0
Lars Kurth
Community Manger, Xen Project
Chairman, Xen Project Advisory Board
Director, Open Source Business Office, Citri...
Was a contributor to various projects
Worked in parallel computing, tools,
mobile and now virtualization
Community guy at ...
Source: The 2014 Future of Open Source Survey Result
The # of Projects is growing rapidly
2007: 0.2M projects
Today: 1.0M projects,
100Billion LOC,
10M contributors
2015: 1.8M...
50% of all enterprises adopt OSS
software
Julian Manson @ Flickr
30% of companies make it easy for
employees to contribute to projects
Influencing a project’s direction is one
of the main...
Open Source Flywheel
[1] bit.do/optionvalue
2001: Open Sourced by IBM
2001 – 2003: Growth from 8 to 80
consortia members
2006: Callisto
10 projects, 260 committers
20...
Tragedy of the Commons
(sort of)
Moyan Brenn @ Flickr
snoopsmouse @ Flickr
Bruce Schneier
Internationally renowned security Technologist
@Bruce_Schneier
Catastrophic is the right word
[for Heartble...
Source: Ohloh.net
Growing Codebase
Static and small contributor base
1 person maintaining 100 KLoC =
Underinvestment
Extre...
snoopsmouse @ Flickr
Features
How many users you have
How many vendors back you
How you are seen in the press
…
can help you succeed
Neutrality / Perception
Support Infrastructure
Expertise / Mentoring
Vendor Network
…
BUT: You still need to do
all the ri...
Create a balanced Flywheel
OSS Foundations can help
Master different skills
Vinovyn @ Flickr
Follow Industry News
Follow Project News
Adopt Software
Engage with Users
Trial Software
Engage with Industry
Evangelize
C...
Community is expanding fast
Companies can’t find staff
Potential of slowing growth
Potential of loosing new vendors
Poachi...
Training:
Expensive to create
Does not normally scale
bit.do/grow-devs
You don’t need training…
Good and active dev wiki
I...
Orgs need to apply
(we did not always get in)
Students only, summer only
Orgs and companies can sponsor
slots
Interns, sum...
30% Community Growth p.a.
Contributors competing for review
time from stretched maintainer /
reviewer base
Average review ...
Short term fixes
(documentation/guidance : set expectations)
(better co-ordination for amongst reviewers)
Grow reviewer ba...
Activities
Problem
Metrics
Activities
Metrics
Problem
Media
Industry
Media Coverage
Social Media Impact
Media
Industry
Users
User & Web Metrics
Features / Releases
Community Metrics
bit.do/oss-metrics
bit.do/oss-commercial-dashboards
Contributors
Media
Industry
Users
Are you helping
your employer
by contributing to
the project?
Employer
Contributors
Media
Industry
Users
Are you spending
your funds wisely?
bit.do/community-plan
Employer
Board
Contributors
Media
Industry
Users
bit.do/xenproject-sample-report-1
bit.do/xenproject-sample-report-2
Open Source Flywheel
revisited
The boundary between
Business and Communities
Create a balanced Flywheel
OSS Foundations can help
Master many different skills
Vinovyn @ Flickr
Get Companies to help you
Undefined Responsibilities
cause problems
Moyan Brenn @ Flickr
Xen Project Advisory Board trying
to push a preferred test harness
over community solution
Paralysis: no new test code
wri...
Vendor trying to use private
channels to Citrix Xen Project
maintainers to get an edge
Committers needed the vendor
help t...
Tedious and Business
Unfriendly Rules
Moyan Brenn @ Flickr
Vendors wants to promote
project at events (swag, booth,
collateral, …)
Tedious approval process
for every single instance...
CommunityCompanies
• PR / AR / Marketing /
Messaging
• Membership Rules /
Trademarks / Legal
• Provide funds to solve
“Com...
Clear Rules and Responsibilities
Remove tension
Create trust
Works best when aligned with Flywheel
Business friendly Rules...
Vinovyn @ Flickr
Maria Ly @ Flickr
Tchami @ Flickr
Please rate the talk
www.slideshare.net/xen_com_mgr/
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project

378

Published on

Collaborative development is at the core of successful open source projects. Yet to be successful in today's competitive open source world, it is increasingly important to master many different disciplines and to develop an edge.

In this talk we will cover a wide range of topics relevant to developers and members of open source communities who want to increase participation in their projects. Topics range from growing your developer base (e.g. by participation in GSoC, OPW and similar programs), rewarding participation, projecting momentum in the media and press, coercing large companies into contributing more and in different ways to your project, running community initiatives successfully and measuring success.

We will use real-life examples and where appropriate share tools and mental models that help you make the right decisions for your project.

