A Strategy for American Innovation - Promote Market-Based Innovation


Published on

1 Like
  • Dear Sir.
    My name is Robert Murray, I am a conceptual designer and holder of several patents.
    I have a plan that would create jobs throughout the U.S.. This plan is based upon harnessing innovation contained within the population. It would require government to protect these ideas and financing to bring them to market. I know several large law firms that could assist in the legal aspects.
    My thinking would run ideas through a protected clearing house to search for similar intellectual properties, then forwarded to design centers for prototyping and testing. Basically assisting the product to market. When products are determined to be profitable the original innovator would have the option to sell the idea to a US company or produce it himself, creating more jobs.
    In this present environment we need the benefits of innovation for the businesses and jobs they will create. Businesses will open, and plant and equipment they will require will be purchased. The money that will purchase American goods and services will provide profits from these small businesses. Businesses that will grow and needing more of everything we produce. We presently have a negative multimillion dollar imbalance of trade. Our cash is flowing out much faster for imported goods. What do we have to sell? Steel, cars, electronics, cloths, shoes, or just about everything you pick up has a foreign origin. Large companies will continue to avail themselves of the cheaper factors of production. The small innovators business is going to them. Business in the US has turned into service based. What do we produce in the US any more, what do we sell to the world to offset our imbalance of trade.
    At one point in recent history Poland was one of the best examples of Capitalism in the world. (Note The Commanding Heights Book, series shown on PBS). When England and the world drove Communism from Poland by assisting Lec Walesa to organize the ship yards, a drastic change occurred. Hundreds of small businesses sprang up. Dress Makers, Shoe Cobblers, Bakers, and so on. Each was making money and putting some into government. Shown in the book The Commanding Heights, also shown on the public broadcasting channel in a three part series, it was Capitalism at its best.
    I have lost a battle with a large off shore corporation that would have enabled me employed many people. My Patent was taken then designed around. I spent three years and became suicidal trying to fight this large corporation. My story is not unique, note 'flash of genus', the movie. Unless you can protect the innovator from the large corporation and make an inexpensive path for evaluation of these ideas, it won't work. I would like the opportunity to discuss my plan to get our economy back on track in a time. The small innovator needs protection and an economical process to get his product to market. The production of these products here in the US would solve the job problem in a few years.
    R Murray
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • RNT may be a good method for the independent inventors

    There are as many as more than 700,000 applications piled up in the USPTO and it usually takes as long as almost 3 years to grant a patent.
    But, there are inventors who are individuals and could not afford the high amount of the patent fees. They hope to have an examination only after their inventions are sold out.
    These difficulties will get even more huge after the change from the first-to-invent system to the first-to-file system. Because an inventor has to file an application as soon as possible to protect his ideas.
    There is a suggestion made attempted to solve this problem. The method discussed as follows may be called as Revoked-but-Not-Terminated(RNT).

    If a patent application is filed and the filing fees are paid, it could be revoked but not terminated within the period of its life, say, 20 years from the filing date. If a patent is granted, it could be revoked but not terminated. In turn, the applicant or patentee should give a step back. His intellectual rights are not protected during the period being revoked. Anyone may utilize the invention during that period without paying the roylty fees at any time.
    For example, if an inventor has filed an application and paid the filing fees, but he does not find a buyer and does not have an examination until 5 years later from the filing date, then the application is revoked during this period, anyone may utilize the invention freely during those 5 years and do not have to pay anything even after the patent is granted.
    If the patent is issued 6 years later from the filing date, and tends to not sell well, the patentee may not pay the maintenance fees. And the patent is roylty free until the patentee paid 7.5 years after grant when he sees the patent tends to sell well.
    As a result, many of the applications shall find it out that it is not in a hurry to be examined at all. Thus the patent office will free tension greatly and it will take a much quicker speed to examine the applications really in a hurry.
    Also, for one especially an indepent inventor who could not afford the patent fees, he could wait until he has sold out his invention to start an exmaination or have a lawyer to help.
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here


    ' IF IT WERE EASY EVERYONE WOULD BE DOING IT' I Have To Just Keep Telling Myself That & Telling Myself That It Will Eventually Pay Off In A Big Way..This Is How I Stay Focused & Stay Confident ! ! !



