7 habits of highly effective researchers

9,110 views
8,762 views

Published on

Published in: Education
1 Comment
15 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Dear Colleagues.
    Since January 29, I publish a video blog with graphic tutorials to
    scientific publishing, called KEEP CALM and PUBLISH PAPERS. I hope,
    you may find this interesting when writing your thesis, paper or
    making a presentation.

    Best regards
    Pawel Jerzy Wojcik, Ph.D.

    https://www.facebook.com/keepcalmandpublishpapers

    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqKuaNlHwxUVDSRt8iLPeNw
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total views
9,110
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
361
Comments
1
Likes
15
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

7 habits of highly effective researchers

  1. 1. The 7 Habits of HighlyEffective Researchers Steve Wallace
  2. 2. IntroductionTechnical writing teacher – NCTU,NCU, NTHU, ITRI - MotivationResearch ResearchersHabits to produce more papers inhigher impact journals.
  3. 3. Understanding feelings about writingA recent survey of 400,000 U.S. faculty revealed26% spent zero hours per week writing.27% never published a peer reviewed journalpaper. 43% had published nothing in the last 2years.62% never published a book.Only 28% had produced two publications in thepast two years.Only 25% of faculty spent more than eight hoursa week writing. This was self reported the realnumber could be much lower. (Lindholm 2005)Some scholars believe this number is 15% offaculty being productive writers (Moxley andTaylor)
  4. 4. MethodData from interviews, phone, conferencesand universitiesPosition as editor has allowed opportunityCompiled into 7 basic ―habits‖ whichsummarize advice and tips in 7 areasTo get the most honest responsesresearchers remained anonymous. Thiswas an important condition to gettingpractical material.
  5. 5. Overview of ResearchersAn effective researcher was defined as a researcher whohas publish a average of five or more SCI or SCCI papers ayear every year for the last five years.There were a total of 146 effective researchers:34 - Engineering17 - Management and Business11 - Foreign Language and Literature10 - Education31 - Natural sciences20 - Medicine12 - Social sciences6 - Law5 - History and Liberal Arts
  6. 6. Habit #1 Effective researchers have a publication supply chain.Quote ―I view producing every paper like producing a product, a creative product like a movie. We have screenings, editors and deadlines to release our product. I am not always the director of the movie, that might be me or it could be one of my students. But I am always the producer. The producer needs to push everybody so that the movie can be released on time.‖ - Civil Engineering Professor # 78
  7. 7. PracticeCapturing raw material when away from the computer:Collect ideas: - Notebook, Post ItnotesTransferred to ongoing filesNotes could be organized and editedinto the beginning of a paper.Easier to begin writing when therewere already ideas
  8. 8. Practice for master’s students Generate papers from your thesisYou invested two or more years writingyour thesis.Try to generate a couple of papers fromthe most important chapters of the thesis.This is easier than writing a totally newpaper from scratch. Work jointly with youradvisor to help market your papers.
  9. 9. PracticeCollect a pool of potential journals for each article For each paper, note the pool of potential journals. Do not submit two papers to the same journal in two months, especially if the two articles are related. Editors prefer to publish two articles by different authors.
  10. 10. Practice Pick journals like you pick stocksDo homework on journals.Submit paper to a journal with a risingimpact factor and higher acceptance rates.avoid declining journals with lowacceptance and diminishing impact factor.Could cause the journal to be removedfrom the SSCI and SCI ranking.
  11. 11. PracticeIdentifying journals with rising impact factors Good specialty journal‘s impact factors are rising. General journal‘s impact factor, except for a few at the top, are expected to decline In general journals, "readers are confronted with a decreasing probability of finding at least one important article in their field." (Holub, Tappeiner, and Eberharter, 1991). In the 1970s, the top ten journals in every field were general journals. In the 1990s, half of the top ten journals were specialized journals.
  12. 12. PracticeBetting your research where you have the highest probability for publication.Sometimes journals have biases andpreferencesSubject matter: Empirical,Theoretical papers?Check past issues of the journal.How many Chinese names can youfind?Preferences are known; biases aredifficult to detect.
  13. 13. Practice Keep a record of your publicationsSome effective researchers use a―research log‖ to:1) Know when to send a reminder to theeditor2) Prevent resubmission of a rejectedpaper to the same journal and3) Avoid multiple submission of severalpapers to the same journal within a shortperiod of time.
  14. 14. PracticeApproach different types of journalsSending all papers to top journals isriskySending all papers to low-qualityjournals is unsatisfactoryQuantity and quality important.Having three papers in differentjournals is better than three in onejournal, if the relative quality of thejournals is the same.
  15. 15. PracticeMaintain a stock of papers under review constantlyIf the acceptance rate of the top-rankingjournals is 15%, you need about 7 papersunder review at all times to have onepaper accepted per year.This does not mean that you should write7 new papers each year.If your goal is to get 10 papers acceptedin the first 5 years of your career, youneed about a dozen papers under reviewat all times.
  16. 16. Practice Dont put two good ideas in one paperSeparate them into two papers.As the papers length increases beyond 15 pages,the chance of acceptance drops.When a topic is split into two papers, theprobability of getting at least one of themaccepted more than doubles.You also will get a paper accepted sooner. – Editors like short papers. – The chance that a referee will detect a mathematical error declines. – Referees will return the report faster.The chance that a referee will misunderstand thepaper also decreases.
  17. 17. Practice Develop template sentencesParts of the introduction, methodsand discussion of one paper canoften be recycled to make a newpaperKeep a database of words andphrases to use in different parts ofyour paper
  18. 18. Consider different subtopicsAverage wait for an acceptance decision =3 years.Average wait for a rejection = 6 to 8months.If you publish in one area, then focus youreffort in that fieldContinuing to write papers in the samenarrow area without evidence of success isrisky.It is like putting all your eggs in onebasket.
  19. 19. PracticeIncorporate English editing into your supply chain Use professional editorial assistance Particularly if you are not a native English speaker Editors will not publish papers with grammatical errors. Referees are often biased; they have an excuse to recommend rejection with grammatical errors
  20. 20. Reasons for major revision or rejection of Taiwanese journal papersFaulty methodologyInadequate references 7% 7% 4%Poor quality supporting figures 16% 9%Outside the scope of journal 7%Not enough contribution to field 2%Authors did not follow manuscript instructions 8%Poor writing style and use of English English Errors 27%Title not representative of study 13%Subject of little novel interest or not generally applicable
  21. 21. Revision“After finishing a journal paper I don’timmediately submit it to a journal. It is notfinished yet. I always find small errors in text,notations, explanations, or missing references, inmy finished paper. I’m especially careful whenrereading the introduction and abstract beforesubmission. A small error on the first page ofintroduction or abstract indicates I was careless.Errors here make referees and editors concludethat the paper should be rejected. They concludethat the author is likely to be careless in contentas well as English. And they might be right.” -Educational Psychology Associate Professor #12
  22. 22. Revision (Continued)“If you dont proofread your ownintroduction, why expect the refereesto spot and correct all the errors?” -Chinese History Professor - # 2“You should always check spellingbefore submission. But there are nosubstitutes for reading the paperspersonally. Spelling checkers do notcheck word meanings.” – Electrical EngineeringPost Doctoral Researcher # 102
  23. 23. Habit #2 Sacrifice other interestsResearchers gave up hobbies, games andtime with friends to become high impactresearchers. Most mentioned that they stillhad time for family, but less TV, computergames, and sports.When you play, play hard; when you work,dont play at all.Theodore Roosevelt
  24. 24. Quotes about sacrifice:“It’s the same with anything you want to begood at. You have to give up something to getsomething else. I gave up watching baseballgames, it was painful at first, but now I enjoy thefeeling of publishing so much. I really don’tmiss it.” —-Mechanical Engineering Assistant Professor #9“I always tell my students that they will getwhat they put in. If they waste time doingresearch, time won’t wait for them, and theyaren’t getting any younger. If they want tomake an impact they better start now because ittakes a long time.’”- Electrical Engineering Associate Professor#30