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
3 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
378
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0
Likes
3
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Love to travel to weird places and grow weird plants
  • 10 years =stories to tell
  • Munich, London, LA
  • TIMING: 7 MINS

    Inspired by the Bezos Flywheel which “explains how to attract ever more sales in an online store”
  • Mention: Core Infrastructure Initiative
  • The reason for these issues is often an imbalanced or broken cycle
    In the case of the Xen Project, we also had an imbalanced cycle, and I spent the last 4 years at the project fixing this.
  • TIMING: 15 MINS

    10 years ago, putting the code out there was usually enough to be successful!

    Today we have a lot of new challenges
  • This is not true any more, because we hit resource limits
  • This story is about change : so let’s start with how OSS changed
  • Example:
    # Apache main strength is the “Apache Way” of building communities
    # One of the LFs main strength is the mix of commercial focus and marketing capabilities
  • Link back to Jim Zemlin’s keynote about the rise of OSS foundations
  • TIMING: 20 MINS

    #1 Inspired by Sales Funnels : conversion of leads from media interest to users to developers/companies
    Effectiveness determined by shape of funnel

    #2 The shape can be manipulated by activities (e.g. Test Days) and external events (e.g. what the competition does)

    #3 Don’t have time to go through this in detail, but there is a blog post and presentation with a case study explaining it

  • TIMING: 22 MINS
  • Maybe even link back to presentations given at events
  • Word of mouth => 60% of our joint GSoC and OPW participants being women
  • Mentoring does imply that existing maintainers and reviewers spend more time
  • TIMING: 30 MINUTES
  • TIMING: 35 MINUTES
  • Marketing vs. Community & Developer Driven
  • Do you remember that lesson?

    CLICK … in the areas they do well
  • Unfortunately that is easier said than done
    ---
    CLICK: because in practice there is often tension when one tries to do this
    CLICK: they have different reasons for participating
    ---
    BUT: the common interest for
    both companies and people mostly participate for their own selfish interests
    In other words: it’s unfair to say the interests of companies vs. those of people are better or worse than the others
    ---
    And of course that tension is manageable And some (!) OSS foundations are very good in helping manage that tension
  • TIMING: 38 MINUTES

    Responsibility in the sense of who should and is allowed to do what
  • The root cause was that we had no proven mechanism for companies and the community to work together
  • NOTE: I also used the conversation to ask for stuff from the vendor (such as donating of HW, …) – and now I am usually setting expectations upfront
  • Common thread to these stories …
    No bad intentions in any of them
    Companies and people will always try and push boundaries (in particular when they are fuzzy) to follow their self-interest
  • TIMING: 42 MINUTES
  • TIMING: 40 MINS
  • Cross-over of people, e.g. committers and maintainers on board and WG groups
  • Apache, Commercial Projects, …
  • TIMING: 45 MINUTES
  • TIMING: 34 MINUTES
  • In other words : why not let companies contribute expertise which they have rather than doing it all yourself
  • TIMING: 36 MINUTES
  • Transcript of "LCNA14: How to run a Collaborative Project"

