The Hitech Act Promise Or Peril For Providers.Hfma.

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    The Hitech Act Promise Or Peril For Providers.Hfma. - Presentation Transcript

    1. The HITECH Act – Promise or Peril for Providers? Bill Barcellona, V.P. June, 2009
    2. Introduction
      • The California Association of Physician Groups
        • 150 Multispecialty Medical Groups & IPAs
        • Physician groups are the members
        • Practicing “Coordinated Patient Care”
        • Serving 15 million patients in California
        • A network of over 59,000 physicians in our groups
        • High adoption rates of HIT – 70 groups at present
    3. Presentation
      • First : Let’s cover the landscape of physician groups in California – and the status of HIT adoption prior to HITECH
      • Second : Examine the premise of HITECH and its mechanisms to stimulate use of HIT – are they valid?
      • Third : What are the technical/legal issues that HITECH addresses or does not address adequately?
      • Last: What strategies can be adopted to make HITECH work best for California physician groups?
    4. Calif. Physician Group Landscape
      • The groups include 60,000 doctors or two-thirds of all licensed doctors in the state
      • The groups serve ½ of the insured population of Californians
      • 75% of the lives are concentrated in the top 35 physician groups
      • 70 groups have deployed HIT to over 11 million patients
    5. Health IT Adoption in California
      • Physician groups are the leading early adopters of HIT
      • This includes EMRs, EPrescribing, Clinical registries, online appointments and secure email communications and claims data
      • Medical groups lead in adoption, but some IPAs are also successfully deploying among their contracted physicians
    6. Impetus for HIT Adoption
      • Prior to HITECH, why did groups adopt HIT systems?
        • Integrated Healthcare Association’s P-4-P initiative paid 46 cents on the dollar
        • Medicine is competitively driven to adopt the latest and greatest gadgetry – and HIT is a gadget
        • Doctors really believe that HIT is the “Holy Grail” that leads to better quality outcomes
    7. Is it True that HIT Saves Money?
      • The Administration believes that HIT is necessary to save money in the healthcare system
      • How? Medicare will require increased reporting and transparency in pricing and quality – employers will follow suit
      • But there is no valid model that produces ROI for the adopter – the provider
    8. Lessons in Effective HIT Adoption
      • The more integrated the group, the more effective HIT adoption
        • Easier to capitalize – one group versus thousands of doctors
        • Easier to manage – centralized HIT department to train and maintain
        • Easier to standardize platforms – one EMR instead of dozens makes for easier upgrades down the road
    9. Barriers to HIT Adoption
      • Funding sources for HIT acquisition are drying up
      • Cumbersome regulatory oversight in the Knox Keene Act and under the FTC prevent innovative business models
      • Individual doctors & patients distrust the Government and rightly see the “Big Brother” mechanism behind HITECH
    10. Does HITECH Address the Barriers?
      • The combination of both acquisition funds and “meaningful user” payments is significant – it could actually work
      • HITECH may create more regulatory barriers – it all depends on CMS
      • The stick may be as small as the carrot – the 2015 “Ding” on non-meaningful users may incent less participation in Medicare
    11. Weaknesses of the HITECH Act
      • The Act missed the point of building a 21 st century HIT system by using the 19 th century “cottage industry” platform
      • Physician response: “Damn it Jim, I’m a doctor, not a programmer!”
      • It’s like making GM apply for the stimulus one employee at a time
    12. Strategies for Physician Groups
      • The groups provide a “low hanging fruit” solution to the most rapid deployment of HIT – empower them to do the job
      • CMS can jump start the application process for incentive funds by allowing groups to collectively apply
      • Recognize that IPAs already collect and report user data anticipated by HITECH
    13. Potential “Best Case” Scenario
      • Physician groups deploy HIT to another 30,000 doctors and California becomes the “most wired” state – HIT speaking
      • More doctors are drawn into integrated group practices – so that HIT is used in a more meaningful way and quality increases
      • The urban infrastructure is expanded to the rural areas via telemedicine
    14. What’s Next?
      • The Accountable Care Organization concept is becoming the focus of federal health reform, with an eye toward:
        • Providing better, faster, easier access to care
        • Demonstrating better clinical outcomes
        • Demonstrating more systematic use of HIT
    15. And Last But Not Least…
      • The privacy provisions of the HITECH Act will start to work their way through California later this year:
        • California Privacy and Security Advisory Board standards effort
        • Potential legislation on privacy matters
        • Continuing implementation of 2008 AB 211
    16. Thank You
      • Bill Barcellona
      • V.P. Government Affairs, CAPG
      • [email_address]

    + wbarcellonawbarcellona, 5 months ago

    custom

    143 views, 0 favs, 1 embeds more stats

    This is a summary of projected impacts on physician more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 143
      • 142 on SlideShare
      • 1 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 0
    Most viewed embeds
    • 1 views on https://www.mturk.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 1 views on https://www.mturk.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories