Strategies for Infrastructure Improvements in Urban Neighbourhoods: An Issue-Oriented Action Agenda for Community Associations

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Notes on slide 1

    2001 Symposium, Shaping Ontario’s Urban Neighbourhoods, Hamilton Convention Centre May 5-6, 2001, Hamilton, Ontario

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    Strategies for Infrastructure Improvements in Urban Neighbourhoods: An Issue-Oriented Action Agenda for Community Associations - Presentation Transcript

    1. Strategies for Infrastructure Improvements in Urban Neighbourhoods: An Issue-Oriented Action Agenda for Community Associations Professor Barry Wellar, Department of Geography, University of Ottawa Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5 Canada Shaping Ontario’s Urban Neighourhoods Hamilton Convention Centre May 5-6, 2001 Hamilton, Ontario
    2. ROLES AND RELATIONSHIPS IN THE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS PROCESS: THE MATTER OF LEGITIMACY ELECTED OFFICIALS PROFESSIONAL STAFF THE PUBLIC COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS Decisions Advice Values & Attitudes
    3. Rational Model of Roles and Relationships in Defining and Achieving Infrastructure Improvements Citizens, Shareholders, Members Consumers, Voters, Interest Groups Values and Attitudes Opinions, Participation, Support, Votes, Rejection Professionals Advice Interpretations, Implications, Recommendations Executives / Electeds Decisions Choices, Priorities
    4. Strategies (1)
      • Alternatives
      • Asphalt / Pavement
      • Back-to-Basics
      • BANANA
      • Bang-for-the-Buck
      • Big Picture
      • Conservation First
      • Copy-the-USA
      • Crisis Management
      • Economic Imperative
    5. Strategies (2)
      • Hearts-and-Minds
      • Holistic
      • If It Ain’t Broke
      • Jobs, Jobs, Jobs
      • NIMBY
      • OPM (Other People’s Money)
      • Pay-As-You-Go
      • Positive Reinforcement
      • Piecemeal
      • Quid Pro Quo
      • Ready, Fire, Aim!
    6. Strategies (3)
      • Research-Based
      • Risk Avoidance
      • Seat-of-the-Pants
      • Squeaky Wheel
      • Sustainable Development
      • Triage
      • User Pay
      • Veneering
      • Where’s the Money?
      • YIMBY
    7. Infrastructure: Physical and Human Components (1)
      • Ambulance
      • Arenas
      • Bikepaths
      • Bridges
      • Colleges
      • Community Centres
      • Computers / Communications
      • Electrical System
      • Fire Stations
      • Food Banks
      • Galleries
    8. Infrastructure: Physical and Human Components (2)
      • Green Spaces
      • Health
      • Hospitals
      • Housing
      • Information Technology
      • Intersections
      • Libraries
      • Medical
      • Museums
      • Open Spaces
      • Parking Lots
      • Parks
      • Playgrounds
    9. Infrastructure: Physical and Human Components (3)
      • Police
      • Power Supply/Grid
      • Pools
      • Roads
      • Schools
      • Sewerage
      • Sidewalks
      • Sports Fields
      • Telecommunications
      • Trash/Waste
      • Trees
      • Universities
      • Utilities
      • Water
    10. “Improvements”
      • As defined by…
      • The Province of Ontario?
      • The Ontario Ministry of Transportation?
      • The Ontario Ministry of the Environment?
      • The Municipality of ___________?
      • The ___________Community Association?
    11. “Smart Growth”
      • Questions, Questions, Questions
      • What was it before we got smart?
      • When did we get smart?
      • How do we know?
      • What caused us to get smart?
      • Is it contagious?
      • How long will it last?
      • How do you spell OOPS?
    12. Stages of Applied Operational Research
      • Pilot Studies
      • Pre-Test Studies
      • Trial Run Studies
      • Monitoring and Evaluation Studies
      • • Emphasis here is on fundamentals , so the stages are limited to what are deemed to be ‘must’ types of studies for non-trivial projects .
    13. Research Variable Evaluation Criteria
      • Pertinence
      • Support
      • Degree of difficulty
      • Knowledge / information / data characteristics and features (status, ownership, openness, access, etc) of variables and about variables.
    14. Research Variable Evaluation Criteria Knowledge/Information/Data Variables (cont.)
      • Availability
      • Sustainability
      • Durability
      • Robustness
      • Reliability
      • Completeness
      • Marketability
      • Vigorous application of these criteria by the researcher, and/or by project evaluators (executives, electeds, professionals, citizens) is an effective and efficient means of moving from potential variables to essential and high priority variables.
    15. Learning Triangles
      • Learning Triangles have the capacity to get us beyond the simplistic to the necessary, but without unduly devilling us with details.
      • Learning Triangles cause and assist us to explicitly deal with essential relationships.
      • Learning Triangles can readily be turned into inter-linked chains, which is a powerful research device for comparing and contrasting concepts, variables, priorities, procedures, objectives, etc.
    16. Key Learning Triangles: Project Evaluation
      • Decisions / Values & Attitudes / Evidence
      • Outputs / Throughputs / Inputs
      • Structure / Function / Performance
      • Utility / Complexity / Reliability
      • Benefits / Costs / Alternatives
      • Pilot Study / Pre-Test / Trial Run
      • Scope / Scale / Functionality
    17. Learning Triangles (cont.) Utility Complexity Sustainability Utility Sustainability Reliability Benefits Costs Risks Costs Risks Alternatives Complexity Sustainability Reliability Complexity Utility Reliability Benefits Risks Alternatives Benefits Costs Alternatives
    18. THAT WAS THEN Context materials for a presentation on “Infrastructure” by Prof. B. Wellar at the 2001 Symposium, Shaping Ontario’s Urban Neighbourhoods, Hamilton Convention Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, May 5 and 6, 2001
    19. THIS IS NOW Context materials for a presentation on “Infrastructure” by Prof. B. Wellar at the 2001 Symposium, Shaping Ontario’s Urban Neighbourhoods, Hamilton Convention Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, May 5 and 6, 2001
    20. Walking Security Index
      • The Walking Security Index was developed by Prof. B. Wellar for the City of Ottawa because … .
    21.  

    + Barry WellarBarry Wellar, 6 months ago

    custom

    250 views, 0 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    The 2001 keynote address at the Hamilton, Ontario s more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 250
      • 250 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 9
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories