Seattle Sc Symposium 2010
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Like this? Share it with your network

Share

Seattle Sc Symposium 2010

on

  • 2,842 views

Slides from #scspn - the Science Commons Symposium in the pacific northwest, February 20 2010.

Slides from #scspn - the Science Commons Symposium in the pacific northwest, February 20 2010.

Statistics

Views

Total Views
2,842
Views on SlideShare
2,840
Embed Views
2

Actions

Likes
7
Downloads
10
Comments
0

1 Embed 2

http://www.slideshare.net 2

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Seattle Sc Symposium 2010 Presentation Transcript

  • 1. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 2. thanks to MSFT Research Lisa Green Hope Leman all the speakers... Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 3. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 4. science commons symposium seattle wa 20 february 2010 john wilbanks Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 5. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 6. “consumers do more than consume” Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 7. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 8. after all, it’s your music. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 9. how do we create an alternative in which creation is not criminal? Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 10. licensed objects Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 11. launched licenses Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 12. html / http tcp/ip ethernet Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 13. commons html / http tcp/ip ethernet Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 14. “i propose the seeming paradox that in science, private property is established by having its substance freely given to others…” - Merton Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 15. science@creativecommons Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 16. “we want ‘that’ for science” Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 17. what’s “that”? Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 18. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 19. what we seem to want is for science to experience an innovation explosion... like the internet. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 20. not “open” science not “decriminalized” science Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 21. 1. the goal is the sparking of generative science. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 22. “Generativity is a system’s capacity to produce unanticipated change through unfiltered contributions from broad and varied audiences” - Jonathan Zittrain Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 23. more generative Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 24. less generative Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 25. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 26. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 27. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 28. leverage Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 29. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 30. adaptability Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 31. Text adaptability Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 32. adaptability Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 33. accessibility ease of mastery transferability Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 34. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 35. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 36. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 37. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 38. as below, so above Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 39. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 40. leverage adaptability accessibility ease of mastery transferability Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 41. requires active intervention to reformat basic systems in science... Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 42. 2. if we want generativity for science, we have to deal with property rights. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 43. ignoring the law does not scale. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 44. data secrecy, sui generis tools contract, patent narratives copyright Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 45. image from the public library of science licensed to the public under cc-by-3.0 Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 46. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited. http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 47. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 48. © in relation to data... Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 49. category errors Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 50. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 51. privacy semantic web formats scientific norms national laws Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 52. privacy semantic web formats scientific norms national laws Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 53. vital to decriminalize in strong copyright. potentially negative impact elsewhere. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 54. in an automated world... Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 55. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 56. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 57. waive all rights necessary for data extraction and re-use no obligations (share-alike, contract) to limit downstream use request behavior (citation) through norms Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 58. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 59. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 60. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 61. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 62. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 63. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 64. 3. if we want generativity for science, we have to deal with tools and inventions. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 65. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 66. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 67. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 68. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 69. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 70. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 71. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 72. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 73. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 74. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 75. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 76. 100,000 lines of stem cells under CC. mapped to 100,000 genomes under CC. mapped to 100,000 histories under CC. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 77. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 78. when “freedom” means “to operate” Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 79. http://www.patentlens.net/daisy/Telomerase/2389/g1/2923.html Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 80. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 81. patents i’m willing to give away Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 82. creative commons patent project: reconstruction of the research exemption model patent license Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 83. revenue clause CC model patent license field of use limitation/exception Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 84. “open innovation” Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 85. 5. if we want generativity for science, we have to deal with infrastructure. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 86. “we used to produce data faster than humans could structure it. now we produce data faster than machines can structure it.” - bruce sterling Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 87. “computers are stupid” Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 88. path 1: make data re-useful Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 89. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 90. models - increase data leverage repository - increases data accessibility training - increases ease of mastery licensing - unifies all the tools Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 91. path 2: make computers less stupid. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 92. the semantic web Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 93. espresso coffee cafe kopi cafezinho latte koffee mocha americano Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 94. converge on common names. “coffee” “cafe” http://ontology.foo.org/1234567 “kopi” Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 95. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 96. do we “integrate” web pages or software packages? Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 97. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 98. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 99. in RDF, law is code, code is law. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 100. the same tools that describe data should animate the legal transactions Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 101. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 102. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 103. http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CcREL Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 104. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 105. 5. if we want generativity for science, we have to deal with the whole problem. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 106. lesson from experience: separation of concerns isn’t just technical. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 107. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 108. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 109. leverage adaptability accessibility ease of mastery transferability Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 110. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 111. science is headed (back) to the garage Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 112. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 113. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 114. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 115. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 116. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 117. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 118. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 119. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 120. pc or iphone? Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 121. it’s important. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 122. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 123. generativity offers us an innovation- based chance of escape. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 124. Saturday, February 20, 2010
  • 125. thank you john d. and catherine t. macarthur foundation ewing marion kauffman foundation chdi foundation omidyar network nike, inc. best buy, inc. yahoo!, inc. mountain equipment corporation sage bionetworks national cancer institute / university of michigan sergey brin and anne wojcicki Saturday, February 20, 2010