The Case of Sechura, Peru A public-private social partnership Jorge Caballero Former Manager Progestion  Sechura, Perú
Contents <ul><li>Background: Situation of Peru </li></ul><ul><li>Legal Framework, roles  </li></ul><ul><li>and competences...
Location
Introduction: Peru <ul><li>Extension:  1.285.220 km 2 </li></ul><ul><li>Population:  28, 220 million </li></ul><ul><li>Urb...
Water Supply and Sanitation Coverage Source: Housing, Construction, and Sanitation Ministry, Peru.     Area 2007 Coverage ...
Sanitation Sector Local Level Municipalities WU - Municipalities - SO – Rural Committees Responsible for service delivery,...
The case of Sechura: Management by SO <ul><li>Extension: 5,714 km 2  . </li></ul><ul><li>Placed in coastal desert. </li></...
Public-Private Social Model empowers supports informs oversees hires professionalizes Municipality Civil Society Specializ...
The process Sensitization  and  Information Promotion  and Empowerment Implementation and Capacity Building Monitoring and...
Before and After   Source: Management Indicators PROGESTION-2008
Before and After Source: Management Indicators PROGESTION-2008
Before and After Source: Management Indicators PROGESTION-2008. 1US$= S/.3
Management by the SO <ul><li>Professionalizing services </li></ul><ul><li>Recruitment of local staff. </li></ul><ul><li>Ex...
  Sanitation <ul><li>Sewage Condominial System </li></ul><ul><li>Ecological Sanittaion </li></ul><ul><li>V. Chunga Aldana ...
What did the SO?  <ul><li>With the municipality </li></ul><ul><li>Periodical report on accomplishments of management contr...
What did the SO? <ul><li>With organized civil society </li></ul><ul><li>Periodical meetings with Community Supervision Boa...
Success factors and lessons <ul><li>Stable political environment although municipal elections. </li></ul><ul><li>Community...
Community Scenes
Remaining Challenges  <ul><li>Sustainability of the new management model when changing municipal authorities. </li></ul><u...
Danke schoen
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Jorge Caballero Peru Lac English Final

433

Published on

Published in: Travel, Business
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
433
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Las inequidades son más evidentes en el área rural donde un 38% de la población no tiene acceso al agua potable y el 70% no cuenta con un sistema digno de disposición sanitaria de excretas (letrina u otro sistema). Otro segmento postergado en términos de inversiones son los servicios atendidos directamente por los municipios (298 servicios a nivel nacional), en este segmento un 41% de la población no cuenta con el servicio de agua potable y un 62% con sistemas de alcantarillado. La situación de coberturas de servicios es menos desfavorable en Lima Metropolitana y en el ámbito de atención de las EPS municipales. En este panorama, para disminuir las inequidades de atención se debe privilegiar al medio rural y a los municipios que por su tamaño de mercado no están integradas a una EPS. Los subsidios a la demanda de estos segmentos deben estar en orden preferente de atención con los escasos recursos del Tesoro Público.
  • Jorge Caballero Peru Lac English Final

