I do publish the stuff on my blog, and I do send the link. But when I present it, I use the familiar 'build' feature in Keynote/Powerpoint, so audience only sees one new bullet point at a time. (Personally, I prefer mind-maps as a compact presentation device...)
Man the format of this presentation is so 1.0! Pages are full with text. How can you expect someone follows you when presenting? If you have to display this amount of information, use a blog, send the link to attendees, make sure they read it, then organise an unconference to discuss and learn from it!
Using Twitter in the Enterprise
Edward Yourdon
email: ed@yourdon.com
blog: www.yourdonreport.com
Version 02
February 25, 2009
Agenda
1. Introduction
2. Basic themes, tool, strategies of Web 2.0
3. Introduction to Twitter
4. Other micro-blogging tools
5. Example: using Twitter for soft ware
development
6. Conclusion
2
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Publication Details, and
General Disclaimer
This presentation is an open-content collaborative document. Anyone with an Internet connection and World Wide Web browser may
view and/or alter its content -- for better or worse -- within the constraints of Google’s access mechanisms for such documents. Please
be advised that nothing in this document has necessarily been reviewed by Ed Yourdon (\"Ed\"); the theories and business practices
expressed by the document are not necessarily his.
This isn't to say you won't find valuable and accurate information herein; however, Ed cannot summarily guarantee the validity of this
document. The content of any given page may recently have been changed, dumbed-down, or other wise edited by someone whose opinion
does not correspond to Ed’s original material (or any subsequent drafts).
Neither Ed, nor any of the contributors, collaborators, nor anyone else connected with this document, can in any way whatsoever be held
responsible for the appearance of any inaccurate information, or for your use of the information contained in or linked from this
document.
You are being granted a limited license to copy anything from this document; it does not create or imply any contractual or extra-
contractual liability on the part of Ed, nor any of the contributors, collaborators, or viewers of this material.
2
There is no agreement or understanding bet ween you and Ed regarding your use or modification of this information beyond the GNU Free
Documentation License (GFDL); neither is Ed responsible should someone change, edit, modify, or remove any information that you may
post on this document.
Any of the trademarks, ser vice marks, collective marks, design rights, personality rights, or similar rights that are mentioned, used, or
cited in this document are the property of their respective owners. Their use here does not imply that you may use them for any purpose
other than for the same or similar informational use -- as recognized under the GFDL licensing scheme. Unless other wise stated, Ed and
this document are neither endorsed by nor affiliated with any of the holders of any such rights; as such, Ed cannot grant any rights to use
any other wise protected materials. Your use of any such or similar incorporated property is at your own risk.
3
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Introduction
Twitter has begun getting a lot of attention in recent
months...
So people are beginning to ask: “What is it? Why should I
care?”
Sometimes they listen to a brief over view, and ask, “What’s
the big deal?”
Many people assume that Twitter is a tool for personal
interactions, but it’s beginning to be used for “serious”
business/enterprise purposes
Need to realize that
Twitter is just one of several emerging “micro-blogging” tools
Twitter is an example of the larger “meme” of Web 2.0
4
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Basic themes of Web 2.0
Web 2.0 is the combination of:
Tools and technologies
Business strategies (e.g., customer participation)
And social/cultural trends
... which drive the individual creation and sharing of content on the Internet (see
also YouTube video, based on Wikpedia article re Web 2.0)
While this is usually focused on “general” business/customer issues, it can also be
focused on the “business” of developing soft ware and systems in an IT
organization.
IT organizations obviously use tools, technologies – but remember also:
They are a “community” with a social structure
They have their own cultural trends
5
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Key tools, technologies, business strategies,
cultural trends
“Technical” tools, technologies
API’s
“Mainstream” tools
Twitter & micro-blogging tools
Business strategies, policies
Cultural/social trends
6
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
“Technical” tools
AJAX
Programming languages aimed at rapid
development – e.g., Ruby on Rails
New IDE’s for supporting development of Web
2.0 apps
While these are important for IT organizations
to be aware of, they’re not as important as the
other items on the list
7
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
API’s
Primarily for creating interfaces with an organization’s
existing tools, data
New tools emerging from vendors like Yahoo, Microsoft
Good examples: Yahoo Pipes, Microsoft PopFly
Most obvious application: creation of mashups
New application: connections to micro-blogging tools (including
Twitter)
8
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
“Mainstream” Web 2.0 tools tools
Wikis
Can be “internal” or “external”
Usually developed with existing tools
Blogs ... and micro-blogs
IBM has approx 3,500 blogs (see “Business Week” article on IBM’s use of social
net working and this article on IBM’s Web 2.0 tools and plans)
Microsoft has approx 3,000 blogs
Can be “internal” or “external”
Also, consider using “micro-blogs”, e.g., Twitter
9
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Introduction to Twitter
Twi t te r simply ask s, “ What are you doing now?”and allows 140-char re sponse s
Starte d in 2007 by Evan Williams, who no t ice d 200 pe ople emerging f rom a le ct ure at
Stanford, all picking up the ir ce ll phone s to ask the ir f r ie nds, “ What are you doing
no w?”
