iPad Publishing Solution Comparison Whitepaper

  • 3,061 views
Uploaded on



A whitepaper discussing the three key publishing business models publishers are using to take advantage of mobile devices, notably the iPad (and also the iPhone).

  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
  • We're a mobile dev company in NYC that has 200+ smartphone apps out for iOS and Android. We just released the iPad Publisher which is the fastest most affordable way to get your own branded digital storefront on the iPad.

    http://www.nov8rix.com/ipad-publisher/

    Have a look at our website link above including the product demo video. Contact us with questions - customers love us, we deliver excellent service.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
3,061
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4

Actions

Shares
Downloads
163
Comments
1
Likes
5

Embeds 0

No embeds

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. iPad Publishing Solution Comparison Whitepaper Robert Elding Marketing Director YUDU Media
  • 2. iPad Publishing Solution Comparison Whitepaper Introduction The launch of the Apple iPad has ushered in a new era of electronic publishing. The sector had already been solidly expanding with devices such as the Amazon Kindle and iPhone capturing the public’s imagination. 1
  • 3. Indeed, the time may not be far off when ink-on-paper versions are overtaken by digital versions, something which was indicated in the February 2010 report released by the Association of American Publishers (AAP). The report brought into focus the fact that eBook sales figures in US went up by as much as 339.3% for the month, whilst paperbacks published for children and young adults were down by 15.5% less over the same period. The launch of the iPad has, however, propelled ePublishing onto a whole new level - it could best be described as a ‘game changer’. With European roll-out delayed twice, Apple has itself described demand for the new device as ‘overwhelming’ with one iPad sold every three seconds. Publishers, who have previously either been slow to adopt ePublishing or have resisted the evolution of printed media into online content, are now scrabbling to adapt their offerings to mobile internet devices. The question is how can they do so in a way that makes their content both accessible and profitable? Moreover, how can they do so in a way that protects and enhances their publishing brand? 2
  • 4. The right ePublishing formula Getting the balance right will be essential, not just to monetise content but also to retain customer loyalty. Pioneering publishing houses are currently not finding it easy, with muddled positioning, confused accessibility and risky pricing structures. One well-known US magazine, Popular Science, has admitted that, “it is searching for what the publishing market will bear”. With its iPad version retailing at $4.99 per issue, customer reaction has been downbeat, especially as the printed version retails at only $12 for a whole year’s subscription. The huge price differential has resulted in loyal customers not being shy in registering their dissatisfaction. Book publishers themselves are also coming in for criticism and are now having to defend charging $13-$15 for eBooks. Consumers who have become accustomed to $9.99 eBook pricing from Amazon have “unrealistic expectations,” industry representatives have said. 3
  • 5. Publishing for iPad: an outstanding opportunity With Apple having already sold 2 million iPad units in just over 2 months since its April 3rd launch, and with pre-launch demand in Europe greater than that for the iPhone, Apple’s iPad offers a tremendous opportunity for publishers. The first ever consumer device to register $1 billion in sales (after just 70 days), the iPad represents a whole new era in publishing whereby consuming media in digital format is now as flexible and portable as printed content. Within a short period of time, consumers will simply wi-fi the latest issues of their favourite magazines and eBooks straight onto their iPad’s to read on the move. As technology develops, airlines might carry digital libraries on board their planes for users to download various magazines and newspapers whilst in-flight. The possibilities are endless. There are drawbacks, however. Chief amongst them is that publishers must pay Apple a 30% fee of all revenue generated via ‘apps’ and any content sold to go in them. This has led publishers to closely examine how they can make titles accessible and inexpensive yet, crucially, also profitable. 4
  • 6. To achieve this, some publishers are offering an app for each title - making publications easily searchable and providing ‘standout’ - whilst others are attempting to circumnavigate the Apple Store charges altogether by offering titles that operate via a newsstand, which makes the titles harder to find and also directs the reader away to another website to complete the transaction, therefore adding another layer of complexity to the purchasing model. This whitepaper will look at the three key publishing business models publishers are using to take advantage of mobile devices, notably the iPad (and also the iPhone). Just as with any new publishing frontier, some models will prove to be more popular than others, giving publishers a key advantage over their competitors. With the iPad proving to be an unheralded success getting it right at the outset will be imperative. This whitepaper will therefore dissect the various business models on the market before giving its final verdict and conclusion on the versions likely to prove most successful. 5
  • 7. 1 The Branded App Based Model This model involves purchasing a single branded ‘app’ per magazine title, which houses all the editions/ issues of that title. The ePublishing partner manages every aspect of developing the branded app for the publisher and the submission of each title to Apple and the App Store. The advantages of this model are clear. Firstly and arguably the most important advantage is: It allows publishers to take advantage of the App Store’s success. Once the app has been approved it is added to the App Store which is the only online store for all Apple devices and the largest online App store on the internet and already boasts 46,000 separate publishing titles. Apple also heavily promotes its Store in a similar vein to how it propelled iTunes into the largest online music store in the world. The App Store therefore offers the largest potential global audience and so publishers can utilize its success to help increase their own. 6
  • 8. Then there’s visibility. Readers can search the App Store for a title, and easily find the title’s app and all publications for that title within it. This makes a publisher’s titles more widely and openly available to the hundreds of millions of App Store users, thereby helping to increase circulation and sales. Another key benefit of this model is that the publisher retains control over its brand image and intellectual property. In addition, because the app is owned by the publisher they receive all the marketing data supplied by Apple at first hand, not to mention the kudos of being seen to be ‘important’ enough to have their own dedicated app - and not just being seen as yet another title on a crowded newsstand. View offline. Another key advantage of using branded Apps for publishing on the iPad is that one can view the editions at any time - even when offline. This makes the iPad a truly ‘mobile’ device and not reliant on the vagaries of the strength of internet connection of wi-fi hotspots. It also gives readers a greater sense of having ‘purchased’ the title and not just ‘access’ to a remote online url - which generates additional loyalty. Branded iPad apps are also lauded for being ‘iPad specific’. This means that the publishing title’s app has been designed specifically for use on the iPad. Consequently, the quality is often higher than if accessed just via the internet and more importantly the reader experience is smooth and harnesses the iPad’s true capabilities. 7
  • 9. Using YUDU’s branded app model, a publisher can expect to retain 65% of the revenue, after Apple takes 30% and YUDU just 5% to cover transactional costs. This represents a much lower revenue share than other iPad publishing models, so the publisher will retain more sales income. Below, the Chairman and CEO of YUDU Media, Richard Stephenson discussing the YUDU iPad solution and the App Model. 8
  • 10. Building a branded app How do publishers obtain their own branded app? The ePublishing partner will build the app for the publisher using the files provided, as well as putting forward the app submission to Apple and the App Store. This takes any burdens away from the publisher and allows the ePublishing partner to utilize its skills in creating the highest quality apps possible for the publisher. Although there is a one-time build cost for the branded app, going through a publishing partner is much more cost effective than hiring app developers for a custom-built app - typically around a third of the price - App developers are in high demand at the moment and are demanding extremely high prices. With YUDU’s approach, once the app has been approved by Apple, publishers can either self publish all their digital editions onto their branded app or contract YUDU to do it all on their behalf using YUDU’s bureau service. Downloading a branded app from the App Store Once a reader has downloaded the publisher’s app from the App Store (the publisher can decide if it is a free or paid for app), all publications relevant to that publisher can then be downloaded onto the mobile device directly via the Apple Store. Every time a new iPad edition is available for that publication, the reader will receive a push notification to let them know. For publishers charging per title, the readers will be able to see the front covers of each issue within the branded app, but only those that have been purchased can be opened and read. This is a great way to encourage readers to purchase more issues as they can see all the issues that are available as well as those they have purchased. 9
  • 11. 2 The Browser Based Model The browser based model involves the user accessing digital edition titles via the iPad’s Internet browser, using a Wi-Fi connection. Essentially the title is hosted online and a user accesses any one single title as they would a website - by clicking on the URL. The model therefore involves reading digital titles on mobile devices in the format that they would be read on a PC or Mac, and only when they have connection to the internet. The one advantage of this model is that the publisher does not need to build an app for the App Store, meaning the process of making a publisher’s titles accessible via the iPad is faster and cheaper. The publisher also avoids the 30% transaction fee from Apple. Instead, the publisher must have their own digital rights management (DRM) system in place and sell the digital titles either via their own online publishing store or via links within their own website. 10
  • 12. Two ePublishing vendors who have gone down this route are Nxtbook , Texterity. Whilst titles using the browser based model are commercially simpler and quicker to bring to market, they have a number of distinct drawbacks: A Because they are streamed, digital titles only become available if the iPad (or iPhone) is connected to the internet. This means that if the wi-fi connection is poor, slow or haphazard, reading a digital title can be an extremely frustrating experience. For instances where there is no internet connection, for example on the move, be it by metro/tube, train or plane, streamed digital editions will not be available - almost negating the reason for the iPad’s creation (a truly mobile reading device). B Perhaps one of the main drawbacks of browser based iPad titles is that they aren’t available on the App Store. Publishers’ potential revenue can therefore be seriously affected given the size of the potential market available to those publishers who’s titles are for sale in the App store. 11
