Ancient Egyptian panorama: The Egyptian army 5000 years ago
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Ancient Egyptian panorama: The Egyptian army 5000 years ago

on

  • 3,017 views

Ancient Egyptian panorama: The Egyptian army 5000 years ago

Ancient Egyptian panorama: The Egyptian army 5000 years ago
http://yassermetwally.com

Statistics

Views

Total Views
3,017
Views on SlideShare
1,127
Embed Views
1,890

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
9
Comments
0

17 Embeds 1,890

http://yasermetwaly.wordpress.com 1431
http://profyasser.wordpress.com 294
http://yasermetwally.blogspot.com 145
http://yasermetwally.blogspot.fr 4
http://131.253.14.98 2
http://yasermetwally.blogspot.in 2
http://yasermetwally.blogspot.ro 2
http://yasermetwally.blogspot.com.es 1
https://www.linkedin.com 1
http://yasermetwally.blogspot.com.au 1
http://yasermetwally.blogspot.co.nz 1
http://yasermetwally.blogspot.pt 1
http://yasermetwally.blogspot.co.uk 1
http://yasermetwally.blogspot.kr 1
http://207.46.192.232 1
http://ps.googleusercontent.com 1
https://yasermetwaly.wordpress.com 1
More...

Accessibility

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft Word

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Ancient Egyptian panorama: The Egyptian army 5000 years ago Ancient Egyptian panorama: The Egyptian army 5000 years ago Presentation Transcript