Basic ide a: re al-t ime interact ions wi th a se lf-se le cte d ne t work of “like-minde d”
indi v iduals wi th whom you share ide as, que s t ions, s tat us update s, obser vat ions abou t
things in your world, e tc.
Also allo ws you to subscr ibe to any me ssage containing spe cif ie d key words, or “hash-
tags”
A Twi t te r use r s ays: “IM is re al-t ime, person-to-person communicat ion, while Twi t ter is
‘baby email’ wi th e ver yone where you ge t to pick whose me ssage s to re ad.”
Ope rate s on a var ie t y of plat forms: Web, s tand-alone clie nt programs (Twhirl, e tc.),
Blackber r y, iPhone, e tc.
Vocabular y: me ss age s = “t wee ts”. Communicat ing = “t wi t ter ing”. Re dis t r ibu t ing an
inte re s t ing me ss age to your own ne t work = “re t wee t ing”, or “RT”
See “Twi t te r in Plain English” for YouTube e xplanat ion of how i t work s.
See “From He re to Twee terni t y: A Pract ical G uide to Ge t t ing Starte d on Twi t ter ” for
good t ips
10
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Twitter’s Web platform
11
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
One example of Twitter client-based program: Twhirl
12
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Another example of Twitter client-based program: Tweetdeck
13
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
One of the mobile platforms for Twitter: Tweetie
14
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
An example of using Twitter’s API: TweetStats
15
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
TweetWheel: an intriguing use of Twitter’s API
16
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
More intro to Twitter
Slide show on the difference bet ween IM, email, blogging, and Twitter.
See David Weinberger’s characterization as “continuous partial friendship”
See characterization as “ambient intimacy” in Nov 4, 2007 New York Times
article entitled “The Global Sympathetic Audience.”
See “Now, Brevity Is the Soul of Office Interaction,” in Nov 23, 2008 NY
Times article.
Case study of a small business using Twitter.
Another case study: San Diego Fire Department started a Twitter feed during
Oct 2007 California wildfires; still active in Dec 2007 for other citizen-
reported events.
St. Louis newspaper encourages subscribers to Twitter about real-time traffic
impact of a repair-shutdown of one of its busy highways.
17
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
More intro to Twitter
See Guy Kawasaki’s “How Twitter Made My Website Better”
See BT Group CIO JP Rangaswami’s blogs here and here and here about use of Twitter in the
enterprise. And see Jan 8, 2009 Net work World article, “12 CIOs who Twitter”.
See also Luis Suarez’s blog on “The Twitter verse Debates” re business justification for using
Twitter in the enterprise.
Useful blog posting on “What is Twitter For? The Message is the Medium” Also, see “What
is Twitter For?” from the same author.
Interesting Dan Farber blog on statistics about Twitter followers
See also “Twitter Tools, Tweaks, and Theories” for more discussion of practical applications
of Twitter.
See “GroupTweet” for interesting tool to support t wittering among a specific group of
users.
Twitter t-shirts now available from eatsleept weet.com
TwitDir says: 2,981,651 Twitterers as of Sep 16, 2008 (see also this chart showing recent
exponential Twitter growth). [Estimated 6 million Twitterers in Feb 2009]
Obama and Clinton each had approx 30,000 Twitter followers, but Obama used it more
effectively; see this “Business Week” article.
18
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
More about Twitter: Zappos
Zappos is a shoe-selling company (just outside Las Vegas) that has grown from $US70 million/
year to $US one billion/year during the past 5 years.
Feb 22, 2009 Tweet by Jim Storer noted that Zappos ranked #7 in customer service for U.S.
companies in Feb 2009 Business Week survey (Amazon was #1)
Zappos Twitter page of 400+ employees is here.
Har vard Business Publishing article on “Why Zappos Pays New Employees to Quit -- And You
Should Too”
19
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Even more about Twitter
See Jason Meserve’s Feb 16, 2009 PC World
article “Twitter is Now a Must in the
Enterprise”
Listen to “The Twitter Song” (silly, but amusing)
See Dan Farber’s April 28, 2008 blog posting,
“What Twitter Brings to the Party”.
See TweetCube, which allows file-sharing via
Twitter, for files up to 10 megabytes (including
PDF and MP3 files).
Tweetjects and blog jects: objects that Tweet
and blog. Examples: a t wittering house (see also
this Wired article), and the t wittering London
Tower Bridge.