  25. 25. Habit #3 Practice research like golfResearchers talked about the methods,writing, grammar, and other parts of theirpaper like a golf player talking aboutdifferent golf club swings.Beautiful swings are great but a few badhits can disqualify you.Researchers watch and improve theweaknesses in their publishing game likean athlete perfecting his sport
  26. 26. Practice Quote on specific skills―Traditionally my introduction is a bit weak; I have a challenge selling the problem to reviewers. I‘ve got to be able to present the problem better if I want people to be interested in my solution. I‘m getting better but I‘m constantly aware that this is a weakness, and I need to practice to improve.‖ – Mechanical Engineering Professor # 31
  27. 27. Practice Imitate skillful writersRead how successful writersintroduce their topic and citeliteratureImitate their words and phrases, andmodify them to suit your topicCreate a file of template sentences
  28. 28. Habit #4 Dramatize process by creating mental modelsResearchers see their writing andresearching in dramatic terms.Some use strong metaphors tocreate exciting mental pictures toencourage themselves and their labs.“The great struggle”.Model of building a houseKilling a monster
  29. 29. Habit #5 Writers use the competitive, political and supportive energy of other researchers.Supportive energy: Support groupsCompetitive energy: Researchers comparethemselves with other researchers and keepscorePolitical: Researchers are political.The negative side is that half of peer reviewedarticles in top rated journals are never referencedby anyone, including the author. This shows thatlow impact papers are often published in the bestjournals because the articles are reviewed byfriends of the author. (Holub, Tappeiner, andEberharter, SEJ 1991).
  30. 30. Practice Don’t Criticize ReferencesI think that the author knows his subjectbetter than I do. I usually use hisreferences to find a suitable reviewer -Associate Editor, Journal of RetailingDon‘t emphasize the importance of yourpaper by putting down on other papers.Your references are probably yourreviewers and they are sensitive.
  31. 31. Examples of offensive citation:"The deficiency of Smiths approach is...""The problems with Smith’s paper are…"“A serious weakness with Smith’sargument, however, is that ......”“The key problem with Smith’s explanationis that ......”“It seems that Smith’s understanding ofthe X framework is questionable.”
  32. 32. A better citation would be:“Smith’s model was effective in Xproblem, however in Y…”“The X benefit of Smith’s approachare not applicable to Y…”
  33. 33. Complement potential reviewersImportant references should be mentionedin the first page. The editor usuallychooses reviewers from those mentionedin the introduction and references.Be generous to all authors, explain whytheir research is significant for youranalysis.This uses less than 1% of the space, butsignificantly affects the probability ofacceptance
  34. 34. Practice Cite researchers who like youInclude references to authors wholike your papers. They might becomereferees.Include references to people withwho you met at conferences.This is to get a fair chance. Refereeshave to make an effort to be fair tounknown authors.
  35. 35. Meet 100 active researchersThere are about a hundred people in your research fieldwho are likely to be referees of your papers.Prepare a list of one hundred active people in your mainresearch area. Try to meet them within a five-year period.Present papers at, or at least attend, two professionalmeetings a year. When presenting papers or attendingregional, national, or international meetings, try to get toknow these people.This is your best opportunity for networking. When you goto conferences smile and “work the room.”
  36. 36. Practice Pay attention to reviewers’ comments―I don‘t‘ think you treated Smithfairly in your literature review, hisinsights deserve more respect.‖―You forgot to include Smith as areference in your paper. His work isfundamental to understanding yourresearch.‖
  37. 37. Scan journal for related articlesTry to find some related articles in thejournal to which you wish to submit yourpaper.Authors who published a paper on arelated subject are likely to be referees.The editor still remembers them and has aconnection to them. Obviously, you needto cite their papers.Even if they are slightly related, try to usetheir references. Explain how your work isrelated.
