White Paper Comparison     ®Citrix MPS 4 and Jetro CockpIT Version 3.6                       July 2006         All tradema...
White Paper Comparison          About this document          This document compares the differences between the two leadin...
White Paper Comparison          Background: Product Design          Citrix MPS4:                       On a Citrix farm, e...
White Paper Comparison                       Citrix MPS4, continued:                          •   Each Citrix server conta...
White Paper Comparison                       CockpIT Enterprise 3.6:                       A CockpIT site includes one or ...
White Paper Comparison                             •   When the client is executed, the CockpIT server informs the client ...
White Paper Comparison                       In addition to the Terminal Server focusing executing applications, it spends...
White Paper Comparison          Enterprise Reliability                       With both CockpIT and MPS4, server farms are ...
White Paper Comparison                       CockpIT Enterprise 3.6                       The main CockpIT Data Base resid...
White Paper Comparison                            CockpIT Enterprise 3.6                            CockpIT’s Load Balanci...
White Paper Comparison                            CockpIT’s Enterprise Reliability and Effectiveness advantages include:  ...
White Paper Comparison                      CockpIT 3.6                            Base License: Jetro Platforms’ CockpIT’...
White Paper Comparison                            TCO Summary                            Along with a substantial savings ...
Jetro Platforms Inc.1550 McMullen Booth RoadClearwater, FL 33759 USA" info@jetroplatforms.com! 727.967.5969
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Jetro vs citrix

1,187

Published on

Published in: Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
1,187
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
21
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Jetro vs citrix

