Cost Effecting Ways to Understand Users’ Searching Habits to Improve Discovery
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Cost Effecting Ways to Understand Users’ Searching Habits to Improve Discovery

  • 156 views
Uploaded on

Indianhead Federated Library System’s MORE ILS consortium staff, represented by Lori Roholt, has taken a basic approach to understanding catalog use based on ILS reporting tools and Google......

Indianhead Federated Library System’s MORE ILS consortium staff, represented by Lori Roholt, has taken a basic approach to understanding catalog use based on ILS reporting tools and Google Analytics, supplemented by observations from library staff. The approach is an informal, low-investment method for gaining a top-level understanding of usage patterns to inform site design and development, as well as instruction.

More in: Education , Technology
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
    Be the first to like this
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
156
On Slideshare
81
From Embeds
75
Number of Embeds
1

Actions

Shares
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0

Embeds 75

http://www.wils.org 75

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide
  • the approaches we’ve taken to understanding how our patrons use the MORE Online Catalog, and what we’ve done in response
  • Currently, our publicly accessible catalog is Innovative Interface’s WebPAC
  • no indexes
    facets
    article integration
    overdrive integration

    Perspective on library service and the catalog. April 2014 snapshot:
    79,009 checkout transactions
    130,457 online catalog sessions
    41,294 online catalog users
    50%-85% of checkouts are locally-owned items
  • Times: mostly business hours
    See also: very little, but some!
    Records retrieved: 45% retrieve 1 record, 30% retrieve 2-30 records; 10% retrieve none
    Limits used: rarely (<2% of searches are limited)
  • Word, 1-8 results: 47%; no results: 3%
    Title, 1-8 results: 64%; no results: 17%

    Takeaway: word searches are more likely to produce results; title searches are more likely to be precise

  • Encore doesn’t use indexes
    RightResult is Encore’s algorithm for ranking search results
  • April 2014: 1.3 million pageviews; 130,000 sessions; 41,294 users
  • April 2014: My Account (72,000 pageviews), Quick Lists (9500 pageviews), library look-up: (6800 pageviews), Research (about 1000 pageviews), help (about 900 pageviews)

    Search behavior: use ILS’s search syntax

Transcript

  • 1. Understanding Users’ Searching Habits to Improve Discovery Lori Roholt MORE Administrator Indianhead Federated Library System
  • 2. About MORE: My Online REsource ● ILS consortium ● 49 member public libraries ● 2013 Stats: o Items: 1.7 million o Bibs: 600,000 o Service population: 458,000 o Registered borrowers: 238,000 o Circulation: 4.8 million
  • 3. Current MORE Online Catalog ● Innovative Interface’s WebPAC o In use since 2000 o Last significant update in 2011 ● Mobile: recently, AirPAC for smartphones
  • 4. Forthcoming MORE Catalog ● Innovative Interface’s Encore ● Mobile: Encore Mobile
  • 5. ILS Tools: Search Activity ● Searching metrics only, last 9 days ● Searches by hour ● Use of “see also” references ● Records retrieved ● Use of limits
  • 6. ILS Tools: Indexes Used Word: 32% Title: 30%
  • 7. ILS tools: Indexes Used
  • 8. ILS tools: Indexes Used Choose your default index
  • 9. ILS tools: Indexes Used Innovative’s RightResult ● Adjacency ● Where search term appears ● Format, esp. serials ● And optionally: o More copies o Matching titles (245a) o Manual promotion
  • 10. Google Analytics: All Activity Historical reporting
  • 11. Google Analytics: All Activity ● Use patterns, by pageviews: o Search o My Account: about half of users log in o Quick Lists o MORE Library look-up ● ILS-specific queries reveal search behavior
  • 12. Forthcoming ILS tools ● Searches, traditional holdings vs. articles ● Use of facets, tags, ratings ● More to come, I hope! o In-library vs. out-of-library use o Use of articles from initial search o Use of OverDrive integration features o My Account features used