  • The Egyptian army 5000 years agoClick here to view the online version of the Egyptian armys 5000 years agoClick here to download the offline version of the Egyptian army 5000 years agoTHE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN ARMED FORCES • The armyUntil the takeover of Lower Egypt by the Hyksos, most conflicts the Egyptians had foughthad been civil wars, where mainly armies of conscripted peasants and artisans led bynoblemen opposed each other, or relatively short campaigns south into Nubia extending thesouthern borders of the realm, or east and west into the desert regions.From the Old Kingdom on foreigners were incorporated into the army. The Egyptianspossibly even signed contracts with foreign potentates to insure the supply of mercenaries.Nubian Medjay entered Egypt during the turmoils of the First Intermediate Period, formedmercenary archer units and served in the armed constabulary. They are known to havefought under Kamose against the Hyksos. Archer unitsDraftees fought in regional contingents, led by local noblemen. Ameni, son of Khnumhotep Iled his men on several campaigns against Nubia • The changing army of the New KingdomThe equipment was basic at the beginning of Egyptian history: something to throw at theenemy or hit him with (see a predynastic battle scene) and a heavy shield to hide behind, andthe need to improve the weaponry remained small for a long time.After the Hyksos had taken control of the Delta [2], the Theban pharaohs of the 17th and18th dynasties adopted new weapons and strategies, a prerequisite for empire building in theMiddle East, a region where the constant development of new and better weapons wasnecessary for survival. Their presence also caused changes in the role of the military inEgyptian society. As the length of the campaigns grew, the use of conscripts became
  • impractical, and the army turned professional, with the nobility in the role of officers andcharioteers, and the king fighting among them, generally in closed ranks.Many specialized troops evolved, such as sappers with heavy shields using battering rams andscaling ladders, trench digging pioneers and, after the reconquest of Nubia, Kushite shocktroops and Nubian archers.This new army did not have all the centuries old traditions other social institutions had. Itwas therefore relatively easy for talented individuals to rise through the ranks. They couldmove into other segments of society and maintain exalted positions thanks to the gifts of landand slaves they received from the pharaohs, from Ahmose I onwards. Appreciation for thisnew nobility, its courage and achievements, was often expressed in inscriptionsA number of army commanders reached kingship, among them Horemheb and Ramses I(XIX Dynasty) and many kings surrounded themselves with former soldiers whose loyaltyand self-sacrifice they had experienced. Didu, a professional soldier, was appointed to thepost of responsible for the deserts east of Thebes, then became the king’s envoy to foreigncountries, later standard bearer of the king’s guard, captain of the ship Meri-amen andfinally commander of the police force. After a long and blameless service Neb-amen, anotherstandard bearer, was appointed chief of police of western Thebes.Amenhotep IV (Akhenaten), whose bodyguard consisted mostly of foreigners -Syrians,Libyans and Nubians – used the army to break the power of the priesthood and thebureaucrats. But after his death the military establishment made peace with the civil serviceand the clergy. Subsequent pharaohs had to take into account the interest of all three sectors.Apart from the regular infantry and the chariotry which under Seti I’s reign appears to havebeen separate from the rest of the army already, there were apparently less professional unitsas well. The king speaks of the DAm.w, interpreted as militia, in a stela:With the expanding empire and the need to find capable soldiers, the Egyptians began toinduct prisoners of war into their army, such as Sherden captured during the incursions ofthe Sea Peoples.Their loyalty to the throne was such, that Sherden only were chosen for the bodyguard ofRamses II.It was probably during the reign of Ramses II that the first regular mounted cavalry—asopposed to horse-drawn chariots—was introduced in any army, but it was only the Persiansin the 6th century BCE who realized its full potential.The XIX and XX Dynasties saw some of the most spectacular exploits of Egyptian power butalso its decline, with Egypt barely able to defend its frontiers and relying heavily onmercenaries. By the middle of the 12th century sixty percent of the soldiers were non-Egyptians.Sheshonq I (XXII Dynasty) recreated the royal army after years of neglect • The army of the Late Period
  • The resurgence of Egyptian power after the occupations of the country by Libyans, Kushitesand Assyrians was mostly based on the hiring of foreign mercenaries from the east and north:Ionians and Carians, Jews, Aramaeans, Phoenicians and others. They were deployed whennative forces were considered to be unreliable. Jewish contingents were stationed atElephantine and Aramaeans at Syene after Egyptian troops had deserted and fled into Nubia.These mercenary troops were often officered by foreign commanders, at times of a differentethnic group, and their obedience was not always ensured. They and their families lived incommunities which upheld traditional values to a large degree and cultivated theirconnection to their home countries by participating financially in the erection of publicedifices “back home”, or by appealing to the authorities for support, as did the Jews whoasked the government in Jerusalem for help after their temple at Elephantine had beendestroyed.Still, there was a feeling of loyalty to their employer, to their officers and to each other, whichall soldiers need to be able to function in the battle field; and when their trust was betrayedtheir reaction could be savage: after Phanes of Halicarnassos had deserted to Cambyses histroops punished him by killing his children before his eyes. • DeploymentDeploying an army in ancient times was laborious business. Inside Egypt soldiers and theirprovisioning could be moved by ship, the fastest mode of mass transportation until the adventof the railway.Marching an army to its destination took much longer, even when depots of food and waterwere available. On his way to Megiddo Thutmose III crossed the Sinai Desert from Tharu onthe eastern border of Egypt to the closest major Canaanite town, Gaza, a distance of about200 km in 9 days [8], at a speed of about 22 km per day.His progress through Canaan was much slower, about 10 km per day [8], probably mostlydue to the fact that in ancient times armies in enemy territory generally provisionedthemselves by looting the countryside which slowed down their advance.At the end of a marching day a camp surrounded by a shield wall had to be set up when onehad to spend the night in the open. Into this protected space the pack animals could beherded and unloaded, tents could be erected there, skilled craftsmen could look after brokenequipment and grooms tend the animals. • The army organizationAncient armies were generally small compared to modern mass armies [5]. The Egyptianarmy of the New Kingdom was composed of three divisions under Seti I on his Canaancampaign, named Suteh (Set)–”the heroic archers”, Amen–”the mighty archers” and Re–”themany-armed”, [4] and of four under Ramses II on his Kadesh campaign, the forth beingnamed Ptah.
  • A division numbered several thousand men, typically 4000 infantry and 1000 chariotry,organized into ten battalions of about 500 soldiers, which were subdivided into companies 250strong, platoons of fifty men and ten men squads.The overall command lay in the hands of the pharaoh himself or one of his close relatives,generally a son. Similar to the administration of the whole kingdom, the army was dividedinto a northern and a southern corps overseen by Chief Deputies. The line of commandincluded ranks corresponding to the modern generals, battalion commanders, standardbearers and adjutants at the company level, lieutenants leading the platoons, and non-commissioned officers in charge of squads. [1]The chariotry was led by marshals (jmj-rA ssmwt – Ami-Re-sesemut). It was divided intobrigades, each of which was comprised of two or more squadrons. Five companies of tenchariots each made up a squadron. Egyptian chariots were manned by two soldiers, a driverand an archer.Parallel to the combat line of command there was a scribal administration organized onhierarchical lines and distinct from the combat officers. The Egyptian army units • The aftermath of battleEgyptian leaders sometimes prided themselves on that nobody had died during theirexpeditions. But battles, even victorious ones, cause victims, wounded and dead. The deadhad to be buried close to where they fell which was generally in foreign soil, a fate manyEgyptians dreaded. Thutmose, a scribe serving in the army during the reign of Ramses XI,was clearly worried. He kept up a lively correspondence with his friends back home, and toone named Hafy he wrote fatalistically: Today I am alive, but the morrow is in god’s hand[12]. In many of his letters he asked his friends to beg the gods to intercede on his behalf: Andyou shall get water for Amen of the thrones of both lands and tell him to preserve me! [11]The treatment of the injured was generally haphazard until the introduction of medical corpsin modern times. Little is known about how the Egyptians prepared themselves for dealingwith expected casualties, but some measures were taken; the above mentioned Thutmose, alsocalled Tjari, for instance, received the following order:
  • The survival chances of the wounded were probably slim despite the Egyptian physicians’extensive knowledge of how to treat serious injuries, knowledge collected in scrolls such as theEdwin Smith papyrus. The Egyptian army units • Behaviour after victoryWhile the Egyptians were perhaps less cruel than the Assyrians who erased cities anddestroyed whole peoples in order to frighten others into submission, they still let theconquered know who was master, at times killing them as the depictions on the NarmerPalette and decapitated bodies discovered near Middle Kingdom fortresses in Nubia seem toindicate, often by enslaving survivors both civilian and military, or plundering theirpossessions and destroying their means of livelihood:Sometimes sizable parts of the population were displaced. Snefru carried off thousands ofNubians after a victory in ca. 2599 BCE. It has been suggested that they were settled inEgyptian villages (domains) founded the following year:Sometimes the bodies were shown to the public, often in a demeaning manner. Thutmose Idisplayed a killed Nubian hanging head down from the prow of his ship, Amenhotep II didlikewise to Syrian enemies:After the conquest of Megiddo by Thutmose III the surviving princes surrendered to thepharaoh, and after accepting the Egyptian king as their overlord, they were allowed tocontinue ruling their cities.Behold, the chiefs of this country came to render their portions, to do obeisance to the fame ofhis majesty, to crave breath for their nostrils, because of the greatness of his power, becauseof the might of the fame of his majesty the country came to his fame, bearing their gifts,consisting of silver, gold, lapis lazuli, malachite; bringing clean grain, wine, large cattle, andsmall cattle for the army of his majesty. Each of the Kode among them bore the tributesouthward. Behold, his majesty appointed the chiefs anew.Booty was important as a source of remuneration of one’s followers and was sometimes thereason for not achieving military success. During the battle of Kadesh the Hittite charioteersseem to have abandoned the pursuit of Ramses and the remnants of his forces in order toplunder the Egyptian camp, which gave the pharaoh time to reorganize his forces and drivethe Hittites back towards Kadesh.