  1. 1. White Paper Comparison ®Citrix MPS 4 and Jetro CockpIT Version 3.6 July 2006 All trademarks property of their respective owners.
  2. 2. White Paper Comparison About this document This document compares the differences between the two leading Server-based Computing (SBC) products: Citrix’ MetaFrame® Presentation Server 4 (MPS4) and Jetro Platforms’ COCKPIT Enterprise Version 3.6. Comparisons are made from the following perspectives. • Background: Product Design • Complexity and Completeness • Efficiency and Performance • Enterprise Reliability & Effectiveness • ROI: Pricing and TCO For each of these perspectives, information is provided for MPS4 and COCKPIT.Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 2 of 14
  3. 3. White Paper Comparison Background: Product Design Citrix MPS4: On a Citrix farm, every Citrix server contains code that allows it to serve client requests. To achieve this goal, each Citrix server has to know about all other servers in the farm. This is achieved via a set of services, or ‘Subsystems’, which execute on each server. The above illustration represents the inter-relationship of MPS4 subsystems. These functions and subsystems are summarized below: • Server farm configuration information is stored on a data base named ‘Data Store’. The Data Store information is typically stored on an external data base system such as MSSQL / Oracle / DB2 which requires DBA expertise to support and maintain.Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 3 of 14
  4. 4. White Paper Comparison Citrix MPS4, continued: • Each Citrix server contacts the Data Store and retrieves relevant information. The information, named ‘Local Host Cache’, is locally stored in an MDB file. • Each physical location, named ‘Zone’ is configured with a main server named ‘Data Collector’. The duty of the ‘Data Collector’ can be dynamically transferred from one Citrix server to another during a process named ‘Zone Data Collector Election’. During this process, each Citrix server broadcasts information that is used by the other servers to determine which server should become the Zone Data Collector. • The Data Collector is responsible for collecting dynamic information from its local zone Citrix servers. Each Citrix server constantly reporting its load factor, license consuming information, session count and other dynamic information to its local zone data collector. • Each Zone Data Collector is exchanging data with all other Zone Data Collectors to replicate each Citrix server state to every other Citrix server. • Licensing information is saved on a central server named ‘Citrix License Server’. On every client connection event, the Citrix server contacts the license server to retrieve a concurrent license.Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 4 of 14
  5. 5. White Paper Comparison CockpIT Enterprise 3.6: A CockpIT site includes one or more central CockpIT servers - all of which serve user requests. The Terminal Servers report their load information to the CockpIT server. When the CockpIT client is launched it sends a request to the main CockpIT server which responds with the best available Terminal Server. The client then opens a seamless RDP session toward the Terminal Server which shows the application set of the logged on user. CockpIT 3.6 design is based upon the following principles: • All farm information such as licensing, configuration, etc. is saved on one or more CockpIT servers which replicate the data among them using a built-in clustering engine. • Each Terminal Server reports its load to the CockpIT servers on a pre-configured interval.Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 5 of 14
  6. 6. White Paper Comparison • When the client is executed, the CockpIT server informs the client with the most available Terminal Server. Then, the client opens a seamless RDP sessions toward this server. • The application set is displayed within the seamless RDP session. Upon the opening of the sessions and whenever the user refreshes the application set, a query is sent from the Terminal Server to the CockpIT servers. Complexity and Completeness One of the fundamental differences between the products is the enhanced and simplified design of CockpIT. Using CockpIT’s powerful web-based console (available from anywhere via secure login), IT administrators have an intuitive user interface to help manage their system. In addition to comparing product design and complexity, it is important to consider the all requirements for a complete Server-based computing solution. With CockpIT’s multiple printing options, customers do not need a rd 3 -party solution as they do with MPS4. When managing server farms, rd MPS4 requires an operational 3 -party database system. CockpIT Advantages - Complexity and Completeness • Shorter IT staff learning curves • Smaller integration efforts (with existing IT systems) • Faster and more flexible installations • Accelerated deployment times • Easier on-going support and management Efficiency and Performance Citrix MPS4 The complexity of Citrix’s MPS 4 architecture produces unnecessary overhead on the Terminal Servers’ hardware resources.Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 6 of 14
  7. 7. White Paper Comparison In addition to the Terminal Server focusing executing applications, it spends resources running Citrix’s various subsystems. Various test labs and case studies show that Citrix’s subsystems consume 10% to 20% percent of the hardware resources of a standard Terminal Server. CockpIT Enterprise 3.6 On a CockpIT farm, user requests are served by one or more central servers named ‘CockpIT Servers’. The CockpIT servers retain all configuration information, licensing “Jetro CockpIT impressed us by handling information and dynamic data about 30 clients (on one server) running our text mix with tolerable performance. In the Terminal Servers in the farm. The contrast, rival products either rolled over under a 30-client load or showed res- Terminal Servers run a thin agent to ponse times in the "poor" category…”, report the server’s load and other key Michael Fudge, Network Computing Feb 2005 dynamic information to the CockpIT servers. This architecture enables the Terminal Server to focus on its primary function – executing user applications. Due to the minor load that CockpIT’s Terminal Server Agent produces on the Terminal Server’s hardware resources, more users can be connected to same server. The following table (pasted from Network Computing Magazine’s web site) illustrates the results of a stress test they conducted with 5 SBC products. CockpIT’s Efficiency and Performance advantages include lower PC server needs/costs, faster user response times, more consistent performance under load.Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 7 of 14