    1. 1. Lars Kurth Community Manger, Xen Project Chairman, Xen Project Advisory Board Director, Open Source Business Office, Citrix lars_kurth
    2. 2. Was a contributor to various projects Worked in parallel computing, tools, mobile and now virtualization Community guy at Symbian Foundation Learned how NOT to do stuff Community guy for the Xen Project Working for Citrix Member of OSS Business Office Accountable to Xen Project Advisory Board Chairman of Xen Project Advisory Board
    3. 3. Source: The 2014 Future of Open Source Survey Result
    4. 4. The # of Projects is growing rapidly 2007: 0.2M projects Today: 1.0M projects, 100Billion LOC, 10M contributors 2015: 1.8M projects John Morgan @ Flickr Simon & His Camera @ Flickr Kumar Appaiah @ Flickr
    5. 5. 50% of all enterprises adopt OSS software Julian Manson @ Flickr
    6. 6. 30% of companies make it easy for employees to contribute to projects Influencing a project’s direction is one of the main reason for contributing Nick @ Flickr toffehoff @ Flickr
    7. 7. Open Source Flywheel
    8. 8. [1] bit.do/optionvalue
    9. 9. 2001: Open Sourced by IBM 2001 – 2003: Growth from 8 to 80 consortia members 2006: Callisto 10 projects, 260 committers 2004: Eclipse Foundation 2011: 10th Birthday 273 projects, 1057 committers, 50+ MLOC, 174 members (see bit.do/Eclipse-10) More projects/products/users, improved process, improved option value/modularity, … …
    10. 10. Tragedy of the Commons (sort of) Moyan Brenn @ Flickr
    11. 11. snoopsmouse @ Flickr
    12. 12. Bruce Schneier Internationally renowned security Technologist @Bruce_Schneier Catastrophic is the right word [for Heartbleed]. On the scale of 1 to 10, this is an 11.
    13. 13. Source: Ohloh.net Growing Codebase Static and small contributor base 1 person maintaining 100 KLoC = Underinvestment Extremely large user base Critical infrastructure component Thus impact of Heartbleed is huge
    14. 14. snoopsmouse @ Flickr
    15. 15. Features How many users you have How many vendors back you How you are seen in the press …
    16. 16. can help you succeed
    17. 17. Neutrality / Perception Support Infrastructure Expertise / Mentoring Vendor Network … BUT: You still need to do all the right things
    18. 18. Create a balanced Flywheel OSS Foundations can help Master different skills Vinovyn @ Flickr
    19. 19. Follow Industry News Follow Project News Adopt Software Engage with Users Trial Software Engage with Industry Evangelize Contribute Customize Lead Activities Metrics Problem
    20. 20. Community is expanding fast Companies can’t find staff Potential of slowing growth Potential of loosing new vendors Poaching Friction Problem Tim J Keegan @ Flickr
    21. 21. Training: Expensive to create Does not normally scale bit.do/grow-devs You don’t need training… Good and active dev wiki In code API docs Recorded developer talks Extensive commit messages Design discussions on the list (linked to in commit message) Willingness to help newcomers (mentors) ...
    22. 22. Orgs need to apply (we did not always get in) Students only, summer only Orgs and companies can sponsor slots Interns, summer and winter Good mentors = word of mouth Committed mentors (who can spend a few hours a week) Suitable projects Not so much about the code = it’s an investment in people Metrics Approx. 40% still engaged after 3 years Repeat mentors, more people willing to mentor
    23. 23. 30% Community Growth p.a. Contributors competing for review time from stretched maintainer / reviewer base Average review time up from 28 to 32 days in 6 months Problem
    24. 24. Short term fixes (documentation/guidance : set expectations) (better co-ordination for amongst reviewers) Grow reviewer base by identifying capable candidates in the community (support + encourage + reward : bit.do/let-them-be-your-heroes) Get backing from vendors to ensure candidates stay engaged in community (if vendor employee) Mentor candidates to get them effective more quickly than normal (copy the GSoC / OPW pattern) Still discussing how to do this (at a BoF yesterday and the dev meeting today) No guarantee this works!!!
    25. 25. Activities Problem Metrics
    26. 26. Activities Metrics Problem
    27. 27. Media Industry Media Coverage Social Media Impact
    28. 28. Media Industry Users User & Web Metrics Features / Releases
    29. 29. Community Metrics bit.do/oss-metrics bit.do/oss-commercial-dashboards Contributors Media Industry Users
    30. 30. Are you helping your employer by contributing to the project? Employer Contributors Media Industry Users
    31. 31. Are you spending your funds wisely? bit.do/community-plan Employer Board Contributors Media Industry Users
    32. 32. bit.do/xenproject-sample-report-1 bit.do/xenproject-sample-report-2
    33. 33. Open Source Flywheel revisited The boundary between Business and Communities
    34. 34. Create a balanced Flywheel OSS Foundations can help Master many different skills Vinovyn @ Flickr Get Companies to help you
    35. 35. Undefined Responsibilities cause problems Moyan Brenn @ Flickr
    36. 36. Xen Project Advisory Board trying to push a preferred test harness over community solution Paralysis: no new test code written Delay of roll-out of independently hosted Test Farm Risk of Test Farm not being adopted • Working group jointly led by community and Advisory Board • Group resolved the issue
    37. 37. Vendor trying to use private channels to Citrix Xen Project maintainers to get an edge Committers needed the vendor help to progress their goals Vendor trying to get more and more Potential of lack of trust in our Xen Project maintainers • A rather difficult conversation • Vendor starting to follow community practices and additionally donating (non-developer) resources to the project
    38. 38. Tedious and Business Unfriendly Rules Moyan Brenn @ Flickr
    39. 39. Vendors wants to promote project at events (swag, booth, collateral, …) Tedious approval process for every single instance • PMC approval • VP of Trademark approval (bottleneck) Frustrated vendors Frustrated community • Simplify process for common situations • Proposal at bit.do/PMC-TM-management
    40. 40. CommunityCompanies • PR / AR / Marketing / Messaging • Membership Rules / Trademarks / Legal • Provide funds to solve “Common Good” problems • Referee of last resort • Principles (aka Values) • Roles • Decision Making • Project Lifecycle • Community Initiatives, Best Practices, … Advisory Board WGs Project Governance Test WG PR WG TCT
    41. 41. Clear Rules and Responsibilities Remove tension Create trust Works best when aligned with Flywheel Business friendly Rules Simple and Easy Enables businesses to help the community Effect: Community sees value in company participation Vinovyn @ Flickr
    42. 42. Vinovyn @ Flickr
    43. 43. Maria Ly @ Flickr
    44. 44. Tchami @ Flickr
    45. 45. Please rate the talk www.slideshare.net/xen_com_mgr/
    1. A particular slide catching your eye?

      Clipping is a handy way to collect important slides you want to go back to later.

    ×