    Stay Cool, Michael V. Caldwell, Proud American Inventor Who Is;

    Always Striving To Be Part Of The Solution, Using Americandoo Attitude, Team Work, Common Sense & Mutual Respect As My Guidelines To Follow At All Times ! ! !
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  •    Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • We’re looking forward to your comments on the Strategy for American Innovation. Please note that comments posted on and messages received through White House Slideshare account are subject to the Presidential Records Act and may be archived. Learn more at WhiteHouse.gov/privacy.
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

A Strategy for American Innovation - Promote Market-Based Innovation

  1. 1. Promote market-Based innovation“All these investments—in innovation, education, and infrastructure—will make America a better place to do business and create jobs. But tohelp our companies compete, we also have to knock down barriers thatstand in the way of their success.” —President Barack Obama, State of the Union Address, January 25, 2011The private sector is an engine of innovation Great ideas can come from many corners, and the capacityof decentralized, competitive markets to see innovative opportunities, prove their value, and enabletheir diffusion drives our economic growth and the creation of new, better jobs for the American peopleThe Obama Administration is committed to providing the best possible environment for private-sectorinnovation, whether by established firms or entrepreneursAccelerate business innovation with the R&E tax creditThe President has proposed to reform the way that businesses are taxed to encourage innovation andentrepreneurship more broadly Any process or proposal for tax reform should address the market failurethat the private incentive for an innovative investment typically falls short of the social interest becausemany of the innovative benefits accrue to consumersMake the R&E tax credit permanentTo encourage private sector innovation, the administration has proposed making the Research andExperimentation Tax Credit permanent, while simplifying its use and expanding its incentive paymentsby 20% The proposal for an expanded credit will invest about $100 billion over 10 years in the form offoregone tax receipts to leverage additional innovationPromote ingenuity through effective intellectual property policyIntellectual property (IP) rights provide critical incentives for commercial innovation IP further allowsnew ideas to be traded between firms, finding their best uses in the marketplace, and is an importantdeterminant of entrepreneurial funding Because IP supports both innovation and entrepreneurship,public policy must ensure that innovators receive high-quality IP rights in a timely manner, while main-taining public access to basic discoveries and room for healthy experimentation   ★ 21 ★
  2. 2. A S T r AT e g y f o r A m e r i C A n i n n ovAT i o nSupport and protect effective intellectual property rightsOur patent system faces serious challenges, with businesses and entrepreneurs now waiting an aver-age of 35 months behind a backlog of over 700,000 patent applications The Obama Administration issupporting comprehensive patent reform to slash the processing time for patent applications, enableapplicants to fast-track their most important applications, and allow a post-grant review procedure thatcan improve patent quality These initiatives, coupled with the 2010-2015 Strategic Plan of the U S Patentand Trademark Office, work to solve core challenges to our patent system and accelerate innovation,entrepreneurship, and economic growthSimilarly, effective enforcement of intellectual property rights is essential to innovation and eco-nomic growth In June, the U S Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator (IPEC) released theAdministration’s first plan to fight intellectual property infringement The plan included 33 specificaction items, spanning six broad categories, which the Administration agreed to undertake to improveenforcement The Administration will continue to prioritize intellectual property enforcement and tosupport U S businesses and consumers through protection of intellectual propertyTo promote international coordination, the United States Trade Representative has negotiated theAnti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, concluded in November 2010, which requires both a strong legalframework for the enforcement against counterfeit and pirated goods and promotes key practices thatmake those laws effective in reality“Now this is important because small businesses produce most of thenew jobs in this country. They are the anchors of our Main Streets. Theyare part of the promise of America – the idea that if you’ve got a dreamand you’re willing to work hard, you can succeed. That’s what leads aworker to leave a job to become her own boss. That’s what propels abasement inventor to sell a new product – or an amateur chef to opena restaurant. It’s this promise that has drawn millions to our shores andmade our economy the envy of the world.” —- President Obama, at the signing of the Small Business Jobs Act, September 27, 2010Encourage high-growth and innovation-based entrepreneurshipEntrepreneurship plays an essential role in generating innovation and stimulating U S economic growthNew firms account for most net job growth, and small businesses employ 30% of high-tech workers Yetmarket obstacles limit entrepreneurship, as would-be entrepreneurs struggle to raise funding withoutan established reputation or without giving ideas away The Obama Administration is committed tohelping entrepreneurs build vibrant businesses that lead to new jobs and economic growth ★ 22 ★