  • Thutmose III exercised better control over his troops at Megiddo. Plundering started afterthe victory over the enemy chariotry was complete, though it prevented, according to thechronicler, the taking of the town by assault. The booty belonged to the king who distributedit to those he deemed deserving.Some conquered territories like Nubia and the Sinai were annexed, administered by Egyptianofficials and controlled with the help of the army, while in others, like Canaan, local kingssubservient to the pharaohs ruled with armies of their own.After a victory was achieved the plunder was distributed, the deserving were honoured andthe gods were thanked.In a Luxor relief Ramses II depicted an unidentified Asiatic fortress which had been taken,with six pigeons rising from it, seemingly sent forth to announce the victory [7]. Victorieswere dedicated to the gods by reliefs and inscriptions on temple walls [10], by offerings ofhacked off limbs of enemies and by donations of a part of the booty to their temples.Most Egyptian victories were achieved over enemies of little significance, bedouins in theeastern desert, tribes in Nubia or ill organized city states in Canaan. When Egypt came upagainst major powers its military performance was less admirable. Against the Hittites orMitanni during the New Kingdom the Egyptians managed to come to understandings whichpreserved their sphere of influence in Canaan, but during the first millennium BCE theyrepeatedly collapsed under the onslaught of foreign armies, be they Kushite, Assyrian orPersian, and their country was occupied. • The navyEgyptian squadrons composed of speedy keftiu [3], kebentiu from Byblos and Egyptiantransports patrolled the eastern Mediterranean.Unlike the later Greeks who developed special naval techniques (used also by Late PeriodEgypt), maritime battles by New Kingdom Egyptians and their opponents, the Sea Peoples,were fought by seaborne land troops. The Egyptian deployment of archers and the fact, thatEgyptian ships could both be sailed and rowed, gave them a decisive advantage, despite theinferiority of the vessels themselves, which were at times quite sizable carrying up to twohundred and fifty soldiers.But often the navy was little more than a means for getting land troops to where they wereneeded. Senusret III reached Nubia by shipSoldiers could also be transported at great speed to the Asiatic coast where they came uponthe rebellious Canaanites without warning. Thutmose III employed this technique with greatsuccess.Egypt lost its role of maritime superpower after the end of the New Kingdom. Phoeniciansand Greeks became the main players in the Mediterranean. Continental powers like thePersians used these sea-faring nations to impose their control on the seas.
  • Egypt renewed its navy under Necho II, investing heavily in the development of biremes andwas possibly among the inventors of the more powerful triremes in its attempt to fight off thePersians. It was unsuccessful and thereafter its fleet was at the behest of the foreign powercontrolling the country. Dozens of Egyptian ships were incorporated into the Persian fleetfighting the Greeks.The last of the Ptolemies, Queen Cleopatra VII joined forces with the Roman Marc Anthony,in an attempt to preserve Egypt’s independence. But her fleet was defeated at Actium, whichspelled out the end of pharaonic Egypt.References 1. Yohanan Aharoni Carta’s Atlas of the Bible, Carta Beit Hadar, Jerusalem, 1964 2. Lionel Casson Ancient Egypt, Time-Life Books 1975 3. Diodorus Siculus Library of History 4. James Henry Breasted, Ancient Records of Egypt: Historical Documents. , Chicago, 1906. 5. Alan H. Gardiner Egyptian Hieratic Papyri, Series I: Literary Texts of the New Kingdom, Part I, Leipzig 1911 6. R.Gonen Klay nesheq qdumim (Weapons of the ancient world), Keter, Jerusalem 1979 7. Labib Habachi, The Two Rock Stelae of Sethos I in the Cataract Area Speaking of Huge Statues and Obelisks, BIFAO 73 (1973), pp.113-125 8. Herodotus, Histories II, 9. Israelit-Groll, Sarah ed. , Studies in Egyptology, Jerusalem 1990 10. Kaplan, Philip, Cross-Cultural Contacts among Mercenary Communities in Saite and Persian Egypt, Mediterranean Historical Review, Vol.18, No.1, June 2003, pp.1-31 11. Kraus, Jürgen, Die Demographie des alten Ägypten, Göttingen 2004 12. Lichtheim M., Ancient Egyptian Literature , University of California Press, 1976 13. Herman de Meulenaere: La statue du général Djed-ptah-iouf-ankh, Caire JE 36949, BIFAO 63 (1965), pp.19-32 14. Pierre Montet Haiey yom-yom bemitzrayim (La vie quotidienne en Egypte), Am Hassefer Publishers Ltd., Tel Aviv 1963 15. Robert B. Partridge Weapons and Warfare in Ancient Egypt, Peartree, 2002 16. W. M. Flinders Petrie Naukratis, London, 1886 17. W. M. Flinders Petrie Kahun, Gurob, and Hawara, London, 1890
  • 18. W. M. Flinders Petrie Illahun, Kahun and Gurob, London, 1891 19. W. M. Flinders Petrie Prehistoric Egypt, London, 1920 20. Yoel Rapel Toldot Eretz Israel (The History of the Land of Israel), Israeli Ministry of Defence, 1984 21. Serge Sauneron, La manufacture d’armes de Memphis, BIFAO 54 (1954)The authorProfessor Yasser Metwally