    1. 1. The Case of Sechura, Peru A public-private social partnership Jorge Caballero Former Manager Progestion Sechura, Perú
    2. 2. Contents <ul><li>Background: Situation of Peru </li></ul><ul><li>Legal Framework, roles </li></ul><ul><li>and competences </li></ul><ul><li>3. A new model – The Small Town </li></ul><ul><li>Pilot Project </li></ul><ul><li>4. Achievements by the specialized </li></ul><ul><li>operator </li></ul><ul><li>5. Factors of success </li></ul><ul><li>6. Challenges </li></ul>
    3. 3. Location
    4. 4. Introduction: Peru <ul><li>Extension: 1.285.220 km 2 </li></ul><ul><li>Population: 28, 220 million </li></ul><ul><li>Urban population: 75.9 % </li></ul><ul><li>Rural population: 24.1% </li></ul><ul><li>Poverty: 39.3 % </li></ul><ul><li>Organization: 25 Regions, 194 provinces, 1.828 districts. </li></ul><ul><li>Small Towns: 2.001 a 30.000 hab. </li></ul><ul><li>650 small towns have 4.1 million inhabitants. </li></ul><ul><li>155 small towns served by 49 public utilities. </li></ul><ul><li>490 small towns served directly by local governments and others. </li></ul>
    5. 5. Water Supply and Sanitation Coverage Source: Housing, Construction, and Sanitation Ministry, Peru.   Area 2007 Coverage Pot. Water Sanitation Sewage Treatment Urban (*) 82% 73% 24% Rural 62% 33%   National 76% 33% 24% (*) Including wells * 6.7 million without access to potable water * 10.9 million without access to sanitation facilities
    6. 6. Sanitation Sector Local Level Municipalities WU - Municipalities - SO – Rural Committees Responsible for service delivery, investments and legal framework (Ordinances) for Small Towns. Service Delivery. Investments. National Level Housing, Construction, and Sanitation Ministry SUNASS National Sector Authority. Defines policies, prioritizes investments and financing . Service Regulator Regional Level Regional Plans. Provides TA and training. Financial support. Regional Government GENERAL LAW FOR SANITATION SERVICES
    7. 7. The case of Sechura: Management by SO <ul><li>Extension: 5,714 km 2 . </li></ul><ul><li>Placed in coastal desert. </li></ul><ul><li>Population: 32, 965 inhab. </li></ul><ul><li>Urban population: 97.5 % </li></ul><ul><li>Rural Population: 2.5% </li></ul>PROGESTION
    8. 8. Public-Private Social Model empowers supports informs oversees hires professionalizes Municipality Civil Society Specialized Operator
    9. 9. The process Sensitization and Information Promotion and Empowerment Implementation and Capacity Building Monitoring and Evaluation Infrastructure Works Health and Hygiene Promotion Gender Equity Alternative Technologies Environment Communications
    10. 10. Before and After Source: Management Indicators PROGESTION-2008
    11. 11. Before and After Source: Management Indicators PROGESTION-2008
    12. 12. Before and After Source: Management Indicators PROGESTION-2008. 1US$= S/.3
    13. 13. Management by the SO <ul><li>Professionalizing services </li></ul><ul><li>Recruitment of local staff. </li></ul><ul><li>Experienced managerial team. </li></ul><ul><li>Close relation with clients, </li></ul><ul><li>household by household. </li></ul><ul><li>Identification of bottlenecks and solutions. </li></ul><ul><li>Personalized attention to claims. </li></ul><ul><li>Flexibility in water bill payment. </li></ul><ul><li>User cadaster and metering. </li></ul><ul><li>Innovative sanitation technologies. </li></ul>
    14. 14. Sanitation <ul><li>Sewage Condominial System </li></ul><ul><li>Ecological Sanittaion </li></ul><ul><li>V. Chunga Aldana and Micaela B. </li></ul><ul><li>Before: Without domestic connection </li></ul><ul><li>Currently: 250 domestic connections </li></ul><ul><li>Benefitted population: 1,250 </li></ul><ul><li>Coverage expansion </li></ul><ul><li>4.8 % </li></ul>Fishermen’s Cove Before: Without domestic connection Currently : 90 domestic connections Benefitted Population: 450 Coverage expansion 1.7 %
    15. 15. What did the SO? <ul><li>With the municipality </li></ul><ul><li>Periodical report on accomplishments of management contract </li></ul><ul><li>Usufructuary payment </li></ul><ul><li>Advise in formulating WSS public investment </li></ul><ul><li>projects </li></ul><ul><li>Participation in oversight of investment </li></ul><ul><li>works </li></ul><ul><li>Convince about model sustainability. </li></ul>
    16. 16. What did the SO? <ul><li>With organized civil society </li></ul><ul><li>Periodical meetings with Community Supervision Board. </li></ul><ul><li>Enabled participation mechanisms, civil society oversight with gender approach. </li></ul><ul><li>Support in the promotion of a culture of water service payment. </li></ul><ul><li>Communication and Educational </li></ul><ul><li>Strategy addressed to the community. </li></ul>
    17. 17. Success factors and lessons <ul><li>Stable political environment although municipal elections. </li></ul><ul><li>Community’s support to the change of the management model. </li></ul><ul><li>Regular income ensured due to service payment by fisher industry (60 %). </li></ul><ul><li>National water and sanitation law incorporated </li></ul><ul><li>specialized operator as </li></ul><ul><li>actor in service administration. </li></ul><ul><li>Tariffs cover operation and </li></ul><ul><li>maintenance costs. </li></ul>
    18. 18. Community Scenes
    19. 19. Remaining Challenges <ul><li>Sustainability of the new management model when changing municipal authorities. </li></ul><ul><li>Understanding that the contract can be adjusted according mutual agreement. </li></ul><ul><li>Tariffs are still not updated as expected. </li></ul><ul><li>Delays in WSS investments by </li></ul><ul><li>the municipality. </li></ul>
    20. 20. Danke schoen
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×