Avoid false alarms where there are only rumors or vague threats of litigation; threats made by a discredited plaintiff, or where the threats lack credibility.</li></ul>When Does the Duty to Preserve Arise? Anticipating Litigation<br />
<ul><li>“The obligation to preserve evidence arises when the party has notice that the evidence is relevant to litigation or when a party should have known that the evidence may be relevant to future litigation.” Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC, 220 F.R.D. 212, 216 (S.D. N.Y. 2003) (Zubulake IV).
“Once a party reasonably anticipates litigation, it must suspend its routine document retention/destruction policy and put in place a ‘litigation hold’ to ensure the preservation of relevant documents.” Id. at 218.</li></ul>Legal Duties: The Duty to Preserve<br />
Determine The Scope Of The Litigation Hold & Issue The Hold<br />
How to implement the litigation hold<br /><ul><li>“[T]he failure to issue a written litigation hold constitutes gross negligence because that failure is likely to result in the destruction of relevant information.” The Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLC, 685 F. Supp. 456 (S.D. N.Y. 2010).
The hold must direct employees (“key players”) to preserve all relevant records, paper and electronic
Cover all potential document storage: laptops, PDA’s, smartphones, home computers, thumb drives, etc.
Create a mechanism for collecting preserved records
Cannot place total reliance on the employees without supervision of counsel</li></li></ul><li><ul><li>“Once a ‘litigation hold’ is in place, a party and her counsel must make certain that all sources of potentially relevant information are identified and placed ‘on hold,’ to the extent required.” Zubulake v. SBS Warburg LLC, 229 F.R.D. 422, 432 (S.D. N.Y. 2004) (Zubulake V).</li></ul>Legal Duties: Duty to Locate<br />
<ul><li>Will the litigation hold be implemented to involve an entire IT system?
Discuss scope of the litigation hold/resolve issues & problems</li></ul>Rule 26(f) Conference Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure<br />
<ul><li>(D) Responding to a Request for Production of Electronically Stored Information. The response may state an objection to a requested form for producing electronically stored information. If the responding party objects to a requested form--or if no form was specified in the request--the party must state the form or forms it intends to use.</li></ul>Rule 34(D) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure <br />
<ul><li>E) Producing the Documents or Electronically Stored Information.Unless otherwise stipulated or ordered by the court, these procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:
(i) A party must produce documents as they are kept in the usual course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the request;
(ii) If a request does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, a party must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms; and
(iii) A party need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form</li></ul>Rule 34(E)Federal Rule of Civil Procedure<br />
<ul><li>(e) Failure to Provide Electronically Stored Information. Absent exceptional circumstances, a court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party for failing to provide electronically stored information lost as a result of the routine, good-faith operation of an electronic information system.</li></ul>Rule 37(e) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure<br />
<ul><li>“Counsel must take affirmative steps to monitor compliance so that all sources of discoverable information are identified and searched.” Zubulake v. SBS Warburg LLC, 229 F.R.D. 422, 432 (S.D. N.Y. 2004) (Zubulake V).</li></ul>Legal Duties: The Duty to Monitor Compliance<br />