The document discusses the potential for coal-to-olefins (CTO) and methanol-to-olefins (MTO) processes to produce ethylene and propylene as alternatives to traditional naphtha cracking. It provides an overview of the CTO and MTO processes, current projects in China, the economics and challenges of these processes compared to naphtha cracking, and the potential impact on global ethylene and polyethylene markets if numerous planned CTO/MTO projects come online by 2020.
2. • The CTO/MTO process
• CTO/MTO Economics
• Current Status – Projects
• Impact on the global ethylene feedstock slate
• Impact on PE and PP fundamentals
• Conclusions
2
Outline
5. • China’s shortage of ethylene and propylene
• Difficulty of importing olefins
• Demand growth for PE and PP
• Naphtha crackers too dependent on imports
• Coal price advantage
• CTO process proven successful in 2011
5
Why CTO/MTO?
8. • Coal gasification, syngas cleaning, methanol synthesis, olefins polymerization.
• Coal is synthesized in a gasifier to produce the synthetic gas
• Syngas is then converted into methanol
• Transformation into olefins
8
CTO/MTO Process
9. History
• In the 1990’s UOP and Norsk Hydro developed the MTO
technology and was integrated with the Total/UOP olefin
cracking process for the basis for advanced MTO.
• In 2009, TOTAL constructed the first fully integrated MTO
demo plant in Belgium.
• In 2011, Wison (Nanjing) Clean Energy Corp announced
that they would use the UOP MTO process to produce
ethylene and propylene, started up in 2013
Process
• Methanol feed is preheated and introduced into the
reactor. The catalyst (proprietary) is circulated to the
fluidized bed regenerator.
• Reactor effluent is quenched to separate water from the
gas stream.
• Gas is compressed
• Effluent is processed in fractionator and purifier removing
contaminants and separating olefins (ethylene and
propylene) from byproducts (C4 and C6).
9
UOP/Hydro MTO Process
2011
2009
1990s
2013
10. History
• The DMTO technology was developed by the Dalian
Institute of Chemical Physics (DICP), Chinese Academy of
Science (CAS) in 1991.
• In 2006, DICP, Lyoyang Petrochemical Engineering
Company of Sinopec, and Shaanxi Xinxing Coal Chemical
Industry constructed a 16.7 k mt demo plant.
• In 2009, an agreement was signed between CAS and
LUMMUS to allow LUMMUS to act as the exclusive agency
of DMTO marketing and licensing.
• DMTO-II, based on DMTO technology, was developed by
Shaanxi Coal (SCCTEC) joinlty with Sinopec Lyoyang.
Testing was completed in 2009.
• In 2010, the Shenhua Baotou plant successfully started up
its DMTO plant.
• In 2014, the first DMTO II plant was started by Pucheng
Clean Energy.
Process
• Involves two reactions of methanol conversion and the
reconversion of by products, both using the same
catalysts. 10
DMTO Process
2010
2006
1991
2014
11. History
• Sinopec S-MTO was developed by Sinopec and Beijing Yanshan Petrochemical
• In October 2011, a plant using the S-MTO process was set up in the 600k mt/year
Sinopec Zhongyan plant
Process
• Methanol feed is preheated and introduced into the reactor. The catalyst (proprietary),
based on SAPO-34, is circulated to the fluidized bed regenerator.
• Reactor effluent is quenched to separate water from the gas stream.
• Gas is compressed
• Effluent is processed in fractionator and purifier removing contaminants and separating
olefins (ethylene and propylene) from byproducts (C4 and C6).