  • 13. C Browser based digital titles are hampered because they are not created specifically to be read on an iPad or iPhone. Not only does this mean that streamed digital titles are unable to harness the iPad’s full potential, it also means that the quality of the viewing experience is lower. This can be particularly true from a layout perspective as well as a reading perspective - functionality, navigation, text and image clarity being the main problems. D Browser based digital titles can feel unrewarding from a customer viewpoint because readers never feel like they ‘own’ a publication that sits in their iPad for whenever they want to read it - they just have ‘access’ as they would online. When that access is denied or cut off through poor wi-fi connection, customer dissatisfaction rises appreciably. E Flash cannot be used on either an iPad or iPhone. As one of the most popular web-based software solutions, present in most online digital edition technology, this can create huge difficulties if browser based digital titles are not configured or reformatted for the iPad or iPhone. 12
  • 14. 3 Third party Newsstand Model This model enables publishers to get their titles on the iPad via a third party newsstand style app, instead of the publishers own branded app. For example, take a theoretical title called ‘Popular Steam Trains’. If this title is held within a third party newsstand app you would have to access it through the ePublishing specialist’s own app. When a reader searches for this title in the Apple Store they will only be directed to the ‘The ePub Specialist’s App’, to then find the title, not directly to the magazine’s own branded app or title itself. The key advantage of this model is that there is no need to purchase a branded app for a publisher’s title and you avoid paying 30% transaction commission charges to Apple. Theoretically this means that it should be a cheaper way to publish on the iPad. However, this is not always the case and third party app owners often charge high revenue shares themselves, meaning that the newsstore route may not be as beneficial in the long term. The main drawbacks of this model, however, are as follows: A Your brand or title cannot be found in the App Store. When readers search for your title, instead of being taken directly to it, they will be confusingly directed to the third party branded newsstand app. If a reader downloads this app, they would then have to search within the app to locate the title. 13
  • 15. B Titles are not sold directly though the App Store and so publishers cannot take advantage of the tremendous power and reach that it holds. Publishers must obtain access codes and purchase from the third party websites or payment portals. This procedure adds another layer of complexity to the purchasing process and could affect customers’ overall experience. This comes at a time when iPhone and iPad users are increasingly expecting to access and buy products easily, directly via the App store itself, not through ‘broken up’ and dislocated purchasing routes. C The publisher’s brand is diluted with the presence of the newsstand’s brand and so the publisher’s title may suffer from being seen as lower quality than those with their own dedicated app, the result being that the title’s brand image may suffer accordingly. It’s also harder to control how your brand is portrayed if your titles sit within a third party branded newsstand. D Digital titles within a third party branded App will sit alongside competitors and other titles. This means that the title has little ‘standout’ and is lost in a sea of other publishers’ titles. E Many titles viewed in third party newsstand apps are not designed solely for the iPad, therefore quality of the iPad titles can be lower using this model. Revenue shares vary but can often be surprisingly biased towards the app provider. Zinio, for example, splits the revenue 50:50 between itself and the digital title publisher, despite the fact it cuts out Apple’s 30% commission. because they aren’t sold directly through the App Store. 14
  • 16. Conclusion Even before the iPad had launched, digital magazines and eBooks were making serious inroads into mainstream culture. GQ magazine, for example, sold 7,000 copies of its December 2009 issue for the iPhone alone, yet since the launch of the iPad the total number of digital GQ sales for Apple devices has soared to nearly 60,000. To take advantage of the iPad phenomenon (and all the ‘me-too’ mobile devices yet to be launched) publishers now need to carefully evaluate all the different publishing models available to them before settling on their chosen route. For each publisher this will be an immensely important decision because As well as protecting their brand, they must choose the model that will help to increase circulation and profit. The eventual success of one content model over another has happened many times before, whether it has been VHS over Betamax or MP3 over Mini Disc. Now is the time to decide. 15
  • 17. The reason YUDU chose the branded app model is because it allows publishers to portray their brand in the best light possible with their own branded reader app of the highest quality. Add to this the fact that the branded app model enables publishers to fully utilize the power of the Apple Store, as well as harness the true capabilities of the iPad and offer the best reader experiences, then the branded app model has a very high chance of succeeding over others. However, it’s by ensuring that revenue is biased towards the publisher that makes YUDU media’s approach unique. After all, it’s the publisher who creates the content so YUDU believe they should be the ones retaining the profit. For more information on YUDU’s iPad solution email ipad@yudu.com or visit www.yudupro.com/ipad US Tel: 1-888-FOR-YUDU UK Tel: (+44) 870 760 9258
  • 18. Branded iPad Apps from