Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Unfinished notes from workshop 5 at ELAG 2007
Unfinished notes from workshop 5 at ELAG 2007
Unfinished notes from workshop 5 at ELAG 2007
Unfinished notes from workshop 5 at ELAG 2007
Unfinished notes from workshop 5 at ELAG 2007
Unfinished notes from workshop 5 at ELAG 2007
Unfinished notes from workshop 5 at ELAG 2007
Unfinished notes from workshop 5 at ELAG 2007
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Unfinished notes from workshop 5 at ELAG 2007

668

Published on

These unfinished notes are part of the report from workshop 5 (Library 2.0 : What's in a name). The complete report is available at the blog http://ws5e.wordpress.com

These unfinished notes are part of the report from workshop 5 (Library 2.0 : What's in a name). The complete report is available at the blog http://ws5e.wordpress.com

Published in: Business, Education
0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
668
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
29
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Unfinished notes From ELAG workshop 5 2007: Library 2.0: What is in a name? [email_address]
  • 2. Who needs it? <ul><li>It is not really a question, unless we decide to fight it </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Which we do not </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Should we leave it to ”the others”? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>No, we would not like to do that </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Because then we will be marginalized </li></ul></ul><ul><li>We have to take part! </li></ul><ul><li>So: Join ”them” </li></ul>
  • 3. Trust <ul><li>Do we trust the users? </li></ul><ul><ul><li>As contributors of content </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>As subject cataloguers </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Too choose their own suppliers of content and other services </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Or just pretending to? </li></ul><ul><li>The general attitude is perhaps not very trusting </li></ul><ul><li>Should we? </li></ul>
  • 4. Are they attracted by us? <ul><li>We (the libraries) are offering a category of content not present on amazon.com </li></ul><ul><li>Attracting users is really a 1.0 thing </li></ul><ul><li>Visibility? </li></ul><ul><li>Who is clicking through whom? </li></ul><ul><li>Transparency vs invisibility </li></ul>
  • 5. Multilingualism <ul><li>Separating content from presentation helps </li></ul><ul><li>Social tagging might help </li></ul><ul><li>Automatic translation as an open service </li></ul><ul><ul><li>E.g for translating queries </li></ul></ul>
  • 6. FRBR 2.0 <ul><li>OAI-ORE meets FRBR </li></ul><ul><li>Social ”FRBRization” </li></ul><ul><li>Complement - not replace </li></ul>
  • 7. Remember that <ul><li>Library 2.0 offers us new possibilities to offer our services, helps us to increase our status, increase funding </li></ul>
  • 8. We need to know more <ul><li>About the actual user behaviour </li></ul><ul><li>Are the users really disappearing? </li></ul><ul><li>We need feedback! </li></ul>

×