  3. 3. P r o m o T e m A r k e T- BA S e d i n n ovAT i o nIncrease access to capital for new businessThe Small Business Jobs Act (SBJA), signed by President Obama on September 27, 2010, provided anadditional $14 billion more in lending support via the Small Business Administration and more than$30 billion in capital support for small business lending via the Treasury, as well as $12 billion in taxrelief to small businesses, to help these businesses invest and create jobs The USDA’s Business andIndustry Guaranteed Lending Program also provides $1 billion annually and, on account of the RecoveryAct, was able to deliver $3 billion in FY 2010 to support the financing of rural businesses All in all, theObama Administration has sought to facilitate small business development by cutting taxes on smallbusinesses 17 timesHold a forum on facilitating access to capital for entrepreneursAmerica’s preeminence in generating innovative new companies depends on open and well-functioningcapital markets Research indicates that American start-ups create a disproportionate share of new jobsand contribute significantly to economic growth Recent trends in capital markets, however, presentseveral challenges for American entrepreneurs To evaluate relevant policy strategies, this forum willbring together top government officials from several agencies with experienced managers and investorsfrom the private sector to assess recent trends in access to capital and its impact on entrepreneurshipWiden America’s lead as the world’s best place for high-growth entrepreneurshipStartup America is the Administration’s sustained campaign to celebrate, inspire, and accelerate high-growth entrepreneurship throughout the nation This coordinated public/private effort brings togetheran alliance of the country’s most innovative entrepreneurs, corporations, universities, foundations, andother leaders, working in concert with a wide range of federal agencies to dramatically increase theprevalence and success of American entrepreneurs The core goals of Startup America are to increasethe number of new high-growth firms that are creating innovation and quality jobs; celebrate andhonor entrepreneurship as a core American value and source of competitive advantage; and inspireand empower an ever-greater diversity of communities and individuals to build successful Americancompanies To achieve these goals, a broad set of federal agencies will launch a coordinated seriesof policies that ensure high-growth startups have unimpeded access to capital, expanded access toquality mentorship, an improved regulatory environment, and a rapid path to commercialization offederally-funded research  Promote regional innovation clustersRegional clusters can be significant sources of entrepreneurship, innovation, and quality jobs, and theroot of new industries The Administration is making substantial investments to promote regional inno-vation clusters that draw together industry, university, and government resources The Small BusinessAdministration’s Regional Cluster Initiative, the USDA’s Agricultural Technology Innovation PartnershipProgram, and the Department of Energy’s Energy Efficient Building Systems Innovation Cluster are allworking to spur regional innovation engines in major technology sectors Moreover, the EconomicDevelopment Administration’s i6 Challenge series encourages and rewards innovative partnershipmodels that accelerate technology commercialization, new venture formation, and job creation Finally, ★ 23 ★
  4. 4. A S T r AT e g y f o r A m e r i C A n i n n ovAT i o nthe Departments of Labor and Education are aligning Workforce Investment Act training and employ-ment programs and career and technical education with regional innovation clusters to ensure thatclusters have the skilled workforce necessary to grow and prosper, and to connect American workerswith good career opportunitiesPromote innovative, open, and competitive marketsLarge, efficient markets attract innovative investment, and competition provides the means by which thebest ideas spread Historically, our strong policy against collusion and unfair practices has contributedto vibrant, competitive American businesses that are better equipped to compete in global marketsAmerica’s long-standing efforts to open foreign markets have brought our private sector greater inno-vation incentives and rewards Well-functioning capital markets have historically made our country aleading place to invest, bringing scarce capital to the best ideas and fueling American ingenuityProtect and enable competitionThe Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have developed newHorizontal Merger Guidelines, issued in August 2010 The new Guidelines include, for the first time, asection explaining how the DOJ and FTC assess whether a merger is likely to retard innovationImprove regulation and regulatory reviewIn January 2011, President Obama issued an Executive Order to improve regulation and the regulatoryreview process Under this Executive Order, the President required federal agencies to design cost-effective, evidence-based regulations that are compatible with economic growth, job creation, andcompetitiveness The Order emphasizes the principles of public participation, integration and innova-tion, flexible approaches, and scientific integrity It also includes a provision on retrospective review,which asks agencies to submit a preliminary plan within 120 days to determine whether any regulationsshould be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed so as to make the agency’s regulatory programmore effective or less burdensomeEnsure an open Internet that protects consumers and enables innovationPresident Obama is strongly committed to an open Internet that protects consumers and innovationTo that same end, the FCC has acted to preserve that openness so that users and innovators are ableto compete on the merits and not face anticompetitive barriers imposed by incumbent broadbandproviders More generally, the Department of Commerce has outlined a path forward to protect Internetprivacy, and the Administration has established an interagency effort to guide and address critical policyissues in the Internet environment, including openness, privacy protections, and cybersecurity concernsPromote American exportsIn March 2010, President Obama launched the National Export Initiative (NEI), an ambitious effort tohelp American businesses that sell their goods and services abroad By unlocking foreign markets forU S goods and services, improving access to credit for U S businesses, and undertaking other measures,the NEI seeks to double U S exports in five years and support millions of additional jobs   ★ 24 ★