Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
2009 03 23  I P  Semiconductor  Industry
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

2009 03 23 I P Semiconductor Industry


Published on

Published in: Business, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide


  • 1. Protection of Intellectual Property in the Semiconductor Industry in The Netherlands Wouter Pors, Partner Bird & Bird The Hague 23 March 2009
  • 2. Netherlands – part of European Union
    • One economic region
    • One trade zone
    • 27 countries
    • 500 million people
    • 16.5 million in The Netherlands
    • 1 currency for 16 countries: Euro
  • 3. The Netherlands: gateway to Europe
    • Trade oriented for centuries
    • Main shipping port: Rotterdam
    • Airport hub: Amsterdam
    • Direct flights to many cities
    • Excellent logistics to Europe
    • First language: Dutch
    • Second language: English
  • 4. The Netherlands: corporate hub
    • Many IP holdings for Europe, due to relatively favourable taxation on royalties
    • Many distribution centres for Europe
    • Relatively large number of European head offices
    • Companies in The Netherlands are usually engaged in international trade
    • Good scientific infrastructure through university system
    • Services and high-tech oriented industry
  • 5. Intellectual property law
    • European law
      • European Patent Convention (uniform prosecution)
      • Community Trademark Regulation
      • Community Design Right Regulation
    • National law harmonized at EU level
      • Dutch Semiconductor Topography Act
      • Dutch Copyright Act
      • Benelux Convention on Intellectual Property
        • Trademarks and Design Rights for The Netherlands, Belgium and Luxemburg
      • Dutch Database Act
    • Not harmonized
      • Tort and unfair competition law
  • 6. Patent law – two options
    • Dutch Patent Act
      • Registration system, very fast grant of patents
      • Allows for immediate protection of research results
      • Enables early scientific publication
    • European Patent Convention
      • Thorough examination of applications
      • Centralized application and prosecution system
      • Centralized opposition system
      • Bundle of national patents after grant
    • Applicant is the owner
      • Inventor mentioned in the application, but no special position
      • Inventors consent not needed for prosecution
  • 7. Patent application strategy
    • Research and development in The Netherlands
    • Apply for Dutch national patent
    • Apply for application under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, invoking the Dutch application as priority document within 12 months
    • Enter the regional/national phase within 30 months
      • European patent application
      • Applications in other countries
    • Decide on registration in countries within Europe after grant of the European patent
    • Test the market before major costs are due
  • 8. The patent litigation hotspots
    • United Kingdom
      • (London)
    • Netherlands
      • (The Hague)
    • Germany
      • (D üsseldorf, Munich, Mannheim)
    • Rulings from these courts have authority in other countries
    • European Patent Office
      • Munich, The Hague
  • 9. Patent enforcement in The Netherlands
    • One specialized court in The Hague
    • Experienced judges with feeling for technology
    • Court appreciates that inventions deserve protection
    • Court takes developments in other European countries into account
    • All judgments are published on the internet
    • Proceedings
      • Accelerated full proceedings on the merits: 12 – 14 months
      • Preliminary injunction proceedings: 4 – 8 weeks
      • Ex parte injunction in very urgent cases: 1 -2 days
  • 10. Further protection of technology
    • Semiconductor topography
      • Requires registration
      • Not much used, since technology progresses fast and good alternatives exist
    • Copyright law
      • Ensues from the act of creation
      • No registration required
      • No artistic level required
      • Available for software and for hardware design
      • Limited exception for technically determined designs
  • 11. Copyright for semiconductor design
    • Supreme Court 4-1-1991 Van Dale vs Romme
      • List of 230.000 words including in an extensive Dutch dictionary
      • The selection of words is a decision of the editors with some subjectivity
      • List is a work which has an individual, original character bearing the stamp of its makers, despite limited room for own views
    • Supreme Court 30-05-2008 Endstra tapes
      • If the work is so trivial that no creative efforts of any nature were involved, then no protection
      • But no requirement of intention of creating a copyright protected work or intentionally creative choices
      • Limitation still is very low threshold
  • 12. Copyright for semiconductor design
    • Supreme Court 24-02-2006 Technip
      • Protection assumed of a “ kinetic scheme ”, a set of chemical reaction comparisons that formed part of a computer simulation programme for controlling a production process in the chemical industry
      • The kinetic scheme itself is not a computer programme
      • The comparisons themselves are not protected, but the set of comparisons is copyright protected
      • Kinetic scheme is not a pure and simple enumeration of numbers, but was created using subjective criteria
      • Selection of comparisons is not an automatic mathematical process
      • Subjective element involved, based on the knowledge, insight and experience of the maker
  • 13. Copyright for semiconductor design
    • Conclusion: semiconductor design which is the result of research and development will be copyright protected in The Netherlands
    • This part of copyright law is not yet harmonized through European Union Directives, so criteria for assuming a copyright protected work vary throughout Europe
    • For instance: German law requires a certain level of artistic character, which semiconductors lack
    • The Netherlands offer a high level of copyright protection and thereby of results of research and development
  • 14. Copyright: some specifics
    • Copyright is vested in the company that publishes the work without mentioning the author
      • By making the product available to the public, the manufacturer is assumed to own the copyright
      • No need to identify the actual designers
    • Evidence of existence
      • No registration required
      • However, proof of priority desirable
      • Safe storage of “design freeze” files to prove priority
        • Online “i-Depot” with Benelux Office for Intellectual Property
        • Physical depot on USB-stick with a notary
  • 15. Cooperation in development
    • No formal legal requirements
    • Joint venture may be designed as proprietor
    • Parties may also decide on co-ownership
      • Each owner free to apply invention and copyrights, but licensing requires cooperation
      • Cooperation and co-ownership governed by agreement, as parties may desire
      • Agreement may involve power of attorney to represent co-owner in exploitation and enforcement, including representation in court
      • Arrangement may be varied for instance per region (i.e. one partner exploits in Europe, other partner in Asia)
  • 16. Professional support
    • The Netherlands have an international orientation
    • Legal professionals are used to adopt an international perspective and work in the English language
    • Several options for using a one-stop-shop for Europe
    • In general, law firms and patent attorney’s firms are separate, but there is a trend for integrated firms
  • 17. Characteristics of Dutch IP protection
    • Fast and reliable patent system, both for national and European patents
    • Supplementary protection available
      • Semiconductor topography rights
      • Copyright protection for semiconductor design
    • Good legal system
      • Effective protection
      • Courts appreciate importance of intellectual property
      • Rulings from Dutch courts are seen as having authority in other European jurisdictions (same applies to judgments from United Kingdom and Germany)
  • 18. Thank you!
    • Wouter Pors
    • Bird & Bird The Hague
    • [email_address]