Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Document- "George C. Marshall Institute"
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Document- "George C. Marshall Institute"

339
views

Published on

Sectoral Emissions Reduction Agreements …

Sectoral Emissions Reduction Agreements
FOIA
Document- "George C. Marshal Institute"


0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
339
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
1
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. M arshal ~GEORGE FOR RELEASE February 12, 2003 O'KEEFE APPLAUDS INDUSTRY ACTIONS TO CHECK EMISSIONS In a statement released today, William O'Keefe. President of the George Marshall Institute, praised the Administration's announcement of new voluntary i~ndustxy program~s designed to reduce grecenhouse gas intensity. Urging caution ini the face of scientific uncertainty, O'Keefe praised the President's program for striking an appropriate balance between sustaining eclornoic grow-th and addressing the risks of clmate change. O'Keefe said: ~-Todav the Bush Administration announces vol LInlary industry programs to address the risk ot humian induced global warmning. Thei rbcus of tl.ese proranms will be actions that will help to achieve the President's uoal of an I18% reduction in greenhouse -as intensttv-a ratio ofoiureehouse -as emissions to economic outLput by 2012, Reminiscent of the criticisms of the State of the UJnion before it was delivered. there are already complaints that volu-ntary actions are insufficient and that more 1s needed to reduce emissions. nlot just their growth. Stripped of its rhetoric. that means a (zovernmrent mandate putting a cap on energy use which is the lifeblood of a healthy. growing economy. With U.S, population rising. maintaining aind improving our standard of living requires faster rates of economic growth and inevitably increased energy use. The President's global warming policy is desigzned to strike a balance between economic growth and actions to address the climate chanoze risk. In the rush to judgment, critics would do well to remember that the state of knowledge about the climate system does not justify the suppression of energy use and economnic urowth reflected in the Kyoto Protocol. The conclusions about past temperature changes and projections about the future. which are the basis for Kyoto. are built onicomnputer simulations which are based on
  • 2. assumptions. not demonstrated scientific facts. As recently as last December. a Department of Commerce climate workshop reaffirmed, as had the National Academy of Sciences, that we do not know enoiull to distinguish natural variability from human influence and we do not adequately understand important climate processes involvinig clouds, water vapor. ocean currents, and solar activity . These elements of uncertainty are not acknowledgyed in the po[icv conclusions drawn from these computer models. Wise policy is based on facts and a good understanding of what science does and does not tell uIS. In spite of all the advances in knowledge over the past decade, we do not know enough to put our economy in jeopardy." The Georg-e Marshall Instituite (GMI). a 50l(cM3 ) non-profit organization founded in 1984 to encourage the use of sound science in makingT public policy. George Marshall Institute 1625 K Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington. D.C. 20006 2012P96-9655 202/296-97 14 hitp ://ww-w.tnarshall org

×