Tweetclouds -- so you can see which words you
use most often when t wittering.
Twitterphone - sending messages to Twitter
via phone
20
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Practical Twitter Applications
from “Twitter Tools, Tweaks, and Theories”
TwitterStalking: figuring out when you can call/email a colleague without
1.
interrupting their day
Microblogging: short updates, expressed succinctly -- rather than long
2.
rambling blog posts that no one has time to read
Note to self: keeping track of one’s own stray thoughts.
3.
Breaking news: Twitter “communities” can form instantly, as new (unexpected)
4.
events occur
Communication - as an alternative to IM/SMS, and especially as an
5.
alternative to phone/email
Link Sharing - instead of del.icio.us or ma.gnolia, which can be pretty
6.
cumbersome
GTD (Getting Things Done): organizing your work flow, to-do lists
7.
Advice, Support, Polling, Questions: extremely quick feedback to questions,
8.
often within minutes.
21
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Another microblogging example: Dopplr
Deals with the “ships passing in the night” phenomenon
Answers the simple question: “Where are you going? When will you be
back?”
Widely adopted by employees in several large multi-national companies,
so their employees can coordinate their business trips
See Brady Forest’s comment on Dopplr’s “Coincidence Feed” -- and the
virtue of providing LESS information in a news feed.
See Stowe Boyd’s Dopplr case study, presented at Web 2.0 Expo in Berlin,
Nov 2007
Dopplr is integrated with Twitter, LinkedIn, Gmail, and Flickr in order to
help create a larger net work of “fellow travelers”
22
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Dopplr page, top view
23
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Dopplr page, trip detail
24
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Dopplr page, trip details
25
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Business strategies, policies
Using Twitter & microblogging to encourage collaboration,
feedback, participation from outsiders
This could mean people outside your department or group, but still
inside the firewall. (See this blog for info on Intranet-based Twitter-
like enterprise tools.)
Or people “outside the firewall” – beyond the boundary of the
enterprise
Using Twitter & microblogging to encourage feedback and
participation in a grass-roots, bottom-up fashion
Many organizations still operate in a predominately top-down,
hierarchical, “control”-oriented fashion
Often ineffective in an environment of rapid, disruptive change …
26
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Use of Web 2.0 & micro-blogging for SW
development
Use Ajax and modern tools to develop more use-friendly Web 2.0 apps more
quickly
Use wikis for collaboration, problem-solving
Use Twitter & microblogging to tell others – both inside and outside the
organization – how exciting the project is, and how great the new system will
be.
Consider letting “outsiders” contribute code, perform testing, help trouble-
shoot, provide tech support, invent new product features
Former employees
Retired employees
Business partners
Random citizens
27
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Use of Web 2.0 & micro-blogging tools for project management
Use Web 2.0 project management tools that facilitate quick, fast
“grass-roots” data-entry for status, progress
Examples: eProject, Basecamp — look for API’s with Twitter &
other microblogging tools...
Caveat: these are usually light-weight tools, may not be adequate
for big “mission-critical” projects
Basic “cultural” issue: quick, informal communication, sharing and
democratization of project-management data
Also, use wikis & micro-blogging to collaborate and share things
like risk-management, issue-management
28
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Use of Web 2.0 & micro-blogging for process improvement
Use wikis blogs, Twitter/micro-blogs to collaborate and share:
“lessons learned”
Tips and techniques
Best practices
Worst practices
Cultural issue: use micro-blogs and wikis to encourage quick, fast,
bottom-up “grass roots” process improvement, rather than (or in
addition to) top-down initiatives
Use external blogs and wikis to get more rapid, more “unfiltered”
feedback from users about the good, the bad, and the ugly aspects of
the system/product
29
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Conclusion
Technologies like Ajax important, but not key aspect of Web 2.0
Most important aspects are business policies and cultural
issues
Use Twitter and other micro-blogging toolsto encourage
outsiders to participate, collaborate in business activities
Use Twitter & micro-blogging to encourage grass-roots, peer-
level, bottom-up project management and process improvement
Recognize that culture-change is likely to be difficult, especially
in “traditional” companies
30
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Bottom line
You can ignore, resist, or forbid the use of Twitter & other
Web 2.0 technologies in your IT organization…
… but by doing so, you’re likely to have a more and more
difficult time attracting talented young developers to work
for you.
… and you make it easier and easier for Web 2.0-sav vy
startups and small companies (e.g., Zappos) to compete
against you.
Remember what Dar win told us: survival of the species is
not mandatory, if you prefer not to evolve
31
Published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)
Using Twitter in the Enterprise
Edward Yourdon
email: ed@yourdon.com
blog: www.yourdonreport.com
Version 02
February 25, 2009
2 comments
Comments 1 - 2 of 2 previous next Post a comment