• Converts methanol to ethylene and propylene at above 80% carbon selectivity
11
Sinopec SMTO Process
12. • CTO
– High return on investment
– Larger projects result in more jobs
– CO2 and water resource challenges
• MTO
– Provides private entry into olefins market
– Viable at smaller capacities
– C02 implications relatively small
– Exposure to merchant methanol pricing
12
CTO v MTO
13. • Movement away from oil feedstock
– Oil imports account for about 60% of China’s demand
• Coal mining diversification as traditional downstream
coal demand levels off
– More than 70 per cent of China's miners are losing money
(China Coal Industry Association)
• Power generators looking for non-regulated
investments with higher margins
• Job creation in poor regions
13
Reasons For China MTO/CTO Investment
15. Water Issues
Source: MEDIUM-TERM COAL MARKET REPORT 2013, IEA
- Theoretical consumption:
15-20t water/ton of
ethylene (4x that of
traditional refinery routes)
- Actual consumption in
Shenhua Baotou CTO: 31t
water/ton of ethylene
- Most coal rich regions are
water scarce
- Must consider the
availability and cost of
water
Source: MEDIUM-TERM COAL MARKET REPORT 2013, IEA
17. 17
CO2 Price Could Hit CTO Margins
(Ethylene Output Only)
Source: Platts
18. Challenges
•High Capital Costs
•Consumes ~40 mt of fresh
water to produce 1 mt of olefins
•Water depleted in production
regions
•Near coal mines away from
coast
•MTO projects relies on imports
Benefits
• Lower Feedstock (Coal) Prices
• Lower cash cost for producing
1 mt of ethylene
• Higher return on investment
• Abundant feedstock for CTO
projects
18
Challenges to CTO/MTO
21. Inner Mongolia Self-owned mine Apr-15 Jun-14 Eastern China naphtha cracker Apr-15 Jun-14
Feedstock Cost Naphtha Feedstock Cost
Coal Price ( ex-plant) $ 40.71 $ 45.60 Naphtha price (ex-plant) $ 574.88 $ 991.63
Coal Consumption per/ton MeOH 1.4 1.4 Naphtha consumption per ton olefins 2 2
Methanol Consumption per/ton olefins 3 3
Total Feedstock Cost per ton olefins $ 170.97 $191.50 Feedstock cost per ton olefins $1,149.76 $1,983.26
Co-Products Co-Products
Total co-product credits $ 111.55 $162.95 Total co-product credits $ 644.28 $ 872.67
Electricity Electricity
Total electricity cost per ton olefins 109.2 109.2 Total electricity cost per ton olefins $ 22.15 $ 22.15
Depreciation and Labor Depreciation and Labor
Total depreciation and Labor $ 96.00 $ 96.00 Total depreciation and Labor $ 54.40 $ 54.40
Water cost Water Cost
Total water cost $ 33.60 $ 33.60 Total water cost $ 4.99 $ 4.99
Effluent treatment cost Effluent treatment cost
per ton olefins $ 18.24 $ 18.24 per ton olefins $ 2.50 $ 2.50
Others Others
others $ 132.80 $132.80 others $ 159.36 $ 159.36
Transportation cost for olefins product Transportation cost for olefins product
Transportation cost per ton olefins $ 91.20 $ 91.20 Transportation cost per ton olefins 0 0
Total production cost per ton olefins $ 540.45 $509.59 Total production cost per ton olefins $ 748.88 $1,353.99
Coal vs. naphtha: A comparison
21
22. Cost Curve
22
Based on Average April Price
$/MT
Thousand MT/Year Olefin Ethylene Capacity
28. CTO/MTO Projects
28
• In our forecast we are tracking around 32 CTO/MTO projects scheduled to
come on stream by 2020
• Most starting up in 2014, 2015, and 2016
• The bulk of the CTO/MTO ethylene projects are expected online by 2018
• ~34% of future production of ethylene is at risk
35. 35
China’s Feedstock Landscape Will Change
If Projects Come To Fruition
Source: Platts
12.3 million mt of propylene
18 million + mt of ethylene
Ethylene Produced from - 2014
Chinese Ethylene Capacity
Additions by Feedstock
Ethylene produced from - 2024
40. • We expect demand for PE in North
America to reach 16.2 million mt in
2015.
• We expect production to reach ~19
million mt, resulting in a surplus of 2.8
million mt.
• The largest surpluses will reside in
HDPE and LLDPE
• The major destination will be South
America, followed by Asia and then
Western Europe
• Largest PE Plants
– CP Chemical Pasadena, Texas, US –
990 k MT/Yr HDPE
– LyondellBasell La Porte, Texas, US –
555 k MT/Yr LDPE
– Dow Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta,
Canada – 880 k MT/Yr LLDPE
40
North America
• Trade Partners
– South America
• Brazil
• Colombia
• Peru
• Chile
– Asia
• China
• Singapore
42. • We expect demand for PE in Europe to reach
16.7 million mt in 2015.
• We expect production to reach ~15.2 million
mt, resulting in a deficit of 1.5 million mt.
• LLDPE to show the strongest growth in
Western Europe
• LDPE will switch to a deficit market in the
medium term
• Western Europe will be the driver to the PE
deficit in Europe
• HDPE and LLDPE will remain in a deficit
market
• The major capacity additions will be in Russia
• Largest PE Plants
– LyondellBasell Wesseling, Germany 770
MT/Yr HDPE
– SABIC Geleen, Netherlands – 480 k
MT/Yr LDPE
– Dow Terneuzen, Netherlands – 655 k
MT/Yr LLDPE 42
Europe
• Trade Partners
– Middle East
• Saudi Arabia
• Qatar
• Iran
– Americas
• US
• Brazil
44. • We expect demand for PE in the Middle East
to reach 5.7 million mt in 2015.
• We expect production to reach ~15.9 million
mt, resulting in a surplus of 10.1 million mt.
• Major capacity additions will be in Iran, Oman
and Saudi Arabia
• The region’s surplus to remain above 10
million mt post 2014
• The largest surpluses will reside in LLDPE
• The main export markets will be Asia, Europe,
and Africa
• Largest PE Plants
– Yanpet Yanbu, Saudi Arabia 535 kMT/Yr
HDPE
– Qapco Mesaieed, Qatar – 700 k MT/Yr
LDPE
– Sharq Eastern Petrochemical Al Jubail,
Saudi Arabia – 1,150 k MT/Yr LLDPE
44
Middle East
• Trade Partners
– Asia
• China
• India
– Western Europe
• Turkey
• Italy
• Belgium
• Spain
46. • We expect demand for PE in Asia to reach
40.7 million mt in 2015.
