Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
0
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Evaluation Matrixes V2
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Evaluation Matrixes V2

537

Published on

A step by step presentation of decision matrixes: how to build them, when to use them.

A step by step presentation of decision matrixes: how to build them, when to use them.

0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
537
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
27
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide
  • Decision matrixes can be as complex as one wants them to be...
  • Criteria can be added or removed, the results are easy to updateHelps manage scope creepAll stakeholders can contributeGreat for sorting findings of a mind map
  • Transcript

    • 1. Decision Matrixes<br />@wickedgeekie - 2010<br />
    • 2. A series of solutions has been identified, how can I find out which one fits best the project requirements? How can I justify this selection? How can I conduct this selection with many people?<br />
    • 3. Welcome to decision matrixes. This is an example matrix. Does this look familiar?<br />
    • 4. What is a decision matrix?<br />A decision making technique<br />which enables to<br />catalogue options<br />identify options’ strengths and weaknesses<br />rank options against project requirements<br />identify the option fitting most closely project requirements<br />documents decisions for future reference<br />conduct all of the above with 1 or more people<br />
    • 5.
    • 6. Decision matrixes can be as complex as one wants them to be...<br />
    • 7. Walk-through example<br />Fanta want to promote their new product on Facebook by enabling users to download a voucher.<br />Which Facebook product is best suited for this?<br />
    • 8. Designing the matrix:Inserting the criteria<br />Listing the decision criteria<br />The page features a voucher, or a link to one<br />The brand remains in control of user generated contentof the page<br />The page must be highly visible to generate a high volume of downloads<br />The solution must be scalable for future promotions<br />
    • 9. Designing the matrix: Adding the propositions<br />Listing the propositions<br />A list of possible formats of page has been drawn, and form the propositions:<br />A Group page<br />A Product or Fan page<br />An Event page<br />An Application<br />
    • 10. Filling in the matrix: comments<br />Scoring the propositions for one criteria is much easier as the understanding of what the criteria is is consistent<br />
    • 11. Adding a ranking scale: 1- lowest desirability to 5 – highest desirability<br />3<br />5<br />2<br />5<br />3<br />1<br />2<br />5<br />2<br />4<br />3<br />1<br />4<br />5<br />4<br />5<br />
    • 12. Keeping only ranking scores<br />3<br />5<br />2<br />5<br />3<br />1<br />5<br />2<br />2<br />4<br />3<br />1<br />4<br />5<br />4<br />5<br />
    • 13. Check if the scores are spread enough: this validates the criteria<br />3<br />5<br />2<br />5<br />3<br />1<br />5<br />2<br />2<br />4<br />3<br />1<br />4<br />5<br />4<br />5<br />1<br />4<br />2<br />1<br />These criteria get scores that are too clustered, they may not be valid – or use weighing to differentiate them<br />
    • 14. Adding weighing<br />3x3= 9<br />5x2= 10<br />2<br />5<br />3x3= 9<br />1x2= 1<br />5<br />2<br />2<br />4<br />3x3= 9<br />1x2= 1<br />4x3= 12<br />5x2= 10<br />4<br />5<br />Not all criteria are equal, add weighing to distinguish most/least important<br />
    • 15. Calculating totals<br />3x3= 9<br />5x2= 10<br />2<br />5<br />26<br />3x3= 9<br />1x2= 1<br />5<br />17<br />2<br />2<br />4<br />3x3= 9<br />1x2= 1<br />16<br />4x3= 12<br />5x2= 10<br />4<br />5<br />31<br />The last result has the highest total, it matches best the criteria selected.<br />
    • 16. Calculating totals<br />3<br />5<br />2<br />5<br />15<br />3<br />1<br />5<br />11<br />2<br />2<br />4<br />3<br />1<br />9<br />4<br />5<br />4<br />5<br />18<br />Criteria can be added or removed, the results are easy to update<br />Helps manage scope creep<br />All stakeholders can contribute<br />Great for sorting findings of a mind map<br />
    • 17. In the UX work process...<br />Can help clarify requirements across the team<br />Documents why a solution is selected<br />Can be conducted with or without the client, depending on timing/internal consensus<br />Can be a deliverable if the question is: “what solution is best and why?”<br />Stakeholders may need to be explained what it is and why it’s useful<br />
    • 18. References<br />Kepner-tregoe: http://www.decide-guide.com/kepner-tregoe.html<br />Mike Swanson: http://blogs.msdn.com/mswanson/archive/2008/07/20/my-decision-matrix.aspx<br />

    ×