  38. 38. Habit #6 Get rejectedWhen rejected, try againEven Nobel Laureates get rejection letters.You may need to play ―ping pong‖ withthe paper. Submit the paper to anotherjournal within one month.You do not have to revise a paper everytime it is rejected. But if a paper isrejected 4 times, there is a serious flaw inthe paper. Find and fix the problem.Why? The same referee might get it again.
  39. 39. Emotions on rejected paper1) Depression2) Anger at editor.3) Anger at system.4) Consider changing job.5) Reviewing manuscripts anddeciding the reviewers had points
  40. 40. PracticeDelete or hide the references to undesirable potential referees You can guess the identity of the reviewers from the reviewers’ comments because of references and writing style. Editors select reviewers from your references. If some reviewers always recommend rejection of your papers, drop their papers from your references (the first time you submit). You can add them later (after the paper is accepted). You can also put them into the body of the paper where they are harder to find This may require rewriting the introduction with a different perspective
  41. 41. Eliminate any trace of prior rejectionsDo not show when the paper wasfirst written.Do not show how many times thepaper has been revised.Document property checkAdd current references
  42. 42. Problems of JournalsAssociation journals: Editors change every few years, and they usually accept more papers from colleagues and friends. Since the editors are chosen from a few major institutions, they get a larger share of publications. The are subsidized by associations. (AER, Econometrica, IEEE, ACM)University journals: Universities protect their own interests. Will often have a stated preference for their own teachers‘ and students‘ papers. Subsidized by universities. (HBR, MIT Sloan)Commercial journals: Least likely to have preferences or biases. Depend on reader subscriptions. (Blackwell, North-Holland,Elsevier )
  43. 43. Do not waste time on dead or dying topicsIf your most recent references are ten years old,it is a dead issue.If the most recent references closely related toyour paper are 5 years old, it is a dying issue.It is also difficult for the editor to find suitablereferees for outdated topics.Your inability to find enough references indicates– You have not read the literature.– Others are not interested in the topic, so, it is unlikely to get published.
  44. 44. How to identify “Hot Topics”Look for clues to anticipate the next ‗big thing‘ Read top journals to identify ‗new problems‘ Read letters to the editor Look for controversies and unexplained findings Look for crossover areas with other domains Do database keyword searchs Attend conferences
  45. 45. Everyone gets rejectedYour options:Abandon the article.Send the article with no changes toanother journal.Revise the article and send it toanother journal.Protest the decision and try toresubmit the article to the rejectingjournal
  46. 46. PracticeAvoid the journals which consistently reject your papersTemporarily avoid journals which always reject youThe editor still remembers bad comments about your papers.Wait until a new editor is appointed.If you think there is prejudice on the basis of sex, race, or nationality, you may consider using initials instead of spelling out the first and middle names.First and middle names, as well as last name, often reveal the sex, race, or nationality of the authors.You may write your full name after the paper is accepted.
  47. 47. Waiting for the Journal’s decisionCauses of quick rejection:Back-logPrevious paper on subjectEditor doesn‘t like topic or style
  48. 48. When should you start contacting the editor about your paper?After three months once a monthFour months twice a monthSix months every dayThe longer the review takes, the lesschance you have a publishing-reviewersmay be negativeInternal fighting in JournalYou may want to consider withdrawing toanother journalEditor‘s feedback is key in making thisdecision
  49. 49. Reminder e-mail to editor―I‘m just e-mailing to inquire aboutthe status of my article titled______,which I submitted to your journal on( date ).‖Don‘t get angrier over time, justkeep sending the same e-mail moreoftenSometimes editors appreciate thereminder
  50. 50. Do not attack refereesGenerally, it is not a good idea to attack the reviewers. – Do not say: "The referees idea is bad, but mine is good." – Better to say, the referee has an interesting idea, but the proposed idea is also good, particularly because of this or that fact. – If the referee makes a good point, explain why you are not pursuing that strategy in the paper.
  51. 51. Habit #7Writers write (and don’t always enjoy it.) Common misunderstanding that good writers enjoy writing Many hate writing. But enjoyed the results. Forced themselves into a daily writing routine.