• We expect production to reach ~34.6
million mt, resulting in a surplus of 6.1
million mt.
• Asia is expected to be in growing deficit
driven by China and India, the majority by
China
• The majority of capacity additions will be
via coal in China, capping deficits in the
short to medium term
• The Middle East will remain the dominant
supplier to Asia, especially China
• Largest PE Plants
– Thai Polyethylene SCG, Map Ta Phut,
Thailand 1,280 (980 + 300) k MT/Yr HDPE
– BASF-YPC Nanjing, China
– Sinopec Beijing Yanshan PC, Beijing,
China – 400 k MT/Yr LDPE
– ExxonMobil Jurong Island, Singapore –
1,900 (600+650+650) k MT/Yr LLDPE 46
Asia
• Trade Partners
– Middle East
• Saudi Arabia
• Iran
• Qatar
• UAE
– North America
• US
47. • Production expected to be 15 million mt
• Demand expected to be 22 million mt,
resulting in a deficit of ~7 million mt.
• Largest PE Plants
– PetroChina Fushun PC 350k MT/Yr HDPE
– SINOPEC Maoming PC 350k MT/Yr HDPE
– BASF-YPC – 400 k MT/Yr LDPE
– SINOPEC Beijing Yanshan PC– 400 k MT/Yr
LDPE
– PetroChina Daqing PC – 625k MT/Yr LLDPE
• Trade Partners
– Middle East
• Iran
• Saudi Arabia
• UAE
• Qatar
– Asia
• South Korea
• Thailand
• Malaysia
• Japan
– North America
• US
47
China
51. • Production expected to be 7.9 million
mt
• Demand expected to be 7.6 million mt,
resulting in a small surplus.
• Rextac Odessa PP plant scheduled to
come online in 2017 is expected to be
the only new plant in NA
• US largest producer with capacity of 8
million mt/year.
• Largest PP plant
– ExxonMobil Baytown, Texas, United
States – 800k mt/year
– Braskem Sao Paulo, Brazil – 800k
mt/year
51
North America PP
• Trade Partners
– Asia
• China
52. • Production is expected to be 10.5
million mt
• Demand is expected to be 10.4 million
mt, resulting in a small surplus.
• Eastern Europe will account for all of
the new PP capacity.
• Germany is the largest producer with a
capacity of 2 million mt/year.
• Largest PP plant
– Total Feluy, Belgium – 910k mt/year
52
Europe PP
• Trade Partners
– Middle East
• Saudi Arabia
– Asia
• India
• S. Korea
54. • Production is expected to be 8.2
million mt
• Demand is expected to be 3.8 million
mt, resulting in a massive surplus of
roughly 4.4 million mt
• The majority of PP will go to Asia
• Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Iran
will see PP investments
• The laregest producer in the region is
Saudi Arabia with roughly 5.3 million
mt/year
• Largest PP plant
– Ibn Zahr Al Jubail, Saudi Arabia –
1,220k mt/year
54
Middle East PP
• Trade Partners
– Asia
• China
– Western Europe
• Turkey
• Italy
• Belgium
56. • Production expected to be 31.6 million
mt
• Demand expected to be 34.4 million
mt, resulting in a deficit of roughly 2.8
million mt
• China accounts for most of the new PP
projects followed by India and
Indonesia
• China accounts for more than half of
Asia PP demand
• South East Asian countries will
experience higher demand increases.
• The largest producer in the region is
China with a capacity of 18.6 million
mt/year
• Largest PP plant
– ExxonMobil Pulau Ayer Chawan, Jurong
Island– 885k MT/Year
56
Asia PP
• Trade Partners
– Middle East
• Saudi Arabia
• UAE
• Oman
• Kuwait
– North America
• US
57. • Production expected to be 15.8 million
mt
• Demand expected to be 20.2 million
mt, resulting in a deficit of roughly 4.4
million mt
• Largest PP plant
– Shenhua Group Ningdong, Ninxia–
1,000k MT/Year
• Trade Partners
– Asia
• South Korea
• Singapore
• India
• Thailand
• Japan
– Middle East
• Saudi Arabia
• UAE
• Oman
• Qatar
57
China PP
59. • The economics show the feasibility of building
CTO/MTO projects
• We are currently tracking 32 CTO/MTO plants,
9.9 million mt of ethylene and 9.8 million mt of
propylene.
• All of these should be operating by 2018.
• Coal will account for the highest growth of
ethylene production on a percentage basis.
• For Polyolefins, the Middle East and the US are
the world suppliers. The global demand centers
are in Asia, Europe, and South America.
59
Conclusions
Source: Platts, EIA