (LPC) contingency theory!! </li></ul>
  20. 20. Example: <ul><li>Emergency occurs: </li></ul><ul><li>BOMB SCARE ! </li></ul><ul><li>Do we really want a leader high in consideration? (at this moment how do you feel about being caught up in a building which has a bomb in it?) </li></ul><ul><li>Or someone who tells us quickly where to go, and what to do? (high in structure) </li></ul>
  21. 21. Leader effectiveness: <ul><li>What is an ‘effective’ leader? </li></ul><ul><li>How do we measure effectiveness? </li></ul><ul><li>Do we ask subordinates? Problems with this? </li></ul><ul><li>Do we ask superiors? Problems with this? </li></ul><ul><li>Do we ask leaders themselves? Problems with this? </li></ul>
  22. 22. Research on measuring leader effectiveness: <ul><li>Use objective measures like productivity and/or quality of output (Hunt et al, 1978) </li></ul><ul><li>Measures of group outcomes (quality of output, number of correct answers or both (Murinham & Leung, 1976) </li></ul><ul><li>Most measures of effectiveness are self-report – problems with this? </li></ul>
  23. 23. Transactional Transformational <ul><li>Leader believes leadership achieved via exchange (transaction). </li></ul><ul><li>Leader assumes people will only follow if there is something in it for them </li></ul><ul><li>Leaders get followers to achieve beyond their expectations by using charisma, inspiration, setting clear, optimistic & apparently attainable goals. </li></ul><ul><li>Leader takes into account individual strengths & encourages free-thinking & team spirit above personal concerns </li></ul>
  24. 24. Next week: <ul><li>Transformational Leadership: implications for leaders and their followers! </li></ul>

×