Think Devlish act Angelic - Search Love 2012
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Think Devlish act Angelic - Search Love 2012

  • 4,943 views
Uploaded on

Stop Chasing Algorithms Guys!!! Build a real business that does real stuff, real stuff attracts links. ...

Stop Chasing Algorithms Guys!!! Build a real business that does real stuff, real stuff attracts links.

From London & Boston 2012 SearchLove w/ Distilled.

More in: Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
No Downloads

Views

Total Views
4,943
On Slideshare
2,242
From Embeds
2,701
Number of Embeds
7

Actions

Shares
Downloads
25
Comments
1
Likes
8

Embeds 2,701

http://www.iloveseo.net 2,688
https://www.linkedin.com 5
http://www.linkedin.com 4
http://www.diffbot.com&_=1357094887057 HTTP 1
http://translate.googleusercontent.com 1
http://www.clickminded.com 1
http://www.lightningpe.com 1

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
    No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Algo Chasing(think devilish, act angelic)Date:November 5, 2012Author:Wil Reynolds (@wilreynolds)
  • 2. Algo view from a non-techie 2
  • 3. Who here has a PhD? 3
  • 4. Who here working on a PhD? 4
  • 5. Google has usoutnumbered? 5
  • 6. Marketing (1800 – 1986) (Print, Billboards, Telemarketing, TV, Direct Mail, Radio, Affinity, Loyalty, word of mouth) 6
  • 7. 7
  • 8. Suddenly marketing looked like this 8
  • 9. “Marketing = Formula?” 9
  • 10. Persuasion (people) vsManipulation (spiders) 10
  • 11. 11
  • 12. 12
  • 13. Who needs “social” skills 13
  • 14. “Too Transparent?” 14
  • 15. I cloaked 15
  • 16. I did whitetext 16
  • 17. 17
  • 18. I was helping? (angelic) 18
  • 19. Until 19
  • 20. 20
  • 21. That’s notsnow white 21
  • 22. Devilish uses of cloaking? 22
  • 23. 600 Sites5 have been hit 1 surprise 23
  • 24. Only blindsided by 1 penalty 24
  • 25. Our own! 25
  • 26. Lets talk aboutSEER’s penalty 26
  • 27. Our history… 27
  • 28. My take ondirectories 28
  • 29. 80% directories20% everything else 2005 29
  • 30. “This is too easy” 30
  • 31. Is the long term way toSEO success based on 31
  • 32. Who has the best list of directories? 32
  • 33. 50% directories50% everything else 2007 33
  • 34. 30% directories70% everything else 2009 34
  • 35. 301 to SEER Interactive 2009 35
  • 36. Gut check“This is too easy” 36
  • 37. One dayTweet from UK 37
  • 38. SEER Is hit 38
  • 39. Bull! 39
  • 40. 40
  • 41. It was true 41
  • 42. 42
  • 43. 43
  • 44. Can PhD’s be wrong? 44
  • 45. DEFINITELY! 45
  • 46. SEOmoz ending a doc in .0 46
  • 47. 47
  • 48. RCS won’t save you 48
  • 49. Social won’t save you 49
  • 50. Lets walk through what happened 50
  • 51. 51
  • 52. 52
  • 53. 53
  • 54. 54
  • 55. 55
  • 56. 56
  • 57. thinkseer.com = toxic? No links built in 3 yrsProgressively better quality 57
  • 58. Problem aboutchasing algo’s 58
  • 59. #1Limited time &more demands 59
  • 60. 2 weeks tofigure it out 60
  • 61. How much time areyou going to spend? 61
  • 62. Could I have invested it in… 62
  • 63. REAL COMPANY SHIT? 63
  • 64. Don’t #2You don’t really know 64
  • 65. 242 65
  • 66. 4 Realities ofGoogle Patents 66
  • 67. #1 - They may never implement it 67
  • 68. #2 - If they do it couldbe 8 years from now 68
  • 69. #3 - If it doesn’t work they’ll yank it 69
  • 70. #4 - Surfacing Quality Content 70
  • 71. #4 – Better for the User 71
  • 72. #4 – Social Graph & mentions vs links 72
  • 73. Rewarding quality 73
  • 74. DUUUUUUH!! 74
  • 75. How many purposefullyReward thin low quality content? 75
  • 76. MaybeRCS can save you? 76
  • 77. Quality assets are how you protect yourself 77
  • 78. 12 hours later 78
  • 79. Back in, why?Algorithmic or RCSmic? 79
  • 80. RCS!! 80
  • 81. 81
  • 82. 3 rd Referrerm.(somesiteyouknow).com 82
  • 83. Responsive FTW! 83
  • 84. 1 tweet@avinash@theverge@gizmodo 84
  • 85. The POWER of 1 85
  • 86. 1 good piece of content 1 tweet 1 RT 86
  • 87. 1 month 7700 links 500 LRD1700 unique referrers 33 days 87
  • 88. Keeps GOING!! 88
  • 89. 89
  • 90. 90
  • 91. 91
  • 92. Your best protectionagainst algo updates RCS! 92
  • 93. 1 reason to followranking algorithms 93
  • 94. Protect yourself fromAffiliate / Partner risk 94
  • 95. Protip: Buy their siteswhile they are hurting 95
  • 96. Do RCS (key) Clean up links Do disavow(switch to new owner might help) 96
  • 97. Wait 2-12 months 97
  • 98. get your 10-20% back 98
  • 99. “Thinking Devilish” 99
  • 100. Lets continue 100
  • 101. Why directories / articles can’t kill quality sites 101
  • 102. Today we get a lot of mixed signals & PANIC!!! 102
  • 103. New Framework to think about penalties / algorithms 103
  • 104. Think about search breaking if… 104
  • 105. PANIC!! Reciprocal Links 105
  • 106. 106
  • 107. 107
  • 108. 108
  • 109. 109
  • 110. 110
  • 111. 111
  • 112. 112
  • 113. 113
  • 114. PANIC!! Sitewides!! 114
  • 115. 115
  • 116. PANIC!! Link Velocity 116
  • 117. Majestic problem 117
  • 118. 118
  • 119. PANIC!! Widgets!!!! 119
  • 120. 120
  • 121. 121
  • 122. 122
  • 123. 123
  • 124. PANIC!! Infographics !!!! 124
  • 125. 125
  • 126. How have I avoidedalgo updates killing me? 126
  • 127. #1 Did RCS 127
  • 128. #2 Think Devilish 128
  • 129. For example 129
  • 130. Find the outboundbroken links from a competitor site 130
  • 131. Something else I don’t like 131
  • 132. Put authorship onnon authored pages (fine line) 132
  • 133. 133
  • 134. 134
  • 135. How long is that gonna last? 135
  • 136. The new“Swinging Axe” style algos 136
  • 137. Pandas & Penguins Oh My! 137
  • 138. “Whew, missed me” 138
  • 139. CO RH A P 139
  • 140. 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 140
  • 141. You get lucky & getpast panda/penguin? 141
  • 142. 142
  • 143. If you insist… 143
  • 144. 144
  • 145. “.3% of queries” 145
  • 146. Vast diff betweenalgo chasing and BUSINESS 146
  • 147. Chase DISPLAY Algo changes 147
  • 148. 148
  • 149. 149
  • 150. 150
  • 151. 151
  • 152. 152
  • 153. 153
  • 154. 154
  • 155. 155
  • 156. 156
  • 157. One more reason tounderstand algos… 157
  • 158. WTF! 158
  • 159. @wilreynolds 159