  52. 52. Quotes about action―Inspiration is overrated, it‘s all abouthard work and there‘s really no wayaround it.‖ – Computer Science Professor#77“Nobody loves English writing. It is only atool, a necessary tool, without it no onewill appreciate our good ideas andreviewers will kill us” – ElectricalEngineering researcher- # 3
  53. 53. Planning vs. ActionTalking about writing isn’t writing.Thinking about writing isn’t writing.Dreaming isn’t writing. Neither areoutlining, researching, or taking notes. Allthese may be necessary to getting aproject completed, but only writing iswriting.Pen to paper, fingers to keyboard
  54. 54. PracticeResearchers learn motivationfor writing about their topic.Reseachers first forced themselves towrite and later developed an interestin writing. Professor William James
  55. 55. Building the Writing HabitThe same time.The same place.Carry a notebookQuiet place. Get rid of rid ofnegative thoughts.Sit alone in silence.Ideas, not grammar, for the firstdraft. Rewrite.
  56. 56. Make writing a daily habitUse timed burstsRational and reactive selfLie to yourself
  57. 57. Do not read too muchMany researchers use the excuse of more reading to prevent writing themselves.You can‘t read every paper ever written on a subject. Remember your goal is to write and publish a paper, not to read everything.If you read a dozen papers on a topic, you should have enough material to start writing a paper. Add your own ideas to this base of knowledge.
  58. 58. Reasons researchers don’t write I am really too busy. – 15 minutes a day Teaching preparation takes all my extra time. Good teachers produce more writing (Sax 2002) I will write just as soon as______ - You don‘t have to be perfect first
  59. 59. Reasons continuedI’m going to make writing mynumber one goal in life. ―the mostvalued activity carries demands fortime and perfection that encouragesits avoidance (Boice 1997)I couldn’t get to my writing site –become flexible with your writingenvironment
  60. 60. Reasons continuedI have to read just one morebook. - Mastery is an illusion, someof the best research done in isolationI just can’t get started. - Rewardyourself for writing, phone or e-mailpartner. Plan an agenda for nextwriting session
  61. 61. Reasons continuedI’m afraid of writing becausepublication is so permanent- Peerreview helpsI’m not in the mood to write rightnow - Behavior modification theory.My childcare responsibilities arepreventing me from writing – Usesmall blocks of time, babysitters, moreefficient (Sax 2002)
  62. 62. Reasons continuedMy thesis advisor is a biggerproblem than a help - Try writingwithout help first or change advisorI can’t sit still - Short bursts withan alarmI write so slowly that I neverseem to get much done – Mostpeople write slowly
  63. 63. Reasons continuedIf I have a long productive writingday, I have a hard time gettingstarted the next day -Common problemI am eager to write but I don’t havethe material or scrolling resources –Third World countriesI have to make progress on severalwriting projects at one time and I am in apanic – two projects are better than one
  64. 64. Reasons continuedI get distracted by Web surfinge-mailing and text messaging –Disconnect yourselfI need big blocks of time to writein my schedule doesn’t allowsuch blocks – Short blocks moreproductive
  65. 65. Researchers are proud of the term researcher and their total impactQuote“I used to think that research allhappened in a lab. That my results werethe only thing that mattered. I now realizethat the experiment isn’t over and theresults haven’t really happened untilthey have been shared with a wideracademic community. Writing is part ofresearch and I’m proud to be both aresearcher and author because the twocan’t be separated.” – ComputerScience Professor - #77
  66. 66. Conclusion: Effective Researchers1) Publication “Supply Chain”2) Sacrifice other interests3) Practice research like a golf game4) Dramatize process by creating mentalmodels5) Use competitive, political andsupportive energy6) Get rejected7) Write, (and don’t always enjoy it)
  67. 67. For More InformationHandout of our talk available www.editing.tw www.seminars.tw Editing from 86 colleges and universities, domain specialized editors, understand Taiwanese English, educational comments Three Stage translation process to preserve meaning and clarity Books How to write and publish an academic paper in 16 weeks How to attend, speak or present a poster at an academic conference References Michaelson, Herbert, How to Write & Publish Engineering Papers and Reports, Oryx Press, 1990. Chapter 6 discusses abstracts. Bob Bly, Research papers for dummies, Wily and Sons Ltd, 2004 Kwan, a Publishers Handbook, University of Illinois http://www.roie.org/

×