  8. 8. White Paper Comparison Enterprise Reliability With both CockpIT and MPS4, server farms are used to support the increased needs of an enterprise installation. Citrix MPS4 To manage multiple servers, Citrix MPS4 uses a central data base called a ‘Data Store’. The Data Store component is central to the operation of the Citrix farm. Upon failure, system administrators cannot perform any system management tasks. Citrix MPS 4 licensing information is saved on a single server named ‘License Server’. If the license server is not available for a period of 96 1 hours , clients can no longer connect to the farm. In their Advanced Concepts Guide, Citrix states that enterprise customers should use Microsoft Clustering Service (MCS) on a SAN environment in 2 order to cluster the date base . This solution has far-reaching resource requirements such as shared storage device(s), fiber switches and NIC’s, enterprise data base software (Oracle / SQL etc) and the IT expertise and time to implement and support them. 1 This grace period was extended to 30 days for all licenses purchased after August 19, 2005 2 Citrix Advanced Concepts Guide, “Cluster Failover Support”, Page 40Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 8 of 14
  9. 9. White Paper Comparison CockpIT Enterprise 3.6 The main CockpIT Data Base resides on each CockpIT server and is replicated among all CockpIT servers using MSMQ technology. With the built-in clustering capabilities of CockpIT, no external storage device is needed. Enterprise Effectiveness Citrix MPS4 Citrix Load Balancing Mechanism consists on 12 counters from which 9 are performance related. These counters include only standard measures such as CPU load, Page/Sec, I/O etc. Each server cal- culates its load information and passes it to the Data Collector. Because of the large amounts of data being transferred on each update process, the default interval for the updates is 30 seconds. The default load evaluator includes a single counter – Number of users.Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 9 of 14
  10. 10. White Paper Comparison CockpIT Enterprise 3.6 CockpIT’s Load Balancing Mechanism uses Windows Server Performance Counters technology. This means that the system administrator has the option of hundreds of performance counters available in Microsoft’s Performance Monitor. The CockpIT Terminal Server Agent calculates the load information by averaging historical measurements of user-defined durations. Furthermore, each counter can be given a factor that affects the weight it has on the overall load factor. Because of the small amount of data that is being transferred on each update, the default load policy report interval can be as low as 5 seconds. This mechanism delivers a more accurate load measurement and takes better advantage of the Terminal Server’s hardware. CockpIT’s default load evaluator includes 5 performance-related counters. Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 10 of14
  11. 11. White Paper Comparison CockpIT’s Enterprise Reliability and Effectiveness advantages include: • Simpler multi-server deployments • No single-point of failure (or need to make DB redundant) • More performance from server-farms with more load balancing measurements and options ROI: Pricing and TCO To evaluate the differences in each product’s Return-on-Investment (ROI), it is important to consider all the costs and benefits associated with implementation and management of each product. Product Pricing Citrix MPS4 Base License: Citrix has several different pricing levels. Depending on features included, Citrix licenses range between $240 for each concurrent user in a single server environment (XPs) up to $340 for concurrent users for its enterprise license (XPe). This highest level offers comparable functionality to Jetro CockpIT 3.6. Subscription: To maintain a current version of MPS4, Citrix’s annual subscriptions costs between $48 - $60 per license (depending on system specifications). Training: Citrix has several courses for MPS 4. The Citrix Administrator course lasts 5 days and costs $1180. The Citrix Enterprise Administrator requires 4 courses; each lasting 2 to 3 days and costing $590. Support: Citrix support agreement ranges between $7320 to $58,800 per year. The price is dependant on the Support Level Agreement (SLA). Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 11 of14
  12. 12. White Paper Comparison CockpIT 3.6 Base License: Jetro Platforms’ CockpIT’s license price is $160 per concurrent user for all features. For existing Citrix user licenses, Jetro Platforms offers a competitive upgrade path at a price of $40 per concurrent user. Included in both these prices is the first year of Software Subscription. Subscription: Jetro CockpIT second year subscription costs $24 per license. Training: Jetro CockpIT enterprise administration course cost $530 and it is 2 days long. Support: Jetro CockpIT support cost between $1200 up to $16,300 per year, depending on SLA levels. The following table summarizes the prices associated with each product. Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 12 of14
  13. 13. White Paper Comparison TCO Summary Along with a substantial savings from substantially lower license and related princes, CockpIT offers many other TCO advantages: Complexity and Completeness • Shorter IT staff learning curves • Smaller integration efforts (with existing IT systems) • Faster and more flexible installations • Accelerated deployment times • Easier on-going support and management Efficiency and Performance • Better utilization of PC Server and related hardware – less need for expensive server-to-server network upgrades • No need to purchase, install and maintain 3rd-party printing or database systems Enterprise Reliability and Effectiveness • Faster and easier to manage server farm deployments • No need for separate investment in redundant DB subsystems • More performance from servers in farm (using increased load balancing options/flexibility) Jetro Platforms Inc. ! 727.967.5969 in US or +1.800.639.5516 International Page 13 of14
  14. 14. Jetro Platforms Inc.1550 McMullen Booth RoadClearwater, FL 33759 USA" info@jetroplatforms.com! 727.967.5969

×