Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Clinical Decision Support Systems andtheir Impact on Cardiovascular DiseasePatient CareWesley O’NealHIMA 5060Fall 2012
Cardiovascular Disease• Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for 1 in every 3 deaths  in the United States (Roger et al.,...
Clinical Decision SupportSystems (CDSS)• Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are defined as clinical  consult systems...
CDSS and CVD• Numerous guidelines exist for the treatment of CVD• Many practitioners are not appropriately reaching qualit...
Congestive Heart Failure• Mudge et al. showed that CDSSs reduced mortality in CHF  patients (Mudge et al., 2010).• Toth-Pa...
Hypertension• Bosworth et al. showed that physicians that used CDSSs to  treat hypertensive patients were more likely to a...
Dyslipidemia• Gilutz et al. showed that CDSSs were able to improve the  cholesterol values of patients with known coronary...
Myocardial Infarction• Riggio et al. found that adherence to evidence-based  guidelines was improved with increases in pre...
Areas of Uncertainty• Only a few of the studies in this report were randomized  controlled trials  • It does appear that C...
Conclusion• CDSSs have a benefit in the management of patients with CHF  and are also able to reduce mortality in these pa...
References•   Bosworth, H. B., Olsen, M. K., Dudley, T., Orr, M., Goldstein, M. K., Datta, S. K., . . . Oddone, E. Z. (200...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Clinical Decision Support Systems and their Impact on Cardiovascular Disease Patient Care

218

Published on

Wesley O'Neal

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
218
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Clinical Decision Support Systems and their Impact on Cardiovascular Disease Patient Care"

  1. 1. Clinical Decision Support Systems andtheir Impact on Cardiovascular DiseasePatient CareWesley O’NealHIMA 5060Fall 2012
  2. 2. Cardiovascular Disease• Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for 1 in every 3 deaths in the United States (Roger et al., 2012)• CVD is projected to increase by 10% over the next 20 years (Heidenreich et al., 2011)• CVD accounts for 20% of healthcare dollars spent and a 3-fold increase in these expenditures is expected (Trogdon, Finkelstein, Nwaise, Tangka, & Orenstein, 2007)
  3. 3. Clinical Decision SupportSystems (CDSS)• Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) are defined as clinical consult systems that use population statistics or encode expert knowledge to assist healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and treatment of disease (Shortliffe & Cimino, 2006)• CDSSs have been reported to improve the quality of care delivered and health outcomes (Kawamoto, Houlihan, Balas, & Lobach, 2005)
  4. 4. CDSS and CVD• Numerous guidelines exist for the treatment of CVD• Many practitioners are not appropriately reaching quality measures (Brady, Oliver, & Pittard, 2001)• CDSSs could possibly improve patient care and reduce the heavy financial burden of CVD• This paper explored the data that has been reported concerning the use of CDSSs and their impact on CVD-related care
  5. 5. Congestive Heart Failure• Mudge et al. showed that CDSSs reduced mortality in CHF patients (Mudge et al., 2010).• Toth-Pal et al. showed that general physicians are able to manage CHF patients with a CDSS (Toth- Pal, Wardh, Strender, & Nilsson, 2008).• Riggio et al. found that ACEIs were more likely to be prescribed upon discharge after MI with a CDSS that was simultaneously linked with the EMR (Riggio et al., 2009).• Eckstein et al. showed that paramedics in the field were capable of diagnosing CHF and treating it when symptoms were linked to a CDSS (Eckstein & Suyehara, 2002).
  6. 6. Hypertension• Bosworth et al. showed that physicians that used CDSSs to treat hypertensive patients were more likely to abide by the national guidelines but not improve blood pressure numbers (Bosworth et al., 2009)• Hicks et al. found similar results (Hicks et al., 2008)• Both of these studies show that CDSSs are not actually able to improve the blood pressure of hypertensive patients but improve guideline adherence
  7. 7. Dyslipidemia• Gilutz et al. showed that CDSSs were able to improve the cholesterol values of patients with known coronary artery disease (CAD)• Increased secondary prevention and possible reduction in MI needs to be researched further
  8. 8. Myocardial Infarction• Riggio et al. found that adherence to evidence-based guidelines was improved with increases in prescriptions for ACEIs (Riggio et al., 2009)• These drugs have been shown to reduce mortality
  9. 9. Areas of Uncertainty• Only a few of the studies in this report were randomized controlled trials • It does appear that CDSSs can improve the care of patients with CVD but studies with a higher level of design will be needed• The studies discussed did not investigate the cost of implementing CDSSs• These studies did not look at long-term outcomes• There was no uniformity in CDSSs used between studies
  10. 10. Conclusion• CDSSs have a benefit in the management of patients with CHF and are also able to reduce mortality in these patients• CDSSs are not able to actually improve the treatment of hypertensive patients but may increase adherence to evidence-based guidelines• CDSSs are able to improve the management of patients with dyslipidemia• CDSSs improve the prescription practices of patients that are discharged from the hospital after MI
  11. 11. References• Bosworth, H. B., Olsen, M. K., Dudley, T., Orr, M., Goldstein, M. K., Datta, S. K., . . . Oddone, E. Z. (2009). Patient education and provider decision support to control blood pressure in primary care: a cluster randomized trial. Am Heart J. 157(3): 450-456.• Brady, A. J., Oliver, M. A., & Pittard, J. B. (2001). Secondary prevention in 24, 431 patients with coronary heart disease: survey in primary care. BMJ. 322(7300): 1463.• Eckstein, M., & Suyehara, D. (2002). Ability of paramedics to treat patients with congestive heart failure via standing field treatment protocols. Am J Emerg Med. 20(1): 23-25.• Gilutz, H., Novack, L., Shvartzman, P., Zelingher, J., Bonneh, D. Y., Henkin, Y., . . . Porath, A. (2009). Computerized community cholesterol control (4C): meeting the challenge of secondary prevention. Isr Med Assoc J. 11(1): 23-29.• Heidenreich, P. A., Trogdon, J. G., Khavjou, O. A., Butler, J., Dracup, K., Ezekowitz, M. D., . . . Woo, Y. J. (2011). Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 123(8): 933-944.• Hicks, L. S., Sequist, T. D., Ayanian, J. Z., Shaykevich, S., Fairchild, D. G., Orav, E. J., & Bates, D. W. (2008). Impact of computerized decision support on blood pressure management and control: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 23(4): 429-441.• Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C. A., Balas, E. A., & Lobach, D. F. (2005). Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 330(7494): 765.• Mudge, A., Denaro, C., Scott, I., Bennett, C., Hickey, A., & Jones, M. A. (2010). The paradox of readmission: effect of a quality improvement program in hospitalized patients with heart failure. J Hosp Med. 5(3): 148-153.• Riggio, J. M., Sorokin, R., Moxey, E. D., Mather, P., Gould, S., & Kane, G. C. (2009). Effectiveness of a clinical-decision-support system in improving compliance with cardiac-care quality measures and supporting resident training. Acad Med. 84(12): 1719-1726.• Roger, V. L., Go, A. S., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Benjamin, E. J., Berry, J. D., Borden, W. B., . . . Turner, M. B. (2012). Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 125(1): e2-e220.• Shortliffe, E. H., & Cimino, J. J. (2006). Biomedical informatics : computer applications in health care and biomedicine (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.• Toth-Pal, E., Wardh, I., Strender, L. E., & Nilsson, G. (2008). A guideline-based computerised decision support system (CDSS) to influence general practitioners management of chronic heart failure. Inform Prim Care. 16(1): 29-39.• Trogdon, J. G., Finkelstein, E. A., Nwaise, I. A., Tangka, F. K., & Orenstein, D. (2007). The economic burden of chronic cardiovascular disease for major insurers. Health Promot Pract. 8(3): 234-242.
  1. A particular slide catching your